军人正性负性情绪在情绪智力与生活满意度间的多重中介效应

目的:检验军人的正性负性情绪在情绪智力与生活满意度之间潜在的多重中介效应。方法:选取某陆军部队男性军人967人(年龄17~34岁),采用Schutte’s情绪智力量表(SSEIS)、正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)和生活满意度指数A(LSIA)进行测试,运用结构方程模型和Bootstrap检验分析变量之间的关系。结果:有68.7%的军人对现在的生活比较满意或很满意。多重中介模型分析显示,情绪智力能通过正性情绪和负性情绪的中介作用间接作用于生活满意度(X^2/df=8.88,GFI=0.98,AGFI=0.94,NFI=0.98,IFI=0.98,TLI=0.95,CFI=0.98,RMSEA:0...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中国心理卫生杂志 Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 155 - 159
Main Author 陈海燕;李红政;王骞;任晋文;方安琪;赵晓瑾
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 中国心理卫生协会 10.02.2018
解放军第303医院全军心理卫生指导中心,南宁,530021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1000-6729
DOI10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2018.02.012

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的:检验军人的正性负性情绪在情绪智力与生活满意度之间潜在的多重中介效应。方法:选取某陆军部队男性军人967人(年龄17~34岁),采用Schutte’s情绪智力量表(SSEIS)、正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)和生活满意度指数A(LSIA)进行测试,运用结构方程模型和Bootstrap检验分析变量之间的关系。结果:有68.7%的军人对现在的生活比较满意或很满意。多重中介模型分析显示,情绪智力能通过正性情绪和负性情绪的中介作用间接作用于生活满意度(X^2/df=8.88,GFI=0.98,AGFI=0.94,NFI=0.98,IFI=0.98,TLI=0.95,CFI=0.98,RMSEA:0.09);Bootstrap检验结果显示,正性情绪、负性情绪和总的中介效应效果量分别为31.5%、14.8%、46.3%。结论:正性情绪和负性情绪在军人情绪智力和生活满意度间存在并行多重中介效应。
Bibliography:Objective: To explore the multiple mediation effects of the positive and negative affect between emotional intelligence and life satisfaction in military personnel. Methods: Totally 967 male military personnel aged 17 to 34 years were investigated with the Schutte" s Emotional Intelligence Scale (SSEIS), the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and Life Satisfaction Index A (LSIA). The relationship among these variables was analyzed by using path analysis and Bootstrap test. Results: Totally 68.7% military personnel were satisfied with their lives. Path analysis showed that emotional intelligence had indirect effects on life satisfaction through the medi- ation effects of positive affect and negative affect (x2/df= 8. 88, GFI = 0. 98, AGFI = 0.94, NFI = 0. 98, IFI = 0. 98, TLI = 0. 95, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0. 09). Bootstrap test showed that the mediational path through positive affect and negative affect with the effect size were 31.5% and 14. 8%, and the total mediational effect size was 46. 3%.
ISSN:1000-6729
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2018.02.012