Calibration of 14 C Histograms: A Comparison of Methods

The interpretation of 14 C histograms is complicated by the non-linearity of the 14 C time scale in terms of calendar years, which may result in clustering of 14 C ages in certain time intervals unrelated to the (geologic or archaeologic) phenomenon of interest. One can calibrate 14 C histograms for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiocarbon Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Main Authors Stolk, Ad, Törnqvist, Torbjörn E., Hekhuis, Kilian P. V., Berendsen, Henk J. A., van der Plicht, Johannes
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 1994
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The interpretation of 14 C histograms is complicated by the non-linearity of the 14 C time scale in terms of calendar years, which may result in clustering of 14 C ages in certain time intervals unrelated to the (geologic or archaeologic) phenomenon of interest. One can calibrate 14 C histograms for such distortions using two basic approaches. The KORHIS method constructs a 14 C histogram before calibration is performed by means of a correction factor. We present the CALHIS method based on the Groningen calibration program for individual 14 C ages. CALHIS first calibrates single 14 C ages and then sums the resulting calibration distributions, thus yielding a calibrated 14 C histogram. The individual calibration distributions are normalized to a standard Gaussian distribution before superposition, thus allowing direct comparison among various 14 C histograms. Several experiments with test data sets demonstrate that CALHIS produces significantly better results than KORHIS. Although some problems remain (part of the distortions due to 14 C variations cannot be eliminated), we show that CALHIS offers good prospects for using 14 C histograms, particularly with highly precise and accurate 14 C ages.
ISSN:0033-8222
1945-5755
DOI:10.1017/S0033822200014272