Pedicle screw insertion into infected vertebrae reduces operative time and range of fixation in minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Background Minimally invasive posterior fixation surgery for pyogenic spondylitis is known to reduce invasiveness and complication rates; however, the outcomes of concomitant insertion of pedicle screws (PS) into the infected vertebrae via the posterior approach are undetermined. This study aimed to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 1 - 8
Main Authors Gamada, Hisanori, Funayama, Toru, Setojima, Yusuke, Nagasawa, Keigo, Nakagawa, Takane, Sakashita, Kotaro, Okuwaki, Shun, Ogawa, Kaishi, Izawa, Shigeo, Shibao, Yosuke, Kumagai, Hiroshi, Nagashima, Katsuya, Fujii, Kengo, Takeuchi, Yosuke, Tatsumura, Masaki, Shiina, Itsuo, Uesugi, Masafumi, Yamazaki, Masashi, Koda, Masao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central Ltd 10.06.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Minimally invasive posterior fixation surgery for pyogenic spondylitis is known to reduce invasiveness and complication rates; however, the outcomes of concomitant insertion of pedicle screws (PS) into the infected vertebrae via the posterior approach are undetermined. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of PS insertion into infected vertebrae in minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 70 patients undergoing minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis across nine institutions. Patients were categorized into insertion and skip groups based on PS insertion into infected vertebrae, and surgical data and postoperative outcomes, particularly unplanned reoperations due to complications, were compared. Results The mean age of the 70 patients was 72.8 years. The insertion group (n = 36) had shorter operative times (146 versus 195 min, p = 0.032) and a reduced range of fixation (5.4 versus 6.9 vertebrae, p = 0.0009) compared to the skip group (n = 34). Unplanned reoperations occurred in 24% (n = 17) due to surgical site infections (SSI) or implant failure; the incidence was comparable between the groups. Poor infection control necessitating additional anterior surgery was reported in four patients in the skip group. Conclusions PS insertion into infected vertebrae during minimally invasive posterior fixation reduces the operative time and range of fixation without increasing the occurrence of unplanned reoperations due to SSI or implant failure. Judicious PS insertion in patients with minimal bone destruction in thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis can minimize surgical invasiveness. Keywords: Minimally invasive spine surgery, Pedicle screws, Posterior fixation, Pyogenic spondylitis
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07565-0