Evaluating the Role of “Nothing to Lose” Attitudes on Risky Behavior in Adolescence
This article examines the extent to which adolescents' expectations about their future in terms of health and education affect their risk-taking behavior. With data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Healthy we test the theory that a “nothing to lose” attitude about the future p...
Saved in:
Published in | Social forces Vol. 80; no. 3; pp. 1005 - 1039 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chapel Hill, NC
The University of North Carolina Press
01.03.2002
University of North Carolina Press Oxford University Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This article examines the extent to which adolescents' expectations about their future in terms of health and education affect their risk-taking behavior. With data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Healthy we test the theory that a “nothing to lose” attitude about the future predicts greater involvement in risky behaviors involving early sexual intercourse, selling drugs, and weapon use. We examine the effects of both individual- and school-level conditions. Results provide mixed support for our “nothing to lose” hypothesis. We do find noteworthy school-level effects of “school climate,” including aggregate expectations, mental health, and the prevalence of single-mother families, that influence adolescent risk-taking behavior more than school measures of SES. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Direct all correspondence to Kathleen Mullan Harris, Carolina Population Center, CB# 8120, University Square, Chapel Hill, NC 27516. istex:6D5E5D7AB4BCB02E92A61BFBC27503CEA7C6F8AF ark:/67375/HXZ-0ZQ6L0SS-Q We are grateful to the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development for supporting Harris through grant 1 P01 HD31921-01 as part of the Add Health project, a program project designed by J. Richard Udry (PI) and Peter Bearman, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 to the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, with cooperative funding participation of seventeen other federal agencies. We also acknowledge support to Harris and Duncan through the Family and Child Well-being Research Network, grants 1 U01 HD37558-01 and 2 U01 HD30947-07, of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. We are grateful to Larry Wu, Dick Udry, Jacque Eccles, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0037-7732 1534-7605 |
DOI: | 10.1353/sof.2002.0008 |