Comparative efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab on hard exudate resolution in diabetic macular edema

To compare the efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for resolution of diabetic macular edema-associated hard exudates (HEs). Post hoc analysis of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T trial. Two hundred and forty-eight subjects with 84 eyes were treated with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCanadian journal of ophthalmology
Main Authors Pak, Kangyeun, Yoon, Changki, Sadda, Srinivas R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 09.08.2025
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To compare the efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for resolution of diabetic macular edema-associated hard exudates (HEs). Post hoc analysis of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T trial. Two hundred and forty-eight subjects with 84 eyes were treated with aflibercept, 71 eyes were treated with bevacizumab, and 93 eyes were treated with ranibizumab. The volume of HEs was measured by automatically quantifying hyperreflective foci on optical coherence tomography volume scans using a deep-learning algorithm. HEs were quantified within the total macula (6 × 6 mm scan area), as well as separately within the central subfield (CSF), inner ring (IR), and outer ring (OR) of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid at baseline, 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks (w) after treatment. The extent of HEs at baseline and the change over time were compared among the groups. Baseline HEs in the total macula were 0.0211 ± 0.0275, 0.0215 ± 0.0266, and 0.0223 ± 0.0272 mm for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. At 1 year, HEs significantly decreased with aflibercept and ranibizumab in the total macula and in all subregions (CSF, OR, and IR), but they only decreased with evacizumab in the CSF. Over 1 year, the reduction in HEs was greater for aflibercept and ranibizumab than for bevacizumab within the total macular region, and anibizumab was superior to bevacizumab for the IR as well. HEs decreased significantly with aflibercept and ranibizumab treatment over 1 year in all regions, but not with bevacizumab, highlighting the differential efficacy among agents in resolving HEs.
AbstractList To compare the efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for resolution of diabetic macular edema-associated hard exudates (HEs).OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for resolution of diabetic macular edema-associated hard exudates (HEs).Post hoc analysis of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T trial.DESIGNPost hoc analysis of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T trial.Two hundred and forty-eight subjects with 84 eyes were treated with aflibercept, 71 eyes were treated with bevacizumab, and 93 eyes were treated with ranibizumab.PARTICIPANTSTwo hundred and forty-eight subjects with 84 eyes were treated with aflibercept, 71 eyes were treated with bevacizumab, and 93 eyes were treated with ranibizumab.The volume of HEs was measured by automatically quantifying hyperreflective foci on optical coherence tomography volume scans using a deep-learning algorithm. HEs were quantified within the total macula (6 × 6 mm scan area), as well as separately within the central subfield (CSF), inner ring (IR), and outer ring (OR) of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid at baseline, 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks (w) after treatment. The extent of HEs at baseline and the change over time were compared among the groups.METHODSThe volume of HEs was measured by automatically quantifying hyperreflective foci on optical coherence tomography volume scans using a deep-learning algorithm. HEs were quantified within the total macula (6 × 6 mm scan area), as well as separately within the central subfield (CSF), inner ring (IR), and outer ring (OR) of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid at baseline, 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks (w) after treatment. The extent of HEs at baseline and the change over time were compared among the groups.Baseline HEs in the total macula were 0.0211 ± 0.0275, 0.0215 ± 0.0266, and 0.0223 ± 0.0272 mm3 for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. At 1 year, HEs significantly decreased with aflibercept and ranibizumab in the total macula and in all subregions (CSF, OR, and IR), but they only decreased with evacizumab in the CSF. Over 1 year, the reduction in HEs was greater for aflibercept and ranibizumab than for bevacizumab within the total macular region, and anibizumab was superior to bevacizumab for the IR as well.RESULTSBaseline HEs in the total macula were 0.0211 ± 0.0275, 0.0215 ± 0.0266, and 0.0223 ± 0.0272 mm3 for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. At 1 year, HEs significantly decreased with aflibercept and ranibizumab in the total macula and in all subregions (CSF, OR, and IR), but they only decreased with evacizumab in the CSF. Over 1 year, the reduction in HEs was greater for aflibercept and ranibizumab than for bevacizumab within the total macular region, and anibizumab was superior to bevacizumab for the IR as well.HEs decreased significantly with aflibercept and ranibizumab treatment over 1 year in all regions, but not with bevacizumab, highlighting the differential efficacy among agents in resolving HEs.CONCLUSIONSHEs decreased significantly with aflibercept and ranibizumab treatment over 1 year in all regions, but not with bevacizumab, highlighting the differential efficacy among agents in resolving HEs.
To compare the efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for resolution of diabetic macular edema-associated hard exudates (HEs). Post hoc analysis of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol T trial. Two hundred and forty-eight subjects with 84 eyes were treated with aflibercept, 71 eyes were treated with bevacizumab, and 93 eyes were treated with ranibizumab. The volume of HEs was measured by automatically quantifying hyperreflective foci on optical coherence tomography volume scans using a deep-learning algorithm. HEs were quantified within the total macula (6 × 6 mm scan area), as well as separately within the central subfield (CSF), inner ring (IR), and outer ring (OR) of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid at baseline, 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks (w) after treatment. The extent of HEs at baseline and the change over time were compared among the groups. Baseline HEs in the total macula were 0.0211 ± 0.0275, 0.0215 ± 0.0266, and 0.0223 ± 0.0272 mm for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. At 1 year, HEs significantly decreased with aflibercept and ranibizumab in the total macula and in all subregions (CSF, OR, and IR), but they only decreased with evacizumab in the CSF. Over 1 year, the reduction in HEs was greater for aflibercept and ranibizumab than for bevacizumab within the total macular region, and anibizumab was superior to bevacizumab for the IR as well. HEs decreased significantly with aflibercept and ranibizumab treatment over 1 year in all regions, but not with bevacizumab, highlighting the differential efficacy among agents in resolving HEs.
Author Pak, Kangyeun
Yoon, Changki
Sadda, Srinivas R
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kangyeun
  surname: Pak
  fullname: Pak, Kangyeun
  organization: Doheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Pusan, South Korea; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Changki
  surname: Yoon
  fullname: Yoon, Changki
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Srinivas R
  surname: Sadda
  fullname: Sadda, Srinivas R
  email: SSAdda@doheny.org
  organization: Doheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States. Electronic address: SSAdda@doheny.org
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40796006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkEtLxDAUhYOMOA_9Ay4kSxczNY--spTBFwy40XW5SW4wpW1q2g6Ov94BR3B1Dh8fZ3GWZNaFDgm55izhjOd3dVKbOiSCiSxhRcKYOiMLXvBsI2XOZv_6nCyHoWZMyiLNL8g8ZYXKGcsXZL8NbQ8RRr9His55A-ZAg6PgGq8xGuzHNdW4B-O_pxb0mkJnaYTO619AQ0c_IFqKX5OFEWnEITTT6I_cd9R60Dh6Q1swUwORosUWLsm5g2bAq1OuyPvjw9v2ebN7fXrZ3u82yJnKN6XWGXLjNIKw2jKrXYEGtRQOMmNKYWShmEmZVsiFVbkQ4GQuCq7TrFROrsjt724fw-eEw1i1fjDYNNBhmIZKCqk4z0SpjurNSZ10i7bqo28hHqq_r-QPfUZw8w
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2025 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2025 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.07.009
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1715-3360
ExternalDocumentID 40796006
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1P~
1~.
1~5
29B
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
6J9
7-5
8P~
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABMAC
ABMZM
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACIEU
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AEVXI
AFCTW
AFJKZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
AXJTR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
GBLVA
HVGLF
KOM
L7B
M41
MO0
NPM
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OF-
OQ~
P-8
P-9
P2P
P6G
PC.
Q38
ROL
SDF
SEL
SES
SJN
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TR2
WH7
Z5R
~G-
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-e1096-8bb5e1cfbea2dbd0dbf7eceb32fa5cc82c3790c40b9e12d9622af36271b4589f3
ISSN 1715-3360
IngestDate Wed Aug 13 23:56:33 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 14 01:41:41 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
License Copyright © 2025 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-e1096-8bb5e1cfbea2dbd0dbf7eceb32fa5cc82c3790c40b9e12d9622af36271b4589f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 40796006
PQID 3239115289
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3239115289
pubmed_primary_40796006
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-Aug-09
20250809
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-09
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-Aug-09
  day: 09
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Canadian journal of ophthalmology
PublicationTitleAlternate Can J Ophthalmol
PublicationYear 2025
SSID ssj0033746
Score 2.3815854
SecondaryResourceType online_first
Snippet To compare the efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for resolution of diabetic macular edema-associated hard exudates (HEs). Post hoc analysis...
To compare the efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for resolution of diabetic macular edema-associated hard exudates (HEs).OBJECTIVETo...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Title Comparative efficacy of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab on hard exudate resolution in diabetic macular edema
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40796006
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3239115289
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLagkxAviHEdbMhIvHWpUjvXx2na1MFWHmilvkW2c7ylo8nEmgr26zmOnTbbQBq8RJGjXOTv5PhcvnNMyKdYap3gwuBFhtkexIH2ZMDA4yoHhqBHjJna4bNxNJoGn2fhbLPHZlNdspQDdfPHupL_QRXHEFdTJfsPyK4figN4jvjiERHG44MwPuy07gbTC8Ls3W4S-7phjRjGiplCCSuhipt6IWRL1sQVqpB2yKQLTOlVH37Wxv3vowPuvrqhyjbB2UL1F8JSViEHp8vvNjjodKGori6WF-L74lbQHq1VS-Aoz39BXW4UzjrzX55fFuuYD-rExrL9ZpJMK3HtuI0uRMHChiCXdrRqjMLAud04YAD3x-7pcRtSmA_mam4qNFnYdFh1z7zVNHv8NTuenp5mk6PZ5DHZYugtsB7ZOjj5Mhq3SzLnsS0za9_pqqcs0e_uO_7uazQ2x-Q5eeacBXpgkd8mj6B8QZ6cOTrES7LqCABtBYBWmnYEYJ924N-nCD7tgE-rkhrwqQOfbsCnRUlb8KkDnzbgvyLT46PJ4chzG2l4MEQX1UukDGGotATBcpn7udQxKJCcaREqlTDF49RXgS9TGLI8NT-oxt80HsogTFLNX5NeWZXwllDJ0CYHwXlqGJ4SvX28LEUkWJJrlYod8rGdvAwVlck-iRKq-jrjjOPCGqKDv0Pe2FnNrmxHlSzwY_Sk_ejdA-5-T55uZGyX9JY_athDw3ApPzjYfwPCu2nd
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+efficacy+of+aflibercept%2C+bevacizumab%2C+and+ranibizumab+on+hard+exudate+resolution+in+diabetic+macular+edema&rft.jtitle=Canadian+journal+of+ophthalmology&rft.au=Pak%2C+Kangyeun&rft.au=Yoon%2C+Changki&rft.au=Sadda%2C+Srinivas+R&rft.date=2025-08-09&rft.issn=1715-3360&rft.eissn=1715-3360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jcjo.2025.07.009&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1715-3360&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1715-3360&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1715-3360&client=summon