Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS

The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations is the brain's electric field, which varies according to each individual's anatomical features. We employed an approach that combine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain stimulation Vol. 8; no. 5; pp. 906 - 913
Main Authors Laakso, Ilkka, Tanaka, Satoshi, Koyama, Soichiro, De Santis, Valerio, Hirata, Akimasa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations is the brain's electric field, which varies according to each individual's anatomical features. We employed an approach that combines imaging and computational modeling to quantitatively study the extent and primary causes of inter-subject variation in tDCS electric fields. Anatomically-accurate models of the head and brain of 24 males (age: 38.63 ± 11.24 years) were constructed from structural MRI. Finite-element method was used to computationally estimate the electric fields for tDCS of the motor cortex. Surface-based inter-subject registration of the electric field and functional MRI data was used for group level statistical analysis. We observed large differences in each individual's electric field patterns. However, group level analysis revealed that the average electric fields concentrated in the vicinity of the primary motor cortex. The variations in the electric fields in the hand motor area could be characterized by a normal distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 20% of the mean. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) thickness was the primary factor influencing an individual's electric field, thereby explaining 50% of the inter-individual variability, a thicker layer of CSF decreasing the electric field strength. The variability in the electric fields is related to each individual's anatomical features and can only be controlled using detailed image processing. Age was found to have a slight negative effect on the electric field, which might have implications on tDCS studies on aging brains. [Display omitted] •TDCS electric fields are modeled in anatomically-accurate models of 24 subjects.•We propose a surface-based inter-subject registration method for variability analysis of electric fields.•The extent and main reasons of inter-subject variation are quantitatively characterized.•Cerebrospinal fluid thickness explains one-half of the inter-subject variability in the electric fields.
AbstractList The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations is the brain's electric field, which varies according to each individual's anatomical features.BACKGROUNDThe sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations is the brain's electric field, which varies according to each individual's anatomical features.We employed an approach that combines imaging and computational modeling to quantitatively study the extent and primary causes of inter-subject variation in tDCS electric fields.OBJECTIVEWe employed an approach that combines imaging and computational modeling to quantitatively study the extent and primary causes of inter-subject variation in tDCS electric fields.Anatomically-accurate models of the head and brain of 24 males (age: 38.63 ± 11.24 years) were constructed from structural MRI. Finite-element method was used to computationally estimate the electric fields for tDCS of the motor cortex. Surface-based inter-subject registration of the electric field and functional MRI data was used for group level statistical analysis.METHODSAnatomically-accurate models of the head and brain of 24 males (age: 38.63 ± 11.24 years) were constructed from structural MRI. Finite-element method was used to computationally estimate the electric fields for tDCS of the motor cortex. Surface-based inter-subject registration of the electric field and functional MRI data was used for group level statistical analysis.We observed large differences in each individual's electric field patterns. However, group level analysis revealed that the average electric fields concentrated in the vicinity of the primary motor cortex. The variations in the electric fields in the hand motor area could be characterized by a normal distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 20% of the mean. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) thickness was the primary factor influencing an individual's electric field, thereby explaining 50% of the inter-individual variability, a thicker layer of CSF decreasing the electric field strength.RESULTSWe observed large differences in each individual's electric field patterns. However, group level analysis revealed that the average electric fields concentrated in the vicinity of the primary motor cortex. The variations in the electric fields in the hand motor area could be characterized by a normal distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 20% of the mean. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) thickness was the primary factor influencing an individual's electric field, thereby explaining 50% of the inter-individual variability, a thicker layer of CSF decreasing the electric field strength.The variability in the electric fields is related to each individual's anatomical features and can only be controlled using detailed image processing. Age was found to have a slight negative effect on the electric field, which might have implications on tDCS studies on aging brains.CONCLUSIONSThe variability in the electric fields is related to each individual's anatomical features and can only be controlled using detailed image processing. Age was found to have a slight negative effect on the electric field, which might have implications on tDCS studies on aging brains.
The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations is the brain's electric field, which varies according to each individual's anatomical features. We employed an approach that combines imaging and computational modeling to quantitatively study the extent and primary causes of inter-subject variation in tDCS electric fields. Anatomically-accurate models of the head and brain of 24 males (age: 38.63 ± 11.24 years) were constructed from structural MRI. Finite-element method was used to computationally estimate the electric fields for tDCS of the motor cortex. Surface-based inter-subject registration of the electric field and functional MRI data was used for group level statistical analysis. We observed large differences in each individual's electric field patterns. However, group level analysis revealed that the average electric fields concentrated in the vicinity of the primary motor cortex. The variations in the electric fields in the hand motor area could be characterized by a normal distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 20% of the mean. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) thickness was the primary factor influencing an individual's electric field, thereby explaining 50% of the inter-individual variability, a thicker layer of CSF decreasing the electric field strength. The variability in the electric fields is related to each individual's anatomical features and can only be controlled using detailed image processing. Age was found to have a slight negative effect on the electric field, which might have implications on tDCS studies on aging brains. [Display omitted] •TDCS electric fields are modeled in anatomically-accurate models of 24 subjects.•We propose a surface-based inter-subject registration method for variability analysis of electric fields.•The extent and main reasons of inter-subject variation are quantitatively characterized.•Cerebrospinal fluid thickness explains one-half of the inter-subject variability in the electric fields.
The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations is the brain's electric field, which varies according to each individual's anatomical features. We employed an approach that combines imaging and computational modeling to quantitatively study the extent and primary causes of inter-subject variation in tDCS electric fields. Anatomically-accurate models of the head and brain of 24 males (age: 38.63 ± 11.24 years) were constructed from structural MRI. Finite-element method was used to computationally estimate the electric fields for tDCS of the motor cortex. Surface-based inter-subject registration of the electric field and functional MRI data was used for group level statistical analysis. We observed large differences in each individual's electric field patterns. However, group level analysis revealed that the average electric fields concentrated in the vicinity of the primary motor cortex. The variations in the electric fields in the hand motor area could be characterized by a normal distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 20% of the mean. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) thickness was the primary factor influencing an individual's electric field, thereby explaining 50% of the inter-individual variability, a thicker layer of CSF decreasing the electric field strength. The variability in the electric fields is related to each individual's anatomical features and can only be controlled using detailed image processing. Age was found to have a slight negative effect on the electric field, which might have implications on tDCS studies on aging brains.
Abstract Background The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations is the brain's electric field, which varies according to each individual's anatomical features. Objective We employed an approach that combines imaging and computational modeling to quantitatively study the extent and primary causes of inter-subject variation in tDCS electric fields. Methods Anatomically-accurate models of the head and brain of 24 males (age: 38.63 ± 11.24 years) were constructed from structural MRI. Finite-element method was used to computationally estimate the electric fields for tDCS of the motor cortex. Surface-based inter-subject registration of the electric field and functional MRI data was used for group level statistical analysis. Results We observed large differences in each individual's electric field patterns. However, group level analysis revealed that the average electric fields concentrated in the vicinity of the primary motor cortex. The variations in the electric fields in the hand motor area could be characterized by a normal distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 20% of the mean. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) thickness was the primary factor influencing an individual's electric field, thereby explaining 50% of the inter-individual variability, a thicker layer of CSF decreasing the electric field strength. Conclusions The variability in the electric fields is related to each individual's anatomical features and can only be controlled using detailed image processing. Age was found to have a slight negative effect on the electric field, which might have implications on tDCS studies on aging brains.
Author Hirata, Akimasa
Laakso, Ilkka
Tanaka, Satoshi
Koyama, Soichiro
De Santis, Valerio
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ilkka
  surname: Laakso
  fullname: Laakso, Ilkka
  email: laakso.ilkka@nitech.ac.jp
  organization: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Satoshi
  surname: Tanaka
  fullname: Tanaka, Satoshi
  organization: Laboratory of Psychology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Soichiro
  surname: Koyama
  fullname: Koyama, Soichiro
  organization: Division of Cerebral Integration, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Aichi 444-8585, Japan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Valerio
  surname: De Santis
  fullname: De Santis, Valerio
  organization: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Akimasa
  surname: Hirata
  fullname: Hirata, Akimasa
  organization: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMofqz-AC_So5euk7RJWwRB6voBiodV8RbSdAqp3UaTVth_b8rqRRBhIJPwzpuZZw7Idm97JOSYwpwCFWftvHJ-zoDyOYQAtkX2aZ6JOM14uh3yIuFxLujrHjnwvgXgRZFnu2SPCWCC5ck-Ke_6AV3sx6pFPUQvyhlVmc4M68j00aILj87o6NpgV_vINtGDHayLSusGo1UXDVfl8pDsNKrzePR9zsjz9eKpvI3vH2_uysv7GDmkQ0w5Y7pJshxEqhlCXqkszQQmRQVc1U1Saco0pULlNaosSRohckChGdcqRZbMyOnG993ZjxH9IFfGa-w61aMdvaQZpTzlHESQnnxLx2qFtXx3ZqXcWv4MHgTnGwGGhj8NOum1wV5jbVyYWdbWSApywixbGTDLCbOEEDB1cvGrWnemn4C84Rp9a0fXBxKSSs8kyOW0iGkPlAMUabjNSPG3wT-ffwGlKZek
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.002
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1876-4754
EndPage 913
ExternalDocumentID 26026283
S1935861X15009419
1_s2_0_S1935861X15009419
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Konica Minolta Science and Technology Foundation
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007418
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1~.
1~5
23N
4.4
457
4G.
4H-
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFWJ
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXLA
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABCQJ
ABFNM
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABTEW
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPKN
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGWIK
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
AXJTR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
GBLVA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
MOBAO
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OK1
OP~
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SSH
SSN
SSZ
T5K
Z5R
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
NCXOZ
RIG
AADPK
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AGRNS
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-e504t-1522cf378064c2e08ba7476e39b05adf3bc12c116a8dea733f6680e6c25ca4e23
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 1935-861X
1876-4754
IngestDate Tue Aug 05 10:09:45 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:53 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:27:22 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:09 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:34:18 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Finite-element method
Electric field
tDCS
Inter-subject variability
Motor cortex
Language English
License Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-e504t-1522cf378064c2e08ba7476e39b05adf3bc12c116a8dea733f6680e6c25ca4e23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 26026283
PQID 1711545506
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1711545506
pubmed_primary_26026283
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_brs_2015_05_002
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1935861X15009419
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_brs_2015_05_002
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Brain stimulation
PublicationTitleAlternate Brain Stimul
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Suh, Lee, Kim (bib37) 2012; 57
Ridding, Ziemann (bib12) 2010; 588
Kim, Kim, Chang, Kim, Kim, Im (bib22) 2014; 564
Opitz, Paulus, Will, Antunes, Thielscher (bib24) 2015; 109
Fischl, Sereno, Tootell, Dale (bib27) 1999; 8
Friston (bib28) 1994; 2
Parazzini, Fiocchi, Liorni, Priori, Ravazzani (bib23) 2014; 24
Good, Johnsrude, Ashburner, Henson, Friston, Frackowiak (bib33) 2001; 14
Bai, Dokos, Ho, Loo (bib26) 2014; 87
Truong, Magerowski, Blackburn, Bikson, Alonso-Alonso (bib18) 2013; 2
Datta, Bansal, Diaz, Patel, Reato, Bikson (bib14) 2009; 2
Batsikadze, Moliadze, Paulus, Kuo, Nitsche (bib32) 2013; 591
Nitsche, Paulus (bib2) 2000; 527
Dale, Fischl, Sereno (bib29) 1999; 9
Heise, Niehoff, Feldheim, Liuzzi, Gerloff, Hummel (bib36) 2014; 6
Brunoni, Nitsche, Bolognini (bib8) 2012; 5
Wagner, Rampersad, Aydin (bib20) 2014; 11
Fischl, Dale (bib30) 2000; 97
Boggio, Ferrucci, Rigonatti (bib34) 2006; 249
Noetscher, Yanamadala, Makarov, Pascual-Leone (bib21) 2014; 61
Fregni, Pascual-Leone (bib5) 2007; 3
Datta, Zhou, Su, Parra, Bikson (bib17) 2013; 10
Nitsche, Paulus (bib3) 2001; 57
Tanaka, Watanabe (bib7) 2009; 61
Tremblay, Lepage, Latulipe-Loiselle, Fregni, Pascual-Leone, Théoret (bib10) 2014; 7
Wiethoff, Hamada, Rothwell (bib11) 2014; 7
Fujiyama, Hyde, Hinder (bib35) 2014; 6
Laakso, Hirata (bib31) 2012; 57
Priori, Berardelli, Rona, Accornero, Manfredi (bib1) 1998; 9
Parazzini, Fiocchi, Rossi, Paglialonga, Ravazzani (bib15) 2011; 58
Datta, Truong, Minhas, Parra, Bikson (bib25) 2012; 3
Shahid, Bikson, Salman, Wen, Ahfock (bib19) 2014; 11
Krause, Cohen Kadosh (bib13) 2014; 8
López-Alonso, Cheeran, Rio-Rodriguez, Fernández-Del-Olmo (bib9) 2014; 7
Furubayashi, Terao, Arai (bib4) 2008; 185
Neuling, Wagner, Wolters, Zaehle, Herrmann (bib16) 2012; 3
Hummel, Celnik, Pascual-Leone (bib6) 2008; 1
References_xml – volume: 87
  start-page: 332
  year: 2014
  end-page: 344
  ident: bib26
  article-title: A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression
  publication-title: Neuroimage
– volume: 249
  start-page: 31
  year: 2006
  end-page: 38
  ident: bib34
  article-title: Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson’s disease
  publication-title: J Neurol Sci
– volume: 9
  start-page: 179
  year: 1999
  end-page: 194
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Cortical surface-based analysis. i. segmentation and surface reconstruction
  publication-title: Neuroimage
– volume: 1
  start-page: 370
  year: 2008
  end-page: 382
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Controversy: noninvasive and invasive cortical stimulation show efficacy in treating stroke patients
  publication-title: Brain Stimul
– volume: 61
  start-page: 2488
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2498
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Comparison of cephalic and extracephalic montages for transcranial direct current stimulation–a numerical study
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
– volume: 57
  start-page: 6961
  year: 2012
  end-page: 6980
  ident: bib37
  article-title: Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
– volume: 97
  start-page: 11050
  year: 2000
  end-page: 11055
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images
  publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
– volume: 14
  start-page: 21
  year: 2001
  end-page: 36
  ident: bib33
  article-title: A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains
  publication-title: Neuroimage
– volume: 6
  start-page: 146
  year: 2014
  ident: bib36
  article-title: Differential behavioral and physiological effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy adults of younger and older age
  publication-title: Front Aging Neurosci
– volume: 3
  start-page: 83
  year: 2012
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Finite element model predicts current density distribution for clinical applications of tDCS and tACS
  publication-title: Front Psychiatry
– volume: 3
  start-page: 383
  year: 2007
  end-page: 393
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS
  publication-title: Nat Clin Pract Neurol
– volume: 7
  start-page: 372
  year: 2014
  end-page: 380
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms
  publication-title: Brain Stimul
– volume: 9
  start-page: 2257
  year: 1998
  end-page: 2260
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp
  publication-title: Neuroreport
– volume: 58
  start-page: 1773
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1780
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Transcranial direct current stimulation: estimation of the electric field and of the current density in an anatomical human head model
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1430006
  year: 2014
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation in the child brain: implications for the treatment of refractory childhood focal epilepsy
  publication-title: Int J Neural Syst
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1899
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1901
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans
  publication-title: Neurology
– volume: 6
  start-page: 115
  year: 2014
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Delayed plastic responses to anodal tDCS in older adults
  publication-title: Front Aging Neurosci
– volume: 185
  start-page: 279
  year: 2008
  end-page: 286
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Short and long duration transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the human hand motor area
  publication-title: Exp Brain Res
– volume: 10
  start-page: 036018
  year: 2013
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose
  publication-title: J Neural Eng
– volume: 2
  start-page: 759
  year: 2013
  end-page: 766
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in obesity: Impact of head fat and dose guidelines
  publication-title: Neuroimage Clin
– volume: 11
  start-page: 036002
  year: 2014
  ident: bib19
  article-title: The value and cost of complexity in predictive modelling: role of tissue anisotropic conductivity and fibre tracts in neuromodulation
  publication-title: J Neural Eng
– volume: 7
  start-page: 773
  year: 2014
  end-page: 783
  ident: bib10
  article-title: The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS
  publication-title: Brain Stimul
– volume: 591
  start-page: 1987
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2000
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans
  publication-title: J Physiol (Lond)
– volume: 57
  start-page: 7753
  year: 2012
  end-page: 7765
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Fast multigrid-based computation of the induced electric field for transcranial magnetic stimulation
  publication-title: Phys Med Biol
– volume: 588
  start-page: 2291
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2304
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects
  publication-title: J Physiol (Lond)
– volume: 109
  start-page: 140
  year: 2015
  end-page: 150
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation
  publication-title: Neuroimage
– volume: 2
  start-page: 5678
  year: 1994
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis
  publication-title: Hum Brain Mapp
– volume: 8
  start-page: 272
  year: 1999
  end-page: 284
  ident: bib27
  article-title: High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface
  publication-title: Hum Brain Mapp
– volume: 5
  start-page: 175
  year: 2012
  end-page: 195
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions
  publication-title: Brain Stimul
– volume: 564
  start-page: 6
  year: 2014
  end-page: 10
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: electric field simulation using individual MRI data
  publication-title: Neurosci Lett
– volume: 527
  start-page: 633
  year: 2000
  end-page: 639
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation
  publication-title: J Physiol (Lond)
– volume: 11
  start-page: 016002
  year: 2014
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model
  publication-title: J Neural Eng
– volume: 8
  start-page: 25
  year: 2014
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Not all brains are created equal: the relevance of individual differences in responsiveness to transcranial electrical stimulation
  publication-title: Front Syst Neurosci
– volume: 61
  start-page: 53
  year: 2009
  end-page: 64
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Transcranial direct current stimulation–a new tool for human cognitive neuroscience
  publication-title: Brain Nerve
– volume: 3
  start-page: 91
  year: 2012
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models
  publication-title: Front Psychiatry
– volume: 2
  start-page: 201
  year: 2009
  end-page: 207
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad
  publication-title: Brain Stimul
– volume: 7
  start-page: 468
  year: 2014
  end-page: 475
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex
  publication-title: Brain Stimul
SSID ssj0059987
Score 2.527263
Snippet The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations...
Abstract Background The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 906
SubjectTerms Adult
Analysis of Variance
Brain Waves
Electric field
Finite-element method
Humans
Inter-subject variability
Male
Middle Aged
Motor cortex
Motor Cortex - physiology
Neurology
tDCS
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods
Title Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1935861X15009419
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1935861X15009419
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.002
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026283
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1711545506
Volume 8
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Ba9swFH6U9tLL2NpuS9cWFUpvTmRZkp1j8BLSlvbSdeQmZEWCDGaHODnkst--J9lOGV0pFHyxkZB5kt5733ufngCu0CaJuU5Q-2UcAYobikjbIYsM2od0jgZOFoEg-yCnT_x2JmZ7kHdnYTytstX9jU4P2rr9MmilOVguFoPH2KfwZDxDlwYxSij9yXnqV3n_z47mIRBOpE1mWUS-dZfZDByvYuUrdseiv4usPBuk1xzOYHgmH-FD6zGSUfNTn2DPlkdwPCoRLf_ekmsSOJwhOH4MeQjwRfWm8OEV8hOBcFOHe0sWJRmHK28Whkw8ba0mlSP3FWJuklerENIm6-_54wk8TcY_8mnUXpMQWUH5OkILzIxL0gy9C8MszQqNGEHaZFhQoecuKUzMTBxLnc2tTpPESZlRKw0TRnPLks-wX1al_QqEOl9IHDeOHRpeGJppx3xNLOk4c8bEPWCdgFR3chN1jUL1qzq62C-FUlVeqoriQ1kP0v91snW7W2oVq5opql7MaA_4ruc_i-KtAS-7uVO4WXwGRJe22uBAqa8-hKBM9uBLM6lq2VT1UMxfxoXO1un7Bv0Gh_6toZ-dwf56tbHn6K-si4uwIC_gYHRzN334Cy9d5zE
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La-MwEB5Kemgvpbt9pY9dFUpvbmTZkp1jcBvSVy59kJuQFQlSqB3i5NB_35FsdyntsrDgk42QmZFm5psZfQI4Q5_EpypC65fGCFBsnwfK9Fmg0T8kU3RwIvcNsmMxeopvJnyyBll7Fsa1VTa2v7bp3lo3b3qNNHvz2az3ELoSnggnGNIgRnHUn-uOnYp3YH1wfTsatwaZI6JI6uIyD9yAtrjp27zyhSPtDvnFR3Llj0_6W8zpfc9wG7aaoJEM6v_6AWum-Ak7gwIB8-sbOSe-jdPnx3cg8zm-oFrlLsNCnhEL11Tcb2RWkCt_681Mk6HrXKtIacl9ibCbZOXCZ7XJ8jJ72IWn4dVjNgqamxICw2m8DNAJM22jJMUAQzND01whTBAm6ueUq6mNch0yHYZCpVOjkiiyQqTUCM24VrFh0R50irIwB0CodVziuHdMX8e5pqmyzNFiCRszq3XYBdYKSLaHN9HcSLTAsu0Ye5EoVemkKik-lHUh-W6QqZoNU8lQVkxS-UWpXYg_Rn5aF_-a8LTVncT94oogqjDlCidKHAER4jLRhf1aqXJeE3tI5u7jwnjr8P8m_Q0bo8f7O3l3Pb49gk33pe5GO4bOcrEyJxi-LPNfzfJ8Bybe6eI
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-subject+Variability+in+Electric+Fields+of+Motor+Cortical+tDCS&rft.jtitle=Brain+stimulation&rft.au=Laakso%2C+Ilkka&rft.au=Tanaka%2C+Satoshi&rft.au=Koyama%2C+Soichiro&rft.au=De+Santis%2C+Valerio&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=1935-861X&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=906&rft.epage=913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.brs.2015.05.002&rft.externalDocID=S1935861X15009419
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F1935861X%2FS1935861X15X00040%2Fcov150h.gif