Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of pulmonary nodules simulated in a dedicated porcine chest phantom

CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D stead...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPLOS ONE Vol. 15; no. 12; p. e0244382
Main Authors Bonert, Madeleine, Schneider, Moritz, Solyanik, Olga, Hellbach, Katharina, Bondesson, David, Gaass, Thomas, Thaens, Natalie, Ricke, Jens, Benkert, Thomas, Dinkel, Julien
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science (PLoS) 23.12.2020
Public Library of Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules. For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences. While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria.
AbstractList CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules. For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences. While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria.
CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.OBJECTIVECT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules.METHODSLesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules.For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences.RESULTSFor nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences.While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria.CONCLUSIONWhile showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria.
ObjectiveCT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.MethodsLesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules.ResultsFor nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences.ConclusionWhile showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria.
Objective CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Methods Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules. Results For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences. Conclusion While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria.
CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening scenarios with repeated examinations. Due to recent technological advances, MRI emerges as a potential alternative for lung imaging using 3D steady state free precession and ultra-short echo-time sequences. Therefore, in this study we assessed the performance of three state-of-the-art MRI sequences for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Lesions of variable sizes were simulated in porcine lungs placed in a dedicated chest phantom mimicking a human thorax, followed by CT and MRI examinations. Two blinded readers evaluated the acquired MR-images locating and measuring every suspect lesion. Using the CT-images as reference, logistic regression was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the tested MRI-sequences for the detection of pulmonary nodules. For nodules with a diameter of 6 mm, all three sequences achieved high sensitivity values above 0.91. However, the sensitivity dropped for smaller nodules, yielding an average of 0.83 for lesions with 4 mm in diameter and less than 0.69 for lesions with 2 mm in diameter. The positive predictive values ranged between 0.91 and 0.96, indicating a low amount of false positive findings. Furthermore, the size measurements done on the MR-images were subject to a bias ranging from 0.83 mm to -1.77 mm with standard deviations ranging from 1.40 mm to 2.11 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the three tested sequences. While showing promising sensitivity values for lesions larger than 4 mm, MRI appears to be not yet suited for lung cancer screening. Nonetheless, the three tested MRI sequences yielded high positive predictive values and accurate size measurements; therefore, MRI could potentially figure as imaging method of the chest in selected follow-up scenarios, e.g. of incidental findings subject to the Fleischner Criteria.
Audience Academic
Author David Bondesson
Julien Dinkel
Katharina Hellbach
Moritz Schneider
Thomas Gaass
Thomas Benkert
Madeleine Bonert
Olga Solyanik
Natalie Thaens
Jens Ricke
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
National Institutes of Health, UNITED STATES
2 Comprehensive Pneumology Center, German Center for Lung Research, Munich, Germany
3 MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
– name: 3 MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
– name: 2 Comprehensive Pneumology Center, German Center for Lung Research, Munich, Germany
– name: National Institutes of Health, UNITED STATES
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Madeleine
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8478-6770
  surname: Bonert
  fullname: Bonert, Madeleine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Moritz
  surname: Schneider
  fullname: Schneider, Moritz
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Olga
  surname: Solyanik
  fullname: Solyanik, Olga
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Katharina
  surname: Hellbach
  fullname: Hellbach, Katharina
– sequence: 5
  givenname: David
  surname: Bondesson
  fullname: Bondesson, David
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Gaass
  fullname: Gaass, Thomas
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Natalie
  surname: Thaens
  fullname: Thaens, Natalie
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Jens
  surname: Ricke
  fullname: Ricke, Jens
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Benkert
  fullname: Benkert, Thomas
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Julien
  surname: Dinkel
  fullname: Dinkel, Julien
BackLink https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1873116917714703360$$DView record in CiNii
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33362273$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNk21r2zAQx83oWLuu32AMwcbYXiTTk614LwalewoUCnt6KxT5nKjYUirJY_kE-9o7N-lIxmDDYMvn3__vu-PuYXHkg4eieMzolAnFXl2HIXrTTdcYnlIupZjxe8UJqwWfVJyKo73zcXGWkltQWQqmaEkfFMdCiIpzJU6Kn2-dWfqQsrPEWDtEYzcktKTHKIzBCCl44y0QhzHnl6QNkeQVkAYy2OyCH_n10PXIxQ3xoRk6SCS5fuhMhoY4TwzSjbO3r-sQrfNA7ApSJuuV8Tn0j4r7rekSnO2ep8XX9---XHycXF59mF-cX06sEmWemBqgZEooDjNe17SEmQBeKpBl20JLLSsBeyFrSlvDpKkXompmUAuoqlIxLk6L-da3CeZaryMWFTc6GKdvAyEutYlYdweay5mgFEAs0InKui6Z5dIoSmtegW3R683Waz0semgs-BxNd2B6-MW7lV6G71qpUtWUocGLnUEMNwN2Q_cuWeg64yEMCTNQQlJR0grRp1t0aTA159uAjnbE9XklK8k5o2N1079QeDXQO4uz0jqMHwheHgiQyfAjL82Qkp5__vT_7NW3Q_b5HrsC0-VVCt0wjks6BJ_s9_B38-4mFIHXW8DGkFKEVluXzeiDpblOM6rHjdC7jdDjRujdRqBY_iG-8_-H7NlW5p3D3413NlOCsapmSjGpKGZHxS9G0hur
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_02841851221144249
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_021_01124_0
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_8689068
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11195961
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.11.002
10.1016/j.crad.2017.01.002
10.1007/s00330-015-4192-3
10.1002/ijc.31937
10.2307/2529786
10.1258/ar.2011.110445
10.1259/bjr/36674326
10.1007/s00330-018-5607-8
10.1371/journal.pone.0156272
10.1056/NEJMoa1102873
10.1002/mrm.24858
10.1007/s13244-011-0146-8
10.2214/AJR.04.0814
10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30958-8
10.1056/NEJMra072149
10.1148/radiol.14132950
10.1148/radiol.2261011275
10.1148/radiol.2272020635
10.1007/s00330-006-0422-z
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000178
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science
2020 Bonert et al 2020 Bonert et al
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science
– notice: 2020 Bonert et al 2020 Bonert et al
DBID RYH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
IOV
ISR
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0244382
DatabaseName CiNii Complete
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints
Gale In Context: Science
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic




MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Sciences (General)
DocumentTitleAlternate Detecting pulmonary nodules with MRI
EISSN 1932-6203
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_248300ee3ba14049951c24a700926ecf
PMC7757901
A646422102
33362273
10_1371_journal_pone_0244382
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations Germany
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Germany
GroupedDBID ---
123
29O
2WC
53G
5VS
7RV
7X2
7X7
7XC
88E
8AO
8C1
8CJ
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
AAUCC
AAWOE
ABDBF
ABIVO
ABJCF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
APEBS
ARAPS
ATCPS
BAWUL
BBNVY
BBORY
BCNDV
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
BWKFM
CCPQU
CS3
D1I
D1J
D1K
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAP
EAS
EBD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F5P
FPL
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HH5
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IEA
IGS
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
IOV
IPY
ISE
ISR
ITC
K6-
KB.
KQ8
L6V
LK5
LK8
M0K
M1P
M48
M7P
M7R
M7S
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
P62
PATMY
PDBOC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
PV9
PYCSY
RNS
RPM
RYH
RZL
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~02
~KM
AAYXX
CITATION
ADRAZ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
IPNFZ
NPM
RIG
PMFND
7X8
PPXIY
PQGLB
5PM
PJZUB
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c735t-a9ee517372e829905e83e257e45ffef0c15e4384900fa14a9b36d8e93e6657123
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1932-6203
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:27:48 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:33:13 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 00:42:29 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:28:12 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:21:50 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 04:47:57 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 05:03:38 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:22:40 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:05:02 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:42:58 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:13 EDT 2025
Thu Jun 26 22:26:45 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Language English
License This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c735t-a9ee517372e829905e83e257e45ffef0c15e4384900fa14a9b36d8e93e6657123
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Competing Interests: Thomas Benkert is employed by Siemens Healthcare GmbH. We confirm that this does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
ORCID 0000-0002-8478-6770
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0244382
PMID 33362273
PQID 2473403506
PQPubID 23479
PageCount e0244382
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_248300ee3ba14049951c24a700926ecf
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7757901
proquest_miscellaneous_2473403506
gale_infotracmisc_A646422102
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A646422102
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A646422102
gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A646422102
gale_healthsolutions_A646422102
pubmed_primary_33362273
crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0244382
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0244382
nii_cinii_1873116917714703360
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-12-23
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-12-23
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-12-23
  day: 23
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: San Francisco, CA USA
PublicationTitle PLOS ONE
PublicationTitleAlternate PLoS One
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Public Library of Science
Publisher_xml – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
– name: Public Library of Science
References B Al Mohammad (pone.0244382.ref029) 2017; 72
T Heye (pone.0244382.ref012) 2012; 53
RD Riordan (pone.0244382.ref020) 2004; 77
LA Torre (pone.0244382.ref002) 2016
M Regier (pone.0244382.ref024) 2007; 17
(pone.0244382.ref005) 2012
DM Renz (pone.0244382.ref011) 2015; 50
J Biederer (pone.0244382.ref015) 2003; 227
JR Landis (pone.0244382.ref022) 1977; 33
pone.0244382.ref017
Staff News Brief (pone.0244382.ref028) 2017
DJ Brenner (pone.0244382.ref008) 2007; 357
R Yip (pone.0244382.ref025) 2014; 273
T Schroeder (pone.0244382.ref013) 2005; 185
BW Stewart (pone.0244382.ref001) 2014
pone.0244382.ref021
J Ferlay (pone.0244382.ref003) 2019; 144
J Biederer (pone.0244382.ref010) 2012; 3
J Biederer (pone.0244382.ref023) 2003; 226
RL Siegel (pone.0244382.ref006) 2018; 68
FR Hirsch (pone.0244382.ref026) 2017; 389
World Health Organization (pone.0244382.ref004) 2018
NP Chudgar (pone.0244382.ref009) 2015; 25
pone.0244382.ref019
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (pone.0244382.ref007) 2011; 365
M Meier-Schroers (pone.0244382.ref016) 2019; 29
A Cieszanowski (pone.0244382.ref014) 2016; 11
O Bieri (pone.0244382.ref018) 2013; 70
A Huber (pone.0244382.ref027) 2016; 26
References_xml – volume: 25
  start-page: 145
  year: 2015
  ident: pone.0244382.ref009
  article-title: Results of the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial
  publication-title: Thoracic Surgery Clinics
  doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.11.002
– volume: 72
  start-page: 433
  year: 2017
  ident: pone.0244382.ref029
  article-title: A review of lung cancer screening and the role of computer-aided detection
  publication-title: Clinical Radiology
  doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.01.002
– volume: 26
  start-page: 3643
  year: 2016
  ident: pone.0244382.ref027
  article-title: Performance of ultralow-dose CT with iterative reconstruction in lung cancer screening: limiting radiation exposure to the equivalent of conventional chest X-ray imaging
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4192-3
– year: 2017
  ident: pone.0244382.ref028
  article-title: RSNA 2017: Fleischner Society Guidelines for Incidental Nodule Management
  publication-title: Applied Radiology
– volume: 144
  start-page: 1941
  year: 2019
  ident: pone.0244382.ref003
  article-title: Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods
  publication-title: International Journal of Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937
– volume-title: The top 10 causes of death
  year: 2018
  ident: pone.0244382.ref004
– volume: 33
  start-page: 363
  year: 1977
  ident: pone.0244382.ref022
  article-title: An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2529786
– volume: 53
  start-page: 153
  year: 2012
  ident: pone.0244382.ref012
  article-title: Detection and size of pulmonary lesions: how accurate is MRI? A prospective comparison of CT and MRI
  publication-title: Acta Radiologica
  doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110445
– ident: pone.0244382.ref021
– volume: 77
  start-page: 991
  year: 2004
  ident: pone.0244382.ref020
  article-title: Pineapple juice as a negative oral contrast agent in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a preliminary evaluation
  publication-title: The British Journal of Radiology
  doi: 10.1259/bjr/36674326
– ident: pone.0244382.ref017
– volume: 29
  start-page: 898
  year: 2019
  ident: pone.0244382.ref016
  article-title: Lung cancer screening with MRI: Evaluation of MRI for lung cancer screening by comparison of LDCT- and MRI-derived Lung-RADS categories in the first two screening rounds
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5607-8
– volume: 11
  start-page: e0156272
  year: 2016
  ident: pone.0244382.ref014
  article-title: MR Imaging of Pulmonary Nodules: Detection Rate and Accuracy of Size Estimation in Comparison to Computed Tomography
  publication-title: PLOS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156272
– volume: 365
  start-page: 395
  year: 2011
  ident: pone.0244382.ref007
  article-title: Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
  publication-title: New England Journal of Medicine
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873
– volume: 70
  start-page: 657
  year: 2013
  ident: pone.0244382.ref018
  article-title: Ultra-fast steady state free precession and its application to in vivo 1 H morphological and functional lung imaging at 1.5 tesla: Ultra-Fast SSFP-Based Lung Imaging
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.24858
– ident: pone.0244382.ref019
– volume: 3
  start-page: 355
  year: 2012
  ident: pone.0244382.ref010
  article-title: MRI of the lung (2/3)
  publication-title: Why … when … how? Insights into Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s13244-011-0146-8
– volume: 185
  start-page: 979
  year: 2005
  ident: pone.0244382.ref013
  article-title: Detection of Pulmonary Nodules Using a 2D HASTE MR Sequence: Comparison with MDCT
  publication-title: American Journal of Roentgenology
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.0814
– volume: 389
  start-page: 299
  year: 2017
  ident: pone.0244382.ref026
  article-title: Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments
  publication-title: The Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30958-8
– volume: 357
  start-page: 2277
  year: 2007
  ident: pone.0244382.ref008
  article-title: Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure
  publication-title: New England Journal of Medicine
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149
– volume: 273
  start-page: 591
  year: 2014
  ident: pone.0244382.ref025
  article-title: CT screening for lung cancer: alternative definitions of positive test result based on the national lung screening trial and international early lung cancer action program databases
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132950
– volume-title: IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans. Personal Habits and Indoor Combustions
  year: 2012
  ident: pone.0244382.ref005
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Lung Cancer and Personalized Medicine
  year: 2016
  ident: pone.0244382.ref002
– volume: 226
  start-page: 250
  year: 2003
  ident: pone.0244382.ref023
  article-title: Artificial Thorax for MR Imaging Studies in Porcine Heart-Lung Preparations
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2261011275
– volume: 227
  start-page: 475
  year: 2003
  ident: pone.0244382.ref015
  article-title: Simulated Pulmonary Nodules Implanted in a Dedicated Porcine Chest Phantom: Sensitivity of MR Imaging for Detection
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272020635
– volume-title: World Cancer Report 2014
  year: 2014
  ident: pone.0244382.ref001
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1341
  year: 2007
  ident: pone.0244382.ref024
  article-title: Detection of small pulmonary nodules in high-field MR at 3 T: evaluation of different pulse sequences using porcine lung explants
  publication-title: European Radiology
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0422-z
– volume: 68
  start-page: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: pone.0244382.ref006
  article-title: Cancer statistics, 2018
  publication-title: CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
– volume: 50
  start-page: 733
  year: 2015
  ident: pone.0244382.ref011
  article-title: Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of the lung in patients with cystic fibrosis with regard to clinical, laboratory, and pulmonary functional parameters
  publication-title: Investigative radiology
  doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000178
SSID ssib045317050
ssib045318062
ssib045324867
ssib045316197
ssib045319074
ssib045319085
ssib045319086
ssib045316121
ssib045318733
ssib045316049
ssib045317797
ssib045315901
ssib045318737
ssib045317988
ssj0053866
Score 2.3678544
Snippet CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in screening...
Objective CT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in...
ObjectiveCT serves as gold standard for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. However, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, a concern especially in...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
nii
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage e0244382
SubjectTerms Animals
Biology and Life Sciences
Cancer
Diagnosis
Early Detection of Cancer
Evaluation
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Lung tumors
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - diagnostic imaging
Phantoms, Imaging
Q
R
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Research and Analysis Methods
Science
Sensitivity and Specificity
Swine
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF5BT1wQ5WloYUFIwMGt7X3Zx_KoChIgAUW9Wev1uLWU2FESH_oL-NvMrDdRjZDKgYul2LNyMu_NznzD2MtaV1o2WRWr2tpYNolAm5MQG9dI43RhrKV-589f9Mmp_HSmzq6M-qKasBEeeGTcYSZzkSQAorKEBFNgRuAyaQ2BBWlwDXlfjHmbzdTog9GKtQ6NcsKkh0EuB4u-gwOMStID710JRB6vf-uVb3Zt-7eM88_CySuR6PgOux1SSH40fvVddgO6u2w3GOmKvw5I0m_usV_vx0I6JOTWuWFp3SXvGz7Hu9S8yHGv3RPiBvB27scVccxhOeaEvIa1L9LqiH4xzFBb7fKSd309zPAlq3ZOc7-g5m3HLa_9cQ99xHSejuq5n8PFFxc0o3h-n50ef_jx7iQOkxdiZ4Rax7YAUClNsIGc4pWCXAAaN0jVNNAkLlWAPJRFkjQoFltUQtc5FALoIAeD4QO20yGvHzHupFKVc1BYkUowWZXmde0yVbtCWchtxMRGDKULsOQ0HWNW-rM2g9uTka0lCa8MwotYvF21GGE5rqF_SxLe0hKotr-BqlYGVSuvU7WIPSP9KMcO1a1rKI-0xF0c7Z0j9sJTELBGR5U753ZYrcqPX3_-A9H3bxOiV4Go6ZEdzoZuCfxNBNg1odybUKJ7cJPH-6jNyFq6prkRKcEjGZNK9PVCJxF7vtHzkpZSzV0H_bBCdhgh6eBZR-zhqPdb_glcmmHmGzEzsYgJg6dPuvbCo5cbowwmoY__h0SesFsZ_f-RZnEm9tjOejnAPiaJ6-qp9we_AQLJZNM
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of pulmonary nodules simulated in a dedicated porcine chest phantom
URI https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1873116917714703360
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33362273
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2473403506
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7757901
https://doaj.org/article/248300ee3ba14049951c24a700926ecf
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3fb9MwELbW7YUXxPgZ2IpBSMBDqiR24uQBoW20DKQNNCjqW-Q4zhapTUrTSPSFV_5t7pw0ImiIvVhqcm6U853vnLO_j5AXaZAEPPMS20-ltHnmMPA5rm2hMi5UEAkp8bzz2XlwOuUfZ_5sh2w5W1sFVtcu7ZBParqaj35837wFh39jWBuEu-00WpaFHkHMwdrWgOxBbBLIaXDGu7oCeLepXmLWYgeew9rDdP_6l16wMpj-3cw9KPL8uqz0782Vf0SryR1yu00z6VFjF_tkRxd3yX7ryBV91aJNv75Hfr1rNtuBIJVK1SupNrTM6AKu4gFHCuvxElE5NM0XhtKIQp5LIW-kqV6bjVwFyi_rOVi0XG1oUab1HB5S5QvkBtMpzQsqaWpKQvgTtI3lfGq4uujyCnmMF_fJdDL-enJqt-wMthLMX9sy0tp3keVGhxjTfB0yDROA5n6W6cxRrq9BhzxynEy6XEYJC9JQR0xjsQcC5gOyW4CuHxGquO8nSulIMpdr4SVumKbK81MV-VKH0iJsOwyxaqHLkUFjHpt6nIAlTKPWGAcvbgfPInbXa9lAd_xH_hhHuJNF4G1zoVxdxq0fxx4PmeNozRKJwEQRJKjK41IgdlWgVWaRp2gfcXOKtZs-4qOAw0oP19cWeW4kEHyjwN09l7KuqvjDp283EPpy0RN62QplJahDyfZEBbwTgnr1JA96kjCFqN7tQ7BmUC22biiYixBKQrgc4gELHIs829p5jF1xX16hy7oCdQjGsTgdWORhY_ed_hh09SA7tojoeURPwf07RX5lEM6F8AUkqo9v8Nwn5JaHn0Bcz_bYAdldr2p9CHniOhmSgZgJaMMTF9vJ-yHZOx6ff74Ymi8vQzM1YPtz_BsC_22A
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic+accuracy+of+magnetic+resonance+imaging+for+the+detection+of+pulmonary+nodules+simulated+in+a+dedicated+porcine+chest+phantom&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Bonert%2C+Madeleine&rft.au=Schneider%2C+Moritz&rft.au=Solyanik%2C+Olga&rft.au=Hellbach%2C+Katharina&rft.date=2020-12-23&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0244382&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0244382&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon