Numerical robustness and efficiency of generalized predictive control algorithms with guaranteed stability
Three previous papers proposed modifications to the generalized predictive control algorithm which guarantee closed-loop stability. The first two adopted the philosophy of constrained receding horizon predictive control (CRHPC), whereas the third adopted a stable generalized predictive control (SGPC...
Saved in:
Published in | International Conference on Control '94 pp. 1017 - 1022 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
London
IEE
1994
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISBN | 0852966105 9780852966105 |
DOI | 10.1049/cp:19940274 |
Cover
Summary: | Three previous papers proposed modifications to the generalized predictive control algorithm which guarantee closed-loop stability. The first two adopted the philosophy of constrained receding horizon predictive control (CRHPC), whereas the third adopted a stable generalized predictive control (SGPC) strategy: first stabilize then control the plant. Here the authors examine the relationship between CRHPC and SGPC and show that theoretically the two approaches are equivalent, but that CRPHPC could be subject to significant numerical instability problems. Two improved implementations of CRHPC are proposed, but SGPC is shown to have better numerical stability and efficiency. |
---|---|
ISBN: | 0852966105 9780852966105 |
DOI: | 10.1049/cp:19940274 |