Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA

Network meta-analysis synthesizes direct and indirect evidence in a network of trials that compare multiple interventions and has the potential to rank the competing treatments according to the studied outcome. Despite its usefulness network meta-analysis is often criticized for its complexity and f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 8; no. 10; p. e76654
Main Authors Chaimani, Anna, Higgins, Julian P. T., Mavridis, Dimitris, Spyridonos, Panagiota, Salanti, Georgia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 03.10.2013
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Network meta-analysis synthesizes direct and indirect evidence in a network of trials that compare multiple interventions and has the potential to rank the competing treatments according to the studied outcome. Despite its usefulness network meta-analysis is often criticized for its complexity and for being accessible only to researchers with strong statistical and computational skills. The evaluation of the underlying model assumptions, the statistical technicalities and presentation of the results in a concise and understandable way are all challenging aspects in the network meta-analysis methodology. In this paper we aim to make the methodology accessible to non-statisticians by presenting and explaining a series of graphical tools via worked examples. To this end, we provide a set of STATA routines that can be easily employed to present the evidence base, evaluate the assumptions, fit the network meta-analysis model and interpret its results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: AC JPTH GS. Performed the experiments: AC DM PS. Analyzed the data: AC DM PS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AC JPTH DM GS. Wrote the paper: AC JPTH DM PS GS.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0076654