Minimally invasive versus open ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty: comparative outcomes and 5-year experience

To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures. From December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC urology Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 118 - 8
Main Authors Chen, Silu, Wang, Xiang, Li, Zhihua, Li, Xinfei, Han, Guanpeng, Tao, Zihao, Li, Zhenyu, Zhang, Peng, Zhu, Hongjian, Yang, Kunlin, Li, Xuesong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 10.06.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures. From December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected. Success was defined as relief of clinical symptoms, stable postoperative serum creatine and absence of radiographic obstruction. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of open procedures and minimally invasive procedures were compared. The etiology included pelvic irradiation (14/20), urinary tuberculosis (3/20) and surgical injury (3/20). Bilateral ureter strictures were repaired in 15 cases. The surgeries conducted consisted of open procedures in 9 patients and minimally invasive procedures in 11 patients. Compared to open procedures, minimally invasive surgeries had less median estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml vs. 300 min, p = 0.010) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (27 d vs. 13 d, p = 0.004). Two patients in the open group experienced grade 3 complications (sigmoid fistula and acute cholecystitis in one patient, and pulmonary embolism in another patient). Over a median follow-up period of 20.1 months, the median bladder functional capacity was 300 ml, with a 100% success rate of IUC. IUC is feasible in both open and minimally invasive procedures, with acceptable complications and a high success rate. Minimally invasive procedures can have less EBL and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open procedure. However, prospective studies with larger groups and longer follow-up are needed.
AbstractList PurposeTo present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures.Patients and methodsFrom December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected. Success was defined as relief of clinical symptoms, stable postoperative serum creatine and absence of radiographic obstruction. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of open procedures and minimally invasive procedures were compared.ResultsThe etiology included pelvic irradiation (14/20), urinary tuberculosis (3/20) and surgical injury (3/20). Bilateral ureter strictures were repaired in 15 cases. The surgeries conducted consisted of open procedures in 9 patients and minimally invasive procedures in 11 patients. Compared to open procedures, minimally invasive surgeries had less median estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml vs. 300 min, p = 0.010) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (27 d vs. 13 d, p = 0.004). Two patients in the open group experienced grade 3 complications (sigmoid fistula and acute cholecystitis in one patient, and pulmonary embolism in another patient). Over a median follow-up period of 20.1 months, the median bladder functional capacity was 300 ml, with a 100% success rate of IUC.ConclusionIUC is feasible in both open and minimally invasive procedures, with acceptable complications and a high success rate. Minimally invasive procedures can have less EBL and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open procedure. However, prospective studies with larger groups and longer follow-up are needed.
Abstract Purpose To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures. Patients and methods From December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected. Success was defined as relief of clinical symptoms, stable postoperative serum creatine and absence of radiographic obstruction. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of open procedures and minimally invasive procedures were compared. Results The etiology included pelvic irradiation (14/20), urinary tuberculosis (3/20) and surgical injury (3/20). Bilateral ureter strictures were repaired in 15 cases. The surgeries conducted consisted of open procedures in 9 patients and minimally invasive procedures in 11 patients. Compared to open procedures, minimally invasive surgeries had less median estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml vs. 300 min, p = 0.010) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (27 d vs. 13 d, p = 0.004). Two patients in the open group experienced grade 3 complications (sigmoid fistula and acute cholecystitis in one patient, and pulmonary embolism in another patient). Over a median follow-up period of 20.1 months, the median bladder functional capacity was 300 ml, with a 100% success rate of IUC. Conclusion IUC is feasible in both open and minimally invasive procedures, with acceptable complications and a high success rate. Minimally invasive procedures can have less EBL and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open procedure. However, prospective studies with larger groups and longer follow-up are needed.
Purpose To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures. Patients and methods From December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected. Success was defined as relief of clinical symptoms, stable postoperative serum creatine and absence of radiographic obstruction. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of open procedures and minimally invasive procedures were compared. Results The etiology included pelvic irradiation (14/20), urinary tuberculosis (3/20) and surgical injury (3/20). Bilateral ureter strictures were repaired in 15 cases. The surgeries conducted consisted of open procedures in 9 patients and minimally invasive procedures in 11 patients. Compared to open procedures, minimally invasive surgeries had less median estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml vs. 300 min, p = 0.010) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (27 d vs. 13 d, p = 0.004). Two patients in the open group experienced grade 3 complications (sigmoid fistula and acute cholecystitis in one patient, and pulmonary embolism in another patient). Over a median follow-up period of 20.1 months, the median bladder functional capacity was 300 ml, with a 100% success rate of IUC. Conclusion IUC is feasible in both open and minimally invasive procedures, with acceptable complications and a high success rate. Minimally invasive procedures can have less EBL and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open procedure. However, prospective studies with larger groups and longer follow-up are needed. Keywords: Ileal ureter replacement, Ileocystoplasty, Ureteral stricture with bladder contracture, Minimally invasive surgery
To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures. From December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected. Success was defined as relief of clinical symptoms, stable postoperative serum creatine and absence of radiographic obstruction. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of open procedures and minimally invasive procedures were compared. The etiology included pelvic irradiation (14/20), urinary tuberculosis (3/20) and surgical injury (3/20). Bilateral ureter strictures were repaired in 15 cases. The surgeries conducted consisted of open procedures in 9 patients and minimally invasive procedures in 11 patients. Compared to open procedures, minimally invasive surgeries had less median estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml vs. 300 min, p = 0.010) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (27 d vs. 13 d, p = 0.004). Two patients in the open group experienced grade 3 complications (sigmoid fistula and acute cholecystitis in one patient, and pulmonary embolism in another patient). Over a median follow-up period of 20.1 months, the median bladder functional capacity was 300 ml, with a 100% success rate of IUC. IUC is feasible in both open and minimally invasive procedures, with acceptable complications and a high success rate. Minimally invasive procedures can have less EBL and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open procedure. However, prospective studies with larger groups and longer follow-up are needed.
To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures.PURPOSETo present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures.From December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected. Success was defined as relief of clinical symptoms, stable postoperative serum creatine and absence of radiographic obstruction. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of open procedures and minimally invasive procedures were compared.PATIENTS AND METHODSFrom December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected. Success was defined as relief of clinical symptoms, stable postoperative serum creatine and absence of radiographic obstruction. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of open procedures and minimally invasive procedures were compared.The etiology included pelvic irradiation (14/20), urinary tuberculosis (3/20) and surgical injury (3/20). Bilateral ureter strictures were repaired in 15 cases. The surgeries conducted consisted of open procedures in 9 patients and minimally invasive procedures in 11 patients. Compared to open procedures, minimally invasive surgeries had less median estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml vs. 300 min, p = 0.010) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (27 d vs. 13 d, p = 0.004). Two patients in the open group experienced grade 3 complications (sigmoid fistula and acute cholecystitis in one patient, and pulmonary embolism in another patient). Over a median follow-up period of 20.1 months, the median bladder functional capacity was 300 ml, with a 100% success rate of IUC.RESULTSThe etiology included pelvic irradiation (14/20), urinary tuberculosis (3/20) and surgical injury (3/20). Bilateral ureter strictures were repaired in 15 cases. The surgeries conducted consisted of open procedures in 9 patients and minimally invasive procedures in 11 patients. Compared to open procedures, minimally invasive surgeries had less median estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml vs. 300 min, p = 0.010) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (27 d vs. 13 d, p = 0.004). Two patients in the open group experienced grade 3 complications (sigmoid fistula and acute cholecystitis in one patient, and pulmonary embolism in another patient). Over a median follow-up period of 20.1 months, the median bladder functional capacity was 300 ml, with a 100% success rate of IUC.IUC is feasible in both open and minimally invasive procedures, with acceptable complications and a high success rate. Minimally invasive procedures can have less EBL and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open procedure. However, prospective studies with larger groups and longer follow-up are needed.CONCLUSIONIUC is feasible in both open and minimally invasive procedures, with acceptable complications and a high success rate. Minimally invasive procedures can have less EBL and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open procedure. However, prospective studies with larger groups and longer follow-up are needed.
To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures. From December 2017 to April 2023, twenty patients underwent IUC in open or minimally invasive (including laparoscopic and robotic) procedures. The baseline characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up outcomes were collected. Success was defined as relief of clinical symptoms, stable postoperative serum creatine and absence of radiographic obstruction. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of open procedures and minimally invasive procedures were compared. The etiology included pelvic irradiation (14/20), urinary tuberculosis (3/20) and surgical injury (3/20). Bilateral ureter strictures were repaired in 15 cases. The surgeries conducted consisted of open procedures in 9 patients and minimally invasive procedures in 11 patients. Compared to open procedures, minimally invasive surgeries had less median estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml vs. 300 min, p = 0.010) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (27 d vs. 13 d, p = 0.004). Two patients in the open group experienced grade 3 complications (sigmoid fistula and acute cholecystitis in one patient, and pulmonary embolism in another patient). Over a median follow-up period of 20.1 months, the median bladder functional capacity was 300 ml, with a 100% success rate of IUC. IUC is feasible in both open and minimally invasive procedures, with acceptable complications and a high success rate. Minimally invasive procedures can have less EBL and shorter postoperative hospitalization than open procedure. However, prospective studies with larger groups and longer follow-up are needed.
Audience Academic
Author Wang, Xiang
Li, Xinfei
Li, Xuesong
Han, Guanpeng
Zhang, Peng
Li, Zhihua
Li, Zhenyu
Chen, Silu
Tao, Zihao
Zhu, Hongjian
Yang, Kunlin
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Silu
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Silu
  organization: Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xiang
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Xiang
  organization: Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Zhihua
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Zhihua
  organization: Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Xinfei
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Xinfei
  organization: Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Guanpeng
  surname: Han
  fullname: Han, Guanpeng
  organization: Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Zihao
  surname: Tao
  fullname: Tao, Zihao
  organization: Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Zhenyu
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Zhenyu
  organization: Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Peng
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Peng
  organization: Department of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Hongjian
  surname: Zhu
  fullname: Zhu, Hongjian
  organization: Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Kunlin
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Kunlin
  email: yangkunlin12345@163.com
  organization: Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China. yangkunlin12345@163.com
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Xuesong
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Xuesong
  email: pineneedle@sina.com
  organization: Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China. pineneedle@sina.com
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38858691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkk1vEzEQhi1URNvAH-CAVuLCZYs_sv7ggqqKj0pFXOC8mtizqSvHXuzdlPx7nLZAg5Bl2R6_81ivZ07JUUwRCXnJ6BljWr4tjGuzbCmvk3XUtN0TcsKWirV8aejRo_0xOS3lhlKmdCefkWOhdaelYSckfPHRbyCEXePjForfYrPFXObSpBFj4wNCaOaME-bm1k_X-0iyuzKlMUCZdu8amzYjZJj2qWme6hFLA9E1XbtDyA3-HDF7jBafk6cDhIIvHtYF-f7xw7eLz-3V10-XF-dXrVtSPrXCcQGaK458pTsOsEKpQQ8DlQ4td5R3K80UE1IaK7nV4OygV6JDLR2zVizI5T3XJbjpx1wN5l2fwPd3gZTXPeTJ24B9J7V2QlhhAJfDoEFYA5020mjquFOV9f6eNc6rDTqLccoQDqCHN9Ff9-u07RljUihmKuHNAyGnHzOWqd_4YjEEiJjm0gsqpTJsb2hBXv8jvUlzjvWv7lS12lTIv6o1VAc-Dqk-bPfQ_lwZxbVSglbV2X9UdTjceFs7aaiVPEx49djpH4u_m0X8AtjqxFM
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2024
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PIMPY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12894-024-01509-5
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database



MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: 7X7
  name: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2490
EndPage 8
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_5688d33c39ae4ff8a3c9a5896980d2d7
A797287730
38858691
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (Youth Clinical Research Project of Peking University First Hospital)
  grantid: 2023YC16.
GroupedDBID ---
-A0
0R~
23N
2WC
3V.
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AAWTL
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACRMQ
ADBBV
ADINQ
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C24
C6C
CCPQU
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECM
EIF
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M~E
NPM
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
ABVAZ
AFGXO
AFNRJ
7QP
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
M48
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-d402t-3d23a8272e2b852aabe68a8ff06dec2d025b81713669c62c8adcf8b35e86d1cc3
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 1471-2490
IngestDate Fri Oct 04 13:14:34 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 17 21:29:02 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 17 04:43:19 EDT 2024
Fri Sep 13 03:50:06 EDT 2024
Fri Jun 14 00:03:47 EDT 2024
Tue Jun 25 19:21:54 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 09 10:11:05 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Minimally invasive surgery
Ileocystoplasty
Ureteral stricture with bladder contracture
Ileal ureter replacement
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-d402t-3d23a8272e2b852aabe68a8ff06dec2d025b81713669c62c8adcf8b35e86d1cc3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163719/
PMID 38858691
PQID 3066894036
PQPubID 42551
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5688d33c39ae4ff8a3c9a5896980d2d7
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11163719
proquest_miscellaneous_3066791171
proquest_journals_3066894036
gale_infotracmisc_A797287730
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A797287730
pubmed_primary_38858691
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-06-10
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-06-10
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-06-10
  day: 10
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC urology
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Urol
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
SSID ssj0017856
Score 2.379839
Snippet To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures. From...
Purpose To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open...
To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open procedures. From...
PurposeTo present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open...
To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open...
Abstract Purpose To present the experience of ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty (IUC), and compare the outcomes of IUC in minimally invasive procedures to open...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 118
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Bladder
Catheters
Cholecystitis
Creatine
Demographics
Development and progression
Diuretics
Embolism
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Ileal ureter replacement
Ileocystoplasty
Ileum - surgery
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally invasive surgery
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Patients
Pulmonary embolism
Retrospective Studies
Rivaroxaban
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Robotics
Small intestine
Surgery
Sutures
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Tuberculosis
Ureter
Ureter - surgery
Ureteral stricture with bladder contracture
Urinary Bladder - surgery
Urine
Urogenital system
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9JLaZo-nKRFgUJPImvJkka9paUhBDanBnIzsh50YestWbuw_74za-92TQ-99GiNBNKMRjNjzXxi7IOtkpbaZ-HBOlFBJUUTohW60SnM0iymSLXD8ztzc1_dPuiHg6e-KCdsgAceGHepDUBUKijnU5UzeBWc1-CMg1mUcagjL_UumBrvDyxosyuRAXO5xlOYIHAlZVygiRR6hOj_-yA-sETTLMkDs3P9gj0f_UV-NczzmD1J7Uv2dD7eiJ-w5XzRLn745XLDF-0vT8nonDIt-jWnh7E4Kj0O7x8p64XTT1dqWYUNAQqg49xtPvHwBwCcr_oOP9Oa-zZyLTaoBzzt0ZBfsfvrr9--3IjxBQURMS7shIpSeZBWJtmAlt43yYCHnGcmpiAjOjwNlBinGuOCkQF8DBkapROYWIagXrOjdtWmt4xnW2VpMDpRLmJI5yCjCGwIAV0ijLChYJ-JofXPASSjJtjqbQMKsx6FWf9LmAX7SOKoSbmQ58GPNQI4BYKpqq-ssxji4alUsPNJT1SKMCXvBFqPSrmuMToyuA3QZhfsYk-mkZRo1qZVP_SxaABsWbA3g_z3S1IAGoxDCkx2xmTNU0q7-L6F7EaLYpQt3en_4NIZeya3W9mgET1nR91jn96ha9Q177da8Bu3vA6Q
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Ni9QwFA_rCuJF_HZ0lQiCpzDTpElevMgqLoMwnlyYW0mTVAfGdp1pF-a_3_c6ndktgsfmozR938nL7zH2weZJS-0r4cE6kUMuRRmiFbrUKczSLKZId4cXP8z8Mv--1MsTNj_chaG0yoNO7BV1bALtkU_RtTXgclS4U1_SLkBop5-v_gqqH0XnrEMxjXvsfibRrUDOtstj6EUl6M3hygyY6Ra1MkHiSsrAQJMp9ADZ_69ivmOZxlmTd8zQxWP2aPAf-fme4E_YSaqfsgeL4YT8GVsvVvXqj1-vd3xVX3tKTueUedFtORXK4qgEcHq3oSwYTpuw1NKEHQEMoCPd7j7xcAsIzpuuxce05b6OXIsdygVPR3Tk5-zy4tvPr3MxVFQQEePEVqgolQdpZZIlaOl9mQx4qKqZiSnIiA5QCRnGrca4YGQAH0MFpdIJTMxCUC_Yad3U6RXjlc0raTBaUS5iiOegcsbZEAK6SBhxw4R9oR9aXO1BMwqCse4bms2vYpCKQhuAqFRQzqe8qsCr4LwGfBPMoox2wj4SOQoSNiK5H-4M4CcQbFVxbp3FkA-11ISdjUaikIRx94GgxSCk2-KWpSbs_bGbZlLiWZ2abj_GokGw2YS93NP_uCQFoME47IERZ4zWPO6pV797CG-0MEbZzL3-_3e9YQ9lz6QGzeUZO203XXqLTlBbvuv5-wZfZAnY
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Minimally invasive versus open ileal ureter with ileocystoplasty: comparative outcomes and 5-year experience
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38858691
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3066894036/abstract/
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3066791171/abstract/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11163719
https://doaj.org/article/5688d33c39ae4ff8a3c9a5896980d2d7
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdtB2MvY9_z2gUNBntyk0iWdNpbU1rKIKWUFcJejCzJqyGxS2IP8t_35NhZzd72YrAlGX3c6e6kn34i5KtKvGDC5LEBpeMEEhZn1qlYZMLbiZ8478LZ4fm1vLpLfizE4oDI_ixMC9q3WXFaLlenZXHfYisfVnbc48TGN_Nz1E_J1VSPD8mh4ryP0bu9AwVC9sdjQI43OAMH-lsW0BZoHuNwWQ0HECADMWfL1P_vfPzEIA3Bkk-sz-Ur8rJzG-nZrnqvyYEv35Dn825j_C1ZzouyWJnlckuL8o8JmHQaABfNhob7sSjqPhZv1gH8QsPaa_hS2W3gFUD_ud5-p_YvDzitmhpf_Yaa0lERb1EdqN-TIr8jd5cXP8-v4u4ihdhheFjH3DFugCnmWQaCGZN5CQbyfCKdt8yh35PBFMNVKbWVzIJxNoeMCw_STa3l78lRWZX-I6G5SnImMUjh2mFkpyHXUitrLXpGGGhDRGahQ9OHHVdGGtir2w_V-nfajWEqJIDj3HJtfJLnYLjVRgD-CSaOORWRb2E40qBj2OfWdEcFsAqBrSo9U1phpIeTU0ROBjlRN-wwuR_QtNPNTYpBkkSJQNMdkS_75FAy4M1KXzW7PArtgJpG5MNu_PdN6mUnIjCQjEGbhykoyC1zdy-4n_6_6DF5wVpZlmhBT8hRvW78Z_SL6myEyrBQI_JsdnF9cztqVxfweTv7NWoV5BFfQhQC
link.rule.ids 230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,12083,21416,27957,27958,31754,31755,33779,33780,43345,43840,53827,53829
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1bb9MwFLagk2AviPsCA4yExJO11o7tY17QhjYVWCuENmlvkWM7UKkko02Q-u85bt1uERKP8SWyfe728WdC3uk8SC5txSxow3LIOSud10yWMrhhGPrg493hyVSNL_MvV_IqbbgtU1rlVieuFbVvXNwjP0LXVoHJUeF-vP7N4qtR8XQ1PaFxl-zlAkOVAdk7OZ1--747R9Ag1faqDKijJWrjCIXLY-YFmkomE1T_vwr5lkXqZ0veMj9nD8mD5DfS4w2hH5E7oX5M7k3SyfgTMp_M6tkvO5-v6Kz-Y2NSOo0ZF92SxgeyKAo_du8WMfuFxs3XWNK4VQQWQAe6XX2g7gYInDZdi59hSW3tqWQrlAcadqjIT8nl2enFpzFLLykwj_Fhy4TnwgLXPPASJLe2DAosVNVQ-eC4R8enhBHGq0oZp7gD610FpZABlB85J56RQd3U4YDQSucVVxilCOMxtDNQGWW0cw5dI4y0ISMncUGL6w1YRhHhq9cFzeJHkaShkArAC-GEsSGvKrDCGSsB_wRDz73OyPtIjiIKGa65s-muAA4hwlUVx9poDPVQO2XksNcShcP1q7cELZJwLosbVsrI21117BkTzurQdJs2Gg2BHmXk-Yb-uykJAAnKYA30OKM3535NPfu5hu5Gy6KEHpkX_x_XG3J_fDE5L84_T7--JPt8zbAKTeYhGbSLLrxCR6gtXydu_wve5gpx
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Lb9MwGLdgSBMXxnMEBhgJiVP6sGP7M7cxqMaj0w5MmsQhcmwHItq0apNJ5a_nc5qUBW47xo_Ijr9n_PPPhLxRiRdMmDw2oHScQMLizDoVi0x4O_Ij5104Ozw9k6cXyedLcdmiKtctrLK0WTEoZ_NBWfxssJXLuR12OLHh-fQE9VNyNdbDpcuHt8kdVFqmu0y93UFQIGR3SAbkcI12OJDgsoC5QCcZhytrOIAAGeg5G77-_63yNbfUh0xe80GTA_K9G_0WevJrUFfZwP7-h9jxZtO7T-61oSk93rZ5QG758iHZn7ab74_IbFqUxdzMZhtalFcm4N5pAHXUaxru4KJoX7B7vQoAGxr-74aShd0E7gKM0avNO2r_co3TRV3ho19TUzoq4g2qHPU74uXH5GLy8dvJadxe1hA7TEGrmDvGDTDFPMtAMGMyL8FAno-k85Y5jK0yGGNKLKW2klkwzuaQceFBurG1_AnZKxelf0porpKcSUyEuHaYPWrItdTKWovRFybzEJH3YbnS5ZaPIw0M2U3BYvUjbT9kKiSA49xybXyS52C41UYAvglGjjkVkbdhsdOgx7ii1rTHEXAIgRErPVZaYTaJBjAiR72WqH-2X92JS9rq_zrFREyivGF4EJHXu-rQM2DaSr-ot20U-ho1jsjhVrp2U-okMyLQk7venPs1KE0NO3gnPc9u3vUV2T__MEm_fjr78pzcZY3SSHTYR2SvWtX-BYZhVfay0bc_2Cc0Iw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimally+invasive+versus+open+ileal+ureter+with+ileocystoplasty%3A+comparative+outcomes+and+5-year+experience&rft.jtitle=BMC+urology&rft.au=Chen%2C+Silu&rft.au=Wang%2C+Xiang&rft.au=Li%2C+Zhihua&rft.au=Li%2C+Xinfei&rft.date=2024-06-10&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2490&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12894-024-01509-5
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2490&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2490&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2490&client=summon