Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice

• Published in: American journal of ophthalmology Vol. 133; no. 3; pp. 327 - 332
• Main Authors: Wadood, Azfar C, Azuara-Blanco, Augusto, Aspinall, Peter, Taguri, Abdel, King, Anthony J.W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 2002; Elsevier
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Area Under Curve; Biological and medical sciences; False Positive Reactions; Female; Glaucoma - diagnosis; Humans; Investigative techniques of ocular function and vision; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Time Factors; Vision Disorders - diagnosis; Visual Field Tests - methods; Visual Fields; Human; Static perimetry; Eye disease; Sensitivity; Specificity; Frequency doubler; Glaucoma (eye); Diagnosis; Technique; Algorithm; Comparative study
• ISSN: 0002-9394; 1879-1891
• DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01424-6

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the screening mode of the Humphrey-Welch Allyn frequency-doubling technology (FDT), Octopus tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP), and the Humphrey Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA)-fast (HSF) in patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: A comparative consecutive case series. METHODS: This was a prospective study which took place in the glaucoma unit of an academic department of ophthalmology. One eye of 70 consecutive glaucoma patients and 28 age-matched normal subjects was studied. Eyes were examined with the program C-20 of FDT, G1-TOP, and 24-2 HSF in one visit and in random order. The gold standard for glaucoma was presence of a typical glaucomatous optic disk appearance on stereoscopic examination, which was judged by a glaucoma expert. The sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of two algorithms for the FDT screening test, two algorithms for TOP, and three algorithms for HSF, as defined before the start of this study, were evaluated. The time required for each test was also analyzed. RESULTS: Values for area under the ROC curve ranged from 82.5%–93.9%. The largest area (93.9%) under the ROC curve was obtained with the FDT criteria, defining abnormality as presence of at least one abnormal location. Mean test time was 1.08 ± 0.28 minutes, 2.31 ± 0.28 minutes, and 4.14 ± 0.57 minutes for the FDT, TOP, and HSF, respectively. The difference in testing time was statistically significant ( P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The C-20 FDT, G1-TOP, and 24-2 HSF appear to be useful tools to diagnose glaucoma. The test C-20 FDT and G1-TOP take approximately 1/4 and 1/2 of the time taken by 24 to 2 HSF.