Comparison of Submental Blood Collection with the Retroorbital and Submandibular Methods in Mice (Mus musculus)

Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Vol. 55; no. 5; pp. 570 - 576
Main Authors Regan, Rainy D, Fenyk-Melody, Judy E, Tran, Sam M, Chen, Guang, Stocking, Kim L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 01.09.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1559-6109
2769-6677
2769-6677

Cover

Abstract Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method-submental blood collection-which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice.
AbstractList Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method—submental blood collection—which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice.
Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method-submental blood collection-which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice.
Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method-submental blood collection-which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice.Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method-submental blood collection-which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice.
Author Stocking, Kim L
Regan, Rainy D
Chen, Guang
Fenyk-Melody, Judy E
Tran, Sam M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Rainy
  surname: Regan
  middlename: D
  fullname: Regan, Rainy D
  organization: Comparative Animal Research, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA. rainy.regan@gmail.com
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Judy
  surname: Fenyk-Melody
  middlename: E
  fullname: Fenyk-Melody, Judy E
  organization: Comparative Animal Research, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sam
  surname: Tran
  middlename: M
  fullname: Tran, Sam M
  organization: Pathology, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Guang
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Guang
  organization: Biostatistics, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Kim
  surname: Stocking
  middlename: L
  fullname: Stocking, Kim L
  organization: Comparative Animal Research, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kcuO0zAUhiM0iOkMvALyclhUsp04djZIUK7SVCAua-vEdlpXjl18GQRPjzMtCBZ48x_p_P7O7aq58MGbB82K8n5Y9z3nF82KMFZjgofL5iqlA8aMs5Y-ai6riXFO6KoJmzAfIdoUPAoT-lzG2fgMDr10IWi0Cc4ZlW3Nfrd5j_LeoE8mxxDiaBcbeH3_qaodi4OItibvg07IerS1yqCbbUloLkkVV9Kzx83DCVwyT8563Xx98_rL5t369sPb95sXt2vbYZzXXe1zgpEOqiN4NKpXusogoB9EJ2r71CjDgaiJaej12ImxxQbzodXtWCdrr5vnJ-5xmUirOlQEJ4_RzhB_yABW_pvxdi934U4yTAdBRQXcnAExfCsmZTnbpIxz4E0oSRJBW9xiwVi1Pv271p8iv7dcDa9OBut3y3blIZTo6_gSwEGSh5NQTHqJ7x9j5wAzCTFXJbhiPv4HY9WZtFx8Obi8Y8yzSqQEC8IlIYxKbSYoLssMUe5-ylSRvwBL366m
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2016
Copyright_xml – notice: American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2016
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Zoology
EISSN 2769-6677
EndPage 576
ExternalDocumentID PMC5029828
27657712
aalas/jaalas/2016/00000055/00000005/art00010
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
29L
2WC
53G
5GY
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FIJ
GX1
HDH
HYE
IPNFZ
OK1
RIG
RPM
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
SJN
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-i400t-4532fab29c410bec6cd0be98a698482762ece7a1cf5da6db48b30e0793d3b7713
IEDL.DBID FIJ
ISSN 1559-6109
2769-6677
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:45:18 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 12:34:49 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:05:28 EDT 2025
Sun Aug 11 05:49:32 EDT 2024
Thu Jan 27 13:08:09 EST 2022
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i400t-4532fab29c410bec6cd0be98a698482762ece7a1cf5da6db48b30e0793d3b7713
Notes 1559-6109(20160901)55:5L.570;1-
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 27657712
PQID 1823030855
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs ingenta_journals_aalas_jaalas_2016_00000055_00000005_art00010
ingenta_journals_ic_aalas_15596109_v55n5_20210817_1152_default_tar_gz_s10
proquest_miscellaneous_1823030855
pubmed_primary_27657712
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5029828
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
PublicationTitleAbbrev J Am Assoc Lab Animal Sci
PublicationTitleAlternate J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
Publisher_xml – name: American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
References 16195737 - Lab Anim (NY). 2005 Oct;34(9):39-43
20664572 - Lab Anim (NY). 2010 Aug;39(8):236-40
26200084 - Lab Anim (NY). 2015 Aug;44(8):301-10
8437430 - Lab Anim. 1993 Jan;27(1):1-22
23475558 - Toxicol Pathol. 2013;41(4):560-614
9807751 - Lab Anim. 1998 Oct;32(4):377-86
11180276 - J Appl Toxicol. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):15-23
20353696 - J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 Mar;49(2):202-6
29256364 - J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2017 Nov 1;56(6):711-712
16519604 - Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(3):311-6
11713907 - Inflamm Res. 2001 Oct;50(10):523-7
21350616 - J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):87-93
19001062 - Lab Anim. 2009 Jan;43(1):65-71
24958546 - Lab Anim. 2014 Oct;48(4):278-91
21382833 - Lab Anim. 2011 Apr;45(2):114-20
19237457 - Lab Anim. 2009 Jul;43(3):255-60
17459552 - Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Sep;45(9):1709-18
23382272 - ILAR J. 2012;53(1):E70-81
19072545 - J Proteome Res. 2009 Jan;8(1):113-7
12086443 - Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1999 Nov;38(6):25-28
References_xml – reference: 19001062 - Lab Anim. 2009 Jan;43(1):65-71
– reference: 11713907 - Inflamm Res. 2001 Oct;50(10):523-7
– reference: 23475558 - Toxicol Pathol. 2013;41(4):560-614
– reference: 8437430 - Lab Anim. 1993 Jan;27(1):1-22
– reference: 23382272 - ILAR J. 2012;53(1):E70-81
– reference: 12086443 - Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1999 Nov;38(6):25-28
– reference: 17459552 - Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Sep;45(9):1709-18
– reference: 16195737 - Lab Anim (NY). 2005 Oct;34(9):39-43
– reference: 16519604 - Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(3):311-6
– reference: 26200084 - Lab Anim (NY). 2015 Aug;44(8):301-10
– reference: 21350616 - J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):87-93
– reference: 29256364 - J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2017 Nov 1;56(6):711-712
– reference: 20664572 - Lab Anim (NY). 2010 Aug;39(8):236-40
– reference: 24958546 - Lab Anim. 2014 Oct;48(4):278-91
– reference: 19237457 - Lab Anim. 2009 Jul;43(3):255-60
– reference: 20353696 - J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 Mar;49(2):202-6
– reference: 21382833 - Lab Anim. 2011 Apr;45(2):114-20
– reference: 11180276 - J Appl Toxicol. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):15-23
– reference: 9807751 - Lab Anim. 1998 Oct;32(4):377-86
– reference: 19072545 - J Proteome Res. 2009 Jan;8(1):113-7
SSID ssj0057532
Score 2.2007456
Snippet Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL)...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
ingenta
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 570
SubjectTerms Animals
Blood Specimen Collection - methods
Experimental Use
Mice - blood
Phlebotomy - methods
Phlebotomy - veterinary
Title Comparison of Submental Blood Collection with the Retroorbital and Submandibular Methods in Mice (Mus musculus)
URI https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aalas/jaalas/2016/00000055/00000005/art00010
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657712
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1823030855
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5029828
Volume 55
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1NT9wwELXKSpV6QdAvFmjlSj20h2gTx3aSAwdARYC0PUCRUC-WHXvpVuCgTcKBX8-M46Bue-wpkZKMZL_YnrHfvCHkc2pTYYSVSQX-QsJzZnBIGZgMUSzLuSo3GCjOv8vTK35-La5jZl0baZUxq6hGpkfdDYkNKNXku5nG5MLZ7-HCkKgVvNxUiHiTihl0OXouEMdvQDiAyo9n5-PkDM5JqFmGh3GJDDTE9SSmdRfzb6bkH0vPyRbZjD4jPRxA3iYvnH9NXv5swo74G9IcP9cSpM2CXqIpzHGkR0hKp2FrIGQvUNx0peDx0QvXgce8MlgxhGpvw0eY4GKQlUrnoax0S5eezmEioV_mfUvveuSs9u3Xt-Tq5NuP49Mk1lFIljBCu4RDmxfasKrmWQqYydrCpSq1rEpUAZXM1a7QWb0QVktreGny1KFyns1NAVHsOzLxjXc7hGYOlnspU6Y5xJFlZRh3Wc0LY3hhbZ5NyUHsThXHQqsCWGrATCFmasRMjZipEbMpOfvn-2UdTSBoiJl6EMILMAXhapkVEMQIpqxb6P62U51eqZtH1aKtTyOgCsYMHoRo75oeDOHpYo4MvSl5PwCs7gdxDwXdIaDNbEqKNeifX0A97vUnfvkr6HILlLNn5e5_9sEeeYVvDES2fTLpVr37AJ5PZz6Gf_kJDw8BxQ
linkProvider Ingenta
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Submental+Blood+Collection+with+the+Retroorbital+and+Submandibular+Methods+in+Mice+%28Mus+musculus%29&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Association+for+Laboratory+Animal+Science&rft.au=Regan%2C+Rainy+D&rft.au=Fenyk-Melody%2C+Judy+E&rft.au=Tran%2C+Sam+M&rft.au=Chen%2C+Guang&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.pub=American+Association+for+Laboratory+Animal+Science&rft.issn=1559-6109&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=576&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27657712&rft.externalDocID=PMC5029828
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1559-6109&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1559-6109&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1559-6109&client=summon