Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor without renal ischemia : comparison with open procedure

Between 1996 and 2003, ten patients with small renal tumors underwent retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal ischemia, nine patients with small renal tumors underwent open partial nephrectomy via a retroperitoneal approach. Both groups were operated on using a microwave tissue coagul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Microwave Surgery Vol. 21; pp. 111 - 115
Main Authors Zakoji, Hidenori, Takihana, Yoshio, Komuro, Mitsuo, Nomura, Teruhisa, Tsuchida, Takayuki, Araki, Isao, Furuya, Yasuhisa, Tanabe, Nobuaki, Takeda, Masayuki, Nakamura, Kenzo, Fukasawa, Mizuya
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Study Group of Microwave Surgery 2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0917-7728
1882-210X
DOI10.3380/jmicrowavesurg.21.111

Cover

More Information
Summary:Between 1996 and 2003, ten patients with small renal tumors underwent retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal ischemia, nine patients with small renal tumors underwent open partial nephrectomy via a retroperitoneal approach. Both groups were operated on using a microwave tissue coagulator. We compared the results of retroperitoneoscopic group with those of a retroperitoneal open surgery group. Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal ischemia was performed without any major or minor complications in any patient. The mean operation time for retroperitoneoscopic surgery significantly longer than that for open partial nephrectomy. However, the mean estimated blood loss for retroperitoneoscopic surgery was less than that for open partial nephrectomy. In addition, the retroperitoneoscopic group seemed to recover more rapidly than the open surgery group. This endoscopic surgery is feasible as minimally invasive procedure. It results in saving renal function, minimal blood loss and rapid recovery.
ISSN:0917-7728
1882-210X
DOI:10.3380/jmicrowavesurg.21.111