A Non Linear Scoring Approach for Evaluating Balance: Classification of Elderly as Fallers and Non-Fallers

Almost one third of population 65 years-old and older faces at least one fall per year. An accurate evaluation of the risk of fall through simple and easy-to-use measurements is an important issue in current clinic. A common way to evaluate balance in posturography is through the recording of the ce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLOS ONE Vol. 11; no. 12; p. e0167456
Main Authors Audiffren, Julien, Bargiotas, Ioannis, Vayatis, Nicolas, Vidal, Pierre-Paul, Ricard, Damien
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science (PLoS) 09.12.2016
Public Library of Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Almost one third of population 65 years-old and older faces at least one fall per year. An accurate evaluation of the risk of fall through simple and easy-to-use measurements is an important issue in current clinic. A common way to evaluate balance in posturography is through the recording of the centre-of-pressure (CoP) displacement (statokinesigram) with force platforms. A variety of indices have been proposed to differentiate fallers from non fallers. However, no agreement has been reached whether these analyses alone can explain sufficiently the complex synergies of postural control. In this work, we study the statokinesigrams of 84 elderly subjects (80.3+- 6.4 years old), which had no impairment related to balance control. Each subject was recorded 25 seconds with eyes open and 25 seconds with eyes closed and information pertaining to the presence of problems of balance, such as fall, in the last six months, was collected. Five descriptors of the statokinesigrams were computed for each record, and a Ranking Forest algorithm was used to combine those features in order to evaluate each subject's balance with a score. A classical train-test split approach was used to evaluate the performance of the method through ROC analysis. ROC analysis showed that the performance of each descriptor separately was close to a random classifier (AUC between 0.49 and 0.54). On the other hand, the score obtained by our method reached an AUC of 0.75 on the test set, consistent over multiple train-test split. This non linear multi-dimensional approach seems appropriate in evaluating complex postural control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC5147917
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceptualization: JA NV PPV DR.Data curation: JA DR.Formal analysis: JA.Funding acquisition: NV PPV DR.Investigation: JA DR.Methodology: NV PPV DR.Project administration: NV PPV DR.Resources: DR.Software: JA.Validation: JA.Visualization: JA IB.Writing – original draft: JA IB.Writing – review & editing: JA IB NV PPV DR.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0167456