Vitrification of caudal fin explants from zebrafish adult specimens
No data on vitrification of tissue samples are available in fishes. Three vitrification solutions were compared: V1: 20% ethylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide; V2: 25% propylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide, and; V3: 20% propylene glycol and 13% methanol, all three prepared in Hanks'...
Saved in:
Published in | Cryo-Letters Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 329 - 332 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Cryoletters
01.09.2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | No data on vitrification of tissue samples are available in fishes. Three vitrification solutions were compared: V1: 20% ethylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide; V2: 25% propylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide, and; V3: 20% propylene glycol and 13% methanol, all three prepared
in Hanks' buffered salt solution plus 20% FBS, following the same one step vitrification procedure developed in mammals. Caudal fin tissue pieces were vitrified into 0.25 ml plastic straws in 30s and stored in liquid nitrogen for 3 days minimum, warmed (10s in nitrogen vapour and 5s in a 25°C
water bath) and cultured (L-15 plus 20% FBS at 28.5°C). At the third day of culture, both attachment and outgrowing rates were recorded. V3 led to the worst results (8% of attachment rate). V1 and V2 allow higher attachment rates (V1: 63% vs V2: 50%. P < 0.05) but not significantly
different outgrowing rates (83%-94%). Vitrification of caudal fin pieces is advantageous in fish biodiversity conservation, particularly in the wild, due to the simplicity of procedure and equipment. |
---|---|
AbstractList | No data on vitrification of tissue samples are available in fishes. Three vitrification solutions were compared: V1: 20% ethylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide; V2: 25% propylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide, and; V3: 20% propylene glycol and 13% methanol, all three prepared in Hanks' buffered salt solution plus 20 percent FBS, following the same one step vitrification procedure developed in mammals. Caudal fin tissue pieces were vitrified into 0.25 ml plastic straws in 30s and stored in liquid nitrogen for 3 days minimum, warmed (10s in nitrogen vapour and 5s in a 25 degree C water bath) and cultured (L-15 plus 20% FBS at 28.5 degree C). At the third day of culture, both attachment and outgrowing rates were recorded. V3 led to the worst results (8% of attachment rate). V1 and V2 allow higher attachment rates (V1: 63% vs V2: 50%. P < 0.05) but not significantly different outgrowing rates (83% to 94%). Vitrification of caudal fin pieces is advantageous in fish biodiversity conservation, particularly in the wild, due to the simplicity of procedure and equipment. No data on vitrification of tissue samples are available in fishes. Three vitrification solutions were compared: V1: 20% ethylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide; V2: 25% propylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide, and; V3: 20% propylene glycol and 13% methanol, all three prepared in Hanks' buffered salt solution plus 20% FBS, following the same one step vitrification procedure developed in mammals. Caudal fin tissue pieces were vitrified into 0.25 ml plastic straws in 30s and stored in liquid nitrogen for 3 days minimum, warmed (10s in nitrogen vapour and 5s in a 25°C water bath) and cultured (L-15 plus 20% FBS at 28.5°C). At the third day of culture, both attachment and outgrowing rates were recorded. V3 led to the worst results (8% of attachment rate). V1 and V2 allow higher attachment rates (V1: 63% vs V2: 50%. P < 0.05) but not significantly different outgrowing rates (83%-94%). Vitrification of caudal fin pieces is advantageous in fish biodiversity conservation, particularly in the wild, due to the simplicity of procedure and equipment. No data on vitrification of tissue samples are available in fishes. Three vitrification solutions were compared: V1: 20% ethylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide; V2: 25% propylene glycol and 20% dimethyl sulphoxide, and; V3: 20% propylene glycol and 13% methanol, all three prepared in Hanks' buffered salt solution plus 20 percent FBS, following the same one step vitrification procedure developed in mammals. Caudal fin tissue pieces were vitrified into 0.25 ml plastic straws in 30s and stored in liquid nitrogen for 3 days minimum, warmed (10s in nitrogen vapour and 5s in a 25 degree C water bath) and cultured (L-15 plus 20% FBS at 28.5 degree C). At the third day of culture, both attachment and outgrowing rates were recorded. V3 led to the worst results (8% of attachment rate). V1 and V2 allow higher attachment rates (V1: 63% vs V2: 50%. P < 0.05) but not significantly different outgrowing rates (83% to 94%). Vitrification of caudal fin pieces is advantageous in fish biodiversity conservation, particularly in the wild, due to the simplicity of procedure and equipment. |
Author | García-Ximénez Cardona-Costa Roig Perez-Camps |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 surname: Cardona-Costa middlename: J. fullname: Cardona-Costa – sequence: 2 surname: Roig middlename: J. fullname: Roig – sequence: 3 surname: Perez-Camps middlename: M. fullname: Perez-Camps – sequence: 4 surname: García-Ximénez middlename: F. fullname: García-Ximénez |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17256066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kEtPwzAQhHMooqXwF1BO3Cr5kdjxsap4SRVcgOvKddbFVeIU20G0v570wZE97M7h02hnrrKR7zyOsgmhBZ8xUhTj7CrGDSFMCqEuszGVrBREiEm2-HApOOuMTq7zeWdzo_taN7l1PsefbaN9irkNXZvvcRW0dfEz13XfpDxu0bgWfbzOLqxuIt6c7zR7f7h_WzzNlq-Pz4v5cuY4r9LMoqDU0lrImtK6WBUKJV-JyhpBmEHFCDGM10JJbYUSleGskkojQSU4VZJPs7uT7zZ0Xz3GBK2LBpvhR-z6CKLitGSFGsDbM9ivWqxhG1yrww7-Yg_Aywlwfo0-adh0ffDD7-AMmLDr4FDdoTn4ZtKXwAijRBEJtKQCarR6aACSDrDeQ6wGw_k_hke34xryCSDHYfIsSAk6pIOo-C8SHIMw |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Physics |
EndPage | 332 |
ExternalDocumentID | 17256066 cryo/cryo/2006/00000027/00000005/art00008 |
Genre | Evaluation Studies Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- 29F 5GY AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS EBS EJD F5P FIJ OK1 P0W RIG ~02 53G CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ~KM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-i338t-fe611f1d67d11d4b49e73b68fc602ce9200c23d697af6968c32879ae0e9631973 |
IEDL.DBID | FIJ |
ISSN | 0143-2044 |
IngestDate | Fri Apr 12 05:59:05 EDT 2024 Thu May 23 23:12:42 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 10 11:05:45 EST 2022 Thu Jan 27 13:03:27 EST 2022 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i338t-fe611f1d67d11d4b49e73b68fc602ce9200c23d697af6968c32879ae0e9631973 |
Notes | 0143-2044(20060901)27:5L.329;1- ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 17256066 |
PQID | 68315249 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | ingenta_journals_ic_cryo_01432044_v27n5_20210907_1516_default_tar_gz_s8 pubmed_primary_17256066 ingenta_journals_cryo_cryo_2006_00000027_00000005_art00008 proquest_miscellaneous_68315249 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20060901 2006 Sep-Oct |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2006 text: 20060901 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Cryo-Letters |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cryo Letters |
PublicationYear | 2006 |
Publisher | Cryoletters |
Publisher_xml | – name: Cryoletters |
SSID | ssj0027669 |
Score | 1.775228 |
Snippet | No data on vitrification of tissue samples are available in fishes. Three vitrification solutions were compared: V1: 20% ethylene glycol and 20% dimethyl... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed ingenta |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 329 |
SubjectTerms | Animals Biodiversity Cryopreservation Cryopreservation - methods Cryoprotectants Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology Cryoprotective Agents - standards Dimethyl Sulfoxide - pharmacology Drug Combinations Ethylene Glycol - pharmacology Methanol - pharmacology Organ Culture Techniques Propylene Glycol - pharmacology Tissue Culture VITRIFICATION Zebrafish |
Title | Vitrification of caudal fin explants from zebrafish adult specimens |
URI | https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cryo/cryo/2006/00000027/00000005/art00008 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17256066 https://search.proquest.com/docview/68315249 |
Volume | 27 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3LSsQwFA0zguBGfDs-s3BbbPpIJ-5kUMcBxYUjswtpHlqQjkw7ovP13tt0ENSdm9AuEujJDbmnOfeEkDO8RjLMmQtyE7kgMakKcqvgtZ-ICBi0DhnWO9_d8-E4GU3SSYc8LGthUFbZVhVpVHro2hc2oFVTWZ_r2efUN0iFG-tFJFbtQ5ieA95NGtQlXaASaPt4O_omYLy54g4t7SA6kuRnBdNf-WWzz1xvkPU2QaSXfkY3SceWW2S1EWrqapsMnop6hvKeBlE6dVSruYEOriip_Xh7RV0LxaIRusAzYVdUL7Qx2aBYVIle_tUOGV9fPQ6GQXsRQlAAg6wDZzljjhmeGcZMkifCZnHO-07zMNIWQA11FBsuMuXQ7EbHwIOEsqGF5cVEFu-SlXJa2n1Cc824TSMbK26Qq_RTA7uTYkKYVCsR9shFC4lsg7mSiLdvIq-C86DLJehyCXqP3PzqXGjfFUFHzOV7lJUpjBShJDSTkHFwaaxTAISs1Uw-L2QFI50u50NCvOMhhirtdF5J3o8h5UhEj-z5aZJv3pZDQiqWIh07-M8nHJI1_5MFVWRHZKWeze0xpB11ftLE0hdZHdQc |
link.rule.ids | 289,315,783,787 |
linkProvider | Ingenta |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vitrification+of+caudal+fin+explants+from+zebrafish+adult+specimens&rft.jtitle=Cryo-Letters&rft.au=Cardona-Costa&rft.au=Roig&rft.au=Perez-Camps&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Xim%C3%A9nez&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.pub=Cryoletters&rft.issn=0143-2044&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=332&rft.externalDocID=cryo%2Fcryo%2F2006%2F00000027%2F00000005%2Fart00008 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0143-2044&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0143-2044&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0143-2044&client=summon |