Sidelined or Mainstreamed? Political Participation and Attitudes of People with Disabilities in the United States
Objective. We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political participation and the underexplored topic of how disability relates to attitudes toward politics. Method. We analyze new disability measures o...
Saved in:
| Published in | Social science quarterly Vol. 94; no. 3; pp. 811 - 839 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Hoboken, NJ
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.09.2013
Southwestern Social Science Association Wiley |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Objective. We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political participation and the underexplored topic of how disability relates to attitudes toward politics. Method. We analyze new disability measures on the 2008 and 2010 Current Population Surveys voting supplements, and two other nationally representative surveys for 2006 and 2007. Results. Citizens with disabilities remain less likely than nondisabled citizens to vote. While there are few differences in political preferences and party affiliations, people with disabilities tend to favor a greater government role in employment and healthcare, and give lower ratings on government responsiveness and trustworthiness. Conclusion. People with disabilities continue to be sidelined in important ways. Fully closing the disability gap would have led to 3.0 million more voters in 2008 and 3.2 million more voters in 2010, potentially affecting many races and subsequent public policies. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political participation and the underexplored topic of how disability relates to attitudes toward politics. We analyze new disability measures on the 2008 and 2010 Current Population Surveys voting supplements, and two other nationally representative surveys for 2006 and 2007. Citizens with disabilities remain less likely than nondisabled citizens to vote. While there are few differences in political preferences and party affiliations, people with disabilities tend to favor a greater government role in employment and healthcare, and give lower ratings on government responsiveness and trustworthiness. People with disabilities continue to be sidelined in important ways. Fully closing the disability gap would have led to 3.0 million more voters in 2008 and 3.2 million more voters in 2010, potentially affecting many races and subsequent public policies. We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political participation and the underexplored topic of how disability relates to attitudes toward politics. We analyze new disability measures on the 2008 and 2010 Current Population Surveys voting supplements, and two other nationally representative surveys for 2006 and 2007. Citizens with disabilities remain less likely than nondisabled citizens to vote. While there are few differences in political preferences and party affiliations, people with disabilities tend to favor a greater government role in employment and healthcare, and give lower ratings on government responsiveness and trustworthiness. People with disabilities continue to be sidelined in important ways. Fully closing the disability gap would have led to 3.0 million more voters in 2008 and 3.2 million more voters in 2010, potentially affecting many races and subsequent public policies. Adapted from the source document. We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political participation and the underexplored topic of how disability relates to attitudes toward politics. We analyze new disability measures on the 2008 and 2010 Current Population Surveys voting supplements, and two other nationally representative surveys for 2006 and 2007. Citizens with disabilities remain less likely than nondisabled citizens to vote. While there are few differences in political preferences and party affiliations, people with disabilities tend to favor a greater government role in employment and healthcare, and give lower ratings on government responsiveness and trustworthiness. People with disabilities continue to be sidelined in important ways. Fully closing the disability gap would have led to 3.0 million more voters in 2008 and 3.2 million more voters in 2010, potentially affecting many races and subsequent public policies. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers Objective. We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political participation and the underexplored topic of how disability relates to attitudes toward politics. Method. We analyze new disability measures on the 2008 and 2010 Current Population Surveys voting supplements, and two other nationally representative surveys for 2006 and 2007. Results. Citizens with disabilities remain less likely than nondisabled citizens to vote. While there are few differences in political preferences and party affiliations, people with disabilities tend to favor a greater government role in employment and healthcare, and give lower ratings on government responsiveness and trustworthiness. Conclusion. People with disabilities continue to be sidelined in important ways. Fully closing the disability gap would have led to 3.0 million more voters in 2008 and 3.2 million more voters in 2010, potentially affecting many races and subsequent public policies. Objective We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political participation and the underexplored topic of how disability relates to attitudes toward politics. Method We analyze new disability measures on the 2008 and 2010 Current Population Surveys voting supplements, and two other nationally representative surveys for 2006 and 2007. Results Citizens with disabilities remain less likely than nondisabled citizens to vote. While there are few differences in political preferences and party affiliations, people with disabilities tend to favor a greater government role in employment and healthcare, and give lower ratings on government responsiveness and trustworthiness. Conclusion People with disabilities continue to be sidelined in important ways. Fully closing the disability gap would have led to 3.0 million more voters in 2008 and 3.2 million more voters in 2010, potentially affecting many races and subsequent public policies. |
| Author | Adya, Meera Schur, Lisa |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lisa surname: Schur fullname: Schur, Lisa email: schur@work.rutgers.edu organization: Rutgers University – sequence: 2 givenname: Meera surname: Adya fullname: Adya, Meera organization: Syracuse University |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27619211$$DView record in Pascal Francis |
| BookMark | eNqNks1uEzEUhS1UJNLAIyBZQkhsZvC_PQuEqhZCpQBBaQQ7yzNzozpMPOnYUdO3x9NUWbCqN77S-Y6v7XvO0VnoAyCEKSlpXh83JZWCFIpxXTJCWUmIMbI8vECTk3CGJoRwU4hK0FfoPMYNIUQwYSbobulb6HyAFvcD_u58iGkAt4X2M170nU--cR1euCEXfueS7wN2ocUXKfm0byHifo0X0O86wPc-3eIrH13tR2PWfMDpFvAq-JQbLJNLEF-jl2vXRXjztE_R6uuXm8tvxfzn7PryYl54IStZuAacA8morFnFtSFKm5pp0QpeNUpRs2ZaKtmyhoGSjWSupoKDA82J5nXLp-jD8dzd0N_tISa79bGBrnMB-n20mTZSEVPx56GSKKGegTIjKa2IyOi7_9BNvx9CfnOmaCWM0LzK1PsnysX81evBhcZHuxv81g0PlmlFK0Zp5j4duXvfwcNJp8SOMbAbO07bjtO2YwzsYwzswS6Xv1a5yv63R_8mpn44-fN1laDZNkXFUfcxweGku-GvVZpraX__mNkZ5fJmrqj9w_8BEqrA2A |
| CODEN | SSQTAL |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2013 Southwestern Social Science Association 2012 by the Southwestern Social Science Association 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Sep 2013 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 Southwestern Social Science Association – notice: 2012 by the Southwestern Social Science Association – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Sep 2013 |
| DBID | BSCLL IQODW 7U4 7UB 8BJ BHHNA DWI FQK JBE WZK |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00885.x |
| DatabaseName | Istex Pascal-Francis Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Sociological Abstracts Sociological Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences Sociological Abstracts (Ovid) |
| DatabaseTitle | Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Sociological Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) Worldwide Political Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Social Sciences (General) Education |
| EISSN | 1540-6237 |
| EndPage | 839 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3042466401 27619211 SSQU885 42864162 ark_67375_WNG_G135TL61_X |
| Genre | article Feature |
| GeographicLocations | United States Of America United States--US |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: U.S. Department of Education – fundername: Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations – fundername: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research funderid: H133B980042–99 |
| GroupedDBID | --Z -DZ -W8 -~X .3N .GA .GO .Y3 05W 0R~ 0S8 10A 123 1OC 31~ 33P 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51Y 52M 52O 52Q 52S 52T 52U 52W 53G 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6TJ 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 85S 8UM 8V8 930 A04 AABNI AAESR AAFWJ AAGJD AAHHS AAHSB AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAUHC AAXRX AAYOK AAZKR ABBHK ABCFB ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABDPE ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABPPZ ABPVW ABSOO ABXSQ ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFII ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIOK ACNCT ACPOU ACREJ ACSCC ACTDY ACXQS ADACV ADBBV ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADNHR ADPLR ADULT ADXAS ADZJE ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AEMOZ AEQDE AEUPB AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFDYH AFEBI AFFDN AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AIAGR AIFKG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AKVCP ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB B0M BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BKOMP BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG CMRWG COF CS3 D-C D-D DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSSH DU5 D~A EAD EAP EAS EAU EBA EBD EBO EBR EBS EBU ECVKH EDJ EJD EMK EOH EPS ERP ESI ESO ESX F00 F01 F5P FEDTE G-S G.N G50 GODZA HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HYQOX HZI HZ~ IAO IEA IER IGG IHE IOF IPC IPSME ITC IX1 J0M JAAYA JBMMH JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLXEF JPL JSODD JST K1G K48 LATKE LC2 LC4 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LPU LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSSH MSFUL MSSSH MVM MXFUL MXSSH N04 N06 N9A NEJ NF~ NHB O-F O66 O9- OIG P2P P2W P2Y P4C PQQKQ Q.N Q11 Q5E QB0 R.K RIG ROL RPD RX1 RXW SA0 SUPJJ TAE TH9 TN5 UB1 UBW UBY UHB V8K VQA W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WIH WII WMRSR WOHZO WQZ WRC WSUWO WXSBR XG1 XOL XSW YCJ YHZ YNT YR2 YYP YZZ ZCG ZXP ZZTAW ~45 ~8M ~A~ ~IA ~OT ~OU ~OV ~OW ~PJ ~PN ~WP AAMNL ACRPL ACYXJ G8K AAJUZ AAPBV ABCVL ABPTK ABSRN ACXME ADDAD AFMIJ AFVGU AGJLS AJYWA BPQBL IQODW 7U4 7UB 8BJ BHHNA DWI FQK JBE WZK |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-i4595-aceaae5215b293780678b274d439c6618f27565d2c2e65c52ab143eae73073bd3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0038-4941 |
| IngestDate | Wed Dec 04 06:34:22 EST 2024 Wed Dec 04 09:50:37 EST 2024 Wed Dec 04 09:43:05 EST 2024 Thu Oct 10 19:51:01 EDT 2024 Wed Dec 20 09:38:20 EST 2023 Sat Aug 24 01:08:54 EDT 2024 Tue Dec 10 23:17:25 EST 2024 Wed Oct 30 09:55:44 EDT 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Political attitude Political Participation Social Integration Voting Behaviour Government Political life Perception Political Commitment Handicapped Political opinion |
| Language | English |
| License | CC BY 4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i4595-aceaae5215b293780678b274d439c6618f27565d2c2e65c52ab143eae73073bd3 |
| Notes | Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations ark:/67375/WNG-G135TL61-X ArticleID:SSQU885 Surveys on voter turnout are subject to overreporting, but there is no reason to think that any under- or overreporting differs by disability status, as discussed in Schur et al. (). The 2006 GSS has a measure of voter turnout in 2004, and the 2007 Maxwell poll has a measure of general voting likelihood. We analyzed these data as well (results available on request), but here focus on the more recent CPS data with a much greater sample size. istex:F19EB1B3784BE3E21D927A858F58A3C7F456AD93 National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research - No. H133B980042-99 U.S. Department of Education All data are public, and the programs used to generate results are available from the authors. We thank Doug Kruse for valuable discussions and assistance. Funding for the disability module for the 2006 General Social Survey was provided by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Grant No. H133B980042–99, and the Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations. Funding for the disability module on the Maxwell Poll of Citizenship and Inequality was provided by a BBI Innovation Grant to Professor Jeffrey Stonecash of the Maxwell School on Citizenship and Public Affairs. The authors wish to thank Peter Blanck and James Schmeling of Syracuse University and Tom Smith of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago for their work in arranging the General Social Survey disability module, and Professor Stonecash for arranging the Maxwell Poll disability module. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
| PQID | 1419484739 |
| PQPubID | 426337 |
| PageCount | 29 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1438560893 proquest_miscellaneous_1438550646 proquest_miscellaneous_1428511904 proquest_journals_1419484739 pascalfrancis_primary_27619211 wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1540_6237_2012_00885_x_SSQU885 jstor_primary_42864162 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_G135TL61_X |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | September 2013 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2013 text: September 2013 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Hoboken, NJ |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken, NJ – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | Social science quarterly |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Social Science Quarterly |
| PublicationYear | 2013 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Southwestern Social Science Association Wiley |
| Publisher_xml | – sequence: 0 name: Southwestern Social Science Association – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley |
| References | Scotch, Richard. 1988. "Disability as the Basis for a Social Movement: Advocacy and the Politics of Definition." Journal of Social Issues 44:159-72. Shields, Todd, Kay Schriner, and Ken Schriner. 1998. "The Disability Voice in American Politics: Political Participation of People with Disabilities in the 1994 Election." Journal of Disability Policy Studies 9:33-52. Anspach, Renee. 1979. "From Stigma to Identity Politics: Political Activism Among the Physically Disabled and Former Mental Patients." Social Science and Medicine 13A:765-73. Clarke, Harold, David Sanders, Marianne Stewart, and Paul Whiteley. 2006. "Taking the Bloom Off New Labour's Rose: Party Choice and Voter Turnout in Britain, 2005." Journal of Elections, Public Opinions, and Parties 16(1):3-36. Schur, Lisa, Todd Shields, Douglas Kruse, and Kay Schriner. 2002. "Enabling Democracy: Disability and Voter Turnout." Political Research Quarterly 55(1):167-90. Schur, Lisa, Todd Shields, and Kay Schriner. 2003. "Can I Make a Difference? Efficacy, Employment, and Disability." Political Psychology 24(1):119-49. Gastil, John. 2000. "The Political Beliefs and Orientations of People with Disabilities." Social Science Quarterly 81:588-603. Erickson, W., C. Lee, and S. von Schrader. 2009. 2008 Disability Status Report: The United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Demographics and Statistics. GAO. 2009. More Polling Places Had No Potential Impediments than in 2000, but Challenges Remain. GAO-09-685. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. Conway, M. Margaret. 2000. Political Participation in the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly. Lav, Richard R., and Caroline Heldman. 2009. "Self-Interest, Symbolic Attitudes, and Multilevel Analysis." Political Psychology 30(4):513-37. Rosenstone, Steven, and John Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Tokaji, Daniel P., and Ruth Colker. 2007. "Absentee Voting by People with Disabilities: Promoting Access and Integrity." McGeorge Law Review 38:1015-64. Verba, Sidney, Kay Schlozman, and Henry Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schur, L. 2003. "Contending with the 'Double Handicap': Political Activism Among Women with Disabilities." Women and Politics 15(2):31-62. Schur, Lisa, and Douglas Kruse. 2000. "What Determines Voter Turnout? Lessons from Citizens with Disabilities." Social Science Quarterly 81(2):571-87. Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Harris. 2010. The ADA: 20 Years Later, Kessler Foundation/NOD Survey of Americans with Disabilities. New York: Harris Interactive. Schneider, Anne, and Helen Ingram. 1993. "Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy." American Political Science Review 87(2):334-47. Yuker, Harold, ed. 1988. Attitudes Toward Persons with Disabilities. New York: Springer. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 1983. Accommodating the Spectrum of Individual Abilities, Clearinghouse Publication 81. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Hahn, Harlan. 1985. "Toward a Politics of Disability: Definitions, Disciplines, and Policies." Social Science Journal 22:87-105. Harris. 2004. 2004 N.O.D./Harris Survey of Americans with Disabilities. New York: Harris Interactive. Kruse, Douglas, Lisa Schur, Kay Schriner, and Todd Shields. 2001. Fact Sheet on Voter Turnout, Voting Difficulties, and Disability in the 2000 Elections. New Brunswick, NJ: School of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers University. Baldwin, Marjorie L., and Steven C. Marcus. 2007. "Labor Market Outcomes of Persons with Mental Disorders." Industrial Relations 46(3):481-510. Schriner, Kay, Lisa Ochs, and Todd Shields. 1997. "The Last Suffrage Movement: Voting Rights for People with Cognitive and Emotional Disabilities," Publius 27(3):75-96. Albrecht, Gary L., ed. 1976. The Sociology of Physical Disability and Rehabilitation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Jolls, Christine. 2004. "Identifying the Effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act Using State-Law Variation: Preliminary Evidence on Educational Participation Effects." American Economic Review 94:447-53. Anderson, Marian. R. 2009. "Community Psychology, Political Efficacy, and Trust." Political Psychology 31(1):59-84. Shapiro, Joseph. 1993. No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Random House. Kruse, Douglas. 1998. "Persons with Disabilities: Demographic, Income, and Health Care Characteristics." Monthly Labor Review 121(9):13-22. Karlawish, J. H., and R. J. Bonnie. 2007. "Voting by Elderly Persons with Cognitive Impairment: Lessons from Other Democratic Nations." McGeorge Law Review 38:880-916. StatsRRTC. 2011. 2011 Annual Disability Statistics Compendium. Durham, NH: Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire. 2011 2010 2006; 16 1993; 87 2002; 55 1976 2009 1998 2008 1996 2003; 15 2006 1997; 27 1995 2005 2004 1993 1985; 22 2007; 38 2004; 94 2009; 30 2009; 31 2001 2000 2003; 24 1988; 44 2000; 81 1983 1979; 13A 1998; 121 2007; 46 1998; 9 1988 |
| References_xml | – volume: 38 start-page: 880 year: 2007 end-page: 916 article-title: Voting by Elderly Persons with Cognitive Impairment: Lessons from Other Democratic Nations publication-title: McGeorge Law Review – volume: 30 start-page: 513 issue: 4 year: 2009 end-page: 37 article-title: Self‐Interest, Symbolic Attitudes, and Multilevel Analysis publication-title: Political Psychology – year: 2011 – year: 2009 – year: 1983 – volume: 24 start-page: 119 issue: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 49 article-title: Can I Make a Difference? Efficacy, Employment, and Disability publication-title: Political Psychology – year: 2005 – volume: 81 start-page: 588 year: 2000 end-page: 603 article-title: The Political Beliefs and Orientations of People with Disabilities publication-title: Social Science Quarterly – volume: 46 start-page: 481 issue: 3 year: 2007 end-page: 510 article-title: Labor Market Outcomes of Persons with Mental Disorders publication-title: Industrial Relations – volume: 16 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 36 article-title: Taking the Bloom Off New Labour's Rose: Party Choice and Voter Turnout in ritain, 2005 publication-title: Journal of Elections, Public Opinions, and Parties – volume: 121 start-page: 13 issue: 9 year: 1998 end-page: 22 article-title: Persons with Disabilities: Demographic, Income, and Health Care Characteristics publication-title: Monthly Labor Review – year: 2001 – volume: 38 start-page: 1015 year: 2007 end-page: 64 article-title: Absentee Voting by People with Disabilities: Promoting Access and Integrity publication-title: McGeorge Law Review – year: 2000 – year: 1996 – volume: 87 start-page: 334 issue: 2 year: 1993 end-page: 47 article-title: Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy publication-title: American Political Science Review – volume: 81 start-page: 571 issue: 2 year: 2000 end-page: 87 article-title: What Determines Voter Turnout? Lessons from Citizens with Disabilities publication-title: Social Science Quarterly – year: 2010 – year: 1998 – volume: 44 start-page: 159 year: 1988 end-page: 72 article-title: Disability as the Basis for a Social Movement: Advocacy and the Politics of Definition publication-title: Journal of Social Issues – volume: 27 start-page: 75 issue: 3 year: 1997 end-page: 96 article-title: The Last Suffrage Movement: Voting Rights for People with Cognitive and Emotional Disabilities publication-title: Publius – year: 2008 – year: 1988 – volume: 31 start-page: 59 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 84 article-title: Community Psychology, Political Efficacy, and Trust publication-title: Political Psychology – year: 2006 – year: 2004 – volume: 94 start-page: 447 year: 2004 end-page: 53 article-title: Identifying the Effects of the mericans with Disabilities Act Using State‐Law Variation: Preliminary Evidence on Educational Participation Effects publication-title: American Economic Review – year: 1995 – volume: 9 start-page: 33 year: 1998 end-page: 52 article-title: The Disability Voice in merican Politics: Political Participation of People with Disabilities in the 1994 Election publication-title: Journal of Disability Policy Studies – volume: 22 start-page: 87 year: 1985 end-page: 105 article-title: Toward a Politics of Disability: Definitions, Disciplines, and Policies publication-title: Social Science Journal – year: 1976 – year: 1993 – volume: 13A start-page: 765 year: 1979 end-page: 73 article-title: From Stigma to Identity Politics: Political Activism Among the Physically Disabled and Former Mental Patients publication-title: Social Science and Medicine – volume: 15 start-page: 31 issue: 2 year: 2003 end-page: 62 article-title: Contending with the ‘Double Handicap’: Political Activism Among Women with Disabilities publication-title: Women and Politics – volume: 55 start-page: 167 issue: 1 year: 2002 end-page: 90 article-title: Enabling Democracy: Disability and Voter Turnout publication-title: Political Research Quarterly |
| SSID | ssj0004248 |
| Score | 2.351555 |
| Snippet | Objective. We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political... Objective We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political... We examine whether people with disabilities are part of the political mainstream, or remain outsiders in important respects, by studying political... |
| SourceID | proquest pascalfrancis wiley jstor istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 811 |
| SubjectTerms | Age Attitudes Citizens Disabilities Disability Education Employment Government officials Health Care Services Health Care Services Policy Participation and Politics People with disabilities Physically Handicapped Political Attitudes Political behavior Political behaviour Political elections Political Participation Political parties Political sociology Politics Public Policy Rating Social sciences Sociology Sociology of disability Sociology of health and medicine Trust Voter turnout Voters Voting |
| Title | Sidelined or Mainstreamed? Political Participation and Attitudes of People with Disabilities in the United States |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-G135TL61-X/fulltext.pdf https://www.jstor.org/stable/42864162 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6237.2012.00885.x https://www.proquest.com/docview/1419484739 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1428511904 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1438550646 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1438560893 |
| Volume | 94 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrZ3La9wwEMaHklMvfYe6SYMCobQHL7EsyfaphOZFaULazdK9ibEsw7LgbfcBoX99Z2Svu1tKA6W3Bcv22p6RfiN__gRwJJ0vTa0peFODsUpYBICmiGtifTQE9BhENFfX5nKkPo71uNM_8bcwrT9EP-HGmRH6a05wLBfbSc4v9Wn4zlihxb6bea4HzJNJmrG67_TLLycpJVXbKVN-q0Il26KePx6IcJXv9N1aqciySVzQnavbJS-2mHSTbMPQdP4YpuuLahUp08FqWQ7cj9_8Hv_PVT-BRx3BipM25J7CA988g6j9zFd0XcVCvO38rN89h-9DttKiM1diNhdXOGHTWo80DL8XnfyO9rzBDYG3wKYSJ0uWMVR0sFktboLSXfC0sTjtfIHZC1ZMGkEMK1p2Fi07v4DR-dnth8u4W-khnihd6BidR_REErok_MhyHkJLqpcrwiVHBJHX7FKvK-mkN9ppiSVxnkefcRdVVuku7DSzxr8EkbsaFeYuMYSCSV1grb1TMsNceypFMYI34anab62bh8X5lMVtmbZfry_sRZLq208mseMIdsNj7xtSoWYIX2UEB1tx0DeQPCVEBXUE--vAsF2PsKASKykUoUBaRHDYb6Zc5hc02PjZittIBuDiWP2tTcoedEaZe9qYY0LRCEyIpv4_btR8mlV9FEeW48iGOLJ3djj8PKJfr_51xz14KMOKISzD24ed5XzlXxO3LcuDkJE_ASxfNCk |
| link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,1375,27924,27925,46294,46718 |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrZ3fb9MwEMdPaDzAC78nwsYwEkLwkGpxbCd5QhNjK9BWg7aib9YlcaRqKGX9IU389dw5aWkRAgnxVilO0iR39uecb74GeCELl5tKU_DGBkMVsQgATRZWxPpoCOjRi2j6A9Mdqw8TPWmXA-JvYRp_iM2EG2eG7685wXlCejfL-a0-jd8JS7TYeDNNdYeA8iZlf8T6rtPPP72klFRNt0wZrjIV7cp6fnskAla-19drrSILJ3FB965qFr3YodJttvWD09ld-Lq-rEaTctlZLfNO8f0Xx8f_dN334E4LseKkibr7cMPVDyBovvQVbW-xEK9aS-vXD-FqyG5adOpSzOaij1P2rXVII_Eb0SrwaM8L3NJ4C6xLcbJkJUNJB5tV4sKL3QXPHIvT1hqY7WDFtBaEsaLBZ9Hg8yMYn70bve2G7WIP4VTpTIdYOERHMKFzIpAk5VE0p5K5JGIqCCLSio3qdSkL6YwutMScUM-hS7iXyst4H_bqWe0eg0iLChWmRWSIBqMqw0q7QskEU-2oGsUAXvrHar81hh4W55esb0u0_TI4t-dRrEc9E9lJAPv-uW8aUq1miGBlAEc7gbBpIHlWiGrqAA7XkWHbTmFBVVaUKaKBOAvg-WYzpTO_o8HazVbcRjIDZ8fqT21itqEzyvyljTkmGg3A-HDa_Metsk-zsI_iyHIcWR9H9toOh5_G9OvJv-74DG51R_2e7b0ffDyA29IvIMKqvEPYW85X7ilh3DI_8un5A3oVOEo |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrZ3fi9NAEMcHuQPxRc8fh9HzXEFEH1Ium91t8iSHtXfqXan2in1bJskGSiE9-wMO_3pnNmlsRRTEt0I2SZPM7H5m8813AV7K3GWm1BS8scFQRSwCQJOGJbE-GgJ69CKay4E5H6uPEz1p9E_8LUztD9FOuHFm-P6aE_y6KHeTnF_q0_DdZYUW-24mie4QT-4rI1P20e99-WklpaSqe2VKcJWqaFfV89sjEa_yrb7ZSBVZN4lLunVlvebFDpRuo60fm_r3YLa5qlqSMuusV1kn__6L4eP_uewDuNsgrDitY-4-3HLVAwjq73xF01csxevG0PrNQ_g2Yi8tOnMh5gtxiVN2rXVI4_Bb0ejvaM8hbim8BVaFOF2xjqGgg81LMfRSd8HzxqLXGAOzGayYVoIgVtTwLGp4fgTj_vurd-dhs9RDOFU61SHmDtERSuiM-KOb8BiaUcFcEC_lhBBJyTb1upC5dEbnWmJGoOfQdbmPyor4EPaqeeUeg0jyEhUmeWSIBaMyxVK7XMkuJtpRLYoBvPJP1V7Xdh4WFzNWt3W1_To4s2dRrK8uTGQnARz6x942pErNEL_KAI534qBtIHlOiCrqAI42gWGbLmFJNVaUKmKBOA3gRbuZkpnf0GDl5mtuI5mA0xP1pzYxm9AZZf7SxpwQiwZgfDS1_3Gr6NMs66M4shxH1seRvbGj0ecx_Xryrzs-h9vDXt9efBh8egp3pF89hCV5R7C3WqzdM2K4VXbsk_MHlN02-Q |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sidelined+or+Mainstreamed%3F+Political+Participation+and+Attitudes+of+People+with+Disabilities+in+the+United+States&rft.jtitle=Social+science+quarterly&rft.au=Schur%2C+Lisa&rft.au=Adya%2C+Meera&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0038-4941&rft.eissn=1540-6237&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6237.2012.00885.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=3042466401 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0038-4941&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0038-4941&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0038-4941&client=summon |