肺定位放射線治療における線量計算アルゴリズムの違いによる線量計算への影響—Pencil Beam Convolution(不均質補正:Batho Power Law)法およびAnalytical Anisotropic Algorithm法の比較

The monitor unit (MU) was calculated by pencil beam convolution (inhomogeneity correction algorithm: batho power law) [PBC (BPL)] which is the dose calculation algorithm based on measurement in the past in the stereotactic lung irradiation study. The recalculation was done by analytical anisotropic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in日本放射線技術学会雑誌 Vol. 65; no. 8; pp. 1064 - 1072
Main Authors 野口, 佳孝, 吉留, 郷志, 橘, 昌幸, 廣瀬, 貴章, 平野, 奈緒美, 福永, 淳一
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会 2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0369-4305
1881-4883
DOI10.6009/jjrt.65.1064

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The monitor unit (MU) was calculated by pencil beam convolution (inhomogeneity correction algorithm: batho power law) [PBC (BPL)] which is the dose calculation algorithm based on measurement in the past in the stereotactic lung irradiation study. The recalculation was done by analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA), which is the dose calculation algorithm based on theory data. The MU calculated by PBC (BPL) and AAA was compared for each field. In the result of the comparison of 1031 fields in 136 cases, the MU calculated by PBC (BPL) was about 2% smaller than that calculated by AAA. This depends on whether one does the calculation concerning the extension of the second electrons. In particular, the difference in the MU is influenced by the X-ray energy. With the same X-ray energy, when the irradiation field size is small, the lung pass length is long, the lung pass length percentage is large, and the CT value of the lung is low, and the difference of MU is increased.
AbstractList The monitor unit (MU) was calculated by pencil beam convolution (inhomogeneity correction algorithm: batho power law) [PBC (BPL)] which is the dose calculation algorithm based on measurement in the past in the stereotactic lung irradiation study. The recalculation was done by analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA), which is the dose calculation algorithm based on theory data. The MU calculated by PBC (BPL) and AAA was compared for each field. In the result of the comparison of 1031 fields in 136 cases, the MU calculated by PBC (BPL) was about 2% smaller than that calculated by AAA. This depends on whether one does the calculation concerning the extension of the second electrons. In particular, the difference in the MU is influenced by the X-ray energy. With the same X-ray energy, when the irradiation field size is small, the lung pass length is long, the lung pass length percentage is large, and the CT value of the lung is low, and the difference of MU is increased.
Author 廣瀬, 貴章
福永, 淳一
橘, 昌幸
平野, 奈緒美
吉留, 郷志
野口, 佳孝
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 野口, 佳孝
  organization: 九州大学病院医療技術部放射線部門
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 吉留, 郷志
  organization: 九州大学病院医療技術部放射線部門
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 橘, 昌幸
  organization: 九州大学病院医療技術部放射線部門
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 廣瀬, 貴章
  organization: 九州大学病院医療技術部放射線部門
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 平野, 奈緒美
  organization: 九州大学病院医療技術部放射線部門
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 福永, 淳一
  organization: 九州大学病院医療技術部放射線部門
BookMark eNpdkc9u00AQxleolQhtbzyAX8Bhl_Xa66MbAUWKRA9wttZm09hyvJVtqHrDTqUGUIWQUiGiViB6Qa0If4JEVVJ4F7Z2nFNeAYciDlxmpJnfzHya7xpYCEXIAbiOYF2H0Lzh-1FS10kdQV27AmqIUqRqlOIFUINYN1UNQ3IVrMSx58CKr0pQq4G8zM7y4eDifK_o_8g_7Uy-DYov3yevM5meyPSZTF_K7HlVnO6-KN_3JsNXMnsnuycy-yq7xzI7k923Mh1O032Z7sxHst7_fHpaAfn55-mbn7-e9Nd56HqBsspZR2mI8LEIHiWeCGfj3sXpXn64W46Oy6OD4sPRbDxYZUlbKOtii0dKk23Nxk-L0f5cVHUkHVkhC7YTz2WBYoVeLJJIbHquYgUbIvKSducPOyw-9stxdxkstlgQ85W_eQk8uH3rfmNNbd67c7dhNVUfUcRUSrCLTMZ0amqEu9whlBmwBR9yxHBLQ1jniBvQJIjT6ssa1Q2H4psGMRzkOMTAS8C63OvHCdvg9mbkdVi0bbOoEhpwe-6RrRObXoa5Vf96bptFts_wb14Ly3A
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2009 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
Copyright_xml – notice: 2009 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
DOI 10.6009/jjrt.65.1064
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1881-4883
EndPage 1072
ExternalDocumentID article_jjrt_65_8_65_8_1064_article_char_ja
GroupedDBID .LE
2WC
ABJNI
ACGFS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
KQ8
OK1
RJT
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-j181a-853c19aa68945eceb58a70f0de1a3f4136e1e70951e80644867b832757b1bb573
ISSN 0369-4305
IngestDate Wed Sep 03 06:13:30 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Language Japanese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j181a-853c19aa68945eceb58a70f0de1a3f4136e1e70951e80644867b832757b1bb573
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjrt/65/8/65_8_1064/_article/-char/ja
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs jstage_primary_article_jjrt_65_8_65_8_1064_article_char_ja
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2009
  text: 2009
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationTitle 日本放射線技術学会雑誌
PublicationTitleAlternate 日放技学誌
PublicationYear 2009
Publisher 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
Publisher_xml – name: 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
References 3) Miften M, Wiesmeyer M, Monthofer S, et al. Implementation of FFT convolution and multigrid superposition models in the FOCUS RTP system. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45 (4) : 817-833.
2) Van Esch A, Tillikainen L, Pyykkonen J, et al. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation. Med Phys 2006; 33 (11) : 4130-4148.
1)日本放射腺腫瘍学会QA委員会.体幹部定位放射線治療ガイドライン.日放腫会誌 2006;18(1):1-18
4) Engelsman M, Damen EM, Koken PW, et al. Impact of simple tissue inhomogeneity correction algorithms on conformal radiotherapy of lung tumours. Radiother Oncol 2001; 60 (3) : 299-309.
6) Li JS, Pawlicki T, Deng J, et al. Validation of a Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45 (10) : 2969-2985.
8)羽生裕二.不整形照射野・不均質内線量分布の評価.放射線治療分科会誌 2000,14(2):44-53
5) Miften M, Wiesmeyer M, Kapur A, et al. Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the BEAM Monte Carlo simulation system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2001; 2 (1) : 21-31.
7) Ma CM, Li JS, Pawlicki T, et al. A Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47 (10) : 1671-1689.
9)馬場祐之,西村龍一,水上直久,他.肺小結節照射における散乱線量補正アルゴリズムの重要性—ファントムモデルでの検証—.日放腫会誌 2003;15(3):171-175
10)大西 洋,平岡真寛 監.詳説 体幹部定位放射線治療— ガイドラインの詳細と照射マニュアル.中外医学社,東京,2006:26-29
11)佐野尚樹,大西 洋.体幹部定位放射線治療の実施にむけて.日放技学誌 2006;62(12):1629-1637
References_xml – reference: 4) Engelsman M, Damen EM, Koken PW, et al. Impact of simple tissue inhomogeneity correction algorithms on conformal radiotherapy of lung tumours. Radiother Oncol 2001; 60 (3) : 299-309.
– reference: 9)馬場祐之,西村龍一,水上直久,他.肺小結節照射における散乱線量補正アルゴリズムの重要性—ファントムモデルでの検証—.日放腫会誌 2003;15(3):171-175.
– reference: 10)大西 洋,平岡真寛 監.詳説 体幹部定位放射線治療— ガイドラインの詳細と照射マニュアル.中外医学社,東京,2006:26-29.
– reference: 1)日本放射腺腫瘍学会QA委員会.体幹部定位放射線治療ガイドライン.日放腫会誌 2006;18(1):1-18.
– reference: 11)佐野尚樹,大西 洋.体幹部定位放射線治療の実施にむけて.日放技学誌 2006;62(12):1629-1637.
– reference: 5) Miften M, Wiesmeyer M, Kapur A, et al. Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the BEAM Monte Carlo simulation system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2001; 2 (1) : 21-31.
– reference: 7) Ma CM, Li JS, Pawlicki T, et al. A Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47 (10) : 1671-1689.
– reference: 3) Miften M, Wiesmeyer M, Monthofer S, et al. Implementation of FFT convolution and multigrid superposition models in the FOCUS RTP system. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45 (4) : 817-833.
– reference: 6) Li JS, Pawlicki T, Deng J, et al. Validation of a Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45 (10) : 2969-2985.
– reference: 8)羽生裕二.不整形照射野・不均質内線量分布の評価.放射線治療分科会誌 2000,14(2):44-53.
– reference: 2) Van Esch A, Tillikainen L, Pyykkonen J, et al. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation. Med Phys 2006; 33 (11) : 4130-4148.
SSID ssib000936904
ssib002223925
ssj0055458
ssib005879721
ssib031740840
ssib000959831
ssib000753122
ssib008799587
ssib002484555
ssib023160873
Score 1.7818415
Snippet The monitor unit (MU) was calculated by pencil beam convolution (inhomogeneity correction algorithm: batho power law) [PBC (BPL)] which is the dose calculation...
SourceID jstage
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 1064
SubjectTerms analytical anisotropic algorithm
batho power law
dose calculation algorithms
inhomogeneity correction algorithm
pencil beam convolution
Title 肺定位放射線治療における線量計算アルゴリズムの違いによる線量計算への影響—Pencil Beam Convolution(不均質補正:Batho Power Law)法およびAnalytical Anisotropic Algorithm法の比較
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjrt/65/8/65_8_1064/_article/-char/ja
Volume 65
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX 日本放射線技術学会雑誌, 2009/08/20, Vol.65(8), pp.1064-1072
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrR1NixRHtBEFyUViNESjMgfrtPSme7qruyq3qpkeRDEYUPA2dM_26A7rjmwmOZiLMyu4GkSEFXFRlHgJipuPDUTMav6L7czOnvYv-F5V90zNIsRNvAxF9av3Pa_f6656bVnHGzOQRjfSGZvxpmf7XpDYccKaNg1CSGdpyhqJ2iD7TXDinH_yPD2_a8-P5umSTjLduPLecyX_xaowB3bFU7I7sOwIKUzAGOwLv2Bh-P0gG5OIEVYmUpCIEhERDgOfyCphVRIFhMM4wkvSIcwnUUhkqGACImGVxBnOEUPkQUZJhMwHTOQD7qpBmTBpLIclIWE1pC6AAYaXkHqYAwuN0CsQAi2_mBHFjChmnIJ6pDADUVqw4U8yVla0dsqPSyQzSFDUj3RxFa8RWSt2e_hnwLKzc1MyjS_hOcgfcsuRCKAqCquPmFC1lPAq0gSCUssElD3CK6haUcWxXsWFhAy7PXUGv0WHLwwKbFwZwTNkFZMiAteeahij3zWI-dnv2p2F9uXZxpSYu9BemO1cvLQdB4oH9GtoeGQN6Hhm8aF8AlRD1aBCROVfvASYAtWgcGAVTzkZCBcoTVRy1XOpvIShGtjokXthFIUYTAMagf9y7p2yQMWrY3jQqaP0EqJA4JYKnqOLAD_IHsgVjuFBUCDONFiAI1ZRYBysZKIFP0d7hCgKSKzgmfoDKGHBt4Qz8exrfG9VzFOlpxAFRSPBikJhXGMeGcFHr5Zi6qPr2bhbewG3sX-eTqx0NsGYa8Md0jPTDf1plDysMiN3cB3dzz_PQ11Hf9Nqe44DFQq2CG61FjrTAZ0er5roGp_HpDqC1QNaZ_oHoevFNTzXWW9BcbmnDDU2ZjWnvmVmLeG5Zm9P_PSn2ciJU86MLQRYaPDyRK9En5qH3lnIzV6MDFtRjmtDqDMDmBslC1DX-I5qRKXTaopv-PXGE61nfYoJtfGVqQuoJFpQVxd7clWZcPZTa19e35eEFn6_tasVf2btPZ3vYDpg9Ye9l_3Vlbevbg2WX_d_u7bx18rgj7837vey7rOsezPr3sl6P8Hk5vXbw1-WNlbvZb2fs8VnWe_PbPFp1nuZLT7Ouqub3btZ9xou6S1th---AID-q983H_3z5uqyjmoljGolI6ptrS-9fXGr__D6cO3p8MmDwfMnW-srKlaVVKwqQazaWr8xWLuLTAGR7to4GpWMaFQaRSMFuzr4dXm4vnjQOleLzlZO2PmnduwWlHixDUVbw-VxHDDu07SRJpTFodN0ZlI39ppQ6ASpm4ZYjqfMwUd6QZhALhjSMHGThIbe59bu-fZ8-oVVSstpnPhYxje478c0aUIOWU5nnLTs8NRxDllfawPVL-t-SvUd-Orh_7P4S-sTvRcAH6AfsXZ3Fr5Pj0JJ2UmOKdd_B9-Ejnc
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E8%82%BA%E5%AE%9A%E4%BD%8D%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%E6%B2%BB%E7%99%82%E3%81%AB%E3%81%8A%E3%81%91%E3%82%8B%E7%B7%9A%E9%87%8F%E8%A8%88%E7%AE%97%E3%82%A2%E3%83%AB%E3%82%B4%E3%83%AA%E3%82%BA%E3%83%A0%E3%81%AE%E9%81%95%E3%81%84%E3%81%AB%E3%82%88%E3%82%8B%E7%B7%9A%E9%87%8F%E8%A8%88%E7%AE%97%E3%81%B8%E3%81%AE%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%BF%E2%80%94Pencil+Beam+Convolution%EF%BC%88%E4%B8%8D%E5%9D%87%E8%B3%AA%E8%A3%9C%E6%AD%A3%EF%BC%9ABatho+Power+Law%EF%BC%89%E6%B3%95%E3%81%8A%E3%82%88%E3%81%B3Analytical+Anisotropic+Algorithm%E6%B3%95%E3%81%AE%E6%AF%94%E8%BC%83&rft.jtitle=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A%E9%9B%91%E8%AA%8C&rft.au=%E9%87%8E%E5%8F%A3%2C+%E4%BD%B3%E5%AD%9D&rft.au=%E5%90%89%E7%95%99%2C+%E9%83%B7%E5%BF%97&rft.au=%E6%A9%98%2C+%E6%98%8C%E5%B9%B8&rft.au=%E5%BB%A3%E7%80%AC%2C+%E8%B2%B4%E7%AB%A0&rft.date=2009&rft.pub=%E5%85%AC%E7%9B%8A%E7%A4%BE%E5%9B%A3%E6%B3%95%E4%BA%BA+%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A&rft.issn=0369-4305&rft.eissn=1881-4883&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1064&rft.epage=1072&rft_id=info:doi/10.6009%2Fjjrt.65.1064&rft.externalDocID=article_jjrt_65_8_65_8_1064_article_char_ja
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0369-4305&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0369-4305&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0369-4305&client=summon