Commenters offer mixed 'messages' on Title II classification of texting

"Wireless provider messaging practices are designed to protect consumers, not restrict them, and in the past Twilio has recognized the value of these measures. Its call to subject mobile messaging to Title II common carriage requirements is the wrong policy and wrong on the law. At its core, Tw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTelecommunications Reports Vol. 81; no. 24; p. 36
Main Authors Kirby, Paul, Stanton, Lynn
Format Newsletter Trade Publication Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Aspen Publishers, Inc 15.12.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0163-9854

Cover

Loading…
Abstract "Wireless provider messaging practices are designed to protect consumers, not restrict them, and in the past Twilio has recognized the value of these measures. Its call to subject mobile messaging to Title II common carriage requirements is the wrong policy and wrong on the law. At its core, Twilio's request is for the Commission to require mobile operators to cease using spam filters and to instead deliver every message that seeks to defraud, trick, and abuse end-user customers. Such regulatory maneuvering directly serves Twilio's interests, as the company's business model clearly reflects that the more traffic Twilio sends, the more profit Twilio generates," CTIA added. CTIA added that the FCC "must also reject Twilio's Petition as a matter of law. Twilio asks the Commission to subject 'short-code-based services' to common carrier regulation under Title II, but its arguments reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of Short Codes, which are not a communications service at all. When a mobile provider sells access to a Short Code, the product being sold is an addressing, billing, and marketing tool, and none of these functions involves the transmission of information. Accordingly, Short Codes are neither telecommunications nor a telecommunications service. Likewise, the Commission must reject Twilio's contention that SMS and MMS are telecommunications services subject to common carrier obligations under the Act. The characteristics of mobile messaging necessarily make it an information service under the Act, not a telecommunications service." Verizon added that "those arguments for classifying mobile messaging as a common carrier service fail as a matter of law. Twilio's effort to extend Title II to mobile messaging is contrary to both the Communications Act and the Open Internet Order. Mobile messaging - like email - is a store-and-forward service: messages are stored by the service while the recipient device is located and then forwarded. The Commission has long correctly classified email as an information service for that very reason; mobile messaging is therefore an information service as well. Furthermore, mobile messaging services, which are able to communicate only with other text-enabled devices on the public switched network, lack the quality of ubiquitous access that the Commission found in the Open Internet Order is emblematic of a commercial mobile service or its functional equivalent. Because messaging services are information services and private mobile services, they cannot be subject to Title II regulation. The common short code system also cannot be subject to Title II because it is not a communications service at all, but merely a means of addressing messages." Foursquare Labs, Inc., which "uses text messaging to confirm user identity on mobile as well as send users contextually relevant content about places near a user," supported the petition. "This year, carriers have begun blocking more and more text message traffic," it said. "There are periods where Foursquare has seen 100% of the messages being blocked by certain carriers. This has significant impact on Foursquare's services. When identity verification texts are blocked users are unable to use Foursquare's services because they cannot confirm their identity. When contextual relevant content [is] blocked, it results in Foursquare being unable to provide its service to users in a manner the user expects, which reflects negatively on the company."
AbstractList "Wireless provider messaging practices are designed to protect consumers, not restrict them, and in the past Twilio has recognized the value of these measures. Its call to subject mobile messaging to Title II common carriage requirements is the wrong policy and wrong on the law. At its core, Twilio's request is for the Commission to require mobile operators to cease using spam filters and to instead deliver every message that seeks to defraud, trick, and abuse end-user customers. Such regulatory maneuvering directly serves Twilio's interests, as the company's business model clearly reflects that the more traffic Twilio sends, the more profit Twilio generates," CTIA added. CTIA added that the FCC "must also reject Twilio's Petition as a matter of law. Twilio asks the Commission to subject 'short-code-based services' to common carrier regulation under Title II, but its arguments reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of Short Codes, which are not a communications service at all. When a mobile provider sells access to a Short Code, the product being sold is an addressing, billing, and marketing tool, and none of these functions involves the transmission of information. Accordingly, Short Codes are neither telecommunications nor a telecommunications service. Likewise, the Commission must reject Twilio's contention that SMS and MMS are telecommunications services subject to common carrier obligations under the Act. The characteristics of mobile messaging necessarily make it an information service under the Act, not a telecommunications service." Verizon added that "those arguments for classifying mobile messaging as a common carrier service fail as a matter of law. Twilio's effort to extend Title II to mobile messaging is contrary to both the Communications Act and the Open Internet Order. Mobile messaging - like email - is a store-and-forward service: messages are stored by the service while the recipient device is located and then forwarded. The Commission has long correctly classified email as an information service for that very reason; mobile messaging is therefore an information service as well. Furthermore, mobile messaging services, which are able to communicate only with other text-enabled devices on the public switched network, lack the quality of ubiquitous access that the Commission found in the Open Internet Order is emblematic of a commercial mobile service or its functional equivalent. Because messaging services are information services and private mobile services, they cannot be subject to Title II regulation. The common short code system also cannot be subject to Title II because it is not a communications service at all, but merely a means of addressing messages." Foursquare Labs, Inc., which "uses text messaging to confirm user identity on mobile as well as send users contextually relevant content about places near a user," supported the petition. "This year, carriers have begun blocking more and more text message traffic," it said. "There are periods where Foursquare has seen 100% of the messages being blocked by certain carriers. This has significant impact on Foursquare's services. When identity verification texts are blocked users are unable to use Foursquare's services because they cannot confirm their identity. When contextual relevant content [is] blocked, it results in Foursquare being unable to provide its service to users in a manner the user expects, which reflects negatively on the company."
Audience Trade
Author Stanton, Lynn
Kirby, Paul
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Kirby, Paul
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Stanton, Lynn
BookMark eNpt0MFKAzEQBuA9VLBV3yHooRcXks1ms3ssRWuh4KWel2w6iZHdpGZS6OMbqIcKzmXg52MY_kUx88HDrJhT1vCya0V9WywQvyhlvKvaebFZh2kCnyAiCcZAJJM7w4EsJ0BUFnBJgid7l0Yg2y3Ro0J0xmmVXM6DIQnOyXl7X9wYNSI8_O674uP1Zb9-K3fvm-16tSst41SUraQ17Q6Vka2RWlRDa7qmqWqqOsMYcG00ragQQOtBD1pyVktKeTNwIZoWKL8rHi93jzF8nwBTH-EYYsKeyTyMCykyerogq0bonTchRaUnh7pf1bzNn_BOZlX-oyx4iGrMrRmX4z_--coPJ3Q-d-Q8OvuZ0KoT4jX_AcYvcPw
ContentType Newsletter
Trade Publication Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2015 Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Dec 15, 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 Aspen Publishers, Inc.
– notice: Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Dec 15, 2015
DBID N95
7WY
7XB
8FE
8FG
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
BGLVJ
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K6~
M0F
M2P
M2T
P5Z
P62
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PQBIZ
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
DatabaseName Business: Insights
ABI/INFORM Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection
Technology Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Business Collection
ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry
Science Database
Telecommunications Database
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
DatabaseTitle ProQuest One Business
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central China
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Telecommunications
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Business Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Business Collection
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest One Business
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
ExternalDocumentID 4007322811
A438130397
Genre Feature
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID 123
29Q
7WY
8FE
8FG
8V8
ACGOD
ACIHN
ACMJI
AEAQA
AEMOZ
AFACB
AFKRA
AGQRV
AHEHV
AHQJS
AKVCP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ARAPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
BGLVJ
BKOMP
BPHCQ
CCPQU
DWQXO
EBA
EBO
EBR
EBU
EMK
EPL
FAC
FAL
FJD
FJW
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
ICD
IOF
IRD
ITC
ITF
ITG
ITH
K1G
K6~
M0F
M2P
MK~
ML~
N95
P62
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQBIZ
PQQKQ
PROAC
RWL
RXW
SJN
TAA
TAF
TH9
TN5
U5U
UNMZH
X6Y
~8M
~ZZ
7XB
AFKWF
M2T
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
PUEGO
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-g1305-870409d2f78f7c52b8f966240a9f11e3cfc02055e04bcbc731470036b35568e03
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0163-9854
IngestDate Thu Aug 28 09:20:46 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:18:06 EDT 2025
Thu Jun 12 23:36:07 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 03:04:25 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 24
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-g1305-870409d2f78f7c52b8f966240a9f11e3cfc02055e04bcbc731470036b35568e03
PQID 1777713575
PQPubID 33497
ParticipantIDs proquest_reports_1777713575
gale_infotracmisc_A438130397
gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A438130397
gale_businessinsightsgauss_A438130397
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20151215
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-12-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2015
  text: 20151215
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Washington
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Washington
PublicationTitle Telecommunications Reports
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Aspen Publishers, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Aspen Publishers, Inc
SSID ssj0013928
Score 1.4730589
Snippet "Wireless provider messaging practices are designed to protect consumers, not restrict them, and in the past Twilio has recognized the value of these measures....
SourceID proquest
gale
SourceType Aggregation Database
StartPage 36
SubjectTerms Classification
Codes
Consumers
Customer services
Information services
Internet access
Petitions
Public interest
Regulation
Regulatory agencies
Service introduction
Spam (Junk email)
Text messaging
Wireless carriers
Wireless communications services
Title Commenters offer mixed 'messages' on Title II classification of texting
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/1777713575
Volume 81
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da8IwED-mPmxv-2ROJ3nY5lNZv2Kap-GGXwN1DAXfik0T2UvdjML-_N3VihPG-lAoCS25pPe73F3uB3DXMq7QUeo7aZgIBxHKOAl3DT5yJbkwZKJQtsWo1Z-GrzM-Kxxutkir3OnEXFGnS0U-8kdP4OUFaF08fX45xBpF0dWCQqMEFR93Crj5qjx3Rm_v-ziCzNlV0a4JHBnlNf__VLw5mnRPoYoIkWr2y2XG2tsZPIMjnZ3D8e68sL2AHp3hoMqZK8vGxGbChh_fOmXNIbGXLLRtsnHGJjTpbDBgOcsl5f9s37s0bIL6FwHqEqbdzuSl7xT0B84CgYWjnsIfTKa-EZERivtJZHBvggg8l8bzdKCMQkFyrt0wUYkSgRcKKi-TBFRVTLvBFZSzZaavgeHIWzqUucERcuFJipZJhboNhRoZvwr3JJa4IL7EmyXXgF3MN9bGbSoDhlAnRRUe8n60-NeruVpsS2PjR6iK1EHH-kFHXLPqoLm2k39cxEbi_QTf_NtagxM0WjillHi8DuX1aqNv0TBYJw0oRd1eo1gDPx_CuA8
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT8JAEJ4gHvDmMyKoexA5NdLHst2DMUTlIa8LJNwq3e4SL6AUov4pf6MzhQZJjDd7aNLspo_deXzdmZ0P4KpqKkL7kWNFXigs9FDGCnnF4CVXkgtDEIWyLXrV5tB7GvFRBr7SvTCUVpnaxMRQRzNFa-Q3tsDDdhFd3L2-WcQaRdHVlEJjJRZt_fmOv2zxbesB57fkOPXHwX3TWrMKWBO01xzVH-VWRo4RvhGKO6FvEPKjYxtLY9vaVUbh-3GuK16oQiVc2xNUtSV0qViXrrh43x3Y9VxXkkb59cYmaiETLldEUa4l_YRh4Fczn_iu-j7k0R9Fmv1YoGO1lbwcQEZPDyGX7k6Oj6BBO0aoTuc8Zn3iTmHdlw8dsXKXuFImOi6z_pQNSMRYq8USTk3KNlrdd2bYAK09usNjGP7LsJxAdjqb6lNg-OVV7ckE3nhc2JJic1KhJcUp9I2ThxINS7Cm2cRTTAsR8WS8jOOgRkXH0LFKkYfrpB-p2mI-VpNVIW58CNWs2upY3OqIGqK2mgvp-AfrSEywEaezP1svIdccdDtBp9VrF2AP4RKnZBabFyG7mC_1OUKSRXiRyAGD5_8WvG89RfAD
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commenters+Offer+Mixed+%27Messages%27+On+Title+II+Classification+of+Texting&rft.jtitle=Telecommunications+Reports&rft.au=Kirby%2C+Paul&rft.au=Stanton%2C+Lynn&rft.date=2015-12-15&rft.pub=Aspen+Publishers%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0163-9854&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=36&rft.externalDocID=4007322811
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0163-9854&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0163-9854&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0163-9854&client=summon