Proximate Cause Explained An Essay in Experimental Jurisprudence
One of the oldest debates in American jurisprudence concerns the concept of "proximate cause." According to so-called formalists, the legal concept of proximate cause is the same as the ordinary concept of "cause." The legal question of whether a cause is proximate for the purpos...
Saved in:
Published in | The University of Chicago law review Vol. 88; no. 1; pp. 165 - 236 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chicago
University of Chicago Law Review
01.01.2021
University of Chicago Law School University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | One of the oldest debates in American jurisprudence concerns the concept of "proximate cause." According to so-called formalists, the legal concept of proximate cause is the same as the ordinary concept of "cause." The legal question of whether a cause is proximate for the purposes of establishing tort liability, therefore, is an objective matter about the external world determinable by familiar descriptive inquiry. By contrast, legal realists think that issues of proximate causation are disguised normative questions about responsibility. As the realists William Prosser and W. Page Keeton put it, proximate cause is better called "responsible cause."
Recent work in cognitive science has afforded us new insights into the way people make causal judgments that were unavailable at the time of the original debate between formalists and realists. We now have access to the results of systematic experimental studies that examine the way people ordinarily think about causation and morality. This work opens up the possibility of a very different approach to understanding the role of causation in the law—one which combines the attractive features of both formalism and realism without accepting their implausible consequences.
In addition to providing a model for interpreting the case law of proximate cause, this Article also introduces a new way of doing legal theory—a method we call "experimental jurisprudence." Experimental jurisprudence is the study of jurisprudential questions using empirical methods. Jurisprudential disputes about proximate cause are especially ripe for empirical analysis because the debate revolves around whether the legal concept of proximate cause is the same as the ordinary concept of causation. Interrogating the ordinary concept of causation, therefore, should shed light on this question. |
---|---|
AbstractList | One of the oldest debates in American jurisprudence concerns the concept of "proximate cause." According to so-called formalists, the legal concept of proximate cause is the same as the ordinary concept of "cause." The legal question of whether a cause is proximate for the purposes of establishing tort liability, therefore, is an objective matter about the external world determinable by familiar descriptive inquiry. By contrast, legal realists think that issues of proximate causation are disguised normative questions about responsibility. As the realists William Prosser and W. Page Keeton put it, proximate cause is better called "responsible cause."
Recent work in cognitive science has afforded us new insights into the way people make causal judgments that were unavailable at the time of the original debate between formalists and realists. We now have access to the results of systematic experimental studies that examine the way people ordinarily think about causation and morality. This work opens up the possibility of a very different approach to understanding the role of causation in the law-one which combines the attractive features of both formalism and realism without accepting their implausible consequences.
In addition to providing a model for interpreting the case law of proximate cause, this article also introduces a new way of doing legal theory - a method we call "experimental jurisprudence." Experimental jurisprudence is the study of jurisprudential questions using empirical methods. Jurisprudential disputes about proximate cause are especially ripe for empirical analysis because the debate revolves around whether the legal concept of proximate cause is the same as the ordinary concept of causation. Interrogating the ordinary concept of causation, therefore, should shed light on this question. One of the oldest debates in American jurisprudence concerns the concept of "proximate cause." According to so-called formalists, the legal concept of proximate cause is the same as the ordinary concept of "cause. " The legal question of whether a cause is proxima te for the purposes of establish ing tort liability, th erefore, is an objective matter about, the external world determinable by familiar descriptive inquiry. By contrast,, legal realists th ink that, issues of proximate causation, are disguised normative questions about, responsibility. As the realists William Prosser and W. Page Keeton, put, it, proximate cause is better called "responsible cause. " Recent, work in, cognitive science has afforded us new insigh ts into the way people make causal judgments th a t, were unavailable a t, the time of the original deba te between, formalists and realists. We now have access to the results of systematic experimental studies that, examine the way people ordinarily think about, causation, and morality. This work opens up the possibility of a very different, approach to understanding the role of causation in, the law-one wh ich combines the attractive features of both formalism and realism without, accepting their implausible consequences. In addition, to providing a model for interpreting the case law of proximate cause, this Article also introduces a new way of doing legal theory-a method we call "experimental jurisprudence." Experimental jurisprudence is the study of jurisprudential questions using empirical methods. Jurisprudential disputes about, proximate cause are especially ripe for empirical analysis because the debate revolves around whether the legal concept, of proximate cause is the same as the ordinary concept, of causation. Interrogating the ordinary concept, of causation, therefore, should shed light, on, this question. |
Audience | Professional Academic |
Author | Shapiro, Scott Knobe, Joshua |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joshua surname: Knobe fullname: Knobe, Joshua – sequence: 2 givenname: Scott surname: Shapiro fullname: Shapiro, Scott |
BookMark | eNo1kE1LAzEQhoNUsFZ_gAehIHhbyOSrO8dSqhUKelDwFtJNsm5pNzVJof57o6ungZdnnneYSzLqQ-_OyBiQY1VLfB-RMaUCKhQoLshlSltKKSiUY3LzEsOp25vspgtzTG66PB12puudvSLn3uySu_6bE_L2sHxdrKr18-PTYr6uWk4hVxIcR8Nc7Z0V1AGnDGu58a7EMPM1ULupOW_Qo3WCKvQgvayNtSAbC4xPyN3gPcTweXQp6204xr5UaiZmNVOgBC_U_UC1Zud01zehz-6U23Jz0nquBEpkMyEKuBrAuO-yNm2XDlknZ2LzUdZ8-I1DbLUNnQaqOQf1jzHKgAIgFUzCj-p2UG1TDlEfYvlT_NJMoSp9nH8DFV9oow |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review Jan 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review Jan 2021 |
DBID | 3V. 4U- 7WY 7WZ 7XB 87Z 8AO 8FK 8FL 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BEZIV CCPQU DWQXO FRNLG F~G GNUQQ GUQSH K60 K6~ L.- M0C M2O MBDVC PQBIZ PQBZA PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U S0X |
DatabaseName | ProQuest Central (Corporate) University Readers ABI/INFORM Complete database ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition) Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest Business Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Business Premium Collection (Alumni) ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Central Student Research Library Prep ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Business Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Global Research Library Research Library (Corporate) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Basic SIRS Editorial |
DatabaseTitle | ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business University Readers Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials SIRS Editorial ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Central ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Research Library ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition) Business Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) Business Premium Collection (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Law Philosophy |
EISSN | 1939-859X |
EndPage | 236 |
ExternalDocumentID | A649592744 10.3316/agispt.20210119042514 26966493 |
Genre | Articles |
GeographicLocations | UNITED STATES |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: UNITED STATES |
GroupedDBID | .4L .72 .CB 0ZK 123 2-G 29Q 2QL 3V. 5.J 6DY 7WY 8AO 8FL 8G5 8OO 8R4 8R5 8V8 96U AAAZS AACLI AAFWJ ABACO ABBHK ABDBF ABLWH ABUWG ABVAB ABXSQ ACBMB ACGFO ACHQT ACIHN ACMJI ACNCT ADACV ADCHZ ADDQP ADEPB ADEYR ADMHG ADNFJ ADULT ADUOI AEAQA AEGZQ AEUPB AFACB AFAZI AFKRA AFXCU AGQRV AHEHV AJPNJ AKNUK AKVCP AL2 ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQSKT AS~ AZQEC BENPR BEZIV BHRNT BKOMP BPHCQ CCPQU CS3 DU5 DWQXO EBU EHL EKAWT ESX F8P FAL FJD FJW FM. FRNLG FRS GCQ GENNL GNUQQ GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH GUQSH HCSNT HISYW HLR HOCAJ IPB IPSME JAAYA JAV JBMMH JBZCM JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLXEF JPL JSODD JST K1G K60 K6~ LBL LGEZI LMKDQ LOTEE LXB LXL LXN LXO LXU LXY M0C M2O MVM NADUK NXXTH OK1 P2P PQBIZ PQBZA PQQKQ PRG PROAC Q.- Q2X RHO RWL RXW S0X SA0 TAA TAC TAE TAF TH9 TQQ TQW TR2 TWJ TWL UFL UNMZH UXK UXR VKN W2G WE1 WH7 X6Y XFL ZRF ZRR ~X8 ~ZZ 4U- 7XB 8FK L.- MBDVC PQEST PQUKI Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-g301t-51e39a2e8fed40e1302985bfee3917f810db833c9f9de4069f15f58add15cd123 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0041-9494 |
IngestDate | Mon Nov 25 20:30:01 EST 2024 Sat Sep 28 21:13:40 EDT 2024 Wed Aug 28 03:30:36 EDT 2024 Wed Dec 11 00:10:35 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-g301t-51e39a2e8fed40e1302985bfee3917f810db833c9f9de4069f15f58add15cd123 |
Notes | University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 1, Jan 2021, 165-236 Informit, Melbourne (Vic) |
PQID | 2478261643 |
PQPubID | 34656 |
PageCount | 72 |
ParticipantIDs | jstor_primary_26966493 rmit_agispt_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_agispt_20210119042514 proquest_journals_2478261643 gale_incontextgauss__A649592744 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20210101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 1 year: 2021 text: 20210101 day: 1 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Chicago |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Chicago |
PublicationTitle | The University of Chicago law review |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | University of Chicago Law Review University of Chicago Law School University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review |
Publisher_xml | – sequence: 0 name: University of Chicago Law Review – name: University of Chicago Law School – name: University of Chicago, acting on behalf of the University of Chicago Law Review |
SSID | ssj0001695 |
Score | 2.430132 |
Snippet | One of the oldest debates in American jurisprudence concerns the concept of "proximate cause." According to so-called formalists, the legal concept of... |
SourceID | proquest gale rmit jstor |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 165 |
SubjectTerms | Analysis Case law Causality Causation Causation (Criminal law) Cognitive science Criminal law Experimental studies Jurisprudence Legal ethics Philosophy Proximate cause (Law) Psychological aspects State court decisions |
Subtitle | An Essay in Experimental Jurisprudence |
Title | Proximate Cause Explained |
URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26966493 http://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20210119042514 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2478261643 |
Volume | 88 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1NTxsxEB2VcOGC-oUIpa0Pva4arz9i91KlKAihCiEEEjfLux5HXDYhuxHtv-9MdtPCpVfLkuWx_fxmPJ4H8GVSEQ1JWheVy5q_5NjC5akpTESDHvM099kWV_biTl_em_sh4NYOaZU7TNwCdVrWHCP_Wmq6yyyRe_V99ViwahS_rg4SGnuwX0rl3Aj2f8yvrm_-YrG0vtcw0Cwmz8rEA_D2yYcvaOWzH_Tby-X8NRwOrFDM-mV8A6-weQt7P-PTO5hdr5e_HohXojiLmxYFZ82RO4_pm5g1Yt628bd4aMT8Wal-ccmlAVfrzVYw9D3cnc9vzy6KQfegWNBx6wojUflYosuY9AT5adE7U2WkZjnNTk5S5ZSqffYJ-edqliYbR0glTZ3oKjqCUbNs8BiErR0xuNrUMSudvInaY0WMZJJUjGj9GD6zPQJXgmg41WRBM2lDmFlynDxXDxzD0dZUYdVXvwilJQ9JezWG053twrDv2_BvlcbAO7ULcUHz7UJ_bkNfDZaal-tFINAO5IMoJe2uW8kuqCSSQlAi9cn_h_gAB9y_D4icwqhbb_AjUYSu-jTsgz-wFrva |
link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,21388,33744,43805 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1NTxsxEB2VcGgviH6gpkDxoddV4_gjay5VQEEpTSNUgcTN8q7HEZdNmt2I9t93Jruh9NKrtSvLX89v7PF7AJ8GBdGQqHVW5Enzkxyb5WlkMhPQoMM0Sm22xdxO7_T1vbnvDtzqLq1yh4lboI7Lks_IPw817WWWyL36svqZsWsU3652Fhp7sM_K6aYH-xeT-c2PJyyW1rUeBprN5NmZuAPeNvnwH1r57AX9dnO5OoSDjhWKcTuMr-EFVm9gbxYe38L4Zr389UC8EsVl2NQoOGuOwnmM52JciUldh9_ioRKTZ1L94pqlAVfrzdYw9B3cXU1uL6dZ53uQLWi5NZmRqFwYYp4w6gHy1aLLTZGQiuUo5XIQi1yp0iUXkV-uJmmSyQmppCkjbUVH0KuWFb4HYcucGFxpypCUjs4E7bAgRjKIKgS0rg9n3B-elSAqTjVZUEtq78eWAifH6oF9ONp2lV-16hd-aClC0k714WTXd76b97X_O0p94Jna-LCg9ja-Xbe-VYOl4uV64Qm0PcUgSkm7-2zIIagkkkJQIvWH_1dxBi-nt99nfvZ1_u0YXvG_7eHICfSa9QZPiS40xcduTvwBmmG-wg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proximate+cause+explained%3A+An+essay+in+experimental+jurisprudence&rft.jtitle=The+University+of+Chicago+law+review&rft.au=Joshua+Knobe&rft.au=Scott+Shapiro&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.issn=0041-9494&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=236&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10.3316%2Fagispt.20210119042514 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0041-9494&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0041-9494&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0041-9494&client=summon |