Comparative Evaluation of Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction for Rapid Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis

Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the achievement of satisfying treatment results and prevention of chronic infections. The present study aimed to compare the efficiency of convent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of Razi Institute Vol. 76; no. 2; pp. 203 - 211
Main Authors Rahbarnia, L, Farajnia, S, Naghili, B, Saeedi, N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Iran Razi Vaccine & Serum Research Institute 01.06.2021
Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the achievement of satisfying treatment results and prevention of chronic infections. The present study aimed to compare the efficiency of conventional microbiological and serological approaches with nested Polymerase chain reaction (nested PCR) for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis. A total of 120 subjects with symptoms of brucellosis were included in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of nested PCR for the detection of Brucella bacteria were compared with serological and blood culture methods. Out of 120 patients enrolled, brucellosis was detected in 73 (60.83%) cases based on serological tests with a blood culture confirmation in 8.33% of participants. Based on the obtained results, 55% of cases were positive in serum agglutination test (SAT≥1:160), and Coombs (C-SAT≥1:160) tests. Furthermore, seven negative SAT cases were positive in C-SAT as evidence of chronic brucellosis. The results of the 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) ≥ 1:80 test were negative in six SAT-positive cases. Based on nested PCR results, 68.18% and 56.06% SAT positive samples were also detected by blood nested PCR and serum nested PCR, respectively. The sensitivity of blood nested PCR was significantly more than serum nested PCR, SAT≥1:160, and blood culture (p <0.001). Moreover, the specificity of blood and serum nested PCR was obtained at 100%, compared to blood culture and SAT≥ 1:160. In the present study, the nested PCR was able to identify chronic brucellosis in SAT negative patients. As evidenced by the obtained results, the nested PCR showed higher efficiency for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis, as compared to the blood culture method. Furthermore, the findings pointed to the high performance of nested PCR for rapid diagnosis of both chronic and acute brucellosis.Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the achievement of satisfying treatment results and prevention of chronic infections. The present study aimed to compare the efficiency of conventional microbiological and serological approaches with nested Polymerase chain reaction (nested PCR) for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis. A total of 120 subjects with symptoms of brucellosis were included in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of nested PCR for the detection of Brucella bacteria were compared with serological and blood culture methods. Out of 120 patients enrolled, brucellosis was detected in 73 (60.83%) cases based on serological tests with a blood culture confirmation in 8.33% of participants. Based on the obtained results, 55% of cases were positive in serum agglutination test (SAT≥1:160), and Coombs (C-SAT≥1:160) tests. Furthermore, seven negative SAT cases were positive in C-SAT as evidence of chronic brucellosis. The results of the 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) ≥ 1:80 test were negative in six SAT-positive cases. Based on nested PCR results, 68.18% and 56.06% SAT positive samples were also detected by blood nested PCR and serum nested PCR, respectively. The sensitivity of blood nested PCR was significantly more than serum nested PCR, SAT≥1:160, and blood culture (p <0.001). Moreover, the specificity of blood and serum nested PCR was obtained at 100%, compared to blood culture and SAT≥ 1:160. In the present study, the nested PCR was able to identify chronic brucellosis in SAT negative patients. As evidenced by the obtained results, the nested PCR showed higher efficiency for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis, as compared to the blood culture method. Furthermore, the findings pointed to the high performance of nested PCR for rapid diagnosis of both chronic and acute brucellosis.
AbstractList Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the achievement of satisfying treatment results and prevention of chronic infections. The present study aimed to compare the efficiency of conventional microbiological and serological approaches with nested Polymerase chain reaction (nested PCR) for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis. A total of 120 subjects with symptoms of brucellosis were included in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of nested PCR for the detection of Brucella bacteria were compared with serological and blood culture methods. Out of 120 patients enrolled, brucellosis was detected in 73 (60.83%) cases based on serological tests with a blood culture confirmation in 8.33% of participants. Based on the obtained results, 55% of cases were positive in serum agglutination test (SAT≥1:160), and Coombs (C-SAT≥1:160) tests. Furthermore, seven negative SAT cases were positive in C-SAT as evidence of chronic brucellosis. The results of the 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) ≥ 1:80 test were negative in six SAT-positive cases. Based on nested PCR results, 68.18% and 56.06% SAT positive samples were also detected by blood nested PCR and serum nested PCR, respectively. The sensitivity of blood nested PCR was significantly more than serum nested PCR, SAT≥1:160, and blood culture (p <0.001). Moreover, the specificity of blood and serum nested PCR was obtained at 100%, compared to blood culture and SAT≥ 1:160. In the present study, the nested PCR was able to identify chronic brucellosis in SAT negative patients. As evidenced by the obtained results, the nested PCR showed higher efficiency for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis, as compared to the blood culture method. Furthermore, the findings pointed to the high performance of nested PCR for rapid diagnosis of both chronic and acute brucellosis.
Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the achievement of satisfying treatment results and prevention of chronic infections. The present study aimed to compare the efficiency of conventional microbiological and serological approaches with nested Polymerase chain reaction (nested PCR) for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis. A total of 120 subjects with symptoms of brucellosis were included in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of nested PCR for the detection of Brucella bacteria were compared with serological and blood culture methods. Out of 120 patients enrolled, brucellosis was detected in 73 (60.83%) cases based on serological tests with a blood culture confirmation in 8.33% of participants. Based on the obtained results, 55% of cases were positive in serum agglutination test (SAT≥1:160), and Coombs (C-SAT≥1:160) tests. Furthermore, seven negative SAT cases were positive in C-SAT as evidence of chronic brucellosis. The results of the 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) ≥ 1:80 test were negative in six SAT-positive cases. Based on nested PCR results, 68.18% and 56.06% SAT positive samples were also detected by blood nested PCR and serum nested PCR, respectively. The sensitivity of blood nested PCR was significantly more than serum nested PCR, SAT≥1:160, and blood culture (P<0.001). Moreover, the specificity of blood and serum nested PCR was obtained at 100%, compared to blood culture and SAT≥ 1:160. In the present study, the nested PCR was able to identify chronic brucellosis in SAT negative patients. As evidenced by the obtained results, the nested PCR showed higher efficiency for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis, as compared to the blood culture method. Furthermore, the findings pointed to the high performance of nested PCR for rapid diagnosis of both chronic and acute brucellosis.
Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the achievement of satisfying treatment results and prevention of chronic infections. The present study aimed to compare the efficiency of conventional microbiological and serological approaches with nested Polymerase chain reaction (nested PCR) for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis. A total of 120 subjects with symptoms of brucellosis were included in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of nested PCR for the detection of Brucella bacteria were compared with serological and blood culture methods. Out of 120 patients enrolled, brucellosis was detected in 73 (60.83%) cases based on serological tests with a blood culture confirmation in 8.33% of participants. Based on the obtained results, 55% of cases were positive in serum agglutination test (SAT&ge;1:160), and Coombs (C-SAT&ge;1:160) tests. Furthermore, seven negative SAT cases were positive in C-SAT as evidence of chronic brucellosis. The results of the 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) &ge; 1:80 test were negative in six SAT-positive cases. Based on nested PCR results, 68.18% and 56.06% SAT positive samples were also detected by blood nested PCR and serum nested PCR, respectively. The sensitivity of blood nested PCR was significantly more than serum nested PCR, SAT&ge;1:160, and blood culture (p &lt;0.001). Moreover, the specificity of blood and serum nested PCR was obtained at 100%, compared to blood culture and SAT&ge; 1:160. In the present study, the nested PCR was able to identify chronic brucellosis in SAT negative patients. As evidenced by the obtained results, the nested PCR showed higher efficiency for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis, as compared to the blood culture method. Furthermore, the findings pointed to the high performance of nested PCR for rapid diagnosis of both chronic and acute brucellosis.Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the achievement of satisfying treatment results and prevention of chronic infections. The present study aimed to compare the efficiency of conventional microbiological and serological approaches with nested Polymerase chain reaction (nested PCR) for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis. A total of 120 subjects with symptoms of brucellosis were included in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of nested PCR for the detection of Brucella bacteria were compared with serological and blood culture methods. Out of 120 patients enrolled, brucellosis was detected in 73 (60.83%) cases based on serological tests with a blood culture confirmation in 8.33% of participants. Based on the obtained results, 55% of cases were positive in serum agglutination test (SAT&ge;1:160), and Coombs (C-SAT&ge;1:160) tests. Furthermore, seven negative SAT cases were positive in C-SAT as evidence of chronic brucellosis. The results of the 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) &ge; 1:80 test were negative in six SAT-positive cases. Based on nested PCR results, 68.18% and 56.06% SAT positive samples were also detected by blood nested PCR and serum nested PCR, respectively. The sensitivity of blood nested PCR was significantly more than serum nested PCR, SAT&ge;1:160, and blood culture (p &lt;0.001). Moreover, the specificity of blood and serum nested PCR was obtained at 100%, compared to blood culture and SAT&ge; 1:160. In the present study, the nested PCR was able to identify chronic brucellosis in SAT negative patients. As evidenced by the obtained results, the nested PCR showed higher efficiency for rapid diagnosis of human brucellosis, as compared to the blood culture method. Furthermore, the findings pointed to the high performance of nested PCR for rapid diagnosis of both chronic and acute brucellosis.
Author Naghili, B
Rahbarnia, L
Saeedi, N
Farajnia, S
AuthorAffiliation 1 Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Research Center for Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, Research and Development Complex, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Biotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
– name: 3 Biotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
– name: 1 Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
– name: 4 Research Center for Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, Research and Development Complex, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: L
  surname: Rahbarnia
  fullname: Rahbarnia, L
– sequence: 2
  givenname: S
  surname: Farajnia
  fullname: Farajnia, S
– sequence: 3
  givenname: B
  surname: Naghili
  fullname: Naghili, B
– sequence: 4
  givenname: N
  surname: Saeedi
  fullname: Saeedi, N
BookMark eNpVkEFvFDEMhSNUREvpT0DKkcsuiSczSS5IsC20UgWo6j3yJN5t0EyyJDMr9d8z2_ZAT35-z_4s-T07STkRYx-lWAMIC5-xxDUIEGsJWgKsZaPlG3YGQpiVNRpO_tOn7KLW2C8tKNUp8Y6dNgpg2bBnzG_yuMeCUzwQvzrgMC8yJ563_CfViQL_nYfHkQpW4psHjInfEfqnmW0u_A73MfDLiLuUa6zHvet5xMS_ldnTMBzND-ztFodKFy_1nN1_v7rfXK9uf_242Xy9XQUANa18oLa3ClrcApER0vem0cFKa1CgsSQlLmHwgvq-oU5jaAIaZbted-ibc3bzjA0Z_7h9iSOWR5cxuicjl53DMkU_kGu1DhQUBhOCstobY0Fi3_WtXI60sLC-PLP2cz9S8JSmgsMr6OskxQe3ywdnlBTSHAGfXgAl_52XT7ox1uNDMFGeq4NWmQ6sFqr5B3zTkGY
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2021, Author(s). Published by Kowsar.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2021, Author(s). Published by Kowsar.
DBID 7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.22092/ari.2020.127122.1371
DatabaseName MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2008-9872
EndPage 211
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_577ded4ad8dd497c88921ab6b5111a52
PMC8410182
GroupedDBID 7X8
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
DIK
5PM
AAFWJ
AFPKN
GROUPED_DOAJ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-d224t-cde5b9425af2ee801cb837d9198a0a89e11a25adc0ebb3e67ad3da8496b76ac3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2008-9872
0365-3439
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:32:30 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:55:22 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 16:53:54 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-d224t-cde5b9425af2ee801cb837d9198a0a89e11a25adc0ebb3e67ad3da8496b76ac3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/577ded4ad8dd497c88921ab6b5111a52
PMID 34223719
PQID 2548629704
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_577ded4ad8dd497c88921ab6b5111a52
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8410182
proquest_miscellaneous_2548629704
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Iran
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Iran
PublicationTitle Archives of Razi Institute
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Razi Vaccine & Serum Research Institute
Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute
Publisher_xml – name: Razi Vaccine & Serum Research Institute
– name: Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute
SSID ssib008244640
ssib029260596
ssib053438405
ssib044730235
Score 2.1568866
Snippet Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the...
Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the...
Brucellosis is recognized as a zoonotic disease with high morbidity in the absence of treatment. The primary diagnosis of brucellosis can be effective in the...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
StartPage 203
SubjectTerms 2me
brucellosis
c-sat
nested pcr
Original
sat
Title Comparative Evaluation of Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction for Rapid Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2548629704
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8410182
https://doaj.org/article/577ded4ad8dd497c88921ab6b5111a52
Volume 76
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA7iyYsoKq4vInittGnSJEddd_GBi4iCt5JXsbC04q4H_70z6bq7PXnx2JS2yTw6j8x8IeQCTIx2VQ6aJgSDAKUyiWasAoZYrguDuon9zo-T4vaV37-Jt7WjvrAmrIMH7ggHAbv0wXPjlfdcS6eUZpmxhQVPITMi_n3B5q0FUyhJCqxWsUIxYRrd9hWwHOcSD8tZSrLIeQ6Rjug2NkUCl7pr92HwcgaTqSGUZIjFIDPGLrM8ttzjZHueab-ucs1QjXfI9sLDpFfdynbJRmj2iBuuUL7paInwTduKTmLGkz61029MUM0CHb6buqHPoet5oODW0mfzUXt609Xl1TN8Lqb_aZSN6RQH98nLePQyvE0W5yskHgz3PHE-CKtBaU3FQgBT5SyEq15nWpnUKB2AwHDTuzRYm4dCGp97o4CHVhbG5Qdks2mbcEio0rYIuKXphOZBSmOdEcozb71WqcsG5BppVX50CBolYlrHAeB0ueB0-RenB-T8l9Il6AAuzjSh_ZqVEORCYKZlygdE9ljQ-2L_TlO_RzRtxRG0jB39xxSPyRbDmpeYpTkhm_PPr3AKTsvcnoF83j2cRSn9AQR455M
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+Evaluation+of+Nested+Polymerase+Chain+Reaction+for+Rapid+Diagnosis+of+Human+Brucellosis&rft.jtitle=Archives+of+Razi+Institute&rft.au=L+Rahbarnia&rft.au=S+Farajnia&rft.au=B+Naghili&rft.au=N+Saeedi&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.pub=Razi+Vaccine+and+Serum+Research+Institute&rft.issn=0365-3439&rft.eissn=2008-9872&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=211&rft_id=info:doi/10.22092%2Fari.2020.127122.1371&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_577ded4ad8dd497c88921ab6b5111a52
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2008-9872&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2008-9872&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2008-9872&client=summon