Mandatory Arbitration of International Tax Disputes: A Solution in Search of a Problem

This article is based on the author's S.J.D. thesis.Improving the resolution of international tax disputes has witnessed recent developments. The Organization of Economic Development and Cooperation (“OECD”) amended its Model Convention and Commentary to include mandatory and binding arbitratio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFlorida tax review Vol. 9; no. 8
Main Author Farah, Ehab
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 11.04.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This article is based on the author's S.J.D. thesis.Improving the resolution of international tax disputes has witnessed recent developments. The Organization of Economic Development and Cooperation (“OECD”) amended its Model Convention and Commentary to include mandatory and binding arbitration of tax disputes between two treaty countries that have been unsuccessful in resolving the disputes through negotiations between their tax authorities. The United States has amended its income tax treaties with Belgium, Canada, Germany and France to include mandatory and binding arbitration of unresolved tax disputes. These amendments are undoubtedly an important step toward improving the resolution of international tax disputes. Nevertheless, the Article argues that these amendments fail to achieve this goal. By their terms, the amendments enable countries to avoid the arbitration. There is a risk these amendments will damage previously existing resolution methods that have generally been successful. The arbitration, as currently proposed, can be used by taxpayers to achieve abusive and undesirable tax results. The Article argues that these amendments will not serve the two primary goals income tax treaties aim at achieving which are preventing double taxation as well as double nontaxation (i.e., escaping taxation).In Part one of the Article I present a brief overview of major contributions to the literature in this field. I set forth an evaluation methodology that focuses on two questions: First, does a mandatory arbitration provision fit in the overall network of tax treaties? Second, can the mandatory and binding arbitration provision actually resolve disputes? I argue that when we are able to answer positively to both questions, a recommendation to adopt such a provision will follow.In Part two I focus on the OECD proposal for mandatory and binding arbitration aimed at improving the resolution of international tax disputes. I conclude that under the current proposed structure, a negative answer to the above evaluation questions is more likely to be given than a positive one. I address certain policy issues related to the proposal, structural deficiencies embodied in it as well as possible negative consequences it may have. I conclude that the proposal should be reexamined.In Part three I examine the mandatory and binding arbitration provisions that were adopted recently in a few income tax treaties to which the United States is partner. I conclude that the United States expresses a position aimed at limiting the application of mandatory and binding arbitration.Part four is a summary of the work. I explain that I generally do not oppose the adoption of mandatory and binding arbitration. Nevertheless, I offer some considerations regarding the circumstances accompanying the application of the proposed provisions as well as their structure. I suggest that the proposals should be reexamined because they lack features that are major and crucial for successful mandatory and binding arbitration and because of the risk that they will negatively affect pre-existing dispute resolution mechanisms.
AbstractList This article is based on the author's S.J.D. thesis.Improving the resolution of international tax disputes has witnessed recent developments. The Organization of Economic Development and Cooperation (“OECD”) amended its Model Convention and Commentary to include mandatory and binding arbitration of tax disputes between two treaty countries that have been unsuccessful in resolving the disputes through negotiations between their tax authorities. The United States has amended its income tax treaties with Belgium, Canada, Germany and France to include mandatory and binding arbitration of unresolved tax disputes. These amendments are undoubtedly an important step toward improving the resolution of international tax disputes. Nevertheless, the Article argues that these amendments fail to achieve this goal. By their terms, the amendments enable countries to avoid the arbitration. There is a risk these amendments will damage previously existing resolution methods that have generally been successful. The arbitration, as currently proposed, can be used by taxpayers to achieve abusive and undesirable tax results. The Article argues that these amendments will not serve the two primary goals income tax treaties aim at achieving which are preventing double taxation as well as double nontaxation (i.e., escaping taxation).In Part one of the Article I present a brief overview of major contributions to the literature in this field. I set forth an evaluation methodology that focuses on two questions: First, does a mandatory arbitration provision fit in the overall network of tax treaties? Second, can the mandatory and binding arbitration provision actually resolve disputes? I argue that when we are able to answer positively to both questions, a recommendation to adopt such a provision will follow.In Part two I focus on the OECD proposal for mandatory and binding arbitration aimed at improving the resolution of international tax disputes. I conclude that under the current proposed structure, a negative answer to the above evaluation questions is more likely to be given than a positive one. I address certain policy issues related to the proposal, structural deficiencies embodied in it as well as possible negative consequences it may have. I conclude that the proposal should be reexamined.In Part three I examine the mandatory and binding arbitration provisions that were adopted recently in a few income tax treaties to which the United States is partner. I conclude that the United States expresses a position aimed at limiting the application of mandatory and binding arbitration.Part four is a summary of the work. I explain that I generally do not oppose the adoption of mandatory and binding arbitration. Nevertheless, I offer some considerations regarding the circumstances accompanying the application of the proposed provisions as well as their structure. I suggest that the proposals should be reexamined because they lack features that are major and crucial for successful mandatory and binding arbitration and because of the risk that they will negatively affect pre-existing dispute resolution mechanisms.
Author Farah, Ehab
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ehab
  surname: Farah
  fullname: Farah, Ehab
BookMark eNotkN9LwzAcxINMsJs--p5_oDNJ03wb38r8NZgorPga0phgpUtGkoH7712nT8fB3cF95mjmg7cI3VKyrIHzO5fjkhEil5SQ5gIVjIMoqZByhgpKhCgr3sAVmqf0TQhlhEGBPl61_9Q5xCNuYz_kqPMQPA4Or3220Z-tHnGnf_DDkPaHbNM9bvE2jIdzcvB4a3U0X1NH4_cY-tHurtGl02OyN_-6QN3TY7d6KTdvz-tVuykNQFPqxpnG9MRoaSgIYEZwDdxJJyWTrq6Yq5lxxoABW58egANq-7qyvJKENtUClX-zJoaUonVqH4edjkdFiZqYqBMTNTFRE5PqF4IfVwc
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.5744/ftr.2009.1008
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Law
Political Science
EISSN 2476-1699
ExternalDocumentID 10_5744_ftr_2009_1008
GroupedDBID .4L
.CB
1XV
2-G
29H
2QL
3V.
5.J
5GY
6DY
7X1
8A9
AACLI
AAYXX
ABACO
ABFRF
ABUWG
ACBMB
ADDQP
ADEYR
ADUOI
AEFWE
AEGXH
AEGZQ
AFACB
AFKRA
AFXCU
AGQRV
AHEHV
AKVCP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ANIOZ
BENPR
BEZIV
BHRNT
BPHCQ
CCPQU
CITATION
DWQXO
EBR
EBU
EKAWT
FM.
FRNLG
HCSNT
HISYW
HOCAJ
IAO
ILT
IOF
ITC
K60
K6~
LGEZI
LO7
LOTEE
LXB
LXL
LXN
LXO
LXU
LXY
NADUK
NXXTH
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQQKQ
PROAC
QF4
QN5
QN7
RHO
RWL
RXW
SJN
TAA
TAC
TAE
TAF
TH9
TQQ
TQW
TWJ
TWL
UXR
VGZHO
VKN
W2G
WE1
X6Y
XPM
ZRF
ZYG
~X8
~ZZ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c778-a8fc8cb0ca9c17672c64a74f9f9929f532f52cfcc7c7e50667f71eb53e4390183
ISSN 1066-3487
IngestDate Fri Aug 23 00:52:07 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c778-a8fc8cb0ca9c17672c64a74f9f9929f532f52cfcc7c7e50667f71eb53e4390183
OpenAccessLink https://journals.upress.ufl.edu/ftr/article/download/376/355
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_5744_ftr_2009_1008
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-04-11
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-04-11
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-04-11
  day: 11
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Florida tax review
PublicationYear 2022
SSID ssj0012027
Score 2.2311547
Snippet This article is based on the author's S.J.D. thesis.Improving the resolution of international tax disputes has witnessed recent developments. The Organization...
SourceID crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Title Mandatory Arbitration of International Tax Disputes: A Solution in Search of a Problem
Volume 9
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NT8IwFG8ELl4MfsXv9GC8mCls3dp5QwMhRowxaLiRtrSRCxic0fjX-97awTAc1MuydFu39Ne9_vo-CTmNUm1GwOsDphujgCXwK4pEcTTy4gTjDWFRD9m7T7pP7HYQDxa1-fLokkxd6K-VcSX_QRXaAFeMkv0DsvNOoQHOAV84AsJw_BXGPVQD5Fby1kyNfQLcIjhkoefry0_MsonVG95cJHqhDENth3M4dnGSD668TJmxdtBFbyTPM-hktmRI6KAyOZelL1KVtQew8cQ0hc2SwAPKEUTML3ombwsZT4Jm4goXFVIyLU0GsUr2xpwxHLBs5rKAYtagxSJTGNZ_rD1zj0DYi2AHQ3gcK2OmmEtZVEgN8xuyKqldt-8fHufmIdTY5GZs__EueSp2cLn0_hLZKLGGfp1seLpPWw67TbJmJlukcic_tkjdux7CZS9gt8nzHFFaQpROLV1ClAKitED0irZogScdT6jDE5-R1OO5Q_qddv-mG_jKF4HmsKuXwmqhVUPLVDd5wkOdMMmZTW0KbNbGUWjjUFutueYmRjdly5tGxZFhqMIS0S6pTqYTs0coDA5sCoHVjpRgKlRC69BI-D2BGiqj7D45K0Zo-OrymwxXYnHw2xsPyfpioh2RajZ7N8dA3DJ14mH8Bs8EQfI
link.rule.ids 314,780,784,27924,27925
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mandatory+Arbitration+of+International+Tax+Disputes%3A+A+Solution+in+Search+of+a+Problem&rft.jtitle=Florida+tax+review&rft.au=Farah%2C+Ehab&rft.date=2022-04-11&rft.issn=1066-3487&rft.eissn=2476-1699&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.5744%2Fftr.2009.1008&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_5744_ftr_2009_1008
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1066-3487&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1066-3487&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1066-3487&client=summon