Patterns of Multimodal Input Usage in Non-Visual Information Navigation

Multimodal input is known to be advantageous for graphical user interfaces, but its benefits for non-visual interaction are unknown. To explore this issue, an exploratory study was conducted with fourteen sighted subjects on a system that allows speech input and hand input on a touchpad. Findings in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) Vol. 6; p. 123c
Main Authors Xiaoyu Chen, Tremaine, M.
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN0769525075
9780769525075
ISSN1530-1605
1530-1605
DOI10.1109/HICSS.2006.377

Cover

More Information
Summary:Multimodal input is known to be advantageous for graphical user interfaces, but its benefits for non-visual interaction are unknown. To explore this issue, an exploratory study was conducted with fourteen sighted subjects on a system that allows speech input and hand input on a touchpad. Findings include: (1) Users chose between these two input modalities based on the types of operations undertaken. Navigation operations were done primarily with touchpad input, while non-navigation instructions were carried out primarily using speech input. (2) Multimodal error correction was not prevalent. Repeating a failed operation until it succeeded and trying other methods in the same input modality were dominant error-correction strategies. (3) The modality learned first was not necessarily the primary modality used later, but a training order effect existed. These empirical results provide guidelines for designing non-visual multimodal input and create a comparison baseline for a subsequent study with blind users.
ISBN:0769525075
9780769525075
ISSN:1530-1605
1530-1605
DOI:10.1109/HICSS.2006.377