Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of pulmonary nodules simulated in a dedicated porcine chest phantom
CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D stead...
Saved in:
Published in | PLOS ONE Vol. 15; no. 12; p. e0244382 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
23.12.2020
Public Library of Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.
Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules.
For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences.
While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria. |
---|---|
AbstractList | CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules. For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences. While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria. CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.OBJECTIVECT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules.METHODSLesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules.For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences.RESULTSFor nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences.While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria.CONCLUSIONWhile showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria. ObjectiveCT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.MethodsLesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules.ResultsFor nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences.ConclusionWhile showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria. Objective CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Methods Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules. Results For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences. Conclusion While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria. CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules. For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences. While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | David Bondesson Julien Dinkel Katharina Hellbach Moritz Schneider Thomas Gaass Thomas Benkert Madeleine Bonert Olga Solyanik Natalie Thaens Jens Ricke |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany National Institutes of Health, UNITED STATES 2 Comprehensive Pneumology Center, German Center for Lung Research, Munich, Germany 3 MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany – name: 3 MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany – name: 2 Comprehensive Pneumology Center, German Center for Lung Research, Munich, Germany – name: National Institutes of Health, UNITED STATES |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Madeleine orcidid: 0000-0002-8478-6770 surname: Bonert fullname: Bonert, Madeleine – sequence: 2 givenname: Moritz surname: Schneider fullname: Schneider, Moritz – sequence: 3 givenname: Olga surname: Solyanik fullname: Solyanik, Olga – sequence: 4 givenname: Katharina surname: Hellbach fullname: Hellbach, Katharina – sequence: 5 givenname: David surname: Bondesson fullname: Bondesson, David – sequence: 6 givenname: Thomas surname: Gaass fullname: Gaass, Thomas – sequence: 7 givenname: Natalie surname: Thaens fullname: Thaens, Natalie – sequence: 8 givenname: Jens surname: Ricke fullname: Ricke, Jens – sequence: 9 givenname: Thomas surname: Benkert fullname: Benkert, Thomas – sequence: 10 givenname: Julien surname: Dinkel fullname: Dinkel, Julien |
BackLink | https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1873116917714703360$$DView record in CiNii https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33362273$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNk21r2zAQx83oWLuu32AMwcbYXiTTk614LwalewoUCnt6KxT5nKjYUirJY_kE-9o7N-lIxmDDYMvn3__vu-PuYXHkg4eieMzolAnFXl2HIXrTTdcYnlIupZjxe8UJqwWfVJyKo73zcXGWkltQWQqmaEkfFMdCiIpzJU6Kn2-dWfqQsrPEWDtEYzcktKTHKIzBCCl44y0QhzHnl6QNkeQVkAYy2OyCH_n10PXIxQ3xoRk6SCS5fuhMhoY4TwzSjbO3r-sQrfNA7ApSJuuV8Tn0j4r7rekSnO2ep8XX9---XHycXF59mF-cX06sEmWemBqgZEooDjNe17SEmQBeKpBl20JLLSsBeyFrSlvDpKkXompmUAuoqlIxLk6L-da3CeZaryMWFTc6GKdvAyEutYlYdweay5mgFEAs0InKui6Z5dIoSmtegW3R683Waz0semgs-BxNd2B6-MW7lV6G71qpUtWUocGLnUEMNwN2Q_cuWeg64yEMCTNQQlJR0grRp1t0aTA159uAjnbE9XklK8k5o2N1079QeDXQO4uz0jqMHwheHgiQyfAjL82Qkp5__vT_7NW3Q_b5HrsC0-VVCt0wjks6BJ_s9_B38-4mFIHXW8DGkFKEVluXzeiDpblOM6rHjdC7jdDjRujdRqBY_iG-8_-H7NlW5p3D3413NlOCsapmSjGpKGZHxS9G0hur |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_02841851221144249 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_021_01124_0 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_8689068 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11195961 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.11.002 10.1016/j.crad.2017.01.002 10.1007/s00330-015-4192-3 10.1002/ijc.31937 10.2307/2529786 10.1258/ar.2011.110445 10.1259/bjr/36674326 10.1007/s00330-018-5607-8 10.1371/journal.pone.0156272 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873 10.1002/mrm.24858 10.1007/s13244-011-0146-8 10.2214/AJR.04.0814 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30958-8 10.1056/NEJMra072149 10.1148/radiol.14132950 10.1148/radiol.2261011275 10.1148/radiol.2272020635 10.1007/s00330-006-0422-z 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000178 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science 2020 Bonert et al 2020 Bonert et al |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science – notice: 2020 Bonert et al 2020 Bonert et al |
DBID | RYH AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISR 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0244382 |
DatabaseName | CiNii Complete CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Gale In Context: Science MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Sciences (General) |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Detecting pulmonary nodules with MRI |
EISSN | 1932-6203 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_248300ee3ba14049951c24a700926ecf PMC7757901 A646422102 33362273 10_1371_journal_pone_0244382 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
GeographicLocations | Germany |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany |
GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 8AO 8C1 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE ABDBF ABIVO ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHMBA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS APEBS ARAPS ATCPS BAWUL BBNVY BBORY BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CS3 D1I D1J D1K DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IGS IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISE ISR ITC K6- KB. KQ8 L6V LK5 LK8 M0K M1P M48 M7P M7R M7S M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PV9 PYCSY RNS RPM RYH RZL SV3 TR2 UKHRP WOQ WOW ~02 ~KM AAYXX CITATION ADRAZ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IPNFZ NPM RIG PMFND 7X8 PPXIY PQGLB 5PM PJZUB PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c735t-a9ee517372e829905e83e257e45ffef0c15e4384900fa14a9b36d8e93e6657123 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1932-6203 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:27:48 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:33:13 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:42:29 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:28:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:21:50 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:47:57 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 05:03:38 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:22:40 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:05:02 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:42:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:13 EDT 2025 Thu Jun 26 22:26:45 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c735t-a9ee517372e829905e83e257e45ffef0c15e4384900fa14a9b36d8e93e6657123 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 Competing Interests: Thomas Benkert is employed by Siemens Healthcare GmbH. We confirm that this does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. |
ORCID | 0000-0002-8478-6770 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0244382 |
PMID | 33362273 |
PQID | 2473403506 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | e0244382 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_248300ee3ba14049951c24a700926ecf pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7757901 proquest_miscellaneous_2473403506 gale_infotracmisc_A646422102 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A646422102 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A646422102 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A646422102 gale_healthsolutions_A646422102 pubmed_primary_33362273 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0244382 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0244382 nii_cinii_1873116917714703360 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-12-23 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-12-23 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2020 text: 2020-12-23 day: 23 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
PublicationTitle | PLOS ONE |
PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS One |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Public Library of Science |
Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) – name: Public Library of Science |
References | B Al Mohammad (pone.0244382.ref029) 2017; 72 T Heye (pone.0244382.ref012) 2012; 53 RD Riordan (pone.0244382.ref020) 2004; 77 LA Torre (pone.0244382.ref002) 2016 M Regier (pone.0244382.ref024) 2007; 17 (pone.0244382.ref005) 2012 DM Renz (pone.0244382.ref011) 2015; 50 J Biederer (pone.0244382.ref015) 2003; 227 JR Landis (pone.0244382.ref022) 1977; 33 pone.0244382.ref017 Staff News Brief (pone.0244382.ref028) 2017 DJ Brenner (pone.0244382.ref008) 2007; 357 R Yip (pone.0244382.ref025) 2014; 273 T Schroeder (pone.0244382.ref013) 2005; 185 BW Stewart (pone.0244382.ref001) 2014 pone.0244382.ref021 J Ferlay (pone.0244382.ref003) 2019; 144 J Biederer (pone.0244382.ref010) 2012; 3 J Biederer (pone.0244382.ref023) 2003; 226 RL Siegel (pone.0244382.ref006) 2018; 68 FR Hirsch (pone.0244382.ref026) 2017; 389 World Health Organization (pone.0244382.ref004) 2018 NP Chudgar (pone.0244382.ref009) 2015; 25 pone.0244382.ref019 The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (pone.0244382.ref007) 2011; 365 M Meier-Schroers (pone.0244382.ref016) 2019; 29 A Cieszanowski (pone.0244382.ref014) 2016; 11 O Bieri (pone.0244382.ref018) 2013; 70 A Huber (pone.0244382.ref027) 2016; 26 |
References_xml | – volume: 25 start-page: 145 year: 2015 ident: pone.0244382.ref009 article-title: Results of the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial publication-title: Thoracic Surgery Clinics doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.11.002 – volume: 72 start-page: 433 year: 2017 ident: pone.0244382.ref029 article-title: A review of lung cancer screening and the role of computer-aided detection publication-title: Clinical Radiology doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.01.002 – volume: 26 start-page: 3643 year: 2016 ident: pone.0244382.ref027 article-title: Performance of ultralow-dose CT with iterative reconstruction in lung cancer screening: limiting radiation exposure to the equivalent of conventional chest X-ray imaging publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4192-3 – year: 2017 ident: pone.0244382.ref028 article-title: RSNA 2017: Fleischner Society Guidelines for Incidental Nodule Management publication-title: Applied Radiology – volume: 144 start-page: 1941 year: 2019 ident: pone.0244382.ref003 article-title: Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods publication-title: International Journal of Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937 – volume-title: The top 10 causes of death year: 2018 ident: pone.0244382.ref004 – volume: 33 start-page: 363 year: 1977 ident: pone.0244382.ref022 article-title: An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers publication-title: Biometrics doi: 10.2307/2529786 – volume: 53 start-page: 153 year: 2012 ident: pone.0244382.ref012 article-title: Detection and size of pulmonary lesions: how accurate is MRI? A prospective comparison of CT and MRI publication-title: Acta Radiologica doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110445 – ident: pone.0244382.ref021 – volume: 77 start-page: 991 year: 2004 ident: pone.0244382.ref020 article-title: Pineapple juice as a negative oral contrast agent in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a preliminary evaluation publication-title: The British Journal of Radiology doi: 10.1259/bjr/36674326 – ident: pone.0244382.ref017 – volume: 29 start-page: 898 year: 2019 ident: pone.0244382.ref016 article-title: Lung cancer screening with MRI: Evaluation of MRI for lung cancer screening by comparison of LDCT- and MRI-derived Lung-RADS categories in the first two screening rounds publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5607-8 – volume: 11 start-page: e0156272 year: 2016 ident: pone.0244382.ref014 article-title: MR Imaging of Pulmonary Nodules: Detection Rate and Accuracy of Size Estimation in Comparison to Computed Tomography publication-title: PLOS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156272 – volume: 365 start-page: 395 year: 2011 ident: pone.0244382.ref007 article-title: Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening publication-title: New England Journal of Medicine doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873 – volume: 70 start-page: 657 year: 2013 ident: pone.0244382.ref018 article-title: Ultra-fast steady state free precession and its application to in vivo 1 H morphological and functional lung imaging at 1.5 tesla: Ultra-Fast SSFP-Based Lung Imaging publication-title: Magn Reson Med doi: 10.1002/mrm.24858 – ident: pone.0244382.ref019 – volume: 3 start-page: 355 year: 2012 ident: pone.0244382.ref010 article-title: MRI of the lung (2/3) publication-title: Why … when … how? Insights into Imaging doi: 10.1007/s13244-011-0146-8 – volume: 185 start-page: 979 year: 2005 ident: pone.0244382.ref013 article-title: Detection of Pulmonary Nodules Using a 2D HASTE MR Sequence: Comparison with MDCT publication-title: American Journal of Roentgenology doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.0814 – volume: 389 start-page: 299 year: 2017 ident: pone.0244382.ref026 article-title: Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments publication-title: The Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30958-8 – volume: 357 start-page: 2277 year: 2007 ident: pone.0244382.ref008 article-title: Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure publication-title: New England Journal of Medicine doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149 – volume: 273 start-page: 591 year: 2014 ident: pone.0244382.ref025 article-title: CT screening for lung cancer: alternative definitions of positive test result based on the national lung screening trial and international early lung cancer action program databases publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132950 – volume-title: IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans. Personal Habits and Indoor Combustions year: 2012 ident: pone.0244382.ref005 – start-page: 1 volume-title: Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine year: 2016 ident: pone.0244382.ref002 – volume: 226 start-page: 250 year: 2003 ident: pone.0244382.ref023 article-title: Artificial Thorax for MR Imaging Studies in Porcine Heart-Lung Preparations publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2261011275 – volume: 227 start-page: 475 year: 2003 ident: pone.0244382.ref015 article-title: Simulated Pulmonary Nodules Implanted in a Dedicated Porcine Chest Phantom: Sensitivity of MR Imaging for Detection publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272020635 – volume-title: World Cancer Report 2014 year: 2014 ident: pone.0244382.ref001 – volume: 17 start-page: 1341 year: 2007 ident: pone.0244382.ref024 article-title: Detection of small pulmonary nodules in high-field MR at 3 T: evaluation of different pulse sequences using porcine lung explants publication-title: European Radiology doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0422-z – volume: 68 start-page: 7 year: 2018 ident: pone.0244382.ref006 article-title: Cancer statistics, 2018 publication-title: CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians – volume: 50 start-page: 733 year: 2015 ident: pone.0244382.ref011 article-title: Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of the lung in patients with cystic fibrosis with regard to clinical, laboratory, and pulmonary functional parameters publication-title: Investigative radiology doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000178 |
SSID | ssib045317050 ssib045318062 ssib045324867 ssib045316197 ssib045319074 ssib045319085 ssib045319086 ssib045316121 ssib045318733 ssib045316049 ssib045317797 ssib045315901 ssib045318737 ssib045317988 ssj0053866 |
Score | 2.3678544 |
Snippet | CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening... Objective CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in... ObjectiveCT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref nii |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | e0244382 |
SubjectTerms | Animals Biology and Life Sciences Cancer Diagnosis Early Detection of Cancer Evaluation Humans Lung Neoplasms Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Lung tumors Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Multiple Pulmonary Nodules Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - diagnostic imaging Phantoms, Imaging Q R Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Research and Analysis Methods Science Sensitivity and Specificity Swine Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF5BT1wQ5WloYUFIwMGt7X3Zx_KoChIgAUW9Wev1uLWU2FESH_oL-NvMrDdRjZDKgYul2LNyMu_NznzD2MtaV1o2WRWr2tpYNolAm5MQG9dI43RhrKV-589f9Mmp_HSmzq6M-qKasBEeeGTcYSZzkSQAorKEBFNgRuAyaQ2BBWlwDXlfjHmbzdTog9GKtQ6NcsKkh0EuB4u-gwOMStID710JRB6vf-uVb3Zt-7eM88_CySuR6PgOux1SSH40fvVddgO6u2w3GOmKvw5I0m_usV_vx0I6JOTWuWFp3SXvGz7Hu9S8yHGv3RPiBvB27scVccxhOeaEvIa1L9LqiH4xzFBb7fKSd309zPAlq3ZOc7-g5m3HLa_9cQ99xHSejuq5n8PFFxc0o3h-n50ef_jx7iQOkxdiZ4Rax7YAUClNsIGc4pWCXAAaN0jVNNAkLlWAPJRFkjQoFltUQtc5FALoIAeD4QO20yGvHzHupFKVc1BYkUowWZXmde0yVbtCWchtxMRGDKULsOQ0HWNW-rM2g9uTka0lCa8MwotYvF21GGE5rqF_SxLe0hKotr-BqlYGVSuvU7WIPSP9KMcO1a1rKI-0xF0c7Z0j9sJTELBGR5U753ZYrcqPX3_-A9H3bxOiV4Go6ZEdzoZuCfxNBNg1odybUKJ7cJPH-6jNyFq6prkRKcEjGZNK9PVCJxF7vtHzkpZSzV0H_bBCdhgh6eBZR-zhqPdb_glcmmHmGzEzsYgJg6dPuvbCo5cbowwmoY__h0SesFsZ_f-RZnEm9tjOejnAPiaJ6-qp9we_AQLJZNM priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of pulmonary nodules simulated in a dedicated porcine chest phantom |
URI | https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1873116917714703360 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33362273 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2473403506 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7757901 https://doaj.org/article/248300ee3ba14049951c24a700926ecf |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3fb9MwELbW7YUXxPgZ2IpBSMBDqiR24uQBoW20DKQNNCjqW-Q4zhapTUrTSPSFV_5t7pw0ImiIvVhqcm6U853vnLO_j5AXaZAEPPMS20-ltHnmMPA5rm2hMi5UEAkp8bzz2XlwOuUfZ_5sh2w5W1sFVtcu7ZBParqaj35837wFh39jWBuEu-00WpaFHkHMwdrWgOxBbBLIaXDGu7oCeLepXmLWYgeew9rDdP_6l16wMpj-3cw9KPL8uqz0782Vf0SryR1yu00z6VFjF_tkRxd3yX7ryBV91aJNv75Hfr1rNtuBIJVK1SupNrTM6AKu4gFHCuvxElE5NM0XhtKIQp5LIW-kqV6bjVwFyi_rOVi0XG1oUab1HB5S5QvkBtMpzQsqaWpKQvgTtI3lfGq4uujyCnmMF_fJdDL-enJqt-wMthLMX9sy0tp3keVGhxjTfB0yDROA5n6W6cxRrq9BhzxynEy6XEYJC9JQR0xjsQcC5gOyW4CuHxGquO8nSulIMpdr4SVumKbK81MV-VKH0iJsOwyxaqHLkUFjHpt6nIAlTKPWGAcvbgfPInbXa9lAd_xH_hhHuJNF4G1zoVxdxq0fxx4PmeNozRKJwEQRJKjK41IgdlWgVWaRp2gfcXOKtZs-4qOAw0oP19cWeW4kEHyjwN09l7KuqvjDp283EPpy0RN62QplJahDyfZEBbwTgnr1JA96kjCFqN7tQ7BmUC22biiYixBKQrgc4gELHIs829p5jF1xX16hy7oCdQjGsTgdWORhY_ed_hh09SA7tojoeURPwf07RX5lEM6F8AUkqo9v8Nwn5JaHn0Bcz_bYAdldr2p9CHniOhmSgZgJaMMTF9vJ-yHZOx6ff74Ymi8vQzM1YPtz_BsC_22A |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic+accuracy+of+magnetic+resonance+imaging+for+the+detection+of+pulmonary+nodules+simulated+in+a+dedicated+porcine+chest+phantom&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Bonert%2C+Madeleine&rft.au=Schneider%2C+Moritz&rft.au=Solyanik%2C+Olga&rft.au=Hellbach%2C+Katharina&rft.date=2020-12-23&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0244382&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0244382&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |