Three drowsiness categories assessment by electroencephalogram in driving simulator environment

Traffic accidents remain one of the most critical issues in many countries. One of the major causes of traffic accidents is drowsiness while driving. Since drowsiness is related to human physiological conditions, drowsiness is hard to prevent. Several studies have been conducted in assessing drowsin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inConference proceedings (IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conf.) Vol. 2017; pp. 2904 - 2907
Main Authors Akbar, Izzat A., Rumagit, Arthur M., Utsunomiya, Mitaku, Morie, Takamasa, Igasaki, Tomohiko
Format Conference Proceeding Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.07.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1557-170X
DOI10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037464

Cover

More Information
Summary:Traffic accidents remain one of the most critical issues in many countries. One of the major causes of traffic accidents is drowsiness while driving. Since drowsiness is related to human physiological conditions, drowsiness is hard to prevent. Several studies have been conducted in assessing drowsiness, especially in a driving environment. One of the common methods used is the electroencephalogram (EEG). It is known that drowsiness occurs in the central nervous system; thus, estimating drowsiness using EEG is the promising way to assess drowsiness accurately. In this study, we tried to estimate drowsiness using frequency-domain and time-domain analysis of EEG. To validate the physiological conditions of the subjects, the Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS), a subject-based assessment of drowsiness condition; and an examiner-based assessment known as facial expression evaluation (FEE) were applied. Three categories were considered; alert (KSS <; 6; FEE <; 1), weak drowsiness (KSS 6-7; FEE 1-2) and strong drowsiness (KSS > 7; FEE > 2). The six parameters (absolute and relative power of alpha, ratio of β/α and (θ+α)/β, and Hjorth activity and mobility parameters) had statistically significant differences between the three drowsiness conditions (P <; 0.001). By using both KSS and FEE, these parameters showed high accuracy in detecting drowsiness (up to 92.9%). Taken together, we suggest that EEG parameters can be used in detecting the three drowsiness conditions in a simulated driving environment.
ISSN:1557-170X
DOI:10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037464