How the observed create ethical dilemmas for the observers: Experiences from studies conducted in clinical settings in the UK and Australia
Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this s...
Saved in:
Published in | Nursing & health sciences Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 410 - 414 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Australia
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1441-0745 1442-2018 1442-2018 |
DOI | 10.1111/nhs.12052 |
Cover
Abstract | Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings. Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings.Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings. Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings. Adapted from the source document. |
Author | Endacott, Ruth Doman, Maggie Bloomer, Melissa J. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Melissa J. surname: Bloomer fullname: Bloomer, Melissa J. email: melissa.bloomer@monash.edu organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia – sequence: 2 givenname: Maggie surname: Doman fullname: Doman, Maggie organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Education and Society, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: Ruth surname: Endacott fullname: Endacott, Ruth organization: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23656564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkk1v1DAQhi1URL848AeQJS5c0tqO7cTcqlW7W6gKUqlAXCzHmbIuibPYTj9-Q_80zm6pEBewDx7PPO8rjWZ20ZYfPCD0ipIDms-hX8YDyohgz9AO5ZwVjNB6ax3TglRcbKPdGK9JzhJRvkDbrJQiX76DHhbDLU5LwEMTIdxAi20AkwBDWjprOty6DvreRHw1hD_BEN_h47sVBAfeQi6Hoccxja3LHzv4drQpuzmPbef82ipCSs5_j1Nycrr8gI1v8dEYUzCdM_vo-ZXpIrx8fPfQ5cnx59miOPs4P50dnRWOc8UK2nJhalMyKSytQbWq5hKotJTUpAEFXJqmkdRUnJeWskqRLGusEJQxQ3m5h95ufFdh-DlCTLp30ULXGQ_DGDWVRAmiuFD_RrmSUnJVVf-BSkGr7Mky-uYv9HoYg889TxSr65qJyfD1IzU2PbR6FVxvwr3-PbwMHG6A2zyj-6c6JXraCp23Qq-3Qp8vLtZBVhQbhYsJ7p4UJvzQsiorob-cz_W8ev-1nH37pOvyF-kGuRo |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. Copyright © 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd – notice: 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. – notice: Copyright © 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
DBID | BSCLL CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ ASE FPQ K6X K9. NAPCQ 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/nhs.12052 |
DatabaseName | Istex Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) British Nursing Index British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present) British Nursing Index ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium British Nursing Index Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) British Nursing Index MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Nursing |
EISSN | 1442-2018 |
EndPage | 414 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3142921141 23656564 NHS12052 ark_67375_WNG_G7JX3CZP_8 |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Multicenter Study Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Nurses' Memorial Centre, Victoria, Australia |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 07C 0R~ 10A 123 1OC 29N 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAKAS AANLZ AAONW AAQQT AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACHQT ACMXC ACPOU ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EIHBH EJD ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 ML0 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SUPJJ TEORI UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WEIWN WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQ9 WQJ WRC WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO AFWVQ ALVPJ AGHNM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ AAMMB AEFGJ AEYWJ AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY ASE FPQ K6X K9. NAPCQ 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-i4492-1d45a8a3265c18e9d9846e16c1080be9e46abb61a7443c12790492bc55122a143 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1441-0745 1442-2018 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 19:28:26 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:30:08 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:55:49 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 07 13:20:49 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:08:41 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:29:58 EST 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:56:01 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | qualitative research ethics clinical research observation vulnerable population |
Language | English |
License | 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i4492-1d45a8a3265c18e9d9846e16c1080be9e46abb61a7443c12790492bc55122a143 |
Notes | Nurses' Memorial Centre, Victoria, Australia istex:DB6349F7832E54B5401DA5A83C6904DA45FDF74E ark:/67375/WNG-G7JX3CZP-8 ArticleID:NHS12052 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 23656564 |
PQID | 1462888257 |
PQPubID | 46242 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1609509459 proquest_miscellaneous_1496664977 proquest_miscellaneous_1465175932 proquest_journals_1462888257 pubmed_primary_23656564 wiley_primary_10_1111_nhs_12052_NHS12052 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_G7JX3CZP_8 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | December 2013 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2013 text: December 2013 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Australia |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Australia – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | Nursing & health sciences |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Nurs Health Sci |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
References | General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: General Medical Council, 2006. Resnik D, Ness E. Participants' responsibilities in clinical research. J. Med. Ethics 2012; 38: 746-750. Griffiths P. Ethical conduct and the nurse ethnographer: consideration of an ethic of care. J. Res. Nurs. 2008; 13: 350-361. Morse JM. Perspectives of the observer and the observed. Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 155-157. Oeye C, Bjellans AK, Skorpen A. Doing participant observation in a psychiatric hospital - research ethics resumed. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007; 65: 2296-2306. Goodwin D, Pope C, Mort M, Smith A. Ethics and ethnography: an experiential account. Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 567-577. Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code: Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwives. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2008. Buchanan DR, Miller FG. A public health perspective on research ethics. J. Med. Ethics 2006; 32: 729-733. Liamputtong P. Researching the Vulnerable. London: Sage Publications, 2006. Beattie ERA, VandenBosch TM. The concept of vulnerability and the protection of human subjects of research. Res. Theory Nurs. Pract. 2007; 21: 156-173. Mattingly C. Toward a vulnerable ethics of research practice. Health 2005; 9: 453-471. Minichiello V , Sullivan G , Greenwood K , Axford R (eds). Handbook of Research Methods for Nursing and Health Science. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia, 2004. National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government, 2007. Schneider Z, Whitehead D, Elliott D, Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing and Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice, Marrickville. Sydney: Elsevier, 2007. Brink P, Edgecombe N. What is becoming of ethnography? Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 1028-1030. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007. Mill J. On Liberty (1999 edn). London: Longman, Roberts & Green, 1869. O'Leary Z. Researching Real-World Problems: A Guide to Methods of Inquiry. London: Sage Publications, 2005. Mulhall A. In the field: notes on observation in qualitative research. J. Adv. Nurs. 2003; 41: 306-313. Murphy E, Dingwall R. Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007; 65: 2223-2234. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. Allen D. Ethno-methodological insights into insider-outsider relationships in nursing ethnographies of healthcare settings. Nurs. Inq. 2004; 11: 14-24. Bloomer M, Cross W, Endacott R, O'Connor M, Moss C. Qualitative observation in a clinical setting: challenges at end of life. Nurs. Health Sci. 2012; 14: 25-31. Biros MH, Baren JM. The ethics of observation. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2009; 16: 908-910. Bonner A, Tolhurst G. Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Res. 2002; 9: 7-19. 2004; 11 2002; 9 2001 2006; 32 2005; 9 2009 2003; 13 2008 2007 2006 2008; 13 2005 2004 2012; 38 2012; 14 2007; 21 2007; 65 2003; 41 2009; 16 1869 |
References_xml | – reference: Mill J. On Liberty (1999 edn). London: Longman, Roberts & Green, 1869. – reference: Minichiello V , Sullivan G , Greenwood K , Axford R (eds). Handbook of Research Methods for Nursing and Health Science. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia, 2004. – reference: O'Leary Z. Researching Real-World Problems: A Guide to Methods of Inquiry. London: Sage Publications, 2005. – reference: Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007. – reference: Oeye C, Bjellans AK, Skorpen A. Doing participant observation in a psychiatric hospital - research ethics resumed. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007; 65: 2296-2306. – reference: Bloomer M, Cross W, Endacott R, O'Connor M, Moss C. Qualitative observation in a clinical setting: challenges at end of life. Nurs. Health Sci. 2012; 14: 25-31. – reference: Resnik D, Ness E. Participants' responsibilities in clinical research. J. Med. Ethics 2012; 38: 746-750. – reference: Murphy E, Dingwall R. Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007; 65: 2223-2234. – reference: Brink P, Edgecombe N. What is becoming of ethnography? Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 1028-1030. – reference: Mulhall A. In the field: notes on observation in qualitative research. J. Adv. Nurs. 2003; 41: 306-313. – reference: Schneider Z, Whitehead D, Elliott D, Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing and Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice, Marrickville. Sydney: Elsevier, 2007. – reference: Mattingly C. Toward a vulnerable ethics of research practice. Health 2005; 9: 453-471. – reference: Biros MH, Baren JM. The ethics of observation. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2009; 16: 908-910. – reference: Liamputtong P. Researching the Vulnerable. London: Sage Publications, 2006. – reference: Goodwin D, Pope C, Mort M, Smith A. Ethics and ethnography: an experiential account. Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 567-577. – reference: Allen D. Ethno-methodological insights into insider-outsider relationships in nursing ethnographies of healthcare settings. Nurs. Inq. 2004; 11: 14-24. – reference: Morse JM. Perspectives of the observer and the observed. Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13: 155-157. – reference: Griffiths P. Ethical conduct and the nurse ethnographer: consideration of an ethic of care. J. Res. Nurs. 2008; 13: 350-361. – reference: Beattie ERA, VandenBosch TM. The concept of vulnerability and the protection of human subjects of research. Res. Theory Nurs. Pract. 2007; 21: 156-173. – reference: General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: General Medical Council, 2006. – reference: Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code: Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwives. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2008. – reference: Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. – reference: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government, 2007. – reference: Bonner A, Tolhurst G. Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Res. 2002; 9: 7-19. – reference: Buchanan DR, Miller FG. A public health perspective on research ethics. J. Med. Ethics 2006; 32: 729-733. – volume: 21 start-page: 156 year: 2007 end-page: 173 article-title: The concept of vulnerability and the protection of human subjects of research publication-title: Res. Theory Nurs. Pract. – volume: 14 start-page: 25 year: 2012 end-page: 31 article-title: Qualitative observation in a clinical setting: challenges at end of life publication-title: Nurs. Health Sci. – volume: 13 start-page: 1028 year: 2003 end-page: 1030 article-title: What is becoming of ethnography? publication-title: Qual. Health Res. – volume: 13 start-page: 155 year: 2003 end-page: 157 article-title: Perspectives of the observer and the observed publication-title: Qual. Health Res. – volume: 65 start-page: 2296 year: 2007 end-page: 2306 article-title: Doing participant observation in a psychiatric hospital – research ethics resumed publication-title: Soc. Sci. Med. – year: 2009 – volume: 16 start-page: 908 year: 2009 end-page: 910 article-title: The ethics of observation publication-title: Acad. Emerg. Med. – start-page: 5625 year: 2001 end-page: 5628 – volume: 32 start-page: 729 year: 2006 end-page: 733 article-title: A public health perspective on research ethics publication-title: J. Med. Ethics – volume: 65 start-page: 2223 year: 2007 end-page: 2234 article-title: Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice publication-title: Soc. Sci. Med. – year: 2005 – volume: 13 start-page: 350 year: 2008 end-page: 361 article-title: Ethical conduct and the nurse ethnographer: consideration of an ethic of care publication-title: J. Res. Nurs. – volume: 11 start-page: 14 year: 2004 end-page: 24 article-title: Ethno‐methodological insights into insider–outsider relationships in nursing ethnographies of healthcare settings publication-title: Nurs. Inq. – year: 2007 – volume: 9 start-page: 453 year: 2005 end-page: 471 article-title: Toward a vulnerable ethics of research practice publication-title: Health – year: 2008 – year: 2006 – volume: 13 start-page: 567 year: 2003 end-page: 577 article-title: Ethics and ethnography: an experiential account publication-title: Qual. Health Res. – year: 2004 – volume: 38 start-page: 746 year: 2012 end-page: 750 article-title: Participants' responsibilities in clinical research publication-title: J. Med. Ethics – volume: 9 start-page: 7 year: 2002 end-page: 19 article-title: Insider–outsider perspectives of participant observation publication-title: Nurse Res. – year: 1869 – volume: 41 start-page: 306 year: 2003 end-page: 313 article-title: In the field: notes on observation in qualitative research publication-title: J. Adv. Nurs. |
SSID | ssj0018053 |
Score | 1.9744487 |
Snippet | Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 410 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Anthropology, Cultural - ethics Australia Beneficence Child Clinical medicine Clinical research Controversy Data Collection - ethics Data Collection - methods Ethical dilemmas ethics Human subjects Humans Medical ethics observation Observation - methods Observational research Observational studies Observer Variation Participatory research Pediatric Nursing - ethics Personal Autonomy Power Professional Misconduct Professional-Patient Relations - ethics Qualitative Research Redundant Research Subjects - psychology Researcher-Subject Relations - ethics Robustness Terminal Care - ethics United Kingdom Vulnerability vulnerable population Vulnerable Populations |
Title | How the observed create ethical dilemmas for the observers: Experiences from studies conducted in clinical settings in the UK and Australia |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-G7JX3CZP-8/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fnhs.12052 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23656564 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1462888257 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1465175932 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1496664977 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1609509459 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3batwwEB1CoJCX3tKL27QoUEpfvERaybaap5ImWRK6lLZLl1IwkqUlIaxd1rs05Bfy052RL0lLCKFvxhrJsjUjnRmPjgDeWG1pl5OMlXIyltrz2HiexE4XqafNmG5GAf1P42Q0kUdTNV2D3W4vTMMP0QfcyDLCfE0Gbmx9zcjLk3rAxY6i-ZcPE-LN__ilp47i2U5goCR_IcZlUrWsQpTF09dEQErf8vwmdPk3WA2rzcED-Nn1s0kyORuslnZQXPxD4fifL_IQ7rcolH1o1OYRrPnyMdxrIwebcDmqfjNEhqyyFLT1jgVs6Zmn7His6PBB87mpGULe64KL-j27Ik_G4kU1Z3WTqsjQ8yZyWWzttGTdjkxW-5B5XdNNamlyzEzpWB-DeQKTg_1ve6O4PbUhPpVSi5g7qUxmEBaqgmdeO40QB4e_oGxG67WXibE24SaVclhwkWp0UoQtELoJYRC-PYX1sir9c2DaOYnFNskyL53wZmZQfeiIGjmbWSEieBvGL__VMHPkZnFGiWqpyr-PD_PD9Gg63PvxOc8i2OoGOG9ttCanR6D_j3NWBNt9MVoX_TIxpa9WQUYhwEKQe5sMuoyJRCB9iwzx-qEnrXQEzxoF6zsthgmhahnBu6AmfUHnn6GC5EFB8vHoa7h4cXfRl7Ah6ASPkIGzBevLxcq_Qhy1tK-DwfwBUMAYRQ |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9QwFD4sK6Iv3i_VVSOI-NJhm0naRnyR1d26l0F0BwdBQtJkcFmmlekMin_BP-056cVVZBHfSnOaXnJO-32nJ18AnlhlaZaTiKV0IhbKJ7HxSRo7VWaeJmO6OSX0jyZpMRX7MznbgBf9XJhWH2JIuFFkhPc1BTglpM9EefW5GSV8W-IL-IJAoEHU69W7QTwqybeDBiUxhhg_lLLTFaI6nuFQhKT0NL_9DV_-DlfD92b3Knzqr7QtMzkdrVd2VH7_Q8Txf2_lGlzpgCh72XrOddjw1Q242CUPbsKPov7KEByy2lLe1jsW4KVnngrk8UCHZ1osTMMQ9Z41XDbP2S_9ZGxe1gvWtNWKDMk36ctibycV6ydlssaH4uuGdlJP0wNmKseGNMwtmO6-Pt4p4m7hhvhECMXjxAlpcoPIUJZJ7pVTiHLQA0oqaLReeZEaa9PEZEKMy4RnCnkKtyWiN84NIrjbsFnVlb8LTDknsNmmee6F497MDXoQrVIj5nPLeQRPwwDqL604hzbLU6pVy6T-MNnTe9n-bLzz8a3OI9jqR1h3YdoQ7-E5cgyZRfB4aMYAo78mpvL1OthIxFiIc8-zQdaYCsTS59iQtB-SaakiuNN62HDRfJwSsBYRPAt-MjT0FA0dRAcH0ZPifdi49--mj-BScXx0qA_fTA7uw2VOC3qEgpwt2Fwt1_4BwqqVfRii5yfOWRxk |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1tb9MwEMdP0xCINzCeMzYwEkK8SbW4dhKzV2ijKxtUE1BRTUiRHTvaNDWZmlYgvgJfmjvngYHQhHhX1Zc0re-S313PfwM8N8rQKicRSmlFKJSLQu2iOLQqTxwtxrQFFfTfT-LxVBzO5GwNdru1MI0-RF9wo8jw92sK8AtbXAry8rQeRHxH4v33moiRJIiIPvTaUVG64yUoKWEI8TkpW1khauPpD0UipR_z29_w8nda9Y-b0W340l1o02VyPlgtzSD__oeG439-kw241WIoe934zR1Yc-VduN6WDu7Bj3H1lSEasspQ1dZZ5uHSMUft8XigxQ-az3XNkHkvGy7qV-yXejIOL6o5q5teRYapN6nL4tnOStYtyWS1863XNb1JZ5oeMV1a1hdh7sN09ObT3jhst20Iz4RQPIyskDrVyIUyj1KnrELGwfnPqZ3ROOVErI2JI50IMcwjnijMUrjJkd0418hvD2C9rEr3CJiyVuCwidPUCcudLjT6D-1RI4rCcB7ACz9_2UUjzZHpxTl1qiUy-zw5yA6Sw9lw7-Q4SwPY6iY4a4O0pqyHp5hhyCSAZ_0whhf9Z6JLV628jUTCQsq9ygZzxlggSV9hQ8J-mEpLFcDDxsH6i-bDmLBaBPDSu0k_0CVo6CCZd5BsMv7oX2z-u-lTuHG8P8revZ0cPYabnHbz8N04W7C-XKzcNjLV0jzxsfMTZOcbEw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+the+observed+create+ethical+dilemmas+for+the+observers%3A+Experiences+from+studies+conducted+in+clinical+settings+in+the+UK+and+Australia&rft.jtitle=Nursing+%26+health+sciences&rft.au=Bloomer%2C+Melissa+J.&rft.au=Doman%2C+Maggie&rft.au=Endacott%2C+Ruth&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.issn=1441-0745&rft.eissn=1442-2018&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fnhs.12052&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fnhs.12052&rft.externalDocID=NHS12052 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1441-0745&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1441-0745&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1441-0745&client=summon |