Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 9; no. 12; p. e114163
• Main Authors: Khanna, Arjun, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, Farzan, Faranak
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 05.12.2014; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adult; Algorithms; Bioindicators; Biomarkers; Brain; Brain Mapping; Cluster analysis; Clustering; Consistency; EEG; Electrodes; Electroencephalography; Electroencephalography - methods; Error analysis; Feature extraction; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Mathematical analysis; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental disorders; Nervous system diseases; Neurophysiology; Recording; Reliability analysis; Rest - physiology; Standard error; Vector quantization
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114163

Electroencephalographic (EEG) microstate analysis is a method of identifying quasi-stable functional brain states ("microstates") that are altered in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers of neurophysiological health and disease. However, use of EEG microstates as neurophysiological biomarkers requires assessment of the test-retest reliability of microstate analysis. We analyzed resting-state, eyes-closed, 30-channel EEG from 10 healthy subjects over 3 sessions spaced approximately 48 hours apart. We identified four microstate classes and calculated the average duration, frequency, and coverage fraction of these microstates. Using Cronbach's α and the standard error of measurement (SEM) as indicators of reliability, we examined: (1) the test-retest reliability of microstate features using a variety of different approaches; (2) the consistency between TAAHC and k-means clustering algorithms; and (3) whether microstate analysis can be reliably conducted with 19 and 8 electrodes. The approach of identifying a single set of "global" microstate maps showed the highest reliability (mean Cronbach's α > 0.8, SEM ≈ 10% of mean values) compared to microstates derived by each session or each recording. There was notably low reliability in features calculated from maps extracted individually for each recording, suggesting that the analysis is most reliable when maps are held constant. Features were highly consistent across clustering methods (Cronbach's α > 0.9). All features had high test-retest reliability with 19 and 8 electrodes. High test-retest reliability and cross-method consistency of microstate features suggests their potential as biomarkers for assessment of the brain's neurophysiological health.