Development of weighting factor for LCIA [Life Cycle Impact Assessment] based on conjoint analysis

Weighting, final step of LCIA, is attractive to provide single index. Many of weighting methodologies have already been proposed until now. Among them, economic valuation has been taken attention because of the facility to understand and availability. Conjoint analysis, one of the methodologies seen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Vol. 16; no. 5; pp. 357 - 368
Main Authors Itsubo, N. (National Inst. of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Tsukuba, Ibaraki (Japan)), Sakagami, M, Kuriyama, K, Washida, T, Kokubu, K, Inaba, A
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, JAPAN 30.09.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0915-0048
1884-5029
DOI10.11353/sesj1988.16.357

Cover

Abstract Weighting, final step of LCIA, is attractive to provide single index. Many of weighting methodologies have already been proposed until now. Among them, economic valuation has been taken attention because of the facility to understand and availability. Conjoint analysis, one of the methodologies seen as economic methodology, is attractive tool to compare between the significance of attributes. In environmental economics, conjoint analysis is considered as effective and the most up-to-date method internationally. Endpoint type LCIA methodology based on Japanese environmental conditions is now being developed in LCA national project of Japan. One of the characteristics of this methodology is that we can calculate the potential damages of safeguard subjects considering the knowledge of environmental science. Damage assessment enables us to minimize the numbers of attributes. In order to provide weighting factors to practitioners whose goals of LCIA are to obtain single index, we applied conjoint analysis to weight across safeguard subjects. The purpose of this research is to measure WTP (Willingness To Pay) for each safeguard subjects and to establish weighting factors of them. The elements we chose are: human health, social welfare, primary productivity, biodiversity, and tax rate. The main research was conducted in Tokyo. The statistical result shows that all of the coefficients are statistically significant. This research belongs to LCA National Project of Japan.
AbstractList Weighting, final step of LCIA, is attractive to provide single index. Many of weighting methodologies have already been proposed until now. Among them, economic valuation has been taken attention because of the facility to understand and availability. Conjoint analysis, one of the methodologies seen as economic methodology, is attractive tool to compare between the significance of attributes. In environmental economics, conjoint analysis is considered as effective and the most up-to-date method internationally. Endpoint type LCIA methodology based on Japanese environmental conditions is now being developed in LCA national project of Japan. One of the characteristics of this methodology is that we can calculate the potential damages of safeguard subjects considering the knowledge of environmental science. Damage assessment enables us to minimize the numbers of attributes. In order to provide weighting factors to practitioners whose goals of LCIA are to obtain single index, we applied conjoint analysis to weight across safeguard subjects. The purpose of this research is to measure WTP (Willingness To Pay) for each safeguard subjects and to establish weighting factors of them. The elements we chose are: human health, social welfare, primary productivity, biodiversity, and tax rate. The main research was conducted in Tokyo. The statistical result shows that all of the coefficients are statistically significant. This research belongs to LCA National Project of Japan.
Author Kuriyama, K
Sakagami, M
Inaba, A
Washida, T
Kokubu, K
Itsubo, N. (National Inst. of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Tsukuba, Ibaraki (Japan))
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Itsubo, N. (National Inst. of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Tsukuba, Ibaraki (Japan))
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Sakagami, M
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Kuriyama, K
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Washida, T
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Kokubu, K
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Inaba, A
BookMark eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhepYK29exH2D6TuVzabY0n9qAT0oCeRMNnOplvSTckGpf_eSNXDzBxe5pnhuSST0AUk5JqzBecylbcR447nxiy4Xsg0OyNTboxKUibyCZmynKcJY8pckHmMvmaMC6kE01NSr_AT2-6wxzDQztEv9M128KGhDuzQ9dSNVRbrJX0vvUNaHG2LdL0_jCldxvFu_Fn9oDVE3NAuUNuFXedHGgRoj9HHK3LuoI04_50z8nZ_91o8JuXzw7pYlonjioVEZs5KgXVtBWhtFMvSNEXIMmQctYI8t0ZoEAAbpWQuXIYZs8pqbYXLjZMzsjpxd3GABqtD7_fQHyvoBz8-Xf05qriu0lMbVf3Hdgt9hWHE3JwwDroKmt7H6ulFjPYYY4ZL-Q0EeG-h
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Society of Environmental Science, japan
Copyright_xml – notice: Society of Environmental Science, japan
DBID FBQ
DOI 10.11353/sesj1988.16.357
DatabaseName AGRIS
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Environmental Sciences
EISSN 1884-5029
EndPage 368
ExternalDocumentID article_sesj1988_16_5_16_5_357_article_char_en
JP2004000813
GroupedDBID ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
B.T
FBQ
JSH
N5S
RZJ
ABJNI
ACGFS
JSF
KQ8
OK1
RJT
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-f140n-37fc32ebbc2a668407555ea77e01e64a99c826a2aad44392f7e70c4c66c2f98f3
ISSN 0915-0048
IngestDate Wed Sep 03 06:30:17 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 07 23:23:37 EST 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language Japanese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-f140n-37fc32ebbc2a668407555ea77e01e64a99c826a2aad44392f7e70c4c66c2f98f3
Notes P01
2004000813
U10
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sesj1988/16/5/16_5_357/_article/-char/en
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs jstage_primary_article_sesj1988_16_5_16_5_357_article_char_en
fao_agris_JP2004000813
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2003/09/30
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2003-09-30
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2003
  text: 2003/09/30
  day: 30
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationTitle ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
PublicationTitleAlternate ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
PublicationYear 2003
Publisher SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, JAPAN
Publisher_xml – name: SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, JAPAN
References 28) 福田(1999)福田吉治,長谷川敏彦,八谷寛,田端航也,日本の疾病負担と障害調整生存年(DALY)厚生の指標,46,4(1999).
4) Goedkoop (1999) M. Goedkoop and R. Spriensma: The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology Report (1999).
8) 産環協(2001)(社)業環境管理協会,平成12年 新エネルギー・産業技術総合開発機構委託,製品等ライフサイクル環境影響評価技術開発成果報告書,平成13年3月.
18) Miller (1956) Miller, G.A., The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, The Psychological Review.
25) 清野(1985)清野豁,内嶋善兵衛,自然植生の純一次生産力の農業気候学的評価(2)日本における純生産量の評価,農業気象,41(2)139-144,1985.
7) International Organization for Standardization (2000) ISO14042, Environmental management -Life cycle assessment- Life cycle impact assessment.
1) BUWAL (1997) BUWAL Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 297: Bewertung in Oekobilanzen mit der Methode der oekologischen Knappheit-Oekofaktoren, 1997.
22) Murray (1996) C.J.L. Murray and A.D. Lopez (Eds.); The Global Burden of Disease, Volume 1, WHO/ Harvard School of Public Health/ World Bank, Harvard University Press, Boston 1996.
13) Green P.E. and VSrinivasan (1990) "Conjoint Analysis in Marketing:New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice", Journal of Marketing Research, 54, 3-19.
15) Goldberg SM., RE. Green and Y. Wind (1982) "Conjoint Analysis of Price Premiums for Hotel Amenities", Journal of Business, 57, 1, S111-5132.
17) Green et al (1991) Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. and Agarwal, M.K., Adaptive Conjoint Analysis, Some Caveats and Suggestions, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 215-222.
21) Itsubo N. and A. Inaba (2000b) Definition of Safeguard Subjects for Damage Oriented Methodology in Japan, Proc. 4th Int. EcoBalance (2000), 217-220.
23) Hofstetter (1998) P Hofstetter: Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1998).
11) 栗山(2000)栗山浩一,環境評価と環境会計.
24) Lieth H., Whittaker, R.H. (1975) Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer-Verlag, (1975).
20) Ben-Akiva, M. and S.R.Lerman (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis, MIT Press.
9) Inaba (2000) A. Inaba, T. Mizuno, N. Itsubo: Development of Japanese LCIA Method Considering the Endpoint Damage, Proc. 4th Int. EcoBalance (2000).
27) 環境庁(2000)環境庁自然保護局野生生物課編「改定・日本の絶滅のおそれのある野生生物―レッドデータブック―8植物I(維管束植物)」,財団法人自然環境研究センター,2000.
3) Itsubo, N., A. Inaba, Y. Matsuno, I. Yasui, and R. Yamamoto (2000a) Current Status of Weighting Methodologies in Japan, Int. J. LCA 5(1) 5-11 (2000).
2) Schmidt-Bleek, E(1997)ファクター10,エコ効率革命を実現する,シュプリンガー・フェアラーク東京.
6) Steen (1999) Steen, B.: A Systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS). Version 2000- Models and Data of the Default Method, Chalmers University of Technology.
10) 鷲田(1999)鷲田豊明,環境評価入門,勁草書房.
19) McFadden,D. (1974) "Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior", in P. Zarembka eds., "Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, 105-142.
14) Cattin P. and D.R. Wittink (1982) "Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis:A Survey", Journal of Marketing, 46, 44-53.
5) EC (1998) European Commission: ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Vol. 7, Methodology 1998 update.
16) 栗山(1999)栗山浩一,鷲田豊明,栗山浩一,竹内憲司(編),環境評価ワークショップ,第2章,築地書館.
12) Louviere J.J., G.Woodworth (1983) "Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350-367.
26) 環境省(2002)環境省環境保健部環境安全課,平成13年度PRTRパイニロット事業報告書,平成14年7月.
References_xml – reference: 3) Itsubo, N., A. Inaba, Y. Matsuno, I. Yasui, and R. Yamamoto (2000a) Current Status of Weighting Methodologies in Japan, Int. J. LCA 5(1) 5-11 (2000).
– reference: 13) Green P.E. and VSrinivasan (1990) "Conjoint Analysis in Marketing:New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice", Journal of Marketing Research, 54, 3-19.
– reference: 14) Cattin P. and D.R. Wittink (1982) "Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis:A Survey", Journal of Marketing, 46, 44-53.
– reference: 17) Green et al (1991) Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. and Agarwal, M.K., Adaptive Conjoint Analysis, Some Caveats and Suggestions, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 215-222.
– reference: 5) EC (1998) European Commission: ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Vol. 7, Methodology 1998 update.
– reference: 8) 産環協(2001)(社)業環境管理協会,平成12年 新エネルギー・産業技術総合開発機構委託,製品等ライフサイクル環境影響評価技術開発成果報告書,平成13年3月.
– reference: 10) 鷲田(1999)鷲田豊明,環境評価入門,勁草書房.
– reference: 25) 清野(1985)清野豁,内嶋善兵衛,自然植生の純一次生産力の農業気候学的評価(2)日本における純生産量の評価,農業気象,41(2)139-144,1985.
– reference: 4) Goedkoop (1999) M. Goedkoop and R. Spriensma: The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology Report (1999).
– reference: 15) Goldberg SM., RE. Green and Y. Wind (1982) "Conjoint Analysis of Price Premiums for Hotel Amenities", Journal of Business, 57, 1, S111-5132.
– reference: 18) Miller (1956) Miller, G.A., The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, The Psychological Review.
– reference: 1) BUWAL (1997) BUWAL Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 297: Bewertung in Oekobilanzen mit der Methode der oekologischen Knappheit-Oekofaktoren, 1997.
– reference: 2) Schmidt-Bleek, E(1997)ファクター10,エコ効率革命を実現する,シュプリンガー・フェアラーク東京.
– reference: 26) 環境省(2002)環境省環境保健部環境安全課,平成13年度PRTRパイニロット事業報告書,平成14年7月.
– reference: 9) Inaba (2000) A. Inaba, T. Mizuno, N. Itsubo: Development of Japanese LCIA Method Considering the Endpoint Damage, Proc. 4th Int. EcoBalance (2000).
– reference: 23) Hofstetter (1998) P Hofstetter: Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1998).
– reference: 27) 環境庁(2000)環境庁自然保護局野生生物課編「改定・日本の絶滅のおそれのある野生生物―レッドデータブック―8植物I(維管束植物)」,財団法人自然環境研究センター,2000.
– reference: 24) Lieth H., Whittaker, R.H. (1975) Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer-Verlag, (1975).
– reference: 28) 福田(1999)福田吉治,長谷川敏彦,八谷寛,田端航也,日本の疾病負担と障害調整生存年(DALY)厚生の指標,46,4(1999).
– reference: 7) International Organization for Standardization (2000) ISO14042, Environmental management -Life cycle assessment- Life cycle impact assessment.
– reference: 19) McFadden,D. (1974) "Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior", in P. Zarembka eds., "Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, 105-142.
– reference: 22) Murray (1996) C.J.L. Murray and A.D. Lopez (Eds.); The Global Burden of Disease, Volume 1, WHO/ Harvard School of Public Health/ World Bank, Harvard University Press, Boston 1996.
– reference: 12) Louviere J.J., G.Woodworth (1983) "Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350-367.
– reference: 21) Itsubo N. and A. Inaba (2000b) Definition of Safeguard Subjects for Damage Oriented Methodology in Japan, Proc. 4th Int. EcoBalance (2000), 217-220.
– reference: 11) 栗山(2000)栗山浩一,環境評価と環境会計.
– reference: 16) 栗山(1999)栗山浩一,鷲田豊明,栗山浩一,竹内憲司(編),環境評価ワークショップ,第2章,築地書館.
– reference: 20) Ben-Akiva, M. and S.R.Lerman (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis, MIT Press.
– reference: 6) Steen (1999) Steen, B.: A Systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS). Version 2000- Models and Data of the Default Method, Chalmers University of Technology.
SSID ssib001234206
ssj0000612142
Score 1.5930033
Snippet Weighting, final step of LCIA, is attractive to provide single index. Many of weighting methodologies have already been proposed until now. Among them,...
SourceID jstage
fao
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 357
SubjectTerms DAMAGE
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
HEALTH
LCA, LCIA, Safeguard Subject, Conjoint Analysis, Weighting
MATHEMATICAL MODELS
PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY
SAFETY
SOCIAL WELFARE
STATISTICAL METHODS
WEIGHING
Title Development of weighting factor for LCIA [Life Cycle Impact Assessment] based on conjoint analysis
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sesj1988/16/5/16_5_357/_article/-char/en
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2003/09/30, Vol.16(5), pp.357-368
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lc9MwENak5cKF4ZWhpXR04MY4-CFZ9qEHJ9PQNDRpIYFy8siORGxmbKZOLvwj_iUrS3Yd6IHCRZOxrMxG-2Vf2l0h9NrxQEdwFloJJ9wiYaIucrelBdYyKGuWSklUofDFzD9bkvNret3r_exkLW03ySD9cWddyb9wFZ4BX1WV7D04234pPIDPwF8YgcMw_hWPOxk_yuj7XIc5le8_rm_RqVMI348m0Rulq1bqXGBUFnmZwetNM5KdyPzs0-TDfKba-6seCTr81GJn8XE5nJujnmyd3ZTtzCwaRrWM2VTbap21QZtoGr2LLia6JKjieTsznU-Xw6VJ5qi26-xbuRN98JpUiSb6OAdaFl9UhtKdNGooXprGtCbw6FBLCQ6tgbTYDQJiUdvEPhq57HfwRztC1tMtrY2-9vS1PH-qAn2hRyWq3AmDYOD4g3bhToNtw764eTN2_JjqARbEzbSqggPQ7aEHLmN1RsD0qnPg6HrENQfW2ghwVDO7utOj-b3NITnQ9fY3qsCwkbwEIygHl6BJJ6wtnMVj9Mi4JjjSlDxBvZw_Rf3T20pImDSqoHqGRh3w4VLiFnxYgw8D-LACH67Bh8sCN-DDDfieo-X4dDE6s8yNHJYER7wAbSRTzxVJkrrcV22CGKVUcMaE7Qif8DBMwV3lLucrApauK5lgdkpS309dGQbS66P9oizEC4RtQXxHhikBe5wIKkLHWzFGGfNS2F-6OkB92JKYfwVdF59furW2AfvVO0Anepfi77ofS3w_Bh7-5_qX6OHtH-EI7W9utuIVGKab5BjtjYdXxzUwfgGOMIgA
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development+of+Weighting+Factor+for+LCIA+based+on+Conjoint+Analysis&rft.jtitle=ENVIRONMENTAL+SCIENCE&rft.au=ITSUBO%2C+Norihiro&rft.au=INABA%2C+Atsushi&rft.au=SAKAGAMI%2C+Masaji&rft.au=KOKUBU%2C+Katsuhiko&rft.date=2003-09-30&rft.pub=SOCIETY+OF+ENVIRONMENTAL+SCIENCE%2C+JAPAN&rft.issn=0915-0048&rft.eissn=1884-5029&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=368&rft_id=info:doi/10.11353%2Fsesj1988.16.357&rft.externalDocID=article_sesj1988_16_5_16_5_357_article_char_en
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0915-0048&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0915-0048&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0915-0048&client=summon