Generalization Error of a Regression Model for Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring using a Single Photoplethysmography (PPG) Signal

• Published in: 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) Vol. 2023; pp. i - iv
• Main Authors: Zylinski, Marek, Occhipinti, Edoardo, Mandic, Danilo
• Format: Conference Proceeding Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States IEEE 01.01.2023
• Subjects: Arterial Pressure; Biological system modeling; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Determination - methods; Data models; Feature extraction; Humans; Machine Learning; Photoplethysmography; Photoplethysmography - methods; Predictive models; Wearable computers
• ISSN: 2694-0604
• DOI: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340929

Photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors integrated in wearable devices offer the potential to monitor arterial blood pressure (ABP) in patients. Such cuffless, non-invasive, and continuous solution is suitable for remote and ambulatory monitoring. A machine learning model based on PPG signal can be used to detect hypertension, estimate beat-by-beat ABP values, and even reconstruct the shape of the ABP. Overall, models presented in literature have shown good performance, but there is a gap between research and potential real-world use cases. Usually, models are trained and tested on data from the same dataset and same subjects, which may lead to overestimating their accuracy. In this paper: we compare cross-validation, where the test data are from the same dataset as training data, and external validation, where the model is tested on samples from a new dataset, on a regression model which predicts diastolic blood pressure from PPG features. The results show that, in the cross-validation, the predicted and the real values are linearly dependent, while in the external validation, the predicted values are not related to the real ones, but probably just through an average value.