How the observed create ethical dilemmas for the observers: Experiences from studies conducted in clinical settings in the UK and Australia

Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNursing & health sciences Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 410 - 414
Main Authors Bloomer, Melissa J., Doman, Maggie, Endacott, Ruth
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1441-0745
1442-2018
1442-2018
DOI10.1111/nhs.12052

Cover

Abstract Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings.
AbstractList Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings.
Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings.Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings.
Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings. Adapted from the source document.
Author Endacott, Ruth
Doman, Maggie
Bloomer, Melissa J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Melissa J.
  surname: Bloomer
  fullname: Bloomer, Melissa J.
  email: melissa.bloomer@monash.edu
  organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Maggie
  surname: Doman
  fullname: Doman, Maggie
  organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Education and Society, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ruth
  surname: Endacott
  fullname: Endacott, Ruth
  organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23656564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkk1v1DAQhi1URL848AeQJS5c0tqO7cTcqlW7W6gKUqlAXCzHmbIuibPYTj9-Q_80zm6pEBewDx7PPO8rjWZ20ZYfPCD0ipIDms-hX8YDyohgz9AO5ZwVjNB6ax3TglRcbKPdGK9JzhJRvkDbrJQiX76DHhbDLU5LwEMTIdxAi20AkwBDWjprOty6DvreRHw1hD_BEN_h47sVBAfeQi6Hoccxja3LHzv4drQpuzmPbef82ipCSs5_j1Nycrr8gI1v8dEYUzCdM_vo-ZXpIrx8fPfQ5cnx59miOPs4P50dnRWOc8UK2nJhalMyKSytQbWq5hKotJTUpAEFXJqmkdRUnJeWskqRLGusEJQxQ3m5h95ufFdh-DlCTLp30ULXGQ_DGDWVRAmiuFD_RrmSUnJVVf-BSkGr7Mky-uYv9HoYg889TxSr65qJyfD1IzU2PbR6FVxvwr3-PbwMHG6A2zyj-6c6JXraCp23Qq-3Qp8vLtZBVhQbhYsJ7p4UJvzQsiorob-cz_W8ev-1nH37pOvyF-kGuRo
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
– notice: 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
DBID BSCLL
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QJ
ASE
FPQ
K6X
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
DOI 10.1111/nhs.12052
DatabaseName Istex
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
British Nursing Index
British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
British Nursing Index
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
British Nursing Index

MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Nursing
EISSN 1442-2018
EndPage 414
ExternalDocumentID 3142921141
23656564
NHS12052
ark_67375_WNG_G7JX3CZP_8
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Nurses' Memorial Centre, Victoria, Australia
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
07C
0R~
10A
123
1OC
29N
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAKAS
AANLZ
AAONW
AAQQT
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACHQT
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EIHBH
EJD
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
ML0
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WEIWN
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQ9
WQJ
WRC
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AFWVQ
ALVPJ
AGHNM
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QJ
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
ASE
FPQ
K6X
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-i4492-1d45a8a3265c18e9d9846e16c1080be9e46abb61a7443c12790492bc55122a143
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1441-0745
1442-2018
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 19:28:26 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:30:08 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:55:49 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 07 13:20:49 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:41 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:29:58 EST 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:56:01 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords qualitative research
ethics
clinical research
observation
vulnerable population
Language English
License 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i4492-1d45a8a3265c18e9d9846e16c1080be9e46abb61a7443c12790492bc55122a143
Notes Nurses' Memorial Centre, Victoria, Australia
istex:DB6349F7832E54B5401DA5A83C6904DA45FDF74E
ark:/67375/WNG-G7JX3CZP-8
ArticleID:NHS12052
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 23656564
PQID 1462888257
PQPubID 46242
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1609509459
proquest_miscellaneous_1496664977
proquest_miscellaneous_1465175932
proquest_journals_1462888257
pubmed_primary_23656564
wiley_primary_10_1111_nhs_12052_NHS12052
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_G7JX3CZP_8
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2013
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2013
  text: December 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Australia
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Australia
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Nursing & health sciences
PublicationTitleAlternate Nurs Health Sci
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: General Medical Council, 2006.
Resnik D, Ness E. Participants' responsibilities in clinical research. J. Med. Ethics 2012; 38: 746-750.
Griffiths P. Ethical conduct and the nurse ethnographer: consideration of an ethic of care. J. Res. Nurs. 2008; 13: 350-361.
Morse JM. Perspectives of the observer and the observed. Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 155-157.
Oeye C, Bjellans AK, Skorpen A. Doing participant observation in a psychiatric hospital - research ethics resumed. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007; 65: 2296-2306.
Goodwin D, Pope C, Mort M, Smith A. Ethics and ethnography: an experiential account. Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 567-577.
Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code: Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwives. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2008.
Buchanan DR, Miller FG. A public health perspective on research ethics. J. Med. Ethics 2006; 32: 729-733.
Liamputtong P. Researching the Vulnerable. London: Sage Publications, 2006.
Beattie ERA, VandenBosch TM. The concept of vulnerability and the protection of human subjects of research. Res. Theory Nurs. Pract. 2007; 21: 156-173.
Mattingly C. Toward a vulnerable ethics of research practice. Health 2005; 9: 453-471.
Minichiello V , Sullivan G , Greenwood K , Axford R (eds). Handbook of Research Methods for Nursing and Health Science. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia, 2004.
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government, 2007.
Schneider Z, Whitehead D, Elliott D, Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing and Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice, Marrickville. Sydney: Elsevier, 2007.
Brink P, Edgecombe N. What is becoming of ethnography? Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 1028-1030.
Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.
Mill J. On Liberty (1999 edn). London: Longman, Roberts & Green, 1869.
O'Leary Z. Researching Real-World Problems: A Guide to Methods of Inquiry. London: Sage Publications, 2005.
Mulhall A. In the field: notes on observation in qualitative research. J. Adv. Nurs. 2003; 41: 306-313.
Murphy E, Dingwall R. Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007; 65: 2223-2234.
Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Allen D. Ethno-methodological insights into insider-outsider relationships in nursing ethnographies of healthcare settings. Nurs. Inq. 2004; 11: 14-24.
Bloomer M, Cross W, Endacott R, O'Connor M, Moss C. Qualitative observation in a clinical setting: challenges at end of life. Nurs. Health Sci. 2012; 14: 25-31.
Biros MH, Baren JM. The ethics of observation. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2009; 16: 908-910.
Bonner A, Tolhurst G. Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Res. 2002; 9: 7-19.
2004; 11
2002; 9
2001
2006; 32
2005; 9
2009
2003; 13
2008
2007
2006
2008; 13
2005
2004
2012; 38
2012; 14
2007; 21
2007; 65
2003; 41
2009; 16
1869
References_xml – reference: Mill J. On Liberty (1999 edn). London: Longman, Roberts & Green, 1869.
– reference: Minichiello V , Sullivan G , Greenwood K , Axford R (eds). Handbook of Research Methods for Nursing and Health Science. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia, 2004.
– reference: O'Leary Z. Researching Real-World Problems: A Guide to Methods of Inquiry. London: Sage Publications, 2005.
– reference: Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.
– reference: Oeye C, Bjellans AK, Skorpen A. Doing participant observation in a psychiatric hospital - research ethics resumed. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007; 65: 2296-2306.
– reference: Bloomer M, Cross W, Endacott R, O'Connor M, Moss C. Qualitative observation in a clinical setting: challenges at end of life. Nurs. Health Sci. 2012; 14: 25-31.
– reference: Resnik D, Ness E. Participants' responsibilities in clinical research. J. Med. Ethics 2012; 38: 746-750.
– reference: Murphy E, Dingwall R. Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007; 65: 2223-2234.
– reference: Brink P, Edgecombe N. What is becoming of ethnography? Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 1028-1030.
– reference: Mulhall A. In the field: notes on observation in qualitative research. J. Adv. Nurs. 2003; 41: 306-313.
– reference: Schneider Z, Whitehead D, Elliott D, Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing and Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice, Marrickville. Sydney: Elsevier, 2007.
– reference: Mattingly C. Toward a vulnerable ethics of research practice. Health 2005; 9: 453-471.
– reference: Biros MH, Baren JM. The ethics of observation. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2009; 16: 908-910.
– reference: Liamputtong P. Researching the Vulnerable. London: Sage Publications, 2006.
– reference: Goodwin D, Pope C, Mort M, Smith A. Ethics and ethnography: an experiential account. Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 567-577.
– reference: Allen D. Ethno-methodological insights into insider-outsider relationships in nursing ethnographies of healthcare settings. Nurs. Inq. 2004; 11: 14-24.
– reference: Morse JM. Perspectives of the observer and the observed. Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 155-157.
– reference: Griffiths P. Ethical conduct and the nurse ethnographer: consideration of an ethic of care. J. Res. Nurs. 2008; 13: 350-361.
– reference: Beattie ERA, VandenBosch TM. The concept of vulnerability and the protection of human subjects of research. Res. Theory Nurs. Pract. 2007; 21: 156-173.
– reference: General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: General Medical Council, 2006.
– reference: Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code: Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwives. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2008.
– reference: Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
– reference: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government, 2007.
– reference: Bonner A, Tolhurst G. Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Res. 2002; 9: 7-19.
– reference: Buchanan DR, Miller FG. A public health perspective on research ethics. J. Med. Ethics 2006; 32: 729-733.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 156
  year: 2007
  end-page: 173
  article-title: The concept of vulnerability and the protection of human subjects of research
  publication-title: Res. Theory Nurs. Pract.
– volume: 14
  start-page: 25
  year: 2012
  end-page: 31
  article-title: Qualitative observation in a clinical setting: challenges at end of life
  publication-title: Nurs. Health Sci.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1028
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1030
  article-title: What is becoming of ethnography?
  publication-title: Qual. Health Res.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 155
  year: 2003
  end-page: 157
  article-title: Perspectives of the observer and the observed
  publication-title: Qual. Health Res.
– volume: 65
  start-page: 2296
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2306
  article-title: Doing participant observation in a psychiatric hospital – research ethics resumed
  publication-title: Soc. Sci. Med.
– year: 2009
– volume: 16
  start-page: 908
  year: 2009
  end-page: 910
  article-title: The ethics of observation
  publication-title: Acad. Emerg. Med.
– start-page: 5625
  year: 2001
  end-page: 5628
– volume: 32
  start-page: 729
  year: 2006
  end-page: 733
  article-title: A public health perspective on research ethics
  publication-title: J. Med. Ethics
– volume: 65
  start-page: 2223
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2234
  article-title: Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice
  publication-title: Soc. Sci. Med.
– year: 2005
– volume: 13
  start-page: 350
  year: 2008
  end-page: 361
  article-title: Ethical conduct and the nurse ethnographer: consideration of an ethic of care
  publication-title: J. Res. Nurs.
– volume: 11
  start-page: 14
  year: 2004
  end-page: 24
  article-title: Ethno‐methodological insights into insider–outsider relationships in nursing ethnographies of healthcare settings
  publication-title: Nurs. Inq.
– year: 2007
– volume: 9
  start-page: 453
  year: 2005
  end-page: 471
  article-title: Toward a vulnerable ethics of research practice
  publication-title: Health
– year: 2008
– year: 2006
– volume: 13
  start-page: 567
  year: 2003
  end-page: 577
  article-title: Ethics and ethnography: an experiential account
  publication-title: Qual. Health Res.
– year: 2004
– volume: 38
  start-page: 746
  year: 2012
  end-page: 750
  article-title: Participants' responsibilities in clinical research
  publication-title: J. Med. Ethics
– volume: 9
  start-page: 7
  year: 2002
  end-page: 19
  article-title: Insider–outsider perspectives of participant observation
  publication-title: Nurse Res.
– year: 1869
– volume: 41
  start-page: 306
  year: 2003
  end-page: 313
  article-title: In the field: notes on observation in qualitative research
  publication-title: J. Adv. Nurs.
SSID ssj0018053
Score 1.9744487
Snippet Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 410
SubjectTerms Adult
Anthropology, Cultural - ethics
Australia
Beneficence
Child
Clinical medicine
Clinical research
Controversy
Data Collection - ethics
Data Collection - methods
Ethical dilemmas
ethics
Human subjects
Humans
Medical ethics
observation
Observation - methods
Observational research
Observational studies
Observer Variation
Participatory research
Pediatric Nursing - ethics
Personal Autonomy
Power
Professional Misconduct
Professional-Patient Relations - ethics
Qualitative Research
Redundant
Research Subjects - psychology
Researcher-Subject Relations - ethics
Robustness
Terminal Care - ethics
United Kingdom
Vulnerability
vulnerable population
Vulnerable Populations
Title How the observed create ethical dilemmas for the observers: Experiences from studies conducted in clinical settings in the UK and Australia
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-G7JX3CZP-8/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fnhs.12052
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23656564
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1462888257
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1465175932
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1496664977
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1609509459
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3batwwEB1CoJCX3tKL27QoUEpfvERaybaap5ImWRK6lLZLl1IwkqUlIaxd1rs05Bfy052RL0lLCKFvxhrJsjUjnRmPjgDeWG1pl5OMlXIyltrz2HiexE4XqafNmG5GAf1P42Q0kUdTNV2D3W4vTMMP0QfcyDLCfE0Gbmx9zcjLk3rAxY6i-ZcPE-LN__ilp47i2U5goCR_IcZlUrWsQpTF09dEQErf8vwmdPk3WA2rzcED-Nn1s0kyORuslnZQXPxD4fifL_IQ7rcolH1o1OYRrPnyMdxrIwebcDmqfjNEhqyyFLT1jgVs6Zmn7His6PBB87mpGULe64KL-j27Ik_G4kU1Z3WTqsjQ8yZyWWzttGTdjkxW-5B5XdNNamlyzEzpWB-DeQKTg_1ve6O4PbUhPpVSi5g7qUxmEBaqgmdeO40QB4e_oGxG67WXibE24SaVclhwkWp0UoQtELoJYRC-PYX1sir9c2DaOYnFNskyL53wZmZQfeiIGjmbWSEieBvGL__VMHPkZnFGiWqpyr-PD_PD9Gg63PvxOc8i2OoGOG9ttCanR6D_j3NWBNt9MVoX_TIxpa9WQUYhwEKQe5sMuoyJRCB9iwzx-qEnrXQEzxoF6zsthgmhahnBu6AmfUHnn6GC5EFB8vHoa7h4cXfRl7Ah6ASPkIGzBevLxcq_Qhy1tK-DwfwBUMAYRQ
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9QwFD4sK6Iv3i_VVSOI-NJhm0naRnyR1d26l0F0BwdBQtJkcFmmlekMin_BP-056cVVZBHfSnOaXnJO-32nJ18AnlhlaZaTiKV0IhbKJ7HxSRo7VWaeJmO6OSX0jyZpMRX7MznbgBf9XJhWH2JIuFFkhPc1BTglpM9EefW5GSV8W-IL-IJAoEHU69W7QTwqybeDBiUxhhg_lLLTFaI6nuFQhKT0NL_9DV_-DlfD92b3Knzqr7QtMzkdrVd2VH7_Q8Txf2_lGlzpgCh72XrOddjw1Q242CUPbsKPov7KEByy2lLe1jsW4KVnngrk8UCHZ1osTMMQ9Z41XDbP2S_9ZGxe1gvWtNWKDMk36ctibycV6ydlssaH4uuGdlJP0wNmKseGNMwtmO6-Pt4p4m7hhvhECMXjxAlpcoPIUJZJ7pVTiHLQA0oqaLReeZEaa9PEZEKMy4RnCnkKtyWiN84NIrjbsFnVlb8LTDknsNmmee6F497MDXoQrVIj5nPLeQRPwwDqL604hzbLU6pVy6T-MNnTe9n-bLzz8a3OI9jqR1h3YdoQ7-E5cgyZRfB4aMYAo78mpvL1OthIxFiIc8-zQdaYCsTS59iQtB-SaakiuNN62HDRfJwSsBYRPAt-MjT0FA0dRAcH0ZPifdi49--mj-BScXx0qA_fTA7uw2VOC3qEgpwt2Fwt1_4BwqqVfRii5yfOWRxk
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1tb9MwEMdP0xCINzCeMzYwEkK8SbW4dhKzV2ijKxtUE1BRTUiRHTvaNDWZmlYgvgJfmjvngYHQhHhX1Zc0re-S313PfwM8N8rQKicRSmlFKJSLQu2iOLQqTxwtxrQFFfTfT-LxVBzO5GwNdru1MI0-RF9wo8jw92sK8AtbXAry8rQeRHxH4v33moiRJIiIPvTaUVG64yUoKWEI8TkpW1khauPpD0UipR_z29_w8nda9Y-b0W340l1o02VyPlgtzSD__oeG439-kw241WIoe934zR1Yc-VduN6WDu7Bj3H1lSEasspQ1dZZ5uHSMUft8XigxQ-az3XNkHkvGy7qV-yXejIOL6o5q5teRYapN6nL4tnOStYtyWS1863XNb1JZ5oeMV1a1hdh7sN09ObT3jhst20Iz4RQPIyskDrVyIUyj1KnrELGwfnPqZ3ROOVErI2JI50IMcwjnijMUrjJkd0418hvD2C9rEr3CJiyVuCwidPUCcudLjT6D-1RI4rCcB7ACz9_2UUjzZHpxTl1qiUy-zw5yA6Sw9lw7-Q4SwPY6iY4a4O0pqyHp5hhyCSAZ_0whhf9Z6JLV628jUTCQsq9ygZzxlggSV9hQ8J-mEpLFcDDxsH6i-bDmLBaBPDSu0k_0CVo6CCZd5BsMv7oX2z-u-lTuHG8P8revZ0cPYabnHbz8N04W7C-XKzcNjLV0jzxsfMTZOcbEw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+the+observed+create+ethical+dilemmas+for+the+observers%3A+Experiences+from+studies+conducted+in+clinical+settings+in+the+UK+and+Australia&rft.jtitle=Nursing+%26+health+sciences&rft.au=Bloomer%2C+Melissa+J.&rft.au=Doman%2C+Maggie&rft.au=Endacott%2C+Ruth&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.issn=1441-0745&rft.eissn=1442-2018&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fnhs.12052&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fnhs.12052&rft.externalDocID=NHS12052
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1441-0745&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1441-0745&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1441-0745&client=summon