Comparison of trunk and hip muscle activity during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension
[Purpose] This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. [Subjects] The study enrolled 18 participants. [Methods] Two exercises (hip and lumbar extension) and two ranges (180° and <180°) were studied. [Results] Differences in degree...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of Physical Therapy Science Vol. 27; no. 9; pp. 2717 - 2718 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Japan
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2015
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0915-5287 2187-5626 |
| DOI | 10.1589/jpts.27.2717 |
Cover
| Abstract | [Purpose] This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. [Subjects] The study enrolled 18 participants. [Methods] Two exercises (hip and lumbar extension) and two ranges (180° and <180°) were studied. [Results] Differences in degree of extension affected the percentage maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the lumbar erector spinae and biceps femoris muscles, with significantly higher average values at >180° than at 180° lumbar extension. No significant differences were found in gluteus maximus activity according to exercise type or range. [Conclusion] Hip extension may be more effective and safer for lumbar rehabilitation than lumbar extension. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | [Purpose] This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. [Subjects] The study enrolled 18 participants. [Methods] Two exercises (hip and lumbar extension) and two ranges (180° and <180°) were studied. [Results] Differences in degree of extension affected the percentage maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the lumbar erector spinae and biceps femoris muscles, with significantly higher average values at >180° than at 180° lumbar extension. No significant differences were found in gluteus maximus activity according to exercise type or range. [Conclusion] Hip extension may be more effective and safer for lumbar rehabilitation than lumbar extension. Purpose: This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. Subjects: The study enrolled 18 participants. Methods: Two exercises (hip and lumbar extension) and two ranges (180 degree and <180 degree ) were studied. Results: Differences in degree of extension affected the percentage maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the lumbar erector spinae and biceps femoris muscles, with significantly higher average values at >180 degree than at 180 degree lumbar extension. No significant differences were found in gluteus maximus activity according to exercise type or range. Conclusion: Hip extension may be more effective and safer for lumbar rehabilitation than lumbar extension. [Purpose] This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. [Subjects] The study enrolled 18 participants. [Methods] Two exercises (hip and lumbar extension) and two ranges (180° and <180°) were studied. [Results] Differences in degree of extension affected the percentage maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the lumbar erector spinae and biceps femoris muscles, with significantly higher average values at >180° than at 180° lumbar extension. No significant differences were found in gluteus maximus activity according to exercise type or range. [Conclusion] Hip extension may be more effective and safer for lumbar rehabilitation than lumbar extension. [Abstract.] [Purpose] This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. [Subjects] The study enrolled 18 participants. [Methods] Two exercises (hip and lumbar extension) and two ranges (180° and <180°) were studied. [Results] Differences in degree of extension affected the percentage maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the lumbar erector spinae and biceps femoris muscles, with significantly higher average values at >180° than at 180° lumbar extension. No significant differences were found in gluteus maximus activity according to exercise type or range. [Conclusion] Hip extension may be more effective and safer for lumbar rehabilitation than lumbar extension. |
| Author | Kim, Sang-min Yoo, Won-gyu |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Yoo, Won-gyu organization: Department of Physical Therapy, College of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inje University: 607 Obangdong, Gimhae, Gyeongsangnamdo 621-749, Republic of Korea – sequence: 1 fullname: Kim, Sang-min organization: Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Inje University, Republic of Korea |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504276$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNks9vFCEcxYmpsdvqzbOZowe3AjMMcDExG9uaNPGiZ2SY7-wyzsAITGP_e5luO_5ITEwIHPi8x4PHGTpx3gFCLwm-IEzIt_2U4gXleRD-BG0oEXzLalqfoA2WhG0ZFfwUncXYY0w5rsQzdEprhivK6w36uvPjpION3hW-K1KY3bdCu7Y42KkY52gGKLRJ9tamu6Kdg3X7orVdBwFcKlrYB4C4KId5bHRYpfAjgYvWu-foaaeHCC8e1nP05fLD59319ubT1cfd-5ut4SVP25Zr0gBjlWxKLFsOLeGio7xkFRYMdNNILIBVFFgjSsa0KTspu7wJRpcVLc_Ru6PvNDcjtCbHC3pQU7CjDnfKa6v-3HH2oPb-VlU1qTHn2eD1g0Hw32eISY02GhgG7cDPURFeUkFJLcr_QCmXkjFeZ_TV77HWPI8NZODNETDBxxigWxGC1VKwWgpWlKul4IzTv3Bjk075ofOl7PAv0dVRlBNYowfvButA9X4OLneijBb9UYAJU_ffRCpMyL16mQRlpBKEZafro1Mfk97DmlWHZPNXWY-Vy_TLMle6IuaggwJX_gTtG9xM |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_4102_sajp_v77i1_1578 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctcp_2017_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_31_371 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-204 10.1097/00007632-199304000-00007 10.1177/0363546506298276 10.1589/jpts.27.315 10.3233/BMR-2011-0301 10.1093/ptj/78.1.8 10.1177/0269215515570379 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2015 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. 2015 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. – notice: 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. 2015 |
| CorporateAuthor | College of Biomedical Science and Engineering Inje University Department of Physical Therapy The Graduate School |
| CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Department of Physical Therapy – name: The Graduate School – name: Inje University – name: College of Biomedical Science and Engineering |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 7TS 5PM |
| DOI | 10.1589/jpts.27.2717 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Physical Education Index PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Physical Education Index |
| DatabaseTitleList | Physical Education Index PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Physical Therapy |
| EISSN | 2187-5626 |
| EndPage | 2718 |
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC4616077 26504276 10_1589_jpts_27_2717 ca8jjpts_2015_002709_011_2717_27182514815 article_jpts_27_9_27_jpts_2015_309_article_char_en |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | .55 07C 29L 2WC 53G 5GY AAEJM AAWTL ACGFO ADBBV ADRAZ AENEX AIAGR AJJEV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BKOMP BMSDO CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD FRP GX1 HYE JMI JSF JSH KQ8 M48 MOJWN OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT RJT RNS RPM RZJ TKC TR2 W2D X7M XSB AAYXX CITATION ACRZS NPM 7X8 7TS 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c737t-d7a1be5549b309d7ed178f27354085eabb908e542e5b8355ac3f99f408eca3423 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 0915-5287 |
| IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:29:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 08:20:51 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 12:31:45 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:21:06 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:12:04 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:21 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 16:12:56 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 06:29:57 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | false |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 9 |
| Keywords | Lumbar extension EMG Hip extension |
| Language | English |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c737t-d7a1be5549b309d7ed178f27354085eabb908e542e5b8355ac3f99f408eca3423 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1589/jpts.27.2717 |
| PMID | 26504276 |
| PQID | 1727995576 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 2 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4616077 proquest_miscellaneous_1732821683 proquest_miscellaneous_1727995576 pubmed_primary_26504276 crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_27_2717 crossref_citationtrail_10_1589_jpts_27_2717 medicalonline_journals_ca8jjpts_2015_002709_011_2717_27182514815 jstage_primary_article_jpts_27_9_27_jpts_2015_309_article_char_en |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20150000 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2015 text: 20150000 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Japan |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Japan |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of Physical Therapy Science |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Journal of Physical Therapy Science |
| PublicationYear | 2015 |
| Publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
| Publisher_xml | – name: The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
| References | 2) Yoo WG: Comparison of the isolated contraction ratios of the hip extensors and erector spinae muscles of the lumbar region and thoracic muscles during different back extension exercises. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27: 315–316. 4) Callaghan JP, Gunning JL, McGill SM: The relationship between lumbar spine load and muscle activity during extensor exercises. Phys Ther, 1998, 78: 8–18. 9) Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, et al.: Muscles: Testing and Function with Posture and Pain, 5th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005. 3) Searle A, Spink M, Ho A, et al.: Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Rehabil, 2015, [Epub ahead of print]. 7) Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, et al.: Intensive dynamic back exercises with or without hyperextension in chronic back pain after surgery for lumbar disc protrusion. A clinical trial. Spine, 1993, 18: 560–567. 5) De Ridder EM, Van Oosterwijck JO, Vleeming A, et al.: Posterior muscle chain activity during various extension exercises: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2013, 14: 204. 1) Smith D, Bissell G, Bruce-Low S, et al.: The effect of lumbar extension training with and without pelvic stabilization on lumbar strength and low back pain. J Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil, 2011, 24: 241–249. 8) Drillis R, Contini R, Bluestein M: Body segment parameters: a survey of measurement techniques. Artif Limbs, 1964, 8: 44–66. 6) Walsh JC, Quinlan JF, Stapleton R, et al.: Three-dimensional motion analysis of the lumbar spine during “free squat” weight lift training. Am J Sports Med, 2007, 35: 927–932. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 25681408 - Clin Rehabil. 2015 Dec;29(12):1155-67 9442191 - Phys Ther. 1998 Jan;78(1):8-18 25729158 - J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Feb;27(2):315-6 8484146 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Apr;18(5):560-7 14208177 - Artif Limbs. 1964;8:44-66 22142713 - J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24(4):241-9 17307893 - Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):927-32 23834759 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jul 09;14:204 |
| References_xml | – reference: 9) Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, et al.: Muscles: Testing and Function with Posture and Pain, 5th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005. – reference: 3) Searle A, Spink M, Ho A, et al.: Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Rehabil, 2015, [Epub ahead of print]. – reference: 5) De Ridder EM, Van Oosterwijck JO, Vleeming A, et al.: Posterior muscle chain activity during various extension exercises: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2013, 14: 204. – reference: 1) Smith D, Bissell G, Bruce-Low S, et al.: The effect of lumbar extension training with and without pelvic stabilization on lumbar strength and low back pain. J Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil, 2011, 24: 241–249. – reference: 6) Walsh JC, Quinlan JF, Stapleton R, et al.: Three-dimensional motion analysis of the lumbar spine during “free squat” weight lift training. Am J Sports Med, 2007, 35: 927–932. – reference: 8) Drillis R, Contini R, Bluestein M: Body segment parameters: a survey of measurement techniques. Artif Limbs, 1964, 8: 44–66. – reference: 2) Yoo WG: Comparison of the isolated contraction ratios of the hip extensors and erector spinae muscles of the lumbar region and thoracic muscles during different back extension exercises. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27: 315–316. – reference: 4) Callaghan JP, Gunning JL, McGill SM: The relationship between lumbar spine load and muscle activity during extensor exercises. Phys Ther, 1998, 78: 8–18. – reference: 7) Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, et al.: Intensive dynamic back exercises with or without hyperextension in chronic back pain after surgery for lumbar disc protrusion. A clinical trial. Spine, 1993, 18: 560–567. – ident: 5 doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-204 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1097/00007632-199304000-00007 – ident: 6 doi: 10.1177/0363546506298276 – ident: 2 doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.315 – ident: 9 – ident: 8 – ident: 1 doi: 10.3233/BMR-2011-0301 – ident: 4 doi: 10.1093/ptj/78.1.8 – ident: 3 doi: 10.1177/0269215515570379 – reference: 25729158 - J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Feb;27(2):315-6 – reference: 22142713 - J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24(4):241-9 – reference: 23834759 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jul 09;14:204 – reference: 8484146 - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Apr;18(5):560-7 – reference: 25681408 - Clin Rehabil. 2015 Dec;29(12):1155-67 – reference: 14208177 - Artif Limbs. 1964;8:44-66 – reference: 17307893 - Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):927-32 – reference: 9442191 - Phys Ther. 1998 Jan;78(1):8-18 |
| SSID | ssj0027048 |
| Score | 1.973649 |
| Snippet | [Purpose] This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. [Subjects] The study enrolled 18... [Abstract.] [Purpose] This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. [Subjects] The study... Purpose: This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. Subjects: The study enrolled 18... [Purpose] This study compared the activity of trunk and hip muscles during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension. [Subjects] The study enrolled 18... |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref medicalonline jstage |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 2717 |
| SubjectTerms | EMG Hip extension Lumbar extension Original |
| Title | Comparison of trunk and hip muscle activity during different degrees of lumbar and hip extension |
| URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpts/27/9/27_jpts-2015-309/_article/-char/en http://mol.medicalonline.jp/en/journal/download?GoodsID=ca8jjpts/2015/002709/011&name=2717-2718e https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504276 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1727995576 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1732821683 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4616077 |
| Volume | 27 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| ispartofPNX | Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2015, Vol.27(9), pp.2717-2718 |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9RAEB_a6oNQ_NbGj7KCPknqJdlkdx9ES7EWoeJDD-5t3a_Qnm3uvNyB_vfO5Ku90gohEHYmYTOzu7_ZZH4D8NZ6mxjuMkRu3sU88yJW1rpY5rwwRemND7Tfcfy9OBrzb5N8sgF9tdHuBdY3hnZUT2q8ON_78_vvJxzwH5vqPVJ9mM6X9V4q8EjEJtzBNamgMOyYy8vQa9TU0cLFMcfQS4ruF_jr2kQNjJCFp0RBcmWdujtFqEY5-NsX7eeTlsbiJlR6_efKK6vV4UO438FMtt_6xSPYCNVjePCjMwo7abkEnsDPg6EOIZuVbLlYVb-YqTw7PZuzi1WNyoxSH6jCBGtTGllfU2XJfMBoPdSkiXOcNYtBtdlbp424pzA-_HJycBR3RRdiJzKxjL0wiQ0IMpTNRsqL4BMhSwQ5OXGhBWOtGsmQ8zTkFtFbblxWKlViY3CG6ASfwVY1q8IOMK5G3pkEbY9xmEutlGVheemtU4hTnIvgff-KtesYyakwxrmmyARto8k2OhWabBPBu0F63jJx3CK331prkOrG4CCl6NReIBjS2M1BhFLdcL6I4POaoXXvl9oZOb1UbTxLaZwjm0fTiVKBiQAngje9b2gcsfQZxlRhtqo1QUalcgz0_ieTYSycFDKL4HnrT0N3eg-NQKx52iBAjOHrLdXZacMczgviExQvbr3nS7hHHWv3mF7BFrpdeI2oa2l3YfPrJNlthtU_eNcunA |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+trunk+and+hip+muscle+activity+during+different+degrees+of+lumbar+and+hip+extension&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+physical+therapy+science&rft.au=Kim%2C+Sang-Min&rft.au=Yoo%2C+Won-Gyu&rft.date=2015&rft.issn=0915-5287&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2717&rft_id=info:doi/10.1589%2Fjpts.27.2717&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F26504276&rft.externalDocID=26504276 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0915-5287&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0915-5287&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0915-5287&client=summon |