Commenters offer mixed 'messages' on Title II classification of texting
"Wireless provider messaging practices are designed to protect consumers, not restrict them, and in the past Twilio has recognized the value of these measures. Its call to subject mobile messaging to Title II common carriage requirements is the wrong policy and wrong on the law. At its core, Tw...
Saved in:
Published in | Telecommunications Reports Vol. 81; no. 24; p. 36 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Newsletter Trade Publication Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
Aspen Publishers, Inc
15.12.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0163-9854 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | "Wireless provider messaging practices are designed to protect consumers, not restrict them, and in the past Twilio has recognized the value of these measures. Its call to subject mobile messaging to Title II common carriage requirements is the wrong policy and wrong on the law. At its core, Twilio's request is for the Commission to require mobile operators to cease using spam filters and to instead deliver every message that seeks to defraud, trick, and abuse end-user customers. Such regulatory maneuvering directly serves Twilio's interests, as the company's business model clearly reflects that the more traffic Twilio sends, the more profit Twilio generates," CTIA added. CTIA added that the FCC "must also reject Twilio's Petition as a matter of law. Twilio asks the Commission to subject 'short-code-based services' to common carrier regulation under Title II, but its arguments reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of Short Codes, which are not a communications service at all. When a mobile provider sells access to a Short Code, the product being sold is an addressing, billing, and marketing tool, and none of these functions involves the transmission of information. Accordingly, Short Codes are neither telecommunications nor a telecommunications service. Likewise, the Commission must reject Twilio's contention that SMS and MMS are telecommunications services subject to common carrier obligations under the Act. The characteristics of mobile messaging necessarily make it an information service under the Act, not a telecommunications service." Verizon added that "those arguments for classifying mobile messaging as a common carrier service fail as a matter of law. Twilio's effort to extend Title II to mobile messaging is contrary to both the Communications Act and the Open Internet Order. Mobile messaging - like email - is a store-and-forward service: messages are stored by the service while the recipient device is located and then forwarded. The Commission has long correctly classified email as an information service for that very reason; mobile messaging is therefore an information service as well. Furthermore, mobile messaging services, which are able to communicate only with other text-enabled devices on the public switched network, lack the quality of ubiquitous access that the Commission found in the Open Internet Order is emblematic of a commercial mobile service or its functional equivalent. Because messaging services are information services and private mobile services, they cannot be subject to Title II regulation. The common short code system also cannot be subject to Title II because it is not a communications service at all, but merely a means of addressing messages." Foursquare Labs, Inc., which "uses text messaging to confirm user identity on mobile as well as send users contextually relevant content about places near a user," supported the petition. "This year, carriers have begun blocking more and more text message traffic," it said. "There are periods where Foursquare has seen 100% of the messages being blocked by certain carriers. This has significant impact on Foursquare's services. When identity verification texts are blocked users are unable to use Foursquare's services because they cannot confirm their identity. When contextual relevant content [is] blocked, it results in Foursquare being unable to provide its service to users in a manner the user expects, which reflects negatively on the company." |
---|---|
AbstractList | "Wireless provider messaging practices are designed to protect consumers, not restrict them, and in the past Twilio has recognized the value of these measures. Its call to subject mobile messaging to Title II common carriage requirements is the wrong policy and wrong on the law. At its core, Twilio's request is for the Commission to require mobile operators to cease using spam filters and to instead deliver every message that seeks to defraud, trick, and abuse end-user customers. Such regulatory maneuvering directly serves Twilio's interests, as the company's business model clearly reflects that the more traffic Twilio sends, the more profit Twilio generates," CTIA added. CTIA added that the FCC "must also reject Twilio's Petition as a matter of law. Twilio asks the Commission to subject 'short-code-based services' to common carrier regulation under Title II, but its arguments reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of Short Codes, which are not a communications service at all. When a mobile provider sells access to a Short Code, the product being sold is an addressing, billing, and marketing tool, and none of these functions involves the transmission of information. Accordingly, Short Codes are neither telecommunications nor a telecommunications service. Likewise, the Commission must reject Twilio's contention that SMS and MMS are telecommunications services subject to common carrier obligations under the Act. The characteristics of mobile messaging necessarily make it an information service under the Act, not a telecommunications service." Verizon added that "those arguments for classifying mobile messaging as a common carrier service fail as a matter of law. Twilio's effort to extend Title II to mobile messaging is contrary to both the Communications Act and the Open Internet Order. Mobile messaging - like email - is a store-and-forward service: messages are stored by the service while the recipient device is located and then forwarded. The Commission has long correctly classified email as an information service for that very reason; mobile messaging is therefore an information service as well. Furthermore, mobile messaging services, which are able to communicate only with other text-enabled devices on the public switched network, lack the quality of ubiquitous access that the Commission found in the Open Internet Order is emblematic of a commercial mobile service or its functional equivalent. Because messaging services are information services and private mobile services, they cannot be subject to Title II regulation. The common short code system also cannot be subject to Title II because it is not a communications service at all, but merely a means of addressing messages." Foursquare Labs, Inc., which "uses text messaging to confirm user identity on mobile as well as send users contextually relevant content about places near a user," supported the petition. "This year, carriers have begun blocking more and more text message traffic," it said. "There are periods where Foursquare has seen 100% of the messages being blocked by certain carriers. This has significant impact on Foursquare's services. When identity verification texts are blocked users are unable to use Foursquare's services because they cannot confirm their identity. When contextual relevant content [is] blocked, it results in Foursquare being unable to provide its service to users in a manner the user expects, which reflects negatively on the company." |
Audience | Trade |
Author | Stanton, Lynn Kirby, Paul |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Kirby, Paul – sequence: 2 fullname: Stanton, Lynn |
BookMark | eNpt0MFKAzEQBuA9VLBV3yHooRcXks1ms3ssRWuh4KWel2w6iZHdpGZS6OMbqIcKzmXg52MY_kUx88HDrJhT1vCya0V9WywQvyhlvKvaebFZh2kCnyAiCcZAJJM7w4EsJ0BUFnBJgid7l0Yg2y3Ro0J0xmmVXM6DIQnOyXl7X9wYNSI8_O674uP1Zb9-K3fvm-16tSst41SUraQ17Q6Vka2RWlRDa7qmqWqqOsMYcG00ragQQOtBD1pyVktKeTNwIZoWKL8rHi93jzF8nwBTH-EYYsKeyTyMCykyerogq0bonTchRaUnh7pf1bzNn_BOZlX-oyx4iGrMrRmX4z_--coPJ3Q-d-Q8OvuZ0KoT4jX_AcYvcPw |
ContentType | Newsletter Trade Publication Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2015 Aspen Publishers, Inc. Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Dec 15, 2015 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 Aspen Publishers, Inc. – notice: Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Dec 15, 2015 |
DBID | N95 7WY 7XB 8FE 8FG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BENPR BEZIV BGLVJ CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ K6~ M0F M2P M2T P5Z P62 PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQBIZ PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
DatabaseName | Business: Insights ABI/INFORM Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Business Premium Collection Technology Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Business Collection ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry Science Database Telecommunications Database Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic |
DatabaseTitle | ProQuest One Business ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Telecommunications ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Business Premium Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Business Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest One Business |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Economics |
ExternalDocumentID | 4007322811 A438130397 |
Genre | Feature |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | 123 29Q 7WY 8FE 8FG 8V8 ACGOD ACIHN ACMJI AEAQA AEMOZ AFACB AFKRA AGQRV AHEHV AHQJS AKVCP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARAPS AZQEC BENPR BEZIV BGLVJ BKOMP BPHCQ CCPQU DWQXO EBA EBO EBR EBU EMK EPL FAC FAL FJD FJW GNUQQ HCIFZ ICD IOF IRD ITC ITF ITG ITH K1G K6~ M0F M2P MK~ ML~ N95 P62 PHGZM PHGZT PQBIZ PQQKQ PROAC RWL RXW SJN TAA TAF TH9 TN5 U5U UNMZH X6Y ~8M ~ZZ 7XB AFKWF M2T PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS PUEGO Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-g1305-870409d2f78f7c52b8f966240a9f11e3cfc02055e04bcbc731470036b35568e03 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0163-9854 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 28 09:20:46 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:18:06 EDT 2025 Thu Jun 12 23:36:07 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 03:04:25 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | false |
Issue | 24 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-g1305-870409d2f78f7c52b8f966240a9f11e3cfc02055e04bcbc731470036b35568e03 |
PQID | 1777713575 |
PQPubID | 33497 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_reports_1777713575 gale_infotracmisc_A438130397 gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A438130397 gale_businessinsightsgauss_A438130397 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20151215 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-12-15 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2015 text: 20151215 day: 15 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Washington |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Washington |
PublicationTitle | Telecommunications Reports |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Aspen Publishers, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Aspen Publishers, Inc |
SSID | ssj0013928 |
Score | 1.4730589 |
Snippet | "Wireless provider messaging practices are designed to protect consumers, not restrict them, and in the past Twilio has recognized the value of these measures.... |
SourceID | proquest gale |
SourceType | Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 36 |
SubjectTerms | Classification Codes Consumers Customer services Information services Internet access Petitions Public interest Regulation Regulatory agencies Service introduction Spam (Junk email) Text messaging Wireless carriers Wireless communications services |
Title | Commenters offer mixed 'messages' on Title II classification of texting |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/1777713575 |
Volume | 81 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da8IwED-mPmxv-2ROJ3nY5lNZv2Kap-GGXwN1DAXfik0T2UvdjML-_N3VihPG-lAoCS25pPe73F3uB3DXMq7QUeo7aZgIBxHKOAl3DT5yJbkwZKJQtsWo1Z-GrzM-Kxxutkir3OnEXFGnS0U-8kdP4OUFaF08fX45xBpF0dWCQqMEFR93Crj5qjx3Rm_v-ziCzNlV0a4JHBnlNf__VLw5mnRPoYoIkWr2y2XG2tsZPIMjnZ3D8e68sL2AHp3hoMqZK8vGxGbChh_fOmXNIbGXLLRtsnHGJjTpbDBgOcsl5f9s37s0bIL6FwHqEqbdzuSl7xT0B84CgYWjnsIfTKa-EZERivtJZHBvggg8l8bzdKCMQkFyrt0wUYkSgRcKKi-TBFRVTLvBFZSzZaavgeHIWzqUucERcuFJipZJhboNhRoZvwr3JJa4IL7EmyXXgF3MN9bGbSoDhlAnRRUe8n60-NeruVpsS2PjR6iK1EHH-kFHXLPqoLm2k39cxEbi_QTf_NtagxM0WjillHi8DuX1aqNv0TBYJw0oRd1eo1gDPx_CuA8 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT8JAEJ4gHvDmMyKoexA5NdLHst2DMUTlIa8LJNwq3e4SL6AUov4pf6MzhQZJjDd7aNLspo_deXzdmZ0P4KpqKkL7kWNFXigs9FDGCnnF4CVXkgtDEIWyLXrV5tB7GvFRBr7SvTCUVpnaxMRQRzNFa-Q3tsDDdhFd3L2-WcQaRdHVlEJjJRZt_fmOv2zxbesB57fkOPXHwX3TWrMKWBO01xzVH-VWRo4RvhGKO6FvEPKjYxtLY9vaVUbh-3GuK16oQiVc2xNUtSV0qViXrrh43x3Y9VxXkkb59cYmaiETLldEUa4l_YRh4Fczn_iu-j7k0R9Fmv1YoGO1lbwcQEZPDyGX7k6Oj6BBO0aoTuc8Zn3iTmHdlw8dsXKXuFImOi6z_pQNSMRYq8USTk3KNlrdd2bYAK09usNjGP7LsJxAdjqb6lNg-OVV7ckE3nhc2JJic1KhJcUp9I2ThxINS7Cm2cRTTAsR8WS8jOOgRkXH0LFKkYfrpB-p2mI-VpNVIW58CNWs2upY3OqIGqK2mgvp-AfrSEywEaezP1svIdccdDtBp9VrF2AP4RKnZBabFyG7mC_1OUKSRXiRyAGD5_8WvG89RfAD |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commenters+Offer+Mixed+%27Messages%27+On+Title+II+Classification+of+Texting&rft.jtitle=Telecommunications+Reports&rft.au=Kirby%2C+Paul&rft.au=Stanton%2C+Lynn&rft.date=2015-12-15&rft.pub=Aspen+Publishers%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0163-9854&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=36&rft.externalDocID=4007322811 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0163-9854&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0163-9854&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0163-9854&client=summon |