High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for the separation of benign from malignant BI-RADS 4/5 lesions found on breast MRI at 3T
Purpose To determine whether readout‐segmented echo‐planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (ss‐EPI) on BI‐RADS 4/5 lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Method...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 674 - 681 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.09.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Purpose
To determine whether readout‐segmented echo‐planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (ss‐EPI) on BI‐RADS 4/5 lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Materials and Methods
Consecutive 3T breast MRI studies with BI‐RADS 4/5 designation and subsequent biopsy or benign mastectomy were retrospectively identified. Freehand regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on lesions and also on normal background fibroglandular tissue for comparison. Lesion‐to‐background contrast was evaluated by normalizing signal intensity of the lesion ROI by the normal background tissue ROI at b = 800. Statistical analysis used the Mann–Whitney/Wilcoxon rank‐sum test for unpaired and Wilcoxon signed‐rank for paired comparisons.
Results
Of 38 lesions in 32 patients, 10 were malignant. Lesion‐to‐background contrast was higher on RESOLVE than ss‐EPI (1.80 ± 0.71 vs. 1.62 ± 0.63, P = 0.03). Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was the same or lower on RESOLVE than ss‐EPI, and this effect was largest in malignant lesions (RESOLVE 0.90 ± 0.13; ss‐EPI 1.00 ± 0.13; median difference −0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.17, −0.02) × 10−3mm2/sec; P = 0.014). By either diffusion method, there was a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant mean ADC (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Increased lesion‐to‐background contrast and improved separation of benign from malignant lesions by RESOLVE compared to standard diffusion suggests that RESOLVE may show promise as an adjunct to clinical breast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;40:674–681. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Purpose To determine whether readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) on BI-RADS 4/5 lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods Consecutive 3T breast MRI studies with BI-RADS 4/5 designation and subsequent biopsy or benign mastectomy were retrospectively identified. Freehand regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on lesions and also on normal background fibroglandular tissue for comparison. Lesion-to-background contrast was evaluated by normalizing signal intensity of the lesion ROI by the normal background tissue ROI at b = 800. Statistical analysis used the Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon rank-sum test for unpaired and Wilcoxon signed-rank for paired comparisons. Results Of 38 lesions in 32 patients, 10 were malignant. Lesion-to-background contrast was higher on RESOLVE than ss-EPI (1.80±0.71 vs. 1.62±0.63, P = 0.03). Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was the same or lower on RESOLVE than ss-EPI, and this effect was largest in malignant lesions (RESOLVE 0.90±0.13; ss-EPI 1.00±0.13; median difference -0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.17, -0.02)×10-3mm2/sec; P = 0.014). By either diffusion method, there was a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant mean ADC (P < 0.001). Conclusion Increased lesion-to-background contrast and improved separation of benign from malignant lesions by RESOLVE compared to standard diffusion suggests that RESOLVE may show promise as an adjunct to clinical breast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;40:674-681. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] To determine whether readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) on BI-RADS 4/5 lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).PURPOSETo determine whether readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) on BI-RADS 4/5 lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Consecutive 3T breast MRI studies with BI-RADS 4/5 designation and subsequent biopsy or benign mastectomy were retrospectively identified. Freehand regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on lesions and also on normal background fibroglandular tissue for comparison. Lesion-to-background contrast was evaluated by normalizing signal intensity of the lesion ROI by the normal background tissue ROI at b = 800. Statistical analysis used the Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon rank-sum test for unpaired and Wilcoxon signed-rank for paired comparisons.MATERIALS AND METHODSConsecutive 3T breast MRI studies with BI-RADS 4/5 designation and subsequent biopsy or benign mastectomy were retrospectively identified. Freehand regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on lesions and also on normal background fibroglandular tissue for comparison. Lesion-to-background contrast was evaluated by normalizing signal intensity of the lesion ROI by the normal background tissue ROI at b = 800. Statistical analysis used the Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon rank-sum test for unpaired and Wilcoxon signed-rank for paired comparisons.Of 38 lesions in 32 patients, 10 were malignant. Lesion-to-background contrast was higher on RESOLVE than ss-EPI (1.80 ± 0.71 vs. 1.62 ± 0.63, P = 0.03). Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was the same or lower on RESOLVE than ss-EPI, and this effect was largest in malignant lesions (RESOLVE 0.90 ± 0.13; ss-EPI 1.00 ± 0.13; median difference -0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.17, -0.02) × 10(-3) mm(2) /sec; P = 0.014). By either diffusion method, there was a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant mean ADC (P < 0.001).RESULTSOf 38 lesions in 32 patients, 10 were malignant. Lesion-to-background contrast was higher on RESOLVE than ss-EPI (1.80 ± 0.71 vs. 1.62 ± 0.63, P = 0.03). Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was the same or lower on RESOLVE than ss-EPI, and this effect was largest in malignant lesions (RESOLVE 0.90 ± 0.13; ss-EPI 1.00 ± 0.13; median difference -0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.17, -0.02) × 10(-3) mm(2) /sec; P = 0.014). By either diffusion method, there was a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant mean ADC (P < 0.001).Increased lesion-to-background contrast and improved separation of benign from malignant lesions by RESOLVE compared to standard diffusion suggests that RESOLVE may show promise as an adjunct to clinical breast MRI.CONCLUSIONIncreased lesion-to-background contrast and improved separation of benign from malignant lesions by RESOLVE compared to standard diffusion suggests that RESOLVE may show promise as an adjunct to clinical breast MRI. To determine whether readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) on BI-RADS 4/5 lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Consecutive 3T breast MRI studies with BI-RADS 4/5 designation and subsequent biopsy or benign mastectomy were retrospectively identified. Freehand regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on lesions and also on normal background fibroglandular tissue for comparison. Lesion-to-background contrast was evaluated by normalizing signal intensity of the lesion ROI by the normal background tissue ROI at b = 800. Statistical analysis used the Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon rank-sum test for unpaired and Wilcoxon signed-rank for paired comparisons. Of 38 lesions in 32 patients, 10 were malignant. Lesion-to-background contrast was higher on RESOLVE than ss-EPI (1.80 ± 0.71 vs. 1.62 ± 0.63, P = 0.03). Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was the same or lower on RESOLVE than ss-EPI, and this effect was largest in malignant lesions (RESOLVE 0.90 ± 0.13; ss-EPI 1.00 ± 0.13; median difference -0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.17, -0.02) × 10(-3) mm(2) /sec; P = 0.014). By either diffusion method, there was a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant mean ADC (P < 0.001). Increased lesion-to-background contrast and improved separation of benign from malignant lesions by RESOLVE compared to standard diffusion suggests that RESOLVE may show promise as an adjunct to clinical breast MRI. Purpose To determine whether readout‐segmented echo‐planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (ss‐EPI) on BI‐RADS 4/5 lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods Consecutive 3T breast MRI studies with BI‐RADS 4/5 designation and subsequent biopsy or benign mastectomy were retrospectively identified. Freehand regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on lesions and also on normal background fibroglandular tissue for comparison. Lesion‐to‐background contrast was evaluated by normalizing signal intensity of the lesion ROI by the normal background tissue ROI at b = 800. Statistical analysis used the Mann–Whitney/Wilcoxon rank‐sum test for unpaired and Wilcoxon signed‐rank for paired comparisons. Results Of 38 lesions in 32 patients, 10 were malignant. Lesion‐to‐background contrast was higher on RESOLVE than ss‐EPI (1.80 ± 0.71 vs. 1.62 ± 0.63, P = 0.03). Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was the same or lower on RESOLVE than ss‐EPI, and this effect was largest in malignant lesions (RESOLVE 0.90 ± 0.13; ss‐EPI 1.00 ± 0.13; median difference −0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.17, −0.02) × 10−3mm2/sec; P = 0.014). By either diffusion method, there was a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant mean ADC (P < 0.001). Conclusion Increased lesion‐to‐background contrast and improved separation of benign from malignant lesions by RESOLVE compared to standard diffusion suggests that RESOLVE may show promise as an adjunct to clinical breast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;40:674–681. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| Author | Kornak, John Hylton, Nola M. Wisner, Dorota J. Deshpande, Vibhas S. Rogers, Nathan Laub, Gerhard A. Newitt, David N. Joe, Bonnie N. Porter, David A. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dorota J. surname: Wisner fullname: Wisner, Dorota J. email: Dorota.Wisner@radiology.ucsf.edu organization: Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, San Francisco, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Nathan surname: Rogers fullname: Rogers, Nathan organization: Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, San Francisco, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Vibhas S. surname: Deshpande fullname: Deshpande, Vibhas S. organization: Magnetic Resonance Research and Development Midwest, Siemens Healthcare, Texas, Austin, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: David N. surname: Newitt fullname: Newitt, David N. organization: Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, San Francisco, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Gerhard A. surname: Laub fullname: Laub, Gerhard A. organization: Magnetic Resonance Research and Development West, Siemens Healthcare, California, Los Angeles, USA – sequence: 6 givenname: David A. surname: Porter fullname: Porter, David A. organization: Magnetic Resonance Research and Development, Siemens Healthcare, Germany – sequence: 7 givenname: John surname: Kornak fullname: Kornak, John organization: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, San Francisco, USA – sequence: 8 givenname: Bonnie N. surname: Joe fullname: Joe, Bonnie N. organization: Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, San Francisco, USA – sequence: 9 givenname: Nola M. surname: Hylton fullname: Hylton, Nola M. organization: Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, San Francisco, USA |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24214467$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpdkUlvFDEUhC0URBa48AOQJS5cnHjt5RhCliEJSEMQiIvl7n6eeOi2J3a3ktz54XhmQg6cXNL7qmRV7aMdHzwg9JbRQ0YpP1oO0R1yKVnxAu0xxTnhqip2sqZKEFbRchftp7SklNa1VK_QLpecSVmUe-jPhVvckggp9NPogseds3ZKWZF7yKcROuwGs3B-gW2IeLwFnGBlotnQweIGvFt4bGMY8GD6rI0f8ccZmR9_-oblkcI9rPNS9k--w9nVRDBpxNfzGTYjFjev0Utr-gRvnt4D9P3s9Obkglx9PZ-dHF8RJ2tWECFMDZ2yDNoOoOSGSybajrVMlHVjwRTMGmmAWwWyBCoNYwWUtDLQVG0rxQH6sM1dxXA3QRr14FILfW88hClpppQoae6GZ_T9f-gyTNHn360pXilWFXWm3j1RUzNAp1cxdxUf9b9-M8C2wL3r4fH5zqheL6fXy-nNcvpzbmOjsodsPS6N8PDsMfG3zoml0j--nOvLn_UvJeZzXYi_Q4Sccg |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| DBID | BSCLL CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 7TK 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1002/jmri.24416 |
| DatabaseName | Istex Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1522-2586 |
| EndPage | 681 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3400787861 24214467 JMRI24416 ark_67375_WNG_KX9Z53RR_6 |
| Genre | article Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Komen funderid: SAC 110017 – fundername: National Institutes of Health (NIH) funderid: R01 CA 116182 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: R01 CA 116182 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: R01 CA132870 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: R01 CA116182 |
| GroupedDBID | --- -DZ .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 24P 31~ 33P 3O- 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABLJU ABOCM ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMOBN F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X HBH HDBZQ HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M65 MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RGB RIWAO RJQFR ROL RWI RX1 RYL SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TWZ UB1 V2E V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WIN WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XV2 ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO AFWVQ ALVPJ AGHNM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 7TK 8FD AAMMB AEFGJ AEYWJ AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY FR3 K9. P64 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-i4916-33a9ed5f1ecdee72a2413cd1c1379bfea61fa4ae2f5e47e04a116e708aeb8cc43 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 02:41:44 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:44:05 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:03:56 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:46:40 EST 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:49:48 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | benign breast MRI diffusion screening malignant DWI |
| Language | English |
| License | 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i4916-33a9ed5f1ecdee72a2413cd1c1379bfea61fa4ae2f5e47e04a116e708aeb8cc43 |
| Notes | National Institutes of Health (NIH) - No. R01 CA 116182 istex:B937560F9B0B759BF134636FEFB4BDE3EBA4BEBE Komen - No. SAC 110017 ark:/67375/WNG-KX9Z53RR-6 ArticleID:JMRI24416 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24416 |
| PMID | 24214467 |
| PQID | 1552851869 |
| PQPubID | 1006400 |
| PageCount | 8 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1553704212 proquest_journals_1552851869 pubmed_primary_24214467 wiley_primary_10_1002_jmri_24416_JMRI24416 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_KX9Z53RR_6 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | September 2014 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2014 text: September 2014 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Nashville |
| PublicationSubtitle | JMRI |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J. Magn. Reson. Imaging |
| PublicationYear | 2014 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | Porter DA, Heidemann RM. High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two-dimensional navigator-based reacquisition. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:468-475. Hayes LL, Jones RA, Palasis S, Aguilera D, Porter DA. Drop metastases to the pediatric spine revealed with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2012;42:1009-1013. Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1664-173. Rubesova E, Grell A-S, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao S-L, Lemort M. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:319-324. Bogner W, Pinker-Domenig K, Bickel H, et al. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T. Radiology 2012;263:64-276. DeMartini W, Lehman C, Partridge S. Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: a review of evidence-based clinical applications. Acad Radiol 2008;15:408-416. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1716-1722. Yuen S, Yamada K, Goto M, Nishida K, Takahata A, Nishimura T. Microperfusion-induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:1080-1084. Peters NHGM, Vincken KL, van den Bosch MAAJ, Luijten PR, Mali WPTM, Bartels LW. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:1100-1105. Medeiros LR, Duarte CS, Rosa DD, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;126:273-285. Holdsworth SJ, Yeom K, Skare S, Gentles AJ, Barnes PD, Bammer R. Clinical application of readout-segmented-echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in pediatric brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1274-1279. Firat AK, Sanli B, Karakas HM, Erdem G. The effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology 2006;48:465-470. Pereira FPA, Martins G, Figueiredo E, et al. Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1030-1035. Matsuoka A, Minato M, Harada M, et al. Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 2008;26:15-20. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007;370:485-492. Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 2010;256:64-73. Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:210-217. Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 2009;253:341-351. 2011; 126 2012; 263 2010; 31 2009; 62 2007; 370 2006; 24 2009; 193 2010; 256 2006; 48 2009; 253 2008; 15 2008; 26 2011; 32 2010; 194 2011; 196 2012; 42 2009; 29 20574085 - Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):64-73 19388115 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 May;29(5):1080-4 16673073 - Neuroradiology. 2006 Jul;48(7):465-70 17693177 - Lancet. 2007 Aug 11;370(9586):485-92 19703869 - Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):341-51 20489111 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1664-73 18236129 - Radiat Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):15-20 21178069 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):210-7 19933670 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1716-22 22438442 - Radiology. 2012 Apr;263(1):64-76 16786565 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Aug;24(2):319-24 22052343 - Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Aug;42(8):1009-13 19770326 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1030-5 21221772 - Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Apr;126(2):273-85 18342764 - Acad Radiol. 2008 Apr;15(4):408-16 20432344 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 May;31(5):1100-5 21596809 - AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Aug;32(7):1274-9 19449372 - Magn Reson Med. 2009 Aug;62(2):468-75 |
| References_xml | – reference: Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1716-1722. – reference: DeMartini W, Lehman C, Partridge S. Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: a review of evidence-based clinical applications. Acad Radiol 2008;15:408-416. – reference: Porter DA, Heidemann RM. High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two-dimensional navigator-based reacquisition. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:468-475. – reference: Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007;370:485-492. – reference: Yuen S, Yamada K, Goto M, Nishida K, Takahata A, Nishimura T. Microperfusion-induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:1080-1084. – reference: Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, Dinc H, Gunes G, Reis A. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:210-217. – reference: Rubesova E, Grell A-S, De Maertelaer V, Metens T, Chao S-L, Lemort M. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:319-324. – reference: Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1664-173. – reference: Bogner W, Pinker-Domenig K, Bickel H, et al. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T. Radiology 2012;263:64-276. – reference: Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 2010;256:64-73. – reference: Peters NHGM, Vincken KL, van den Bosch MAAJ, Luijten PR, Mali WPTM, Bartels LW. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:1100-1105. – reference: Medeiros LR, Duarte CS, Rosa DD, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;126:273-285. – reference: Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 2009;253:341-351. – reference: Pereira FPA, Martins G, Figueiredo E, et al. Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1030-1035. – reference: Hayes LL, Jones RA, Palasis S, Aguilera D, Porter DA. Drop metastases to the pediatric spine revealed with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2012;42:1009-1013. – reference: Matsuoka A, Minato M, Harada M, et al. Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 2008;26:15-20. – reference: Holdsworth SJ, Yeom K, Skare S, Gentles AJ, Barnes PD, Bammer R. Clinical application of readout-segmented-echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in pediatric brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1274-1279. – reference: Firat AK, Sanli B, Karakas HM, Erdem G. The effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology 2006;48:465-470. – volume: 24 start-page: 319 year: 2006 end-page: 324 article-title: Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 370 start-page: 485 year: 2007 end-page: 492 article-title: MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study publication-title: Lancet – volume: 196 start-page: 210 year: 2011 end-page: 217 article-title: Contribution of diffusion‐weighted imaging to dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol – volume: 253 start-page: 341 year: 2009 end-page: 351 article-title: Diffusion‐weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? publication-title: Radiology – volume: 263 start-page: 64 year: 2012 end-page: 276 article-title: Readout‐segmented echo‐planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion‐weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T publication-title: Radiology – volume: 193 start-page: 1030 year: 2009 end-page: 1035 article-title: Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion‐weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol – volume: 42 start-page: 1009 year: 2012 end-page: 1013 article-title: Drop metastases to the pediatric spine revealed with diffusion‐weighted MR imaging publication-title: Pediatr Radiol – volume: 26 start-page: 15 year: 2008 end-page: 20 article-title: Comparison of 3.0‐and 1.5‐tesla diffusion‐weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer publication-title: Radiat Med – volume: 32 start-page: 1274 year: 2011 end-page: 1279 article-title: Clinical application of readout‐segmented‐echo‐planar imaging for diffusion‐weighted imaging in pediatric brain publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol – volume: 126 start-page: 273 year: 2011 end-page: 285 article-title: Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta‐analysis publication-title: Breast Cancer Res Treat – volume: 194 start-page: 1664 year: 2010 end-page: 173 article-title: Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol – volume: 256 start-page: 64 year: 2010 end-page: 73 article-title: Diffusion‐weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0‐T breast MR imaging publication-title: Radiology – volume: 62 start-page: 468 year: 2009 end-page: 475 article-title: High resolution diffusion‐weighted imaging using readout‐segmented echo‐planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two‐dimensional navigator‐based reacquisition publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 31 start-page: 1100 year: 2010 end-page: 1105 article-title: Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b‐values publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 48 start-page: 465 year: 2006 end-page: 470 article-title: The effect of intravenous gadolinium‐DTPA on diffusion‐weighted imaging publication-title: Neuroradiology – volume: 15 start-page: 408 year: 2008 end-page: 416 article-title: Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: a review of evidence‐based clinical applications publication-title: Acad Radiol – volume: 193 start-page: 1716 year: 2009 end-page: 1722 article-title: Quantitative diffusion‐weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol – volume: 29 start-page: 1080 year: 2009 end-page: 1084 article-title: Microperfusion‐induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – reference: 16786565 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Aug;24(2):319-24 – reference: 17693177 - Lancet. 2007 Aug 11;370(9586):485-92 – reference: 20489111 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1664-73 – reference: 16673073 - Neuroradiology. 2006 Jul;48(7):465-70 – reference: 19703869 - Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):341-51 – reference: 19933670 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1716-22 – reference: 19388115 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 May;29(5):1080-4 – reference: 21178069 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):210-7 – reference: 21221772 - Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Apr;126(2):273-85 – reference: 21596809 - AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Aug;32(7):1274-9 – reference: 20432344 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 May;31(5):1100-5 – reference: 18342764 - Acad Radiol. 2008 Apr;15(4):408-16 – reference: 20574085 - Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):64-73 – reference: 19770326 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1030-5 – reference: 18236129 - Radiat Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):15-20 – reference: 22052343 - Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Aug;42(8):1009-13 – reference: 19449372 - Magn Reson Med. 2009 Aug;62(2):468-75 – reference: 22438442 - Radiology. 2012 Apr;263(1):64-76 |
| SSID | ssj0009945 |
| Score | 2.3475018 |
| Snippet | Purpose
To determine whether readout‐segmented echo‐planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to... To determine whether readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard... Purpose To determine whether readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 674 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over benign Biopsy breast MRI Breast Neoplasms - pathology Contrast Media Diagnosis, Differential diffusion Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods DWI Echo-Planar Imaging Female Gadolinium DTPA Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Magnetic resonance imaging malignant Middle Aged Retrospective Studies screening Sensitivity and Specificity |
| Title | High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for the separation of benign from malignant BI-RADS 4/5 lesions found on breast MRI at 3T |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-KX9Z53RR-6/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjmri.24416 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24214467 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1552851869 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1553704212 |
| Volume | 40 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaqHhAXoDwDBRkJcUDKbuI4L4lLeZS2aHsIrVghIct2JtW2bLbaTQTixJkTv5FfwoyTzQrEBW5R_EjimYk_z4w_M_ZEWG3DCAIfpNC-tIn2tbHSr6ywgSlxBV2RQ39ynBycyqNpPN1iz9d7YTp-iMHhRpbh_tdk4NqsxhvS0PP5cjbCySkkvm1K1iJEVGy4o_LcnVCM-CHywyxIB25SMd40RUhKo_nlb_jyd7jq5pv96-zj-k27NJOLUduYkf36B4nj_37KDXatB6J8r9OcHbYF9U12ZdKH2m-x75QB8vPbD1yO99rJ6TCVlrxrePuzc6lCyWdzd84RR_DLEUzyFXRs4lh_UXED9eys5rSJhc8R8p9R3g1_cYg9FHuv3nE5jvknoD5X2ENblxzbGUqUb_ikOOS64dHJbXa6__rk5YHfH9zgzyTCTT-KdA5lXIVgS4BUaAre2TJErUhzU4FOwkpLDaKKQaYQSB2GCaRBpsFk1sroDtuuFzXcY1zoSloQ1pSJQeykdWiTpMwkAj20b1167KkToLrsyDmUXl5Qrloaq_fHb9Tbaf4hjopCJR7bXUtY9Wa6UsQ_h5AzS3KPPR6K0cAoaqJrWLSuTpQGFDj32N1OM4aHUTwd19Opx545-Q4FHRm0UCRZ5SSrjnDU3NX9f6n8gF1FiCa7rLZdtt0sW3iIMKgxj5y6_wIKggec |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZgkYALb9jAAkZCHJDS5uE4yXF5LO3utofQFRUXy3Emq-7SFLWJQJw4c-I38kuYcUIqEBe4RYntKJ6Z-PPM-BvGngZGGz8EzwURaFcYqV2dG-GWJjBeXuAOuiSH_mQqRyficB7Nu9wcOgvT8kP0DjeyDPu_JgMnh_Rwyxp6tlwvBrg6-fIiu0Qlve2OKtuyR6WprVGMCCJ0_cSLe3bSYLjti6CU5vPz3xDm74DVrjgH19uyqhtLVEiJJueDps4H5ssfNI7__TE32LUOi_L9VnlusgtQ3WKXJ120_Tb7RkkgP75-xx15p6Cc6qk05GDD25-sVxUKvljaUkcc8S9HPMk30BKKY_tVyXOoFqcVp3MsfImo_5RSb_iLMY6Q7b96y8Uw4h-AxtzgCE1VcOyXU658zSfZmOuah7M77OTg9ezlyO1qN7gLgYjTDUOdQhGVPpgCIA40xe9M4aNixGlegpZ-qYWGoIxAxOAJ7fsSYi_RkCfGiPAu26lWFewyHuhSGAhMXsgc4ZPWvpGySARiPTRxXTjsmZWg-tjycyi9Pqd0tThS76Zv1NE8fR-FWaakw_Z-iVh1lrpRREGHqDORqcOe9I_RxihwoitYNbZNGHsUO3fYvVY1-pdRSB231LHDnlsB9w9aPuhAkWSVlaw6xFmzV_f_pfFjdmU0mxyr4_H06AG7iohNtElue2ynXjfwEFFRnT-yuv8TaGcLtw |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELaWRVpx4f3IsoCREAektHk4TiJxWShlu0srFHZFhYQs25msym7TVZsIxIkzJ34jv4Sxk6YCcYFbFD-SeGbizzPjz4Q8CbTUfgieCyyQLtNculJp5hY60J7KcQVdGIf-eMIPTtjhNJpukefrvTANP0TncDOWYf_XxsAv8qK_IQ39NF_Oejg5-fwSucy4lxidHmQb8qg0tUcUI4AIXT_x4o6cNOhv2iImNcP55W8A83e8aiec4TXycf2qTZ7JWa-uVE9__YPF8X-_5Tq52iJRut-ozg2yBeVNsjNuY-23yHeTAvLz2w9cj7fqSc1pKrVxr-Htz9anCjmdze1BRxTRL0U0SVfQ0Ilj_UVBFZSz05KaXSx0jpj_1CTe0Bcj7CHbH7yjrB_RczB9rrCHuswptlMmU76i42xEZUXD49vkZPjq-OWB257c4M4Y4k03DGUKeVT4oHOAOJAmeqdzH9UiTlUBkvuFZBKCIgIWg8ek73OIvUSCSrRm4R2yXS5KuEdoIAumIdAq5wrBk5S-5jxPGCI9NHCZO-SpFaC4aNg5hFyemWS1OBLvJ6_F0TT9EIVZJrhD9tYSFq2droQhoEPMmfDUIY-7YrQwEzaRJSxqWyeMPRM5d8jdRjO6h5mAOi6oY4c8s_LtCho26EAYyQorWXGIo2avdv-l8iOy83YwFG9Gk6P75ArCNdZkuO2R7WpZwwOERJV6aDX_F2b7Cm8 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-resolution+diffusion-weighted+imaging+for+the+separation+of+benign+from+malignant+BI-RADS+4%2F5+lesions+found+on+breast+MRI+at+3T&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+magnetic+resonance+imaging&rft.au=Wisner%2C+Dorota+J&rft.au=Rogers%2C+Nathan&rft.au=Deshpande%2C+Vibhas+S&rft.au=Newitt%2C+David+N&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=674&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjmri.24416&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=3400787861 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon |