WTO体制におけるダンピング防止税の位置 グローバリゼーションと国際経済秩序の関係の視点から
Saved in:
| Published in | 世界法年報 Vol. 2005; no. 24; pp. 49 - 78 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | Japanese |
| Published |
世界法学会
31.03.2005
|
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0917-0421 2185-9086 |
| DOI | 10.11388/yearbookofworldlaw1986.2005.49 |
Cover
| Author | 阿部, 克則 |
|---|---|
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 阿部, 克則 |
| BookMark | eNptkE1LAlEYhS9hkJm_o9XYez_mzr3LkL5AcGO4HN65zpQ2OTEjiLtGN2EURC1atwoiiYJ2_pprSf-ipHDV5jyrczg866TQTbohIZsUKpRypbYGIaZBkpwkUT9J41aMfaqVrDAAtyL0CikyqlxHg5IFUgRNPQcEo2uknGXtAEBSVwnpFYlsNuqz6e3HxbvNn2w-tvmNHV7a0bkdvdnR3SKHL1_3r5_PD_PHa5tPZtOr-XSyQVYjjLOw_McSOdzdaVT3nVp976C6XXM6FFxwfu7IyAgecUCtFUiu0fO08FjkgREB1UZyo1CzgAXgMdSKu63QREIaZBjwEmn-7nayHh6F_lnaPsV04GPaa5s49P_X4C80-EwsKfSyYY4x9TvIvwGTvHPm |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 世界法学会 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 世界法学会 |
| DOI | 10.11388/yearbookofworldlaw1986.2005.49 |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 2185-9086 |
| EndPage | 78 |
| ExternalDocumentID | article_yearbookofworldlaw1986_2005_24_2005_24_49_article_char_ja |
| GroupedDBID | ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS JSF KQ8 RJT |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-j1050-2006fc43f30a9980639a779472f70c4b19c63c8a92b2b072a9835decf46ca2ab3 |
| ISSN | 0917-0421 |
| IngestDate | Wed Sep 03 06:28:11 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | false |
| IsScholarly | false |
| Issue | 24 |
| Language | Japanese |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j1050-2006fc43f30a9980639a779472f70c4b19c63c8a92b2b072a9835decf46ca2ab3 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/yearbookofworldlaw1986/2005/24/2005_24_49/_article/-char/ja |
| PageCount | 30 |
| ParticipantIDs | jstage_primary_article_yearbookofworldlaw1986_2005_24_2005_24_49_article_char_ja |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2005/03/31 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-03-31 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2005 text: 2005/03/31 day: 31 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationTitle | 世界法年報 |
| PublicationYear | 2005 |
| Publisher | 世界法学会 |
| Publisher_xml | – name: 世界法学会 |
| References | (48) J. Thiesing, “Artikel 91”, in Groeben, Boeckh, and Thiesing Hrsg., Kommentar zum EWG-Vertrag, (1974), S.1145-1151 (2) J. A. Scholte, Globalization: A Critical Introduction, (2000), pp.15-17 (90) R. Howse and K. Nicolaïdis, “From Politi cs to Technocracy-and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.96, (2002), pp.235-248. E-U. Pertersmann, “Challenges to the Legitimacy and Efficiency of the World Trading System: Democratic Governance and Competition Culture in the WTO”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol.7, (2004), pp.601-603. (30) J. H. Jackson, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Ecomomic Relations (2nd ed.), (1997), pp.248-250 (41) WT/WGTCP/W/88, pp.2-3. カナダ: 対米国6件, 対メキシコ1件 (G/ADP/N/119/CAN, PP.10-12) (29) 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (1) 」「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻3号, (2001年), 7-10頁 北村泰三「外国人労働者の人権保障と移住労働者条約」「熊本法学」75巻, (1993年), 121頁. (2001), pp.1-8. (26) J. H. Jackson, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Ecomomic Relations (2nd ed.), (1997), p.248. R. Dale, “Antidumping Laws as Barriers to Trade: The United States and the International Antidumping Code”, Cornell Law. Review.Vol.57, (1972), pp.35-7 小寺彰「WTO体制の法構造」 (東京大学出版会, 2000年), 181-197頁 (6) J. Watal, Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries. (68) 野中俊彦・中村睦男・高橋和之・高見勝利「憲法1 (第3版) 」 (有斐閣, 2001年), 417頁. (34) M. C. E. J. Bronckers, “Rehabilitating Antidumping and Other Trade Remedies through Cost-Benefit Analyses”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.30, No.2, (1996), p.16. (42) TN/RL/W/27, pp.2-4. (22) A. Jones and B. Sufrin, EC Competition Law (2nd ed.), (2004), pp.385-403 (54) 米国: 対カナダ9件, 対メキシコ9件 (G/ADP/N/119/USA, PP.25-31) (18) Brooke Group Ltd., Petitioner v. Brown&Williamson Tobacco Corporation, 509 U. S. 209, 224 (1993). R. Howse, “From Politi cs to Technocracy-and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.96, (2002), pp.94-117. (3) 本山美彦 (編) 「グローバリズムの衝撃」 (東洋経済新報社, 2001年), iii頁. (69) 佐藤一雄「市場経済と競争法」 (商事法務研究会, 1994年), 25-33頁. D. P. Kommers, “lmmigration”, in Encyclopedia of public International Law, Vol.II (1995), pp.940-943 (80) E. Jahn, “Migration Movements”, in Encyclopedia of public Interational Law, Vol.III (1997), pp.369-371 (94) J. P. Trachtman, “International Competition Rules for Governments and for Private Business: The Case for Linking Future WTO Negotiations on Investment, Competition and Environmental Rules to Reforms of Anti-Dumping Laws”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.30, No.3, (1996), p.21 D. P. Wood, “Unfair' Trade Injury: A Competition Based Approach”, 41 Stanford Law Review, Vol.41, (1989), pp.1167-73 (28) D. P. Wood, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Ecomomic Relations (2nd ed.), (1997), p.1173. (75) A. F. Lowenfeld, Intemational Econmic Law (2002), pp.117-121. (81) J. P. Trachtman, “lmmigration”, in Encyclopedia of public International Law, Vol.II (1995), pp.3-18. (72) 岸井大太郎・向田直範・和田健夫・内田耕作・稗貫俊文「経済法: 独占禁止法と競争政策 (第3版補訂) 」 (有斐閣, 2001年), 5-8頁. (59) G. Marceau, Anti-Dumping and Anti-Trust Issues in Free-trade Areas, (1994), p.200 (43) TN/RL/W/51. (49) G. Marceau, Anti-Dumping and Anti-Trust Issues in Free-trade Areas, (1994), pp.215-216. (87) E.-U. Petersmann, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement, (1997), pp.25-57 (11) Panel Report on Thailand-Anti-dumping Duties on Angles, Shapes and Sections of Iron or Non-Alloy Steel and H-Beams from Poland, WT/DS122/R, paras. 7.222-7.237 Appellate Body Report on Thailand-Antidumping Duties on Angles, Shapes and Sections of Iron or Non-Alloy Steel and H-Beams from Poland, WT/DS122/AB/R, paras. 121-128. (70) 佐藤, 「市場経済と競争法」 (商事法務研究会, 1994年), 33-34頁. (4) 荒木一郎「グローバリゼーションとGATS」「ジュリスト」1232号 (2002年). M. S. Knoll, “United States Antidumping Law: The Case foe Reconsideration”, Texas International Law Journal, Vol.22, (1987), pp.284-5. (71) 金子宏「総説」「現代行政法大系第10巻: 財政」 (有斐閣, 1984年), 1-2頁 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (2) 」「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻4号, (2001年), 144-145頁 (32) 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (3・完) 」, 第15巻3号, (2001年), 30-32頁. (38) J. H. Jackson, “International Economic Law in Times That Are Interesting”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol.3, (2000), p.13. (39) 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (3・完) 」, 「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻3号, (2001年), 32-43頁. (89) J. G. Ruggie, “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embeded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order”, International Organization Vol.36, (1982), pp.195-231 T. P. Stewart, “Administration of the Antidumping Law: A Different Perspective”, in R. Boltuck&R. E. Litan eds., Down in the Dumps: Administration of the Unfair Trade Laws (1991), pp.308-9 (5) 小寺編著, 「グローバリズムの衝撃」 121-124頁. (83) B. M. Hoekman and M. M. Kostecki, The Political Economy of the World Trading System (2nd ed.), (2001), pp.17-18. E.-U. Petersmann, “European and International Constitutional Law: Time for Promoting' Cosmopolitan Democracy' in the WTO”, in G. de Burca and J. Scott (eds.), The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues, (2001), pp.97-98. (25) P. D. Ehrenhaft, “What the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Provisions of the Trade Agreements Act [Can] [Will] [Should] Mean for U. S. Trade Policy”, Law and Policy in International Business, Vol.11 (1979), p.1367 (33) M. C. E. J. Bronckers, “Rehabilitating Antidumping and Other Trade Remedies through Cost-Benefit Analyses”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.30, No.2, (1996), p.16. (86) E.-U. Petersmann, Constitutional Functions and Constitutional Problems of International Economic Law, (1991) 滝川敏明「貿易摩擦と独禁法」 (有斐閣, 1994年), 127-138頁 J. E. Stiglititz, Globalization and Its Discontents, (2002) 長岡貞男「ダンピングが反競争的か, 反ダンピング措置が反競争的か」「日本国際経済法学会年報」9号, (2000年), 1-21頁. Panel Report onunited States-Continmd Dunnping&subsidy Offse et/Act of 2000, WT/DS217, DS234/R, para. 8.3. (16) P. E. Areeda&H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, vol.III 2nd edition (2002), pp.280-281. (37) A. V. Deardorff, “Economic Perspective on Antidumping Law”, in J. H. Jackson and E. A. Vermulst, eds., Vol.22, (1987), pp.32-3. 金子宏「租税法 (第8版増補版) 」 (弘文堂, 2002年), 4頁. (91) E.-U. Petersmann, “International Competition Rules for Governments and for Private Business: The Case for Linking Future WTO Negotiations on Investment, Competition and Environmental Rules to Reforms of Anti-Dumping Laws”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.30, No.3, (1996), pp.28-33. M. Furse, Competition Law of the EC and UK (4th ed.), (2004), pp.270-277. (19) 中川寛子「不当廉売と日米欧競争法」 (有斐閣, 2001年), 116-118頁. I. Pernice, “Art. 91”, in Grabitz Hrsg., Kommentar zum EWGVertrag, (1984) J. H. Jackson, “Dumping in International Trade: Its Meaning and Context”, in J. H. Jackson and E. A. Vermulst, eds., Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study, (1989), pp.20-2. 村井正「国際租税法の課題と展望」「ジュリスト」1000号 (1992年), 104-5頁. (13) Panel Report on United States-Investigation of the International Trade Commission in Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS277/R, paras. 7.69, 7.96. (64) G. Marceau, “A Single Market for Goods and Services in the Antipodes”, World Economy, Vol.12, No.2, (1989), pp.211-215. (27) P. Stern., The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Ecomomic Relations (2nd ed.), (1997), p.713. 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (2) 」, 「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻3号, (2001年), 107-109頁, 142-144頁 (45) Panel Report on united States-Anti-Dumping. Act of 1916 WT/DS 136/R, paras. 6.131, 6.189 F.-H. Wenig, “Anti-dumping-and Antisubventionsrecht”, in Dauses Hrsg., Handbuch des EG-Wirtschaftsrecht, (1994), S.4. (21) Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 1991. AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities. Article 86-Eliminatory practices of a dominant undertaking.Case C-62/86., para. 72. WT/DS 162/R, paras. 6.149, 6.211. (74) 大山道広「GATT/WTOルールの経済的意義」「経済研究」第50巻, (1999年), 9頁. (62) G. Thomson, “A Single Market for Goods and Services in the Antipodes”, World Economy, Vol.12, No.2, (1989), p.207. メキシコ: 対米国7件, 対カナダ0件 (G/ADP/N/119/MEX, PP.6-7). 荒木一郎・川瀬剛志編著「WTO体制化のセーフガード: 実効性ある制度の構築に向けて」 (東洋経済新報社, 2004年) (23) 中川, 「不当廉売と日米欧競争法」, 285頁. (85) 西元宏治 (奥脇直也監修) 「国際関係の法制度化現象とWTOにおける立憲化議論の射程」「ジュリスト」1254号, (2003年), 119-122頁. J. H. Jackson and W. Davey, Legal Problems of International Economic Relations (2nd ed.), (1986), pp.650-2 R. Dale, “International Economic Law in Times That Are Interesting”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol.3, (2000), pp.190-197 (65) R. P. Kewalram, “The Australia-New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement: An Experiment with the Replacement of Anti-Dumping Laws by Trade Practices Legislation”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.27, No.5, pp.112-114. (67) B. Hoekman, Free Trade and Deep Integration: Antidumping and Antitrust in Regional Agreements, The Policy Research Working Paper Series No.1950, available at http: //econ.worldbank.org/docs/749.pdf, at32. 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (3・完) 」, 「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻3号, (2001年), 24-27頁 (79) 古城, 「国際経済: 経済のグローバル化とガヴァナンスの要請」 246-247頁 P. Stern, “New Directions for the Trade Laws”, George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, Vol.18, (1985), p.712 柳赫秀「国際通貨・金融に関する法」「法学教室」280号, (2004年), 96-109頁. (35) J. J. Barcelló III, “Antidumping Laws as Barriers to Trade: The United States and the International Antidumping Code”, Cornell Law. Review.Vol.57, (1972), pp.503-5 (78) J. P. Trachtman, “Legal Aspects of a Poverty Agenda at the WTO: Trade Law and “Global Apartheid””, Journal of Interational Economic Law Vol.6, (2003), p.14. (20) Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 1991. AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities. Article 86-Eliminatory practices of a dominant undertaking.Case C-62/86., para.71. ジョセブ・E・スティグリッツ著, 鈴木主税訳「世界を不幸にしたグローバリズムの正体」 (徳間書店, 2002年). (1) J. H. Jackson, “Global Economics and International Economic Law”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol.1 (1998), pp.1-4 (88) R. Howse and K. NicolaIdis, “Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing the WTO Is a Step Too Far”, in R. B. Porter et. al. (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Tr |
| References_xml | – reference: (83) B. M. Hoekman and M. M. Kostecki, The Political Economy of the World Trading System (2nd ed.), (2001), pp.17-18. – reference: (82) T. Cottier and C. Germann, “The WTO and EU Distributive Policy: the Case of Regional Promotion and Assistance”, in G. de Búrca and J. Scott eds., The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues, (2001), pp.190-192. – reference: (37) A. V. Deardorff, “Economic Perspective on Antidumping Law”, in J. H. Jackson and E. A. Vermulst, eds., Vol.22, (1987), pp.32-3. – reference: (50) W. Prastifka and W. Fry, Anti-Dumping and Anti-Trust Issues in Free-trade Areas, (1994), pp.376-377. – reference: (1) J. H. Jackson, “Global Economics and International Economic Law”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol.1 (1998), pp.1-4 – reference: 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (3・完) 」「千葉大学法学論集」第16巻1号, (2001年), 27-29頁 – reference: B. Hindley and P. Messerin, “Guarantees of Market Access and Regionalism”, in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst (eds.), Regional Integration and the Global Trading System, (1993), p.363. – reference: (78) J. P. Trachtman, “Legal Aspects of a Poverty Agenda at the WTO: Trade Law and “Global Apartheid””, Journal of Interational Economic Law Vol.6, (2003), p.14. – reference: 荒木一郎・川瀬剛志編著「WTO体制化のセーフガード: 実効性ある制度の構築に向けて」 (東洋経済新報社, 2004年) – reference: (94) J. P. Trachtman, “International Competition Rules for Governments and for Private Business: The Case for Linking Future WTO Negotiations on Investment, Competition and Environmental Rules to Reforms of Anti-Dumping Laws”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.30, No.3, (1996), p.21 – reference: (39) 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (3・完) 」, 「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻3号, (2001年), 32-43頁. – reference: Panel Report onunited States-Continmd Dunnping&subsidy Offse et/Act of 2000, WT/DS217, DS234/R, para. 8.3. – reference: (68) 野中俊彦・中村睦男・高橋和之・高見勝利「憲法1 (第3版) 」 (有斐閣, 2001年), 417頁. – reference: E.-U. Petersmann, “European and International Constitutional Law: Time for Promoting' Cosmopolitan Democracy' in the WTO”, in G. de Burca and J. Scott (eds.), The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues, (2001), pp.97-98. – reference: (91) E.-U. Petersmann, “International Competition Rules for Governments and for Private Business: The Case for Linking Future WTO Negotiations on Investment, Competition and Environmental Rules to Reforms of Anti-Dumping Laws”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.30, No.3, (1996), pp.28-33. – reference: (3) 本山美彦 (編) 「グローバリズムの衝撃」 (東洋経済新報社, 2001年), iii頁. – reference: 滝川敏明「貿易摩擦と独禁法」 (有斐閣, 1994年), 127-138頁 – reference: Appellate Body Report on Thailand-Antidumping Duties on Angles, Shapes and Sections of Iron or Non-Alloy Steel and H-Beams from Poland, WT/DS122/AB/R, paras. 121-128. – reference: 村井正「国際租税法の課題と展望」「ジュリスト」1000号 (1992年), 104-5頁. – reference: (41) WT/WGTCP/W/88, pp.2-3. – reference: (33) M. C. E. J. Bronckers, “Rehabilitating Antidumping and Other Trade Remedies through Cost-Benefit Analyses”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.30, No.2, (1996), p.16. – reference: (42) TN/RL/W/27, pp.2-4. – reference: (43) TN/RL/W/51. – reference: (10) R. Dale, Anti-dumping Law in a Liberal Trade Order, (1980), p.5. – reference: (79) 古城, 「国際経済: 経済のグローバル化とガヴァナンスの要請」 246-247頁 – reference: R. Dale, “International Economic Law in Times That Are Interesting”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol.3, (2000), pp.190-197 – reference: (2001), pp.1-8. – reference: (45) Panel Report on united States-Anti-Dumping. Act of 1916 WT/DS 136/R, paras. 6.131, 6.189 – reference: R. M. Bierwagen, GATT Article VI and the Protectionist Bias in Anti-dumping Laws, (1990), pp.168-9 – reference: (49) G. Marceau, Anti-Dumping and Anti-Trust Issues in Free-trade Areas, (1994), pp.215-216. – reference: (59) G. Marceau, Anti-Dumping and Anti-Trust Issues in Free-trade Areas, (1994), p.200 – reference: (62) G. Thomson, “A Single Market for Goods and Services in the Antipodes”, World Economy, Vol.12, No.2, (1989), p.207. – reference: (64) G. Marceau, “A Single Market for Goods and Services in the Antipodes”, World Economy, Vol.12, No.2, (1989), pp.211-215. – reference: (30) J. H. Jackson, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Ecomomic Relations (2nd ed.), (1997), pp.248-250 – reference: カナダ: 対米国6件, 対メキシコ1件 (G/ADP/N/119/CAN, PP.10-12) – reference: 須網隆夫「貿易と文化市民的・社会的価値と経済的価値の調整」小寺彰編著「転換期のWTO-非貿易的関心事項の分析」 (東洋経済新報社, 2003年), 231-232頁. – reference: 古城佳子「国際経済: 経済のグローバル化とガヴァナンスの要請」渡辺昭夫・土山實男「グローバル・ガヴァナンス: 政府なき秩序の模索」 (東京大学出版会, 2001年), 243-244頁. – reference: (22) A. Jones and B. Sufrin, EC Competition Law (2nd ed.), (2004), pp.385-403 – reference: (6) J. Watal, Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries. – reference: 長岡貞男「ダンピングが反競争的か, 反ダンピング措置が反競争的か」「日本国際経済法学会年報」9号, (2000年), 1-21頁. – reference: (24) 中川, 「不当廉売と日米欧競争法」 288頁. – reference: 金子宏「租税法 (第8版増補版) 」 (弘文堂, 2002年), 4頁. – reference: (4) 荒木一郎「グローバリゼーションとGATS」「ジュリスト」1232号 (2002年). – reference: (26) J. H. Jackson, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Ecomomic Relations (2nd ed.), (1997), p.248. – reference: WT/DS 162/R, paras. 6.149, 6.211. – reference: J. E. Stiglititz, Globalization and Its Discontents, (2002) – reference: T. P. Stewart, “United States Antidumping Law: The Case foe Reconsideration”, Texas International Law Journal, Vol.22, (1987), 308-9. – reference: メキシコ: 対米国7件, 対カナダ0件 (G/ADP/N/119/MEX, PP.6-7). – reference: 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (2) 」「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻4号, (2001年), 144-145頁 – reference: (36) P. Ehrenhaft, “United States Antidumping Law: The Case foe Reconsideration”, Texas International Law Journal, Vol.22, (1987), P.1367. – reference: 櫻井雅夫「新国際投資法投資と貿易の相互作用」 (有信堂, 2000年), ;柳赫秀「国際投資に関する法」「法学教室」279号, (2003年), 111-128頁. – reference: 小寺彰「WTO体制の法構造」 (東京大学出版会, 2000年), 181-197頁 – reference: R. Howse, “From Politi cs to Technocracy-and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.96, (2002), pp.94-117. – reference: E-U. Pertersmann, “Challenges to the Legitimacy and Efficiency of the World Trading System: Democratic Governance and Competition Culture in the WTO”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol.7, (2004), pp.601-603. – reference: (67) B. Hoekman, Free Trade and Deep Integration: Antidumping and Antitrust in Regional Agreements, The Policy Research Working Paper Series No.1950, available at http: //econ.worldbank.org/docs/749.pdf, at32. – reference: (92) R. Howse, “International Competition Rules for Governments and for Private Business: The Case for Linking Future WTO Negotiations on Investment, Competition and Environmental Rules to Reforms of Anti-Dumping Laws”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.30, No.3, (1996), pp.97-98. – reference: (18) Brooke Group Ltd., Petitioner v. Brown&Williamson Tobacco Corporation, 509 U. S. 209, 224 (1993). – reference: P. Stern, “New Directions for the Trade Laws”, George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, Vol.18, (1985), p.712 – reference: (81) J. P. Trachtman, “lmmigration”, in Encyclopedia of public International Law, Vol.II (1995), pp.3-18. – reference: (16) P. E. Areeda&H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, vol.III 2nd edition (2002), pp.280-281. – reference: F.-H. Wenig, “Anti-dumping-and Antisubventionsrecht”, in Dauses Hrsg., Handbuch des EG-Wirtschaftsrecht, (1994), S.4. – reference: (86) E.-U. Petersmann, Constitutional Functions and Constitutional Problems of International Economic Law, (1991) – reference: ジョセブ・E・スティグリッツ著, 鈴木主税訳「世界を不幸にしたグローバリズムの正体」 (徳間書店, 2002年). – reference: J. H. Jackson, “Dumping in International Trade: Its Meaning and Context”, in J. H. Jackson and E. A. Vermulst, eds., Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study, (1989), pp.20-2. – reference: (19) 中川寛子「不当廉売と日米欧競争法」 (有斐閣, 2001年), 116-118頁. – reference: 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (2) 」, 「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻3号, (2001年), 107-109頁, 142-144頁 – reference: (84) W. A. Kerr and L. J. Loppacher, “Anti-dumping in the Doha Negotiations: Fairy Tales at the World Trade Organization”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.38, (2004), pp.211-225. – reference: 佐藤, 「市場経済と競争法」 (商事法務研究会, 1994年), 36-41頁. – reference: (46) 川合弘造「途上国反ダンピング提訴の提起する問題-特に急増する中国の対日AD発動案件について」「ジュリスト」1254号, (2003年), 45-47頁. – reference: T. P. Stewart, “Administration of the Antidumping Law: A Different Perspective”, in R. Boltuck&R. E. Litan eds., Down in the Dumps: Administration of the Unfair Trade Laws (1991), pp.308-9 – reference: J. H. Jackson and W. Davey, Legal Problems of International Economic Relations (2nd ed.), (1986), pp.650-2 – reference: (27) P. Stern., The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Ecomomic Relations (2nd ed.), (1997), p.713. – reference: (80) E. Jahn, “Migration Movements”, in Encyclopedia of public Interational Law, Vol.III (1997), pp.369-371 – reference: (34) M. C. E. J. Bronckers, “Rehabilitating Antidumping and Other Trade Remedies through Cost-Benefit Analyses”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.30, No.2, (1996), p.16. – reference: R. Dale, “Antidumping Laws as Barriers to Trade: The United States and the International Antidumping Code”, Cornell Law. Review.Vol.57, (1972), pp.35-7 – reference: (69) 佐藤一雄「市場経済と競争法」 (商事法務研究会, 1994年), 25-33頁. – reference: (21) Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 1991. AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities. Article 86-Eliminatory practices of a dominant undertaking.Case C-62/86., para. 72. – reference: W. Prastifka and W. Fry, “Article 91”, in D. Campbell et. al. eds., The Law of the European Community: A Commentary on the EC Treaty, Vol.3, (2002), pp.375-378. – reference: (90) R. Howse and K. Nicolaïdis, “From Politi cs to Technocracy-and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.96, (2002), pp.235-248. – reference: (15) Panel Report on Korea-Antidumping Duties on Imports of Polyacetal Resins from the United States, ADP/92, para.222. – reference: (85) 西元宏治 (奥脇直也監修) 「国際関係の法制度化現象とWTOにおける立憲化議論の射程」「ジュリスト」1254号, (2003年), 119-122頁. – reference: (48) J. Thiesing, “Artikel 91”, in Groeben, Boeckh, and Thiesing Hrsg., Kommentar zum EWG-Vertrag, (1974), S.1145-1151 – reference: (25) P. D. Ehrenhaft, “What the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Provisions of the Trade Agreements Act [Can] [Will] [Should] Mean for U. S. Trade Policy”, Law and Policy in International Business, Vol.11 (1979), p.1367 – reference: (54) 米国: 対カナダ9件, 対メキシコ9件 (G/ADP/N/119/USA, PP.25-31) – reference: (65) R. P. Kewalram, “The Australia-New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement: An Experiment with the Replacement of Anti-Dumping Laws by Trade Practices Legislation”, Journal of World Trade, Vol.27, No.5, pp.112-114. – reference: M. Furse, Competition Law of the EC and UK (4th ed.), (2004), pp.270-277. – reference: (89) J. G. Ruggie, “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embeded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order”, International Organization Vol.36, (1982), pp.195-231 – reference: (20) Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 1991. AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities. Article 86-Eliminatory practices of a dominant undertaking.Case C-62/86., para.71. – reference: (28) D. P. Wood, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Ecomomic Relations (2nd ed.), (1997), p.1173. – reference: (87) E.-U. Petersmann, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement, (1997), pp.25-57 – reference: (11) Panel Report on Thailand-Anti-dumping Duties on Angles, Shapes and Sections of Iron or Non-Alloy Steel and H-Beams from Poland, WT/DS122/R, paras. 7.222-7.237 – reference: (32) 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (3・完) 」, 第15巻3号, (2001年), 30-32頁. – reference: (75) A. F. Lowenfeld, Intemational Econmic Law (2002), pp.117-121. – reference: (5) 小寺編著, 「グローバリズムの衝撃」 121-124頁. – reference: (40) See, Attachment to MTN. GNG/NG8/W/83/Add.5, Compendium of Drafting Proposals for Modifications to the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement (Anti-Dumping Code), pp.1-3. – reference: (74) 大山道広「GATT/WTOルールの経済的意義」「経済研究」第50巻, (1999年), 9頁. – reference: (38) J. H. Jackson, “International Economic Law in Times That Are Interesting”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol.3, (2000), p.13. – reference: D. P. Wood, “Unfair' Trade Injury: A Competition Based Approach”, 41 Stanford Law Review, Vol.41, (1989), pp.1167-73 – reference: I. Pernice, “Art. 91”, in Grabitz Hrsg., Kommentar zum EWGVertrag, (1984) – reference: 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (3・完) 」, 「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻3号, (2001年), 24-27頁 – reference: (71) 金子宏「総説」「現代行政法大系第10巻: 財政」 (有斐閣, 1984年), 1-2頁 – reference: (12) Panel Report on united States-Anti-dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products form Japan, WT/DS184/R, paras. 7.258-7.260. – reference: M. S. Knoll, “United States Antidumping Law: The Case foe Reconsideration”, Texas International Law Journal, Vol.22, (1987), pp.284-5. – reference: (88) R. Howse and K. NicolaIdis, “Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing the WTO Is a Step Too Far”, in R. B. Porter et. al. (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, (2001), pp.235-243. – reference: (73) 来生新「経済活動と法」 (放送大学教育振興会, 1987年), 51頁. – reference: (13) Panel Report on United States-Investigation of the International Trade Commission in Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS277/R, paras. 7.69, 7.96. – reference: D. P. Kommers, “lmmigration”, in Encyclopedia of public International Law, Vol.II (1995), pp.940-943 – reference: (2) J. A. Scholte, Globalization: A Critical Introduction, (2000), pp.15-17 – reference: (29) 拙稿「ガットにおけるダンピング防止税の位置 (1) 」「千葉大学法学論集」第15巻3号, (2001年), 7-10頁 – reference: 柳赫秀「国際通貨・金融に関する法」「法学教室」280号, (2004年), 96-109頁. – reference: (70) 佐藤, 「市場経済と競争法」 (商事法務研究会, 1994年), 33-34頁. – reference: (23) 中川, 「不当廉売と日米欧競争法」, 285頁. – reference: (72) 岸井大太郎・向田直範・和田健夫・内田耕作・稗貫俊文「経済法: 独占禁止法と競争政策 (第3版補訂) 」 (有斐閣, 2001年), 5-8頁. – reference: (35) J. J. Barcelló III, “Antidumping Laws as Barriers to Trade: The United States and the International Antidumping Code”, Cornell Law. Review.Vol.57, (1972), pp.503-5 – reference: 北村泰三「外国人労働者の人権保障と移住労働者条約」「熊本法学」75巻, (1993年), 121頁. |
| SSID | ssib006158467 ssj0003306029 |
| Score | 1.4028945 |
| SourceID | jstage |
| SourceType | Publisher |
| StartPage | 49 |
| Subtitle | グローバリゼーションと国際経済秩序の関係の視点から |
| Title | WTO体制におけるダンピング防止税の位置 |
| URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/yearbookofworldlaw1986/2005/24/2005_24_49/_article/-char/ja |
| Volume | 2005 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| ispartofPNX | 世界法年報, 2005/03/31, Vol.2005(24), pp.49-78 |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NaxQxFA-1gvRSFBW_6cHgaXQ2X5McZ3anFMUv2GJvQzIfh0VakS1ST273IoqC6MGzJ0EsouBt_5qpFv8LX2Yy21ksfl-yj2TmvZd9b5LfC8kLQhfzgnIjjO_xNDMeywrhGcFTL8sCJrnxDdN2HfL6DbGyyq6u8bW5QwutXUubQ3M5fXjguZK_sSrUgV3tKdk_sOyUKVQADfaFEiwM5W_Z-E7_Jo4ZjnpYURxzLCWOBI4pwEMcRo6QoSNUpyIIlnUTtbscaiKijlBstobgCJ5RWAFngmOBwx4OgQhwKLGMG1mxU0P2bBMQYdxGvVWrxErYVgV6di0rEAE0qB0pHDFLhD6Opi7QiF22BGgEAsEdqm7yqgtQQkMws27Bm4N8ztN-Idn2RlTPdLEK28uWMKvCQFMzyqs6QCncU75Lqe1GdSuy5b-EtUbpOkmqm-_rG4R-nEmotMcjtmC8seHORlFlsL2rH3SUFPVaXMNmJl23c4bk4BftrZ88IWz6y1TSvGGP2SUDwPqHSRBUWw6u3W6NjZ19qGhRBoVYzyd1Kkn3lxxBlxrNr_xcb4BbAwg-mo2LFZbqH0WLLghaCmuVjqG5gT6OBHjz7uTll8efy9G7cvSkHL0ot5-W40fl-FM5fmXL7Q_fXn_8-v7N3tvn5Whnd_Jsb7JzAq0ux_3uiudu9fAGgOV9-wGLImW0oL6GWN9CZB3ArBCQIvBTZjoqFTSVWhFDjB8QrSBIyPK0YCLVRBt6Es2vb6znp9CSzaxpUlUApIXWTEIsowpNCohRjBQiO41u1d1M7tWpW5J_ts6Z_8_yLFrY_z7Oofnh_c38PCDdoblQucB3a7eVXQ |
| linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=WTO%E4%BD%93%E5%88%B6%E3%81%AB%E3%81%8A%E3%81%91%E3%82%8B%E3%83%80%E3%83%B3%E3%83%94%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B0%E9%98%B2%E6%AD%A2%E7%A8%8E%E3%81%AE%E4%BD%8D%E7%BD%AE&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E6%B3%95%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B1&rft.au=%E9%98%BF%E9%83%A8%2C+%E5%85%8B%E5%89%87&rft.date=2005-03-31&rft.pub=%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E6%B3%95%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A&rft.issn=0917-0421&rft.eissn=2185-9086&rft.volume=2005&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=78&rft_id=info:doi/10.11388%2Fyearbookofworldlaw1986.2005.49&rft.externalDocID=article_yearbookofworldlaw1986_2005_24_2005_24_49_article_char_ja |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0917-0421&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0917-0421&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0917-0421&client=summon |