Effectiveness of Physical Robot Versus Robot Simulator in Teaching Introductory Programming

This study reports the use of a physical robot and robot simulator in an introductory programming course in a university and measures students' programming background conceptual learning gain and learning experience. One group used physical robots in their lessons to complete programming assign...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) pp. 486 - 493
Main Authors Kurniawan, Oka, Tiong Seng Lee, Norman, Datta, Subhajit, Sockalingam, Nachamma, Pey Kin Leong
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.12.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2470-6698
DOI10.1109/TALE.2018.8615190

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This study reports the use of a physical robot and robot simulator in an introductory programming course in a university and measures students' programming background conceptual learning gain and learning experience. One group used physical robots in their lessons to complete programming assignments, while the other group used robot simulators. We are interested in finding out if there is any difference in the learning gain and experiences between those that use physical robots as compared to robot simulators. Our results suggest that there is no significant difference in terms of students' learning between the two approaches. However, the control group that uses the physical robot shows a more positive response in their attitudes towards computing. We discuss the implications of our findings in relation to engaging students and challenges in using physical robots from the learner perspectives and ways to alleviate this. Finally, by considering the insights from students' comments, we also suggest an alternative that may give both benefits of using both physical robots and robot simulators.
AbstractList This study reports the use of a physical robot and robot simulator in an introductory programming course in a university and measures students' programming background conceptual learning gain and learning experience. One group used physical robots in their lessons to complete programming assignments, while the other group used robot simulators. We are interested in finding out if there is any difference in the learning gain and experiences between those that use physical robots as compared to robot simulators. Our results suggest that there is no significant difference in terms of students' learning between the two approaches. However, the control group that uses the physical robot shows a more positive response in their attitudes towards computing. We discuss the implications of our findings in relation to engaging students and challenges in using physical robots from the learner perspectives and ways to alleviate this. Finally, by considering the insights from students' comments, we also suggest an alternative that may give both benefits of using both physical robots and robot simulators.
Author Kurniawan, Oka
Datta, Subhajit
Sockalingam, Nachamma
Tiong Seng Lee, Norman
Pey Kin Leong
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Oka
  surname: Kurniawan
  fullname: Kurniawan, Oka
  email: kurniawano@ieee.org
  organization: Inf. Syst. Technol. & Design Pillar, Singapore Univ. of Technol. & Design, Singapore, Singapore
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Norman
  surname: Tiong Seng Lee
  fullname: Tiong Seng Lee, Norman
  email: norman_lee@sutd.edu.sg
  organization: Inf. Syst. Technol. & Design Pillar, Singapore Univ. of Technol. & Design, Singapore, Singapore
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Subhajit
  surname: Datta
  fullname: Datta, Subhajit
  email: subhajit_datta@sutd.edu.sg
  organization: Inf. Syst. Technol. & Design Pillar, Singapore Univ. of Technol. & Design, Singapore, Singapore
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Nachamma
  surname: Sockalingam
  fullname: Sockalingam, Nachamma
  email: nachamma@sutd.edu.sg
  organization: Learning Sci. Lab., Singapore Univ. of Technol. & Design, Singapore, Singapore
– sequence: 5
  surname: Pey Kin Leong
  fullname: Pey Kin Leong
  email: peykinleong@sutd.edu.sg
  organization: Eng. Product Dev. Pillar, Singapore Univ. of Technol. & Design, Singapore, Singapore
BookMark eNotkEtLAzEAhKMoWGt_gHjJH9g178exlFoLBYtWLx5KNo820t1IshX231uxp2Hmg2GYW3DVpc4DcI9RjTHSj5vpal4ThFWtBOZYowsw0VJhTpUQnBB0CUaESVQJodUNmJTyhRAiQjFC8Qh8zkPwto8_vvOlwBTgej-UaM0BvqYm9fDD53IsZ_MW2-PB9CnD2MGNN3Yfux1cdn1O7mhP-QDXOe2yadsTuAPXwRyKn5x1DN6f5pvZc7V6WSxn01UVseR9xTRXWhL6N9pyKo0IjngvKQnOiEYYizyV2mHdBM0445wJ1TgbBGHUOUXH4OG_N3rvt985tiYP2_Md9BeSOlY0
ContentType Conference Proceeding
DBID 6IE
6IL
CBEJK
RIE
RIL
DOI 10.1109/TALE.2018.8615190
DatabaseName IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
IEEE Xplore POP ALL
IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings
IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: RIE
  name: IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Education
EISBN 9781538665220
1538665220
EISSN 2470-6698
EndPage 493
ExternalDocumentID 8615190
Genre orig-research
GroupedDBID 6IE
6IF
6IL
6IN
AAJGR
AAWTH
ABLEC
ADZIZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BEFXN
BFFAM
BGNUA
BKEBE
BPEOZ
CBEJK
CHZPO
IEGSK
OCL
RIE
RIL
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-495897237815c537a6fd2ee732fda6b6ac0e379d19bf945455468bdcf6243dd83
IEDL.DBID RIE
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 02:47:00 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i175t-495897237815c537a6fd2ee732fda6b6ac0e379d19bf945455468bdcf6243dd83
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs ieee_primary_8615190
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-Dec.
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-Dec.
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE)
PublicationTitleAbbrev TALE
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher IEEE
Publisher_xml – name: IEEE
SSID ssj0002684231
ssj0003203504
Score 1.7771782
Snippet This study reports the use of a physical robot and robot simulator in an introductory programming course in a university and measures students' programming...
SourceID ieee
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 486
SubjectTerms computational thinking
Conferences
Education
Educational robots
Mobile robots
Programming
Robot sensing systems
robotics
simulator
Title Effectiveness of Physical Robot Versus Robot Simulator in Teaching Introductory Programming
URI https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8615190
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3PS8MwFA5zJ72o28Tf5ODRdm3TtMlRZGOKk6EbDDyMpElgiK3M9qB_vXltNn_gwVvTQBuS0ve99773PYQugkALC8yJJ0IuvNiEymOhoBbIURklJrUWCuKQ4_tkNItv53TeQpebWhitdU0-0z5c1rl8VWQVhMr6DMwvtw76lnXcmlqtTTwFVEvWGS0YkwhyZrFLZIYB70-v7gbA5WK-e86Phiq1PRnuovF6JQ2N5NmvSulnH79EGv-71D3U-6rcw5ONTdpHLZ13oDOzY3F00M43AcIuemrEi90fDxcGT9y54YdCFiWGcFr15gaPyxdo9lWs8DLHU0fDxDfAdQfV2GL1Du8GuteLneih2XAwvR55rt2Ct7QYovSsq8SgB1nKQppRkorEqEjrlERGiUQmIgs0SbkKuTQ8tsiLxgmTKjNJFBOlGDlA7bzI9SHChBspo1QGGWGxkoGQTPCIZZRmiYp5eIS6sGWL10ZRY-F26_jv2ydoG46tIZGcona5qvSZhQKlPK-_gU_6jrJr
linkProvider IEEE
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV07T8MwELYqGIAFaIt444GRpEmchz0i1KqFtqoglSoxVHbsSBVqgkoywK_Hl7jlIQa2OJYSyxflznfffR9C146juA7MicVdxi0_daVFXR7oQC4QXphG2kNBHnI0DvtT_34WzBroZtMLo5SqwGfKhsuqli_zpIRUWYeC-2X6gL6t_b7P6m6tTUYFeEvWNS0YEw-qZr4pZboO68S3wy6guahtnvRDUqXyKL19NFqvpQaSvNhlIezk4xdN438Xe4DaX717eLLxSoeoobImaDMbHEcT7X2jIGyh55q-2PzzcJ7iibEcfsxFXmBIqJVvZvC0WILcV77CiwzHBoiJB4B2B97YfPUO7wbA11JPtNG0143v-pYRXLAWOoooLH1YoqBCFlE3SAIS8TCVnlIR8VLJQxHyxFEkYtJlImXaAoBwo0Imaej5REpKjtBWlmfqGGHCUiG8SDgJob4UDheUM48mQZCE0mfuCWrBls1fa06Nudmt079vX6GdfjwazoeD8cMZ2gUT1pCSc7RVrEp1oQODQlxW38MnhlS1uw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.title=2018+IEEE+International+Conference+on+Teaching%2C+Assessment%2C+and+Learning+for+Engineering+%28TALE%29&rft.atitle=Effectiveness+of+Physical+Robot+Versus+Robot+Simulator+in+Teaching+Introductory+Programming&rft.au=Kurniawan%2C+Oka&rft.au=Tiong+Seng+Lee%2C+Norman&rft.au=Datta%2C+Subhajit&rft.au=Sockalingam%2C+Nachamma&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.pub=IEEE&rft.eissn=2470-6698&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=493&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FTALE.2018.8615190&rft.externalDocID=8615190