Short and long term outcomes of cardiac amyloidosis patients listed for heart transplantation in the united states: a propensity-matched analysis

• Published in: European heart journal Vol. 42; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Akintoye, E, Alvarez, P, Briasoulis, A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 12.10.2021
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0965
• ISSN: 0195-668X

Abstract Background Heart transplantation (HT) in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) patients has been historically controversial due to the risk of amyloid recurrence. However, recent single-center experiences suggest good outcomes in carefully selected patients. We sought to evaluate contemporary outcomes of CA patients listed for HT in the U.S. and evaluate predictors of survival Methods Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database on adult patients listed for a donor heart in the U.S. between 2010 and 2019, we identified 3 cohorts of patients, namely CA, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and non-CA restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM). Propensity-match analysis was used to compare primary outcomes of waitlist mortality and post-transplant graft survival between CA and DCM. Results Over the study period, 411 CA patients (mean age 62.7 years, 16.1% female) were added to the waitlist. In the propensity-matched cohorts, the rates of waitlist mortality were 33.7, 15.8, and 15.6 per 100 person-years for CA, DCM, and non-CA RCM, respectively. Compared to DCM, there was significantly higher waitlist mortality for CA (HR=1.75, 95% CI=1.16–2.65). Over the study period, 330 CA patients were transplanted with donor hearts. The 1-year graft survival rates for CA, DCM, and non-CA RCM were 89%, 92%, and 86%, respectively; and 5-year graft survival rates were 78%, 82%, and 76%, respectively. Graft survival for CA was significantly worse than DCM (HR=1.46, 1.03–2.08), and the two most significant risk factors for poor graft survival among CA patients were renal failure requiring dialysis while on the waitlist (HR=5.4, 1.6–17) and prior history of malignancy (HR=1.7, 1.0–29). CA patients with neither of the risk factor had 1- and 5-year graft survival that is comparable to those of DCM (HR=1.18, 0.81–1.74). On the other hand, CA patients with either of the risk factor had 1- and 5-year graft survival of 81% and 65%, respectively, (HR=2.33, 1.40–3.87, compared to DCM). Conclusion CA patients experience higher waitlist mortality and worse post-transplant graft survival compared to DCM. However, we identified two risk factors that can be used for further risk-stratification in these patients to achieve comparable graft survival as DCM. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.