National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line Genetic Evaluation: a comparison of growth and carcass traits in terminal progeny

The objective of this study was to compare growth and carcass traits of 1,252 progeny of six commercially available dam lines included in the National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line Evaluation Project. Lines compared included one maternal line supplied by each of American Diamond Swine Genetic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of animal science Vol. 82; no. 12; pp. 3482 - 3485
Main Authors Cassady, J.P, Robison, O.W, Johnson, R.K, Mabry, J.W, Christian, L.L, Tokach, M.D, Miller, R.K, Goodwin, R.N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Savoy, IL Am Soc Animal Sci 01.12.2004
American Society of Animal Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The objective of this study was to compare growth and carcass traits of 1,252 progeny of six commercially available dam lines included in the National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line Evaluation Project. Lines compared included one maternal line supplied by each of American Diamond Swine Genetics (ADSG), Danbred NA (DB), two lines supplied by Monsanto Choice Genetics (DK and GPK347), Newsham Hybrids (NH), and Landrace x Large White females supplied by the National Swine Registry (NSR). All females were mated to DB, Duroc-Hampshire terminal sires. Traits analyzed were ADG from 56 to 115 kg live weight, days to 115 kg, backfat thickness measured at the 10th rib, carcass length, dressing percent, and 10th-rib LM area. Carcass traits were adjusted to a carcass weight of 85 kg. The statistical model included fixed effects of maternal line, sex, farrowing group, and finishing unit (farm). All two-way interactions among main effects were tested and removed from final models because they were not significant. In addition, because they were not significant, effects of farm and farrowing group were removed from models for carcass length and 10th-rib backfat thickness, and farm was removed from the model for LM area. Least squares means for ADG ranged from 0.74 to 0.79 kg/d. The GPK347 line had lower ADG and greater days to 115 kg than all other lines (P < 0.05). The ADSG (P < 0.05) and NH (P < 0.01) progeny had lower ADG than DK progeny. The DK line had the fewest days to 115 kg (P < 0.05). Progeny for the DB and NH lines had the least 10th-rib backfat, differing from ADSG, DK, and GPK347 (P < 0.05). Pigs from DB females had the greatest dressing percent, differing from ADSG, DK, GPK347, and NH (P < 0.05). The GPK347 had a lower dressing percent than all other lines (P < 0.05). Progeny of DB females had the greatest LM area, differing from ADSG, DK, GPK347, and NSR (P < 0.05). Offspring from ADSG and GPK347 had the smallest LM area; however, GPK347 and NSR did not differ. Differences in carcass length were statistically significant; however, actual differences were small. Economic weights for these traits relative to reproductive traits must be considered in integrated economic analyses to properly compare differences among lines in net economic value for specific markets.
AbstractList The objective of this study was to compare growth and carcass traits of 1,252 progeny of six commercially available dam lines included in the National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line Evaluation Project. Lines compared included one maternal line supplied by each of American Diamond Swine Genetics (ADSG), Danbred NA (DB), two lines supplied by Monsanto Choice Genetics (DK and GPK347), Newsham Hybrids (NH), and Landrace x Large White females supplied by the National Swine Registry (NSR). All females were mated to DB, Duroc-Hampshire terminal sires. Traits analyzed were ADG from 56 to 115 kg live weight, days to 115 kg, backfat thickness measured at the 10th rib, carcass length, dressing percent, and 10th-rib LM area. Carcass traits were adjusted to a carcass weight of 85 kg. The statistical model included fixed effects of maternal line, sex, farrowing group, and finishing unit (farm). All two-way interactions among main effects were tested and removed from final models because they were not significant. In addition, because they were not significant, effects of farm and farrowing group were removed from models for carcass length and 10th-rib backfat thickness, and farm was removed from the model for LM area. Least squares means for ADG ranged from 0.74 to 0.79 kg/d. The GPK347 line had lower ADG and greater days to 115 kg than all other lines (P < 0.05). The ADSG (P < 0.05) and NH (P < 0.01) progeny had lower ADG than DK progeny. The DK line had the fewest days to 115 kg (P < 0.05). Progeny for the DB and NH lines had the least 10th-rib backfat, differing from ADSG, DK, and GPK347 (P < 0.05). Pigs from DB females had the greatest dressing percent, differing from ADSG, DK, GPK347, and NH (P < 0.05). The GPK347 had a lower dressing percent than all other lines (P < 0.05). Progeny of DB females had the greatest LM area, differing from ADSG, DK, GPK347, and NSR (P < 0.05). Offspring from ADSG and GPK347 had the smallest LM area; however, GPK347 and NSR did not differ. Differences in carcass length were statistically significant; however, actual differences were small. Economic weights for these traits relative to reproductive traits must be considered in integrated economic analyses to properly compare differences among lines in net economic value for specific markets.
The objective of this study was to compare growth and carcass traits of 1,252 progeny of six commercially available dam lines included in the National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line Evaluation Project. Lines compared included one maternal line supplied by each of American Diamond Swine Genetics (ADSG), Danbred NA (DB), two lines supplied by Monsanto Choice Genetics (DK and GPK347), Newsham Hybrids (NH), and Landrace x Large White females supplied by the National Swine Registry (NSR). All females were mated to DB, Duroc-Hampshire terminal sires. Traits analyzed were ADG from 56 to 115 kg live weight, days to 115 kg, backfat thickness measured at the 10th rib, carcass length, dressing percent, and 10th-rib LM area. Carcass traits were adjusted to a carcass weight of 85 kg. The statistical model included fixed effects of maternal line, sex, farrowing group, and finishing unit (farm). All two-way interactions among main effects were tested and removed from final models because they were not significant. In addition, because they were not significant, effects of farm and farrowing group were removed from models for carcass length and 10th-rib backfat thickness, and farm was removed from the model for LM area. Least squares means for ADG ranged from 0.74 to 0.79 kg/d. The GPK347 line had lower ADG and greater days to 115 kg than all other lines (P &lt; 0.05). The ADSG (P &lt; 0.05) and NH (P &lt; 0.01) progeny had lower ADG than DK progeny. The DK line had the fewest days to 115 kg (P &lt; 0.05). Progeny for the DB and NH lines had the least 10th-rib backfat, differing from ADSG, DK, and GPK347 (P &lt; 0.05). Pigs from DB females had the greatest dressing percent, differing from ADSG, DK, GPK347, and NH (P &lt; 0.05). The GPK347 had a lower dressing percent than all other lines (P &lt; 0.05). Progeny of DB females had the greatest LM area, differing from ADSG, DK, GPK347, and NSR (P &lt; 0.05). Offspring from ADSG and GPK347 had the smallest LM area; however, GPK347 and NSR did not differ. Differences in carcass length were statistically significant; however, actual differences were small. Economic weights for these traits relative to reproductive traits must be considered in integrated economic analyses to properly compare differences among lines in net economic value for specific markets.
Author Tokach, M.D
Miller, R.K
Goodwin, R.N
Christian, L.L
Cassady, J.P
Johnson, R.K
Robison, O.W
Mabry, J.W
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Cassady, J.P
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Robison, O.W
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Johnson, R.K
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Mabry, J.W
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Christian, L.L
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Tokach, M.D
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Miller, R.K
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Goodwin, R.N
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16302490$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15537767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqF0b1vEzEYBnALFdG0sDKCF2C64m-f2VBUClKAStDZeuPzJS53drDvKJ3413FIECOTB__82O_jM3QSU_QIPaXkgkmmXzNCxEXLKOOiZT8foAWVTDacKn6CFoQw2rQtZaforJRbQiiTRj5Cp1RKrrXSC_TrE0whRRjwdcrf8HVO3ex8LniZ5ujCgD_C5PN-fxWix1c--ik4fPkDhvnPyTcYsEvjDnIoKeLU401Od9MWQ-ywg-ygFDxlCFPBIeIaNoZ93C6njY_3j9HDHobinxzXc3Tz7vLr8n2z-nz1Yfl21fSMm6kRvDWmM8J0IIzThCi3Nlx2XSvateiJUISue-WU6qVhtQ9NdA-qA13HlIrwc_TykFvv_T77MtkxFOeHAaJPc7FKE8WU5v-FVCtjjGorfHaE83r0nd3lMEK-t3-7reDFEUBxMPQZaqHln1OcMGH2T3t1cNuw2d6F7G0ZYRhqLLW3UFpmKbP7763y-UH2kCxsauP25gsjlBNilFBM8t8J8KCP
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS
DBID FBQ
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
8FD
FR3
P64
RC3
7X8
DOI 10.2527/2004.82123482x
DatabaseName AGRIS
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Genetics Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Genetics Abstracts
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1525-3163
EndPage 3485
ExternalDocumentID 15537767
16302490
jas82_12_3482
US201300964625
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
..I
.55
.GJ
0R~
186
18M
29J
2WC
3V.
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5WD
7RQ
7X2
7X7
7XC
88A
88E
88I
8AF
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FW
8G5
8R4
8R5
AABJS
AABMN
AAIMJ
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWDT
ABCQX
ABJCF
ABJNI
ABPTD
ABPTK
ABSAR
ABUWG
ABWST
ABXZS
ACFRR
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACQAM
ACUTJ
ADBBV
ADEIU
ADFRT
ADGZP
ADIPN
ADNWM
ADRTK
ADVEK
AELWJ
AENEX
AEQTP
AETBJ
AFFZL
AFGWE
AFKRA
AFRAH
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGQXC
AHMBA
AI.
AIKOY
AJEEA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALXQX
ANFBD
AOIJS
APJGH
AQDSO
ASAOO
ATCPS
ATDFG
AZQEC
BAYMD
BBNVY
BCRHZ
BENPR
BES
BEYMZ
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKOMP
BPHCQ
BVXVI
BYORX
C1A
CASEJ
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
ELUNK
EYRJQ
F5P
F9R
FBQ
FHSFR
FJW
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FQBLK
FYUFA
GAUVT
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
INIJC
KBUDW
KOP
KSI
KSN
L6V
L7B
LK8
M0K
M0L
M1P
M2O
M2P
M2Q
M7P
M7S
MBTAY
ML0
MV1
MW2
NEJ
NHB
NLBLG
NOMLY
NVLIB
O9-
OBOKY
ODMLO
OJZSN
OK1
OWPYF
P-O
P0-
P2P
PATMY
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
PYCSY
Q2X
ROX
RPM
RUSNO
RWL
RXW
S0X
SJN
TAE
TCN
TJA
TR2
TWZ
UKHRP
VH1
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
XOL
YKV
YXANX
ZCG
ZGI
ZXP
~KM
-
0R
1AW
AALRV
ABFLS
ABUFD
ADACO
AELNO
AGCAB
BBAFP
GJ
H13
KM
LA8
MBDVC
PADUT
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
RAK
08R
AAUGY
IQODW
AAHBH
AARHZ
AASNB
AAUAY
ABMNT
ABXVV
ACZBC
ADQBN
AGKRT
AGMDO
ALIPV
ATGXG
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
8FD
FR3
P64
RC3
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-f239t-43899d949da49c7006cb935dd848b4f04601bf6c66f592821707fa6da77765603
ISSN 0021-8812
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 04:09:17 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 16 10:00:13 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:43:07 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 22 16:04:45 EDT 2023
Tue Nov 10 19:20:47 EST 2020
Wed Dec 27 19:19:55 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Keywords Pigs
Evaluation
Farming animal
Growth
Meat product
Carcass
Pig
Progeny
Vertebrata
Meat animals
Mammalia
Producer
Genetics
Line Evaluation
Artiodactyla
Ungulata
Pork
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-f239t-43899d949da49c7006cb935dd848b4f04601bf6c66f592821707fa6da77765603
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID 15537767
PQID 17699968
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67062673
proquest_miscellaneous_17699968
pubmed_primary_15537767
pascalfrancis_primary_16302490
highwire_smallpub1_jas82_12_3482
fao_agris_US201300964625
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2004-Dec
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2004-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2004
  text: 2004-Dec
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Savoy, IL
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Savoy, IL
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of animal science
PublicationTitleAlternate J Anim Sci
PublicationYear 2004
Publisher Am Soc Animal Sci
American Society of Animal Science
Publisher_xml – name: Am Soc Animal Sci
– name: American Society of Animal Science
SSID ssj0012595
Score 1.8529763
Snippet The objective of this study was to compare growth and carcass traits of 1,252 progeny of six commercially available dam lines included in the National Pork...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
highwire
fao
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 3482
SubjectTerms Animal productions
Animals
backfat
Biological and medical sciences
Body Composition - genetics
Breeding
breeding lines
carcass characteristics
crossbreds
dressing percentage
Female
finishing
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gender differences
Genetic Variation
growth traits
litters (young animals)
liveweight gain
maternal effect
Meat and meat product industries
meat quality
Models, Genetic
pork
progeny
swine
Swine - genetics
Swine - growth & development
swine breeds
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
Title National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line Genetic Evaluation: a comparison of growth and carcass traits in terminal progeny
URI http://jas.fass.org/cgi/content/abstract/82/12/3482
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15537767
https://search.proquest.com/docview/17699968
https://search.proquest.com/docview/67062673
Volume 82
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9owFLbW9mV7mHYvuzA_7A2lSxzHdvbGKlhVFYo20HiLnIsrJBYmoFLVl_31nRM7JEitdnmJICIO8vl8fI6Pv8-EfIh9bTDz8DJplMe18j2V5sbLApXlBQ8hRkDu8Ggszmb8fB7Nm3JBxS7ZpifZ7Z28kv-xKtwDuyJL9h8su2sUbsBnsC9cwcJw_Ssbj-uVvAkKL00q8VYk5CLRPFsseyNtJZ4x87YK0yjPOtgJfFtaetY-irB3BXl5TXeDQQCxdXWMxLbaN-u2ziyrbV1FuVcSboW2ulz8qMmWDXJOoS1tffp5QytDAppjfV32dgs-7uCuCgDNSuxIp2v3_Pe95Qre2vpR0wcCT6lgzwUr1oYaazlU1N5pTc7wNbrL8bOIYekZX3iicDaGx26aKa4u648vk-Hs4iKZDubTA3LEZBxBwn70eTCefN3VniAhtOdeuD9qpT7xDR_324dwxOhVS1kaN9bqDYwtYw9FuT9rqaKX6RPy2NmG9i2GnpIHRfmMPOpfrZ30SvGc_KrRRBFNdIcm6tBEazRRRBN1aKINmj7RPm2wRFeGWixRwBJ1WKIWS3RR0hpL1GHpBZkNB9PTM88dz-EZFsZbj6M0Yx7zONc8ziS47yyNwyjPFVcpN1hxD1IjMiFMFENmH0hfGi1yLaVEyafwJTksV2VxTGjBcqZzU_gwwXBhUg0upBCxYLHGjRF-hxxDTycaemWTzL4xLLdD7s0hee8QWnd_sgFsL6GbIaXVG8WSgCVoqA7p7pkl-WmFXBLIRVAxE5p_X9spAe-KJTNdFqvrTRJIgSsC6v5fCOkLJmTYIa-sgZvWoyhErazXf2z9DXnYDJW35HC7vi7eQay7TbvkQM4lXNXwS9cB9TeGQqzE
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,27957,27958,31755,33409,33780
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National+Pork+Producers+Council+Maternal+Line+Genetic+Evaluation%3A+A+comparison+of+growth+and+carcass+traits+in+terminal+progeny&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+animal+science&rft.au=Cassady%2C+J+P&rft.au=Robison%2C+O+W&rft.au=Johnson%2C+R+K&rft.au=Mabry%2C+J+W&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3482&rft.epage=3485&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527%2F2004.82123482x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8812&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8812&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8812&client=summon