Actual and Perceived Units of Alcohol in a Self-Defined "Usual Glass" of Alcoholic Drinks in England

Background Several studies have found participants pour more than 1 standard drink or unit as their usual glass. This is the first study to measure actual and perceived amounts of alcohol in a self‐defined usual glass of wines and spirits in the general population. Methods Participants were a conven...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 978 - 983
Main Authors Boniface, Sadie, Kneale, James, Shelton, Nicola
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Several studies have found participants pour more than 1 standard drink or unit as their usual glass. This is the first study to measure actual and perceived amounts of alcohol in a self‐defined usual glass of wines and spirits in the general population. Methods Participants were a convenience sample of adults who drink alcohol or who pour drinks for other people (n = 283, 54% women) at 6 sites in South East England. The survey was face to face and comprised a self‐completion questionnaire and pouring task. Estimation accuracy, categorised as correct (±0.5 units), underestimate (>0.5 units), or overestimate (>0.5 units) was the main outcome. Results The mean number of units poured was 1.90 (SD 0.80; n = 264) for wine and 1.93 (SD 0.78; n = 201) for spirits. The amount of alcohol in a self‐defined usual glass was estimated in 440 glasses (248 wine and 192 spirits). Overestimation took place in 42% glasses of spirit poured and 29% glasses of wine poured, and underestimation in 17 and 19%, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression found volume poured to be significantly associated with underestimating both wines and spirits, and additionally for wine only, belonging to a non‐white ethnic group and being unemployed or retired. Not having a university degree was significantly associated with overestimating both drink types. Conclusions This study is the first in the general population and did not identify systematic underestimation of the amount of alcohol in a self‐defined usual glass. Underestimation is significantly associated with volume poured for both drink types; therefore, advocating pouring smaller glasses could reduce underestimation of alcohol consumption.
Bibliography:Medical Research Council Doctoral Training Grant
istex:261358D8BD8B6F7AD2C15B7C963181DD8B140CC0
ArticleID:ACER12046
ark:/67375/WNG-SMZTQ7SV-C
UCL Research Ethics Committee was consulted prior to commencement of the study. Ethical approval was not required as no identifiable information was collected (sociodemographic information was collected in categories).
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0145-6008
1530-0277
DOI:10.1111/acer.12046