Perforator Selection with Computed Tomography Angiography for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Multicentre Analysis
: Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for which side of the abdomen to use for unilateral breast reconstruction. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to assist medical imagin...
Saved in:
Published in | Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Vol. 60; no. 9; p. 1500 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
MDPI AG
01.09.2024
MDPI |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | : Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for which side of the abdomen to use for unilateral breast reconstruction. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to assist medical imaging interpretation. This study compares the perforator selection preferences of experienced plastic surgeons with four popular LLMs based on CTA images for breast reconstruction.
: Six experienced plastic surgeons from Australia, the US, Italy, Denmark, and Argentina reviewed ten CTA images, indicated their preferred side of the abdomen for unilateral breast reconstruction and recommended the type of autologous reconstruction. The LLMs were prompted to do the same. The average decisions were calculated, recorded in suitable tables, and compared.
: The six consultants predominantly recommend the DIEP procedure (83%). This suggests experienced surgeons feel more comfortable raising DIEP than TRAM flaps, which they recommended only 3% of the time. They also favoured MS TRAM and SIEA less frequently (11% and 2%, respectively). Three LLMs-ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-4, and Bing CoPilot-exclusively recommended DIEP (100%), while Claude suggested DIEP 90% and MS TRAM 10%. Despite minor variations in side recommendations, consultants and AI models clearly preferred DIEP.
: Consultants and LLMs consistently preferred DIEP procedures, indicating strong confidence among experienced surgeons, though LLMs occasionally deviated in recommendations, highlighting limitations in their image interpretation capabilities. This emphasises the need for ongoing refinement of AI-assisted decision support systems to ensure they align more closely with expert clinical judgment and enhance their reliability in clinical practice. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background and Objectives: Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for which side of the abdomen to use for unilateral breast reconstruction. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to assist medical imaging interpretation. This study compares the perforator selection preferences of experienced plastic surgeons with four popular LLMs based on CTA images for breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Six experienced plastic surgeons from Australia, the US, Italy, Denmark, and Argentina reviewed ten CTA images, indicated their preferred side of the abdomen for unilateral breast reconstruction and recommended the type of autologous reconstruction. The LLMs were prompted to do the same. The average decisions were calculated, recorded in suitable tables, and compared. Results: The six consultants predominantly recommend the DIEP procedure (83%). This suggests experienced surgeons feel more comfortable raising DIEP than TRAM flaps, which they recommended only 3% of the time. They also favoured MS TRAM and SIEA less frequently (11% and 2%, respectively). Three LLMs-ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-4, and Bing CoPilot-exclusively recommended DIEP (100%), while Claude suggested DIEP 90% and MS TRAM 10%. Despite minor variations in side recommendations, consultants and AI models clearly preferred DIEP. Conclusions: Consultants and LLMs consistently preferred DIEP procedures, indicating strong confidence among experienced surgeons, though LLMs occasionally deviated in recommendations, highlighting limitations in their image interpretation capabilities. This emphasises the need for ongoing refinement of AI-assisted decision support systems to ensure they align more closely with expert clinical judgment and enhance their reliability in clinical practice.Background and Objectives: Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for which side of the abdomen to use for unilateral breast reconstruction. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to assist medical imaging interpretation. This study compares the perforator selection preferences of experienced plastic surgeons with four popular LLMs based on CTA images for breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Six experienced plastic surgeons from Australia, the US, Italy, Denmark, and Argentina reviewed ten CTA images, indicated their preferred side of the abdomen for unilateral breast reconstruction and recommended the type of autologous reconstruction. The LLMs were prompted to do the same. The average decisions were calculated, recorded in suitable tables, and compared. Results: The six consultants predominantly recommend the DIEP procedure (83%). This suggests experienced surgeons feel more comfortable raising DIEP than TRAM flaps, which they recommended only 3% of the time. They also favoured MS TRAM and SIEA less frequently (11% and 2%, respectively). Three LLMs-ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-4, and Bing CoPilot-exclusively recommended DIEP (100%), while Claude suggested DIEP 90% and MS TRAM 10%. Despite minor variations in side recommendations, consultants and AI models clearly preferred DIEP. Conclusions: Consultants and LLMs consistently preferred DIEP procedures, indicating strong confidence among experienced surgeons, though LLMs occasionally deviated in recommendations, highlighting limitations in their image interpretation capabilities. This emphasises the need for ongoing refinement of AI-assisted decision support systems to ensure they align more closely with expert clinical judgment and enhance their reliability in clinical practice. : Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for which side of the abdomen to use for unilateral breast reconstruction. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to assist medical imaging interpretation. This study compares the perforator selection preferences of experienced plastic surgeons with four popular LLMs based on CTA images for breast reconstruction. : Six experienced plastic surgeons from Australia, the US, Italy, Denmark, and Argentina reviewed ten CTA images, indicated their preferred side of the abdomen for unilateral breast reconstruction and recommended the type of autologous reconstruction. The LLMs were prompted to do the same. The average decisions were calculated, recorded in suitable tables, and compared. : The six consultants predominantly recommend the DIEP procedure (83%). This suggests experienced surgeons feel more comfortable raising DIEP than TRAM flaps, which they recommended only 3% of the time. They also favoured MS TRAM and SIEA less frequently (11% and 2%, respectively). Three LLMs-ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-4, and Bing CoPilot-exclusively recommended DIEP (100%), while Claude suggested DIEP 90% and MS TRAM 10%. Despite minor variations in side recommendations, consultants and AI models clearly preferred DIEP. : Consultants and LLMs consistently preferred DIEP procedures, indicating strong confidence among experienced surgeons, though LLMs occasionally deviated in recommendations, highlighting limitations in their image interpretation capabilities. This emphasises the need for ongoing refinement of AI-assisted decision support systems to ensure they align more closely with expert clinical judgment and enhance their reliability in clinical practice. Background and Objectives: Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for which side of the abdomen to use for unilateral breast reconstruction. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to assist medical imaging interpretation. This study compares the perforator selection preferences of experienced plastic surgeons with four popular LLMs based on CTA images for breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Six experienced plastic surgeons from Australia, the US, Italy, Denmark, and Argentina reviewed ten CTA images, indicated their preferred side of the abdomen for unilateral breast reconstruction and recommended the type of autologous reconstruction. The LLMs were prompted to do the same. The average decisions were calculated, recorded in suitable tables, and compared. Results: The six consultants predominantly recommend the DIEP procedure (83%). This suggests experienced surgeons feel more comfortable raising DIEP than TRAM flaps, which they recommended only 3% of the time. They also favoured MS TRAM and SIEA less frequently (11% and 2%, respectively). Three LLMs—ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-4, and Bing CoPilot—exclusively recommended DIEP (100%), while Claude suggested DIEP 90% and MS TRAM 10%. Despite minor variations in side recommendations, consultants and AI models clearly preferred DIEP. Conclusions: Consultants and LLMs consistently preferred DIEP procedures, indicating strong confidence among experienced surgeons, though LLMs occasionally deviated in recommendations, highlighting limitations in their image interpretation capabilities. This emphasises the need for ongoing refinement of AI-assisted decision support systems to ensure they align more closely with expert clinical judgment and enhance their reliability in clinical practice. Background and Objectives : Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for which side of the abdomen to use for unilateral breast reconstruction. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to assist medical imaging interpretation. This study compares the perforator selection preferences of experienced plastic surgeons with four popular LLMs based on CTA images for breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods : Six experienced plastic surgeons from Australia, the US, Italy, Denmark, and Argentina reviewed ten CTA images, indicated their preferred side of the abdomen for unilateral breast reconstruction and recommended the type of autologous reconstruction. The LLMs were prompted to do the same. The average decisions were calculated, recorded in suitable tables, and compared. Results : The six consultants predominantly recommend the DIEP procedure (83%). This suggests experienced surgeons feel more comfortable raising DIEP than TRAM flaps, which they recommended only 3% of the time. They also favoured MS TRAM and SIEA less frequently (11% and 2%, respectively). Three LLMs—ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-4, and Bing CoPilot—exclusively recommended DIEP (100%), while Claude suggested DIEP 90% and MS TRAM 10%. Despite minor variations in side recommendations, consultants and AI models clearly preferred DIEP. Conclusions : Consultants and LLMs consistently preferred DIEP procedures, indicating strong confidence among experienced surgeons, though LLMs occasionally deviated in recommendations, highlighting limitations in their image interpretation capabilities. This emphasises the need for ongoing refinement of AI-assisted decision support systems to ensure they align more closely with expert clinical judgment and enhance their reliability in clinical practice. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Seth, Ishith Bukret, William E Phan, Robert Kenney, Peter Sinkjær Lim, Bryan Rozen, Warren M Cuomo, Roberto Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen Ross, Richard J Xie, Yi Thomsen, Jørn Bo |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA 5 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia 1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Melbourne 3199, Australia 4 Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Melbourne 3199, Australia – name: 3 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA – name: 5 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia – name: 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark – name: 4 Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ishith orcidid: 0000-0001-5444-8925 surname: Seth fullname: Seth, Ishith organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Melbourne 3199, Australia – sequence: 2 givenname: Bryan orcidid: 0009-0007-9647-5180 surname: Lim fullname: Lim, Bryan organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Melbourne 3199, Australia – sequence: 3 givenname: Robert surname: Phan fullname: Phan, Robert organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Melbourne 3199, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: Yi surname: Xie fullname: Xie, Yi organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Melbourne 3199, Australia – sequence: 5 givenname: Peter Sinkjær orcidid: 0009-0003-3217-3475 surname: Kenney fullname: Kenney, Peter Sinkjær organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark – sequence: 6 givenname: William E surname: Bukret fullname: Bukret, William E organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA – sequence: 7 givenname: Jørn Bo orcidid: 0000-0002-7368-6133 surname: Thomsen fullname: Thomsen, Jørn Bo organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark – sequence: 8 givenname: Roberto orcidid: 0000-0002-8396-095X surname: Cuomo fullname: Cuomo, Roberto organization: Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy – sequence: 9 givenname: Richard J surname: Ross fullname: Ross, Richard J organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Melbourne 3199, Australia – sequence: 10 givenname: Sally Kiu-Huen orcidid: 0000-0001-7332-627X surname: Ng fullname: Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia – sequence: 11 givenname: Warren M orcidid: 0000-0002-4092-182X surname: Rozen fullname: Rozen, Warren M organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Melbourne 3199, Australia |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39336540$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkk1vEzEQhleoiH7AnROyxIVLynjtXXu5oBAVqFQEgva8ctbjxJHXTr1eUE796zhJCw1CPsxo5p3HMx6fFkc-eCyKlxTOGWvgbY_adtarGqChFcCT4oTWXE4ayvnRI_-4OB2GFQArK1E-K45Zw1hdcTgp7r5hNCGqFCL5gQ67ZIMnv2xaklno12NCTa5DHxZRrZcbMvUL--DnMnLjrVMJo3LkQ0Q1JPIdu-CHFMcd6R2Zkpmz3nZZ8WV0yXboU8QMUm4z2OF58dQoN-CLe3tW3Hy8uJ59nlx9_XQ5m15NNAdIEw2Nhk7W0jRzLoSkW4NG1GgMpYbXWINimpaalwwEVlB1WVQ1jQDNVMnOiss9Vwe1atfR9ipu2qBsuwuEuGhVzN05bCnQcm4k7eaMcya5VKI2TFCtZU5ImVnv96z1OM8b2E2k3AH0MOPtsl2Eny2lPK9N0kx4c0-I4XbEIbW9HTp0TnkM49AySqEBKSTL0tf_SFdhjPn19qpKVJxVf1ULlSew3oR8cbeFtlOZZVII2DZ-_h9VPhp7m9eGxub4QcGrx5P-GfHh_7DfDc7KGw |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG 2024 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2024 by the authors. 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG – notice: 2024 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2024 by the authors. 2024 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.3390/medicina60091500 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: 7X7 name: ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1648-9144 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_1012bf81cb3443848a76f371dd812b88 A811087708 39336540 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Australia Denmark Italy Argentina United States San Francisco California United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Australia – name: Denmark – name: United States – name: Argentina – name: Italy – name: San Francisco California – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 0SF 29M 2WC 4.4 457 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ AACTN AADQD AAEDT AAFWJ AAIKJ ABMAC ABUWG ACGFS ADBBV ADEZE AFKRA AFPKN AFZYC AGHFR AHDRD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR CCPQU CGR CUY CVF DIK ECM EIF EMOBN F5P FDB FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE IAO ITC KQ8 MODMG NPM O9- OK1 PGMZT PIMPY RPM UKHRP XSB 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-d400t-d09d0c868f9b477819b47ef76eff11f46e60a3d12d42307e505c81959970d3a23 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1648-9144 1010-660X |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:15:25 EDT 2024 Mon Sep 30 11:48:17 EDT 2024 Mon Sep 30 17:01:11 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 21:11:23 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 02:32:28 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 15 04:49:40 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 23 09:30:44 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Keywords | computed tomography angiography DIEP flap large language models plastic surgery AI in medicine breast reconstruction |
Language | English |
License | Published by MDPI on behalf of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-d400t-d09d0c868f9b477819b47ef76eff11f46e60a3d12d42307e505c81959970d3a23 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-7368-6133 0000-0002-8396-095X 0000-0002-4092-182X 0000-0001-5444-8925 0009-0007-9647-5180 0009-0003-3217-3475 0000-0001-7332-627X |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433981/ |
PMID | 39336540 |
PQID | 3110575435 |
PQPubID | 5046879 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1012bf81cb3443848a76f371dd812b88 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11433981 proquest_miscellaneous_3110908783 proquest_journals_3110575435 gale_infotracmisc_A811087708 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A811087708 pubmed_primary_39336540 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2024 text: 2024-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland – name: Basel |
PublicationTitle | Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Medicina (Kaunas) |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | MDPI AG MDPI |
Publisher_xml | – name: MDPI AG – name: MDPI |
SSID | ssj0032572 |
Score | 2.3793113 |
Snippet | : Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have differing preferences for... Background and Objectives : Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have... Background and Objectives: Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have... Background and Objectives : Despite CTAs being critical for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction, experienced plastic surgeons may have... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1500 |
SubjectTerms | Abdomen AI in medicine Angiography Australia Beliefs, opinions and attitudes breast reconstruction Chatbots Clinical medicine computed tomography angiography Computed Tomography Angiography - methods Consulting services CT imaging Decision making DIEP flap Female Humans Large language models Light rail transit Mammaplasty Mammaplasty - methods Medical imaging equipment Methods Middle Aged Perforator Flap - blood supply Pilots Plastic surgeons plastic surgery Practice Preferences Preoperative care Surgeons Tomography |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LaxsxEBbFh9BL6bubpkGBQk9LJEvWozc7JISAS6EJ-Lbo2QbcdaHOuX-9MyvZ9dJDL72sF0trtBqN9I1n5htC3kvvRVKBtTqJ0MrkdOt9znDhLkUftRyiKpef1PWdvFnNVgelvjAmrNADl4k7R_4pnw0PXkgpjDROqyw0jxGOJm9Kmi-f7YypsgcLWIjFzwm7jFJsVRyUAgz88-qzdnDSW0BDrJL1_70lH5xJ43jJgwPo6il5UpEjnZcRPyOPUv-cHC2rb_wF-fV5iFRHI5p-GarbwJRT_J-V1tINkd5uvleKajrvv97v7uExCuBz7TAdeU0XGKi-pWiZ_uGX_UjntJKIrumQtjuMM9EdrclLcnd1eXtx3dbyCm0Exd22kdnIglEmWy-1BmgAHylrlXLmPEuVFHMi8mmUGC2eACsF9LpZq1kUbipekUm_6dMbQgVodUZjxwaAC9Y49OdblrRVAQ2qhixwjrsfhUGjQ07r4QuQdFcl3f1L0g35gBLqUPNADMHVBAIYAnJYdXODKQ1aM-h5MuoJGhPGzTsZd1Vjf3aCY8XjGaDHhpztm_FJjELr0-ah9LHwG0Y05HVZEvtXElYIBfC3IWa0WEbvPG7p778NfN5gksLKNPz4f8zSW_J4CrirhMGdkAmskvQOcNPWnw4q8hsB0RWR priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9UwFA-6gfgifludEkHwqSxpsnz4IvfKxhA2hm5w30o-t8G1ne767L_uOW26rQi-tKVJS9rzkd_JOTmHkA_Se5FUYLVOItQyOV17nzMcuEvRRy2HqMqjY3V4Jr-u9lZlwe26hFVOOnFQ1LEPuEa-KzhWpN2D2f3z1c8aq0ahd7WU0LhPthsu0U27vdw_Pvk26WIBDDn6O0HbKMVWo6NSgKG_W3zXDmZ8C6iIlaT9_6rmO3PTPG7yzkR08Jg8KgiSLkaSPyH3UveUPDgqPvJn5M_JELGOxjT9PlS5gV9Pcb2VlhIOkZ72P0qqarrozi-na3iMAghdO9yWvKZLDFjfULRQb_PMfqILWpKJrumwfXcYZ6JTepPn5Oxg__TLYV3KLNQRBHhTR2YjC0aZbL3UGiACnFLWKuXMeZYqKeZE5E2UGDWeADMF9L5Zq1kUrhEvyFbXd-kVoQKkO6PRYwPABmsc-vUtS9qqgIZVRZb4j9urMZNGi7mthxv9r_O2iAoGnTU-Gx68kFIYaZxWWWgeI4ARb0xFPiKFWpRAIENwZSMBDAFzWbULg1sbtGbQc2fWEyQnzJsnGrdFcq_bWz6ryPubZnwSo9G61P8e-1h4hxEVeTmyxM0nCSuEAhhcETNjltk3z1u6y4shrzeYpsCZhr_-_7jekIcNIKsx0G2HbAH901tARhv_rrD_X7kuD28 priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Perforator Selection with Computed Tomography Angiography for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Multicentre Analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39336540 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3110575435 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3110908783/abstract/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11433981 https://doaj.org/article/1012bf81cb3443848a76f371dd812b88 |
Volume | 60 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdtB2MvY9_z1gUNBntyY0eqPvaWlJYySAlbC3kz-mwDiVO29Ln_-u5kuavZ214cE0lGtu6k3-l-dyLkC7eWBeGqUgbmSh6MLK2NES61Cd56yROrcn4hzq_49-Xxco-IPhYmkfadXR21681Ru7pJ3MrbjRv3PLHxYn4CGJ4xrerxPtmXjPU2ejf_MhDCzscJM4wQ1bJzTkKDapz91QZWeQ1ICI-BY2DRi7T3kXL2_zszP1qahrTJR-vQ2QvyPANIOu06-pLshfYVeTrPLvLX5H6RCOtoS9Of6ZAb-PIUt1tpPsHB08vtJmeqptP2etXfQzMKGHRtMCp5TWfIV99RNFD_ppn9Rqc05xJd0xS9m_oZaJ_d5A25Oju9PDkv8ykLpQf93ZW-0r5ySqioLZcSEAL8hChFiLGuIxdBVIb5euI5ksYDQCaHzjetZeWZmbC35KDdtuE9oQyUO6LNox2gBq0MuvV1FaQWDu2qgszwGze3XSKNBlNbpz-2v66bPMDIOZvYqGpnGedMcWWkiEzW3gMWsUoV5CuOUIMKCMPgTI4jgC5gKqtmqjCyQcoKah4OaoLiuGFxP8ZNVtzfDavx4ONjAJEF-fxQjC2RjNaG7V1XR8MzFCvIu04kHl6pF6eCqIGwDN55WAJSntJ691L94f-bfiTPJgC6Og7cITkA2QifADTt7Ag0ZSlH5Mns9GLxY5S2HkZJb_4AaCAa6Q |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,12083,21416,27955,27956,31752,31753,33777,33778,43343,43838,53825,53827,74100,74657 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagSMAF8SyBAkZC4hTVWbt-cEFbRLVAt0JiK-0t8rNUWpJClzN_nRnHu22ExCWJYidy4hn7G8_4G0LeCOd4lJ7VKnJfi2hV7VxKcGhsDC4okaMq5ydydio-Lw-WZcHtsoRVbsbEPFCH3uMa-T5vMCPtAczu7y9-1pg1Cr2rJYXGTXJLcC5QztVya3BxEMfB2wljjZRsObgpOZj5-8VzbWG-N4CJWKHs_3dgvjYzjaMmr01DR_fJvYIf6XTo8AfkRuwektvz4iF_RP58zfHqaErTbznHDfx4iquttCRwCHTR_yhE1XTanZ1vruExChB0ZXFT8ooeYrj6mqJ9esUy-45OaaESXdG8eTe3M9INucljcnr0cfFhVpckC3UA9V3XgZnAvJY6GSeUAoAAp5iUjCk1TRIySmZ5aCZBYMx4BMTk0fdmjGKB2wl_Qna6votPCeWg2wlNHuMBNBht0atvWFRGejSrKnKI_7i9GHg0WmS2zjf6X2dtURQMOZu4pBvvuBBcC22VTFw1IQAUcVpX5C32UIv6B93gbdlGAE1AJqt2qnFjg1IMau6NaoLe-HHxpo_boreX7ZWUVeT1thifxFi0Lva_hzoG3qF5RXYHkdh-EjecSwDBFdEjYRl987ikO_-eWb3BMAXJ1M2z_7frFbkzW8yP2-NPJ1-ek7sTwFhDyNse2QFZiC8AI63dy6wIfwEJzxD2 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LbxMxELagSBUXxJstBYyExGkVb-z6wQWlQFQerSrRSrmt_CyVwm5Lw5m_zozXSbtC4pJEsTfyZmY83-x8niHkjXCOR-lZrSL3tYhW1c6lBC-NjcEFJTKr8vBIHpyKL4u9ReE_XRVa5XpPzBt16D0-I5_wBjvS7oF3n6RCizj-OH9_cVljBynMtJZ2GrfJHfCSDNs4qMUm-OKgmkPmE_YdKdliSFlyCPknJYttwfcbwEeslO__d5O-4aXGDMobLml-n9wrWJLOBuE_ILdi95BsH5Zs-SPy5zhz1zGspt9zvxsQAsUnr7Q0cwj0pP9ZilbTWXd2vv4Ml1GAo0uLB5SXdB-p6yuKsep1xdl3dEZLWdElzQd58zojXRc6eUxO559OPhzUpeFCHcCUV3VgJjCvpU7GCaUALMBbTErGlJomCRklszw00yCQPx4BPXnMwxmjWOB2yp-Qra7v4jNCOdh5wvDHeAAQRlvM8BsWlZEeQ6yK7ON_3F4MNTVarHKdv-h_nbXFaJB-NnVJN95xIbgW2iqZuGpCAFjitK7IW5RQi7YIYvC2HCmAJWBVq3am8ZCDUgxm7o5mgg358fBaxm2x4av2WuMq8nozjFciL62L_e9hjoHf0LwiTweV2NwSN5xLAMQV0SNlGd3zeKQ7_5ErfEOQCpqpm53_r-sV2QYbaL99Pvr6nNydAtwa2G-7ZAtUIb4AuLRyL7Md_AW-VBUi |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perforator+Selection+with+Computed+Tomography+Angiography+for+Unilateral+Breast+Reconstruction%3A+A+Clinical+Multicentre+Analysis&rft.jtitle=Medicina+%28Kaunas%2C+Lithuania%29&rft.au=Ishith+Seth&rft.au=Bryan+Lim&rft.au=Robert+Phan&rft.au=Yi+Xie&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.pub=MDPI+AG&rft.issn=1010-660X&rft.eissn=1648-9144&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1500&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fmedicina60091500&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_1012bf81cb3443848a76f371dd812b88 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1648-9144&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1648-9144&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1648-9144&client=summon |