The Perceptions of digital technology at a New Zealand tertiary institution

The way educational institutions view certain technology has changed dramatically over the years, especially with the world lockdown in 2020. Understanding how digital technology is seen in an educational institution is the path to finding out how to improve and enhance the learning experience for s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning Vol. 4; no. 1; p. 7
Main Author Singh, Umang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 26.01.2022
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2624-4705
2624-4705
DOI10.24135/pjtel.v4i1.118

Cover

Abstract The way educational institutions view certain technology has changed dramatically over the years, especially with the world lockdown in 2020. Understanding how digital technology is seen in an educational institution is the path to finding out how to improve and enhance the learning experience for students. A study by the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) showed “digitalisation has been one of the main drivers of innovation in educational practices in the classroom in the past decade.” (Vlies, 2020)   The study examined how different members of a New Zealand tertiary education institution perceive digital technology in their respective areas of study. It examined how technology is viewed by students from differing degrees and levels, as well as how these views differ within the undergraduate and postgraduate levels of study. The perception of educators was also examined to see how different departments view the tools they use in their respective programmes and how it differs from both past and present students. The methodology behind the research was using a mixed-method research approach to gain both qualitative and quantitative data. This method would allow for the Sequential Explanatory Strategy (Terrell, 2012) to interpret the study. The strategy is done via the collection and analysis of quantitative data followed by the collection and analysis of qualitative data. The quantitative data collection used an online survey to collect a large, population of anonymous participants.   The online survey was conducted using the Qualtrics software and was administered amongst the population of the university. A particular focus was put on the undergraduate population, being the largest group of students, given their reliance on distance learning as a result of the lockdowns in New Zealand in 2020/21. The survey featured a multitude of questions to collect a mix of quantitative and qualitative data.   The findings from the initial survey highlighted departments at the institution that have a stronger positive outlook towards using a higher amount digital technology in their curriculum. There was a subgroup that still preferred a more practical, face-to-face approach. In response to a question regarding whether digital technology adoption may be lagging in certain programmes/disciplines, the majority of participants gave the unknown response with the second-highest group saying it was likely. The main reason participants gave for the lag of adoption of digital technology was the underfunding of programmes, with some participants further suggesting a possible correlation between underfunding, understaffing and inadequate training. The latter coheres with the OECD study, with training being one of two key aspects of education policies: “First, teachers need sufficient training to deploy and teach about digital technologies. Second, countries need a standard for digital skills and literacy for students.” (Vlies, 2020)   Ongoing follow-up interviews are currently being conducted to supplement the data from the online survey results. This study will be of interest to curriculum developers, decision-makers, policymakers, future students, educators, technologists, and other educational institution staff.
AbstractList The way educational institutions view certain technology has changed dramatically over the years, especially with the world lockdown in 2020. Understanding how digital technology is seen in an educational institution is the path to finding out how to improve and enhance the learning experience for students. A study by the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) showed “digitalisation has been one of the main drivers of innovation in educational practices in the classroom in the past decade.” (Vlies, 2020)   The study examined how different members of a New Zealand tertiary education institution perceive digital technology in their respective areas of study. It examined how technology is viewed by students from differing degrees and levels, as well as how these views differ within the undergraduate and postgraduate levels of study. The perception of educators was also examined to see how different departments view the tools they use in their respective programmes and how it differs from both past and present students. The methodology behind the research was using a mixed-method research approach to gain both qualitative and quantitative data. This method would allow for the Sequential Explanatory Strategy (Terrell, 2012) to interpret the study. The strategy is done via the collection and analysis of quantitative data followed by the collection and analysis of qualitative data. The quantitative data collection used an online survey to collect a large, population of anonymous participants.   The online survey was conducted using the Qualtrics software and was administered amongst the population of the university. A particular focus was put on the undergraduate population, being the largest group of students, given their reliance on distance learning as a result of the lockdowns in New Zealand in 2020/21. The survey featured a multitude of questions to collect a mix of quantitative and qualitative data.   The findings from the initial survey highlighted departments at the institution that have a stronger positive outlook towards using a higher amount digital technology in their curriculum. There was a subgroup that still preferred a more practical, face-to-face approach. In response to a question regarding whether digital technology adoption may be lagging in certain programmes/disciplines, the majority of participants gave the unknown response with the second-highest group saying it was likely. The main reason participants gave for the lag of adoption of digital technology was the underfunding of programmes, with some participants further suggesting a possible correlation between underfunding, understaffing and inadequate training. The latter coheres with the OECD study, with training being one of two key aspects of education policies: “First, teachers need sufficient training to deploy and teach about digital technologies. Second, countries need a standard for digital skills and literacy for students.” (Vlies, 2020)   Ongoing follow-up interviews are currently being conducted to supplement the data from the online survey results. This study will be of interest to curriculum developers, decision-makers, policymakers, future students, educators, technologists, and other educational institution staff.
Author Singh, Umang
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Umang
  surname: Singh
  fullname: Singh, Umang
BookMark eNpNkDtPwzAAhC1UJErpzOo_kNTP2B5RxUtUwJCJxbIdpzUKdhUbUP89aWFgupNOdzp9l2AWU_QAXGNUE4YpX-3fix_qLxZwjbE8A3PSEFYxgfjsn78Ay5yDRYwJzilRc_DU7jx89aPz-xJSzDD1sAvbUMwAi3e7mIa0PUBToIHP_hu-eTOY2E3ZWIIZDzDEXEL5PJavwHlvhuyXf7oA7d1tu36oNi_3j-ubTeUklhVBDWk4bjrnOLfMS6Ia2znbE6GkFMo47BF11mKiqOVcKMGVMVOBiX4K6AKsfmfdmHIefa_3Y_iYvmiM9ImGPtHQRxp6okF_AG9mVrQ
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.24135/pjtel.v4i1.118
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2624-4705
ExternalDocumentID 10_24135_pjtel_v4i1_118
GroupedDBID AAYXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
M~E
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c818-20626516dcc55b4e8296bdcbf2798879ac1e03cbb1293b5579759aa16d47f03c3
ISSN 2624-4705
IngestDate Tue Jul 01 02:38:32 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c818-20626516dcc55b4e8296bdcbf2798879ac1e03cbb1293b5579759aa16d47f03c3
OpenAccessLink https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pjtel/article/download/118/83
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_24135_pjtel_v4i1_118
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-01-26
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-01-26
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-01-26
  day: 26
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning
PublicationYear 2022
SSID ssib044755329
Score 2.1708927
Snippet The way educational institutions view certain technology has changed dramatically over the years, especially with the world lockdown in 2020. Understanding how...
SourceID crossref
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 7
Title The Perceptions of digital technology at a New Zealand tertiary institution
Volume 4
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8QwEA66XryIouKbHDwIpWsfSdMeRVYWRfGwC3srSZuuFe0uUj148Lc7adKHusLqpYS0Gdp8YfplMg-ETqPQl6nPua2KFdnA_x2bJ4Fjhz53pBShJ4iKRr69C4Zjcj2hk7aKYxVdUop-8r4wruQ_qEIf4KqiZP-AbCMUOqAN-MIVEIbr0hjft54pivil-VSVAbHKxmSuwhV514_RUm4AufKWy42nQI2NIanGUc_qkNXWAm8NigftNWBSs04bIw20KyPN-JmbXmNO8JRfhq1j1rXW8QKP2IQ5-qhZLugzapP8WB1aBbJFilmd3qkkFvPHUj7130jugq4O239Qfe7-7dfUOAzCVqUSEVcCYiUA9i7hKlrzGKuO528_BrUeUTkMqV8VqGveXGd1qmScf32JDiHpMIvRJtows4wvNL5baEUW2-gGsMUdbPEswwZb3GKLeYk5BmyxwRbX2OIOtjtodDUYXQ5tU_jCToA_wRKHXSZ1gzRJKBVEhl4UiDQRmaeSy7GIJ650_EQIxdUEpSxiNOIcBhCWwQ1_F_WKWSH3EIbhrps5UZb5IZEgSgKDlTA3EmYmJHQfndUfH891epP4l7k-WP7RQ7TeLq0j1CtfXuUxcLdSnFRAfQJHWkku
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Perceptions+of+digital+technology+at+a+New+Zealand+tertiary+institution&rft.jtitle=Pacific+Journal+of+Technology+Enhanced+Learning&rft.au=Singh%2C+Umang&rft.date=2022-01-26&rft.issn=2624-4705&rft.eissn=2624-4705&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft_id=info:doi/10.24135%2Fpjtel.v4i1.118&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_24135_pjtel_v4i1_118
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2624-4705&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2624-4705&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2624-4705&client=summon