Explicit vs. Implicit Feedback for SU and MU-MIMO

SU and MU-MIMO performance relies on accurate link adaptation in order to benefit from multi-user scheduling, beamforming, adaptive coding and modulation. Such accuracy highly depends on the type of the channel state information feedback. LTE-Advanced has defined two major types of feedback, i.e. im...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010 pp. 1 - 5
Main Authors Clerckx, B, Gil Kim, Junil Choi, Young-Jun Hong
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.12.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN1424456363
9781424456369
ISSN1930-529X
DOI10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683816

Cover

Abstract SU and MU-MIMO performance relies on accurate link adaptation in order to benefit from multi-user scheduling, beamforming, adaptive coding and modulation. Such accuracy highly depends on the type of the channel state information feedback. LTE-Advanced has defined two major types of feedback, i.e. implicit and explicit feedback. Implicit feedback makes some assumptions on the transmit precoding and receiver processing at the time of CSI and CQI feedback. The CSI is expressed in terms of a recommended precoder, commonly denoted as PMI. Explicit feedback refers to the feedback of channel information without making any assumption on the transmit and receiver processing. In this paper, we discuss pros and cons of such feedback mechanisms for both SU and MU-MIMO and compare performance of both approaches using system level simulations compliant with LTE-A system. It is shown that implicit feedback is the preferred feedback framework for both SU and MU-MIMO.
AbstractList SU and MU-MIMO performance relies on accurate link adaptation in order to benefit from multi-user scheduling, beamforming, adaptive coding and modulation. Such accuracy highly depends on the type of the channel state information feedback. LTE-Advanced has defined two major types of feedback, i.e. implicit and explicit feedback. Implicit feedback makes some assumptions on the transmit precoding and receiver processing at the time of CSI and CQI feedback. The CSI is expressed in terms of a recommended precoder, commonly denoted as PMI. Explicit feedback refers to the feedback of channel information without making any assumption on the transmit and receiver processing. In this paper, we discuss pros and cons of such feedback mechanisms for both SU and MU-MIMO and compare performance of both approaches using system level simulations compliant with LTE-A system. It is shown that implicit feedback is the preferred feedback framework for both SU and MU-MIMO.
Author Gil Kim
Clerckx, B
Young-Jun Hong
Junil Choi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: B
  surname: Clerckx
  fullname: Clerckx, B
  email: bruno.clerckx@samsung.com
  organization: Commun. Lab., Samsung Electron., Yongin, South Korea
– sequence: 2
  surname: Gil Kim
  fullname: Gil Kim
  organization: Commun. Lab., Samsung Electron., Yongin, South Korea
– sequence: 3
  surname: Junil Choi
  fullname: Junil Choi
  organization: Commun. Lab., Samsung Electron., Yongin, South Korea
– sequence: 4
  surname: Young-Jun Hong
  fullname: Young-Jun Hong
  organization: Commun. Lab., Samsung Electron., Yongin, South Korea
BookMark eNpFj81Kw0AURkesYFN9gm7mBRLvnTt3kllK6E8gIQsNuCvJZALRNi1JEX17BQOuDucsPvgCsRjOgxdijRAhgn3a5WVaFpGC38AmoQTNjQhQK63ZUIy3_2JoIZZoCUJW9u1eBNP0DsA6YVwK3Hxdjr3rr_JzimR2mmXrfdvU7kN251G-VLIeWllUYZEV5YO46-rj5B9nrkS13bym-zAvd1n6nIc9xnwNTdOCdS4Bhs5opTpLDtkzmcSydaxa0oYQvLaNYa0aJKg7Z-OYGzCxppVY_-323vvDZexP9fh9mL_SD5z2RKY
ContentType Conference Proceeding
DBID 6IE
6IH
CBEJK
RIE
RIO
DOI 10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683816
DatabaseName IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume
IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings
IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: RIE
  name: IEEE Xplore DIgital Library
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISBN 1424456371
9781424456383
9781424456376
142445638X
EndPage 5
ExternalDocumentID 5683816
Genre orig-research
GroupedDBID 29I
6IE
6IH
6IK
6IM
AAJGR
ACGFS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CBEJK
IPLJI
M43
RIE
RIO
RNS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-6bd09cc8050f6422f93c15e5368959c52d346310e49b6542b130afc9775b06743
IEDL.DBID RIE
ISBN 1424456363
9781424456369
ISSN 1930-529X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 02:53:10 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i175t-6bd09cc8050f6422f93c15e5368959c52d346310e49b6542b130afc9775b06743
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs ieee_primary_5683816
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-Dec.
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-Dec.
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010
PublicationTitleAbbrev GLOCOM
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher IEEE
Publisher_xml – name: IEEE
SSID ssj0054851
ssj0000507002
Score 1.5303785
Snippet SU and MU-MIMO performance relies on accurate link adaptation in order to benefit from multi-user scheduling, beamforming, adaptive coding and modulation. Such...
SourceID ieee
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Array signal processing
Covariance matrix
Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions
Interference
MIMO
Receiving antennas
Title Explicit vs. Implicit Feedback for SU and MU-MIMO
URI https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5683816
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LT4NAEJ60PenFR2t8Zw8ehS7sLmHPjbU1Yk2UpLem-yBpGmmj1IO_3lmg-IgHbywJgQGS-Wb2-74BuBKKx9RS7YXadasszzylGfd0gBVuZp0fixMnJw_RKOV3UzFtwXWjhbHWluQz67vDci_frPTGtcr6IordPlcb2vibVVqtpp9CEdhQ2lhHIRAvRy8iPqFYbMnpVtQlIhaxrddTvZa1HVFAZf_2fjKYJBXnq77fj8ErZd4Z7kGyfeKKbrL0N4Xy9ccvM8f_hrQPvS-FH3lsctcBtGx-CLvfzAm7EDh63kIvCvL-5pPxS70Y4iVqrpcE0S55Ssk8NyRJvWScTHqQDm-eByOvHrDgLRA1FF6kDJVax_juMqxDwkwyHQgrWBRLIbUIDeMR4j_LpXKDrRQmvHmmETIKRZ164Qg6-Sq3x0AUwizF3SSszHBrAlV6w4UG60UWGGZPoOuCn60rD41ZHffp36fPYCdsaCPn0CleN_YCk3-hLsuv_gnDIaKY
linkProvider IEEE
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV09T8MwED2VMgALHwXxjQdGkjqxHcVzRWmhaZFopG5V7ThSVZEiSBn49ZyTNHyIgS2OFCVnRbp353vvAVwLxUNqqHZ8bbtVhqeO0ow72sMKNzVWj8WSk6Nh0Iv5_URMGnBTc2GMMcXwmXHtZXGWnyz1yrbK2iII7TnXBmxi3ueiZGvVHRWK0IbSWjwKoXhhvogIhWK5JSdrWpcIWMDWak_VWlaCRB6V7bvBqDOKyqmv6o0_rFeKzNPdhWj9zeXAycJd5crVH7_kHP8b1B4cfnH8yGOdvfahYbID2PkmT9gCzw7ozfU8J-9vLuk_V4suPqJmekEQ75KnmMyyhESxE_Wj0SHE3dtxp-dUFgvOHHFD7gQqoVLrEPcuxUrETyXTnjCCBaEUUgs_YTxABGi4VNbaSmHKm6UaQaNQ1PIXjqCZLTNzDEQh0FLcemGlCTeJpwp1OD_BipF5CTMn0LLBT19KFY1pFffp37evYKs3jgbTQX_4cAbbfj1Ecg7N_HVlLhAK5Oqy-AM-AYcFpeU
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.title=2010+IEEE+Global+Telecommunications+Conference+GLOBECOM+2010&rft.atitle=Explicit+vs.+Implicit+Feedback+for+SU+and+MU-MIMO&rft.au=Clerckx%2C+B&rft.au=Gil+Kim&rft.au=Junil+Choi&rft.au=Young-Jun+Hong&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.pub=IEEE&rft.isbn=9781424456369&rft.issn=1930-529X&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FGLOCOM.2010.5683816&rft.externalDocID=5683816
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1930-529X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1930-529X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1930-529X&client=summon