Roles of Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Computed Tomography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Noninvasive Risk Stratification and a Conceptual Framework for the Selection of Noninvasive Imaging Tests in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

• Published in: The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) Vol. 47; no. 7; pp. 1107 - 1118
• Main Authors: Berman, Daniel S, Hachamovitch, Rory, Shaw, Leslee J, Friedman, John D, Hayes, Sean W, Thomson, Louise E.J, Fieno, David S, Germano, Guido, Wong, Nathan D, Kang, Xingping, Rozanski, Alan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Soc Nuclear Med 01.07.2006; Society of Nuclear Medicine
• Subjects: Atherosclerosis - pathology; Cardiology; Cardiovascular disease; Coronary Artery Disease - pathology; Exercise; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Myocardium - pathology; NMR; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Nuclear medicine; Perfusion; Prognosis; Risk; Risk factors; Tomography; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
• ISSN: 0161-5505; 1535-5667

This review deals with noninvasive imaging for risk stratification and with a conceptual approach to the selection of noninvasive tests in patients with suspected or known chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). Already widely acknowledged with SPECT, there is an increasing body of literature data demonstrating that CT coronary calcium assessment is also of prognostic value. The amount of coronary atherosclerosis, as can be extrapolated from CT coronary calcium score, has been shown to be highly predictive of cardiac events. The principal difference between myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) and CT coronary calcium for prognostic application appears to be that the former is an excellent tool for assessing short-term risk, thus effectively guiding decisions regarding revascularization. In contrast, the atherosclerosis imaging methods are likely to provide greater long-term risk assessment and, thus, are more useful in determination of the need for aggressive medical prevention measures. Although the more recent development of CT coronary angiography is promising for diagnosis, there has been no information to date regarding the prognostic value of the CT angiographic data. Similarly, cardiac MRI has not yet been adequately studied for its prognostic content. The selection of the most appropriate test for a given patient depends on the specific question being asked. In patients with a very low likelihood of CAD, no imaging test may be required. In screening the remaining asymptomatic patients, atherosclerosis imaging may be beneficial. In symptomatic patients, MPS, CT coronary angiography, and cardiac MRI play important roles. We consider it likely that, with an increased emphasis on prevention and a concomitant aging of the population, many forms of noninvasive cardiac imaging will continue to grow, with nuclear cardiology continuing to grow.