Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

• Published in: Cancer imaging Vol. 20; no. 1
• Main Authors: Freihat, Omar, Pinter, Tamas, Kedves, András, Sipos, Dávid, Cselik, Zsolt, Repa, Imre, Kovács, Ãrpád
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: BioMed Central Ltd 08.08.2020
• Subjects: Cancer metastasis; Care and treatment; Driving while intoxicated; Squamous cell carcinoma
• ISSN: 1470-7330
• DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00334-x

Background To determine the usefulness of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) derived from PET/MRI in discriminating normal from metastatic lymph nodes and the correlation between the metastatic lymph nodes with the grade and the localization of the primary tumor. Methods Retrospective study of 90 lymph nodes from 90 subjects; 65 patients who had proven histopathological metastatic lymph nodes from (HNSCC) who had undergone .sup.18F- PET/MRI for clinical staging and assessment and twenty-five lymph nodes were chosen from 25 healthy subjects. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) map was generated from DWI with b values (0 and 800 s/mm.sup.2). ADC values of the metastatic lymph nodes were calculated and compared to the normal lymph nodes ADC values, ROC was used to determine the best cut-off values to differentiate between the two group. Metastatic lymph nodes ADC mean values were compared to primary tumor grade and localization. Results ADCmean value of the metastatic lymph nodes in the overall sample (0.899 [+ or -] 0.98*10.sup.- 3 mm.sup.2/sec) was significantly lower than the normal lymph nodes' ADCmean value (1.267 [+ or -] 0.88*10.sup.- 3 mm.sup.2/sec); (P = 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) was 98.3%, sensitivity and specificity were 92.3 and 98.6%, respectively, when using a threshold value of (1.138 [+ or -] 0.75*10.sup.- 3 mm.sup.2/sec) to differentiate between both groups. Significant difference was found between metastatic lymph nodes (short-axis diameter < 10 mm), ADCmean (0.898 [+ or -] 0.72*10.sup.- 3 mm.sup.2/sec), and the benign lymph nodes ADCmean, (P = 0.001). No significant difference was found between ADCmean of the metastatic lymph nodes < 10 mm and the metastatic lymph nodes > 10 mm, ADCmean (0.899 [+ or -] 0.89*10.sup.- 3 mm.sup.2/sec), (P = 0.967). No significant differences were found between metastatic lymph nodes ADCmean values and different primary tumor grades or different primary tumor localization, (P > 0.05). Conclusion DWI-ADC is an effective and efficient imaging technique in differentiating between normal and malignant lymph nodes, and might be helpful to discriminate sub-centimeters lymph nodes. Trial registration The trial is registered in clinical trials under ID:NCT04360993, registration date: 17/04/2020. Keywords: MRI, DWI, ADC, HNSCC, Metastasis, Benign, Lymph nodes