New J apanese neonatal anthropometric charts for gestational age at birth

Abstract Background More than 10 years have passed since the previous Japanese neonatal growth charts were published, therefore the aim of this study was to develop an updated set of Japanese neonatal growth charts. Methods We used data from the registry database of the J apan Society of Obstetrics...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatrics international Vol. 56; no. 5; pp. 702 - 708
Main Authors Itabashi, Kazuo, Miura, Fumihiro, Uehara, Ritei, Nakamura, Yoshikazu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.10.2014
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background More than 10 years have passed since the previous Japanese neonatal growth charts were published, therefore the aim of this study was to develop an updated set of Japanese neonatal growth charts. Methods We used data from the registry database of the J apan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology from 2003 until 2005. A total of 150 471 singleton live births without stillbirth or severe congenital malformation were enrolled in the preliminary analysis. It was found that the distribution of the 10th centile charts based on these subjects was skewed toward lower birthweight for preterm infants, because of the significantly lower birthweight in the 10th centile in neonates delivered by cesarean section than those delivered vaginally. Therefore, the data of subjects delivered by cesarean section were also excluded. Results Finally, 104 748 singleton vaginal births at 22–41 weeks of gestation were used to construct a new set of Japanese neonatal anthropometric charts. The birthweight chart is parity and sex specific. The differences between the Japanese fetal growth chart and the new neonatal birthweight chart were small. Conclusion The present new neonatal anthropometric charts may reveal unrestricted growth pattern mimicking fetal growth. Use of these charts may result in recognition of abnormal fetal growth and risk in preterm infants. Further studies are needed to evaluate the risk for adverse neonatal and long‐term outcome among small‐for‐gestational‐age infants using these neonatal charts.
ISSN:1328-8067
1442-200X
DOI:10.1111/ped.12331