Comparison of Submental Blood Collection with the Retroorbital and Submandibular Methods in Mice (Mus musculus)
Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Vol. 55; no. 5; pp. 570 - 576 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
01.09.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1559-6109 2769-6677 2769-6677 |
Cover
Abstract | Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or
submandibular plexus. We developed a third method-submental blood collection-which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due
to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality
samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the
submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent
between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method—submental blood collection—which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice. Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method-submental blood collection-which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice. Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method-submental blood collection-which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice.Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method-submental blood collection-which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice. |
Author | Stocking, Kim L Regan, Rainy D Chen, Guang Fenyk-Melody, Judy E Tran, Sam M |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rainy surname: Regan middlename: D fullname: Regan, Rainy D organization: Comparative Animal Research, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA. rainy.regan@gmail.com – sequence: 2 givenname: Judy surname: Fenyk-Melody middlename: E fullname: Fenyk-Melody, Judy E organization: Comparative Animal Research, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Sam surname: Tran middlename: M fullname: Tran, Sam M organization: Pathology, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Guang surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Guang organization: Biostatistics, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Kim surname: Stocking middlename: L fullname: Stocking, Kim L organization: Comparative Animal Research, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kcuO0zAUhiM0iOkMvALyclhUsp04djZIUK7SVCAua-vEdlpXjl18GQRPjzMtCBZ48x_p_P7O7aq58MGbB82K8n5Y9z3nF82KMFZjgofL5iqlA8aMs5Y-ai6riXFO6KoJmzAfIdoUPAoT-lzG2fgMDr10IWi0Cc4ZlW3Nfrd5j_LeoE8mxxDiaBcbeH3_qaodi4OItibvg07IerS1yqCbbUloLkkVV9Kzx83DCVwyT8563Xx98_rL5t369sPb95sXt2vbYZzXXe1zgpEOqiN4NKpXusogoB9EJ2r71CjDgaiJaej12ImxxQbzodXtWCdrr5vnJ-5xmUirOlQEJ4_RzhB_yABW_pvxdi934U4yTAdBRQXcnAExfCsmZTnbpIxz4E0oSRJBW9xiwVi1Pv271p8iv7dcDa9OBut3y3blIZTo6_gSwEGSh5NQTHqJ7x9j5wAzCTFXJbhiPv4HY9WZtFx8Obi8Y8yzSqQEC8IlIYxKbSYoLssMUe5-ylSRvwBL366m |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2016 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2016 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Zoology |
EISSN | 2769-6677 |
EndPage | 576 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5029828 27657712 aalas/jaalas/2016/00000055/00000005/art00010 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 29L 2WC 53G 5GY AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS DIK E3Z EBS EJD F5P FIJ GX1 HDH HYE IPNFZ OK1 RIG RPM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM SJN 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-i400t-4532fab29c410bec6cd0be98a698482762ece7a1cf5da6db48b30e0793d3b7713 |
IEDL.DBID | FIJ |
ISSN | 1559-6109 2769-6677 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:45:18 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 12:34:49 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:05:28 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 11 05:49:32 EDT 2024 Thu Jan 27 13:08:09 EST 2022 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i400t-4532fab29c410bec6cd0be98a698482762ece7a1cf5da6db48b30e0793d3b7713 |
Notes | 1559-6109(20160901)55:5L.570;1- ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 27657712 |
PQID | 1823030855 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | ingenta_journals_aalas_jaalas_2016_00000055_00000005_art00010 ingenta_journals_ic_aalas_15596109_v55n5_20210817_1152_default_tar_gz_s10 proquest_miscellaneous_1823030855 pubmed_primary_27657712 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5029828 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2016 text: 2016-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | J Am Assoc Lab Animal Sci |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | American Association for Laboratory Animal Science |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Association for Laboratory Animal Science |
References | 16195737 - Lab Anim (NY). 2005 Oct;34(9):39-43 20664572 - Lab Anim (NY). 2010 Aug;39(8):236-40 26200084 - Lab Anim (NY). 2015 Aug;44(8):301-10 8437430 - Lab Anim. 1993 Jan;27(1):1-22 23475558 - Toxicol Pathol. 2013;41(4):560-614 9807751 - Lab Anim. 1998 Oct;32(4):377-86 11180276 - J Appl Toxicol. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):15-23 20353696 - J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 Mar;49(2):202-6 29256364 - J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2017 Nov 1;56(6):711-712 16519604 - Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(3):311-6 11713907 - Inflamm Res. 2001 Oct;50(10):523-7 21350616 - J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):87-93 19001062 - Lab Anim. 2009 Jan;43(1):65-71 24958546 - Lab Anim. 2014 Oct;48(4):278-91 21382833 - Lab Anim. 2011 Apr;45(2):114-20 19237457 - Lab Anim. 2009 Jul;43(3):255-60 17459552 - Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Sep;45(9):1709-18 23382272 - ILAR J. 2012;53(1):E70-81 19072545 - J Proteome Res. 2009 Jan;8(1):113-7 12086443 - Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1999 Nov;38(6):25-28 |
References_xml | – reference: 19001062 - Lab Anim. 2009 Jan;43(1):65-71 – reference: 11713907 - Inflamm Res. 2001 Oct;50(10):523-7 – reference: 23475558 - Toxicol Pathol. 2013;41(4):560-614 – reference: 8437430 - Lab Anim. 1993 Jan;27(1):1-22 – reference: 23382272 - ILAR J. 2012;53(1):E70-81 – reference: 12086443 - Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1999 Nov;38(6):25-28 – reference: 17459552 - Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Sep;45(9):1709-18 – reference: 16195737 - Lab Anim (NY). 2005 Oct;34(9):39-43 – reference: 16519604 - Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(3):311-6 – reference: 26200084 - Lab Anim (NY). 2015 Aug;44(8):301-10 – reference: 21350616 - J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):87-93 – reference: 29256364 - J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2017 Nov 1;56(6):711-712 – reference: 20664572 - Lab Anim (NY). 2010 Aug;39(8):236-40 – reference: 24958546 - Lab Anim. 2014 Oct;48(4):278-91 – reference: 19237457 - Lab Anim. 2009 Jul;43(3):255-60 – reference: 20353696 - J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 Mar;49(2):202-6 – reference: 21382833 - Lab Anim. 2011 Apr;45(2):114-20 – reference: 11180276 - J Appl Toxicol. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):15-23 – reference: 9807751 - Lab Anim. 1998 Oct;32(4):377-86 – reference: 19072545 - J Proteome Res. 2009 Jan;8(1):113-7 |
SSID | ssj0057532 |
Score | 2.2007456 |
Snippet | Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL)... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed ingenta |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 570 |
SubjectTerms | Animals Blood Specimen Collection - methods Experimental Use Mice - blood Phlebotomy - methods Phlebotomy - veterinary |
Title | Comparison of Submental Blood Collection with the Retroorbital and Submandibular Methods in Mice (Mus musculus) |
URI | https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aalas/jaalas/2016/00000055/00000005/art00010 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27657712 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1823030855 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5029828 |
Volume | 55 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1NT9wwELXKSpV6QdAvFmjlSj20h2gTx3aSAwdARYC0PUCRUC-WHXvpVuCgTcKBX8-M46Bue-wpkZKMZL_YnrHfvCHkc2pTYYSVSQX-QsJzZnBIGZgMUSzLuSo3GCjOv8vTK35-La5jZl0baZUxq6hGpkfdDYkNKNXku5nG5MLZ7-HCkKgVvNxUiHiTihl0OXouEMdvQDiAyo9n5-PkDM5JqFmGh3GJDDTE9SSmdRfzb6bkH0vPyRbZjD4jPRxA3iYvnH9NXv5swo74G9IcP9cSpM2CXqIpzHGkR0hKp2FrIGQvUNx0peDx0QvXgce8MlgxhGpvw0eY4GKQlUrnoax0S5eezmEioV_mfUvveuSs9u3Xt-Tq5NuP49Mk1lFIljBCu4RDmxfasKrmWQqYydrCpSq1rEpUAZXM1a7QWb0QVktreGny1KFyns1NAVHsOzLxjXc7hGYOlnspU6Y5xJFlZRh3Wc0LY3hhbZ5NyUHsThXHQqsCWGrATCFmasRMjZipEbMpOfvn-2UdTSBoiJl6EMILMAXhapkVEMQIpqxb6P62U51eqZtH1aKtTyOgCsYMHoRo75oeDOHpYo4MvSl5PwCs7gdxDwXdIaDNbEqKNeifX0A97vUnfvkr6HILlLNn5e5_9sEeeYVvDES2fTLpVr37AJ5PZz6Gf_kJDw8BxQ |
linkProvider | Ingenta |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Submental+Blood+Collection+with+the+Retroorbital+and+Submandibular+Methods+in+Mice+%28Mus+musculus%29&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Association+for+Laboratory+Animal+Science&rft.au=Regan%2C+Rainy+D&rft.au=Fenyk-Melody%2C+Judy+E&rft.au=Tran%2C+Sam+M&rft.au=Chen%2C+Guang&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.pub=American+Association+for+Laboratory+Animal+Science&rft.issn=1559-6109&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=576&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27657712&rft.externalDocID=PMC5029828 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1559-6109&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1559-6109&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1559-6109&client=summon |