Patterns of Multimodal Input Usage in Non-Visual Information Navigation
Multimodal input is known to be advantageous for graphical user interfaces, but its benefits for non-visual interaction are unknown. To explore this issue, an exploratory study was conducted with fourteen sighted subjects on a system that allows speech input and hand input on a touchpad. Findings in...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) Vol. 6; p. 123c |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
IEEE
2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISBN | 0769525075 9780769525075 |
ISSN | 1530-1605 1530-1605 |
DOI | 10.1109/HICSS.2006.377 |
Cover
Summary: | Multimodal input is known to be advantageous for graphical user interfaces, but its benefits for non-visual interaction are unknown. To explore this issue, an exploratory study was conducted with fourteen sighted subjects on a system that allows speech input and hand input on a touchpad. Findings include: (1) Users chose between these two input modalities based on the types of operations undertaken. Navigation operations were done primarily with touchpad input, while non-navigation instructions were carried out primarily using speech input. (2) Multimodal error correction was not prevalent. Repeating a failed operation until it succeeded and trying other methods in the same input modality were dominant error-correction strategies. (3) The modality learned first was not necessarily the primary modality used later, but a training order effect existed. These empirical results provide guidelines for designing non-visual multimodal input and create a comparison baseline for a subsequent study with blind users. |
---|---|
ISBN: | 0769525075 9780769525075 |
ISSN: | 1530-1605 1530-1605 |
DOI: | 10.1109/HICSS.2006.377 |