Objective understanding of Nutri-Score Front-Of-Package nutrition label according to individual characteristics of subjects: Comparisons with other format labels
To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However,...
Saved in:
| Published in | PloS one Vol. 13; no. 8; p. e0202095 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
23.08.2018
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However, to be effective in purchasing situations, the label needs to be well understood, which may be influenced by label format and sociodemographic characteristics. This study aimed at investigating the objective understanding of the Nutri-Score compared to other label formats, and more particularly among specific at-risk populations.
The objective understanding of four FOPLs-namely Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), the simplified nutrition labelling system (SENS), and modified Reference Intakes (mRIs)-was investigated in a sample from the NutriNet-Santé French cohort (n = 3,751). Logistic regression mixed models were computed to assess the association of the four FOPLs, compared to a "no label" situation, on the consumers' ability to rank products according to their overall nutritional quality. Objective understanding was also investigated according to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics.
Compared to a "no label" situation, all FOPLs were significantly associated to an increase in consumers' ability to classify the products correctly, with wide disparities in results according to formats. The best performance was observed for the Nutri-Score (OR = 20.33(17.68-23.37)), followed by SENS (OR = 9.57(8.50-10.77)), MTL (OR = 3.55(3.20-3.93)) and mRIs (OR = 1.53(1.39-1.69)). This ranking was similar among all sub-populations and the ORs associated to the Nutri-Score were over 10, whichever the sub-group considered. Women, younger people, non-smokers, individuals with higher educational level and those with children had a higher capacity to identify healthier products (all P≤0.05).
Nutri-Score, with a summarized graded and color-coded format, using semantic colours, is associated to a higher objective understanding than monochrome and nutrient-specific labels. Furthermore, though objective understanding may differ according to individual characteristics of subjects, the magnitude of effect of the Nutri-Score largely outweighed this effect, even in the at-risk populations. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However, to be effective in purchasing situations, the label needs to be well understood, which may be influenced by label format and sociodemographic characteristics. This study aimed at investigating the objective understanding of the Nutri-Score compared to other label formats, and more particularly among specific at-risk populations.BACKGROUNDTo improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However, to be effective in purchasing situations, the label needs to be well understood, which may be influenced by label format and sociodemographic characteristics. This study aimed at investigating the objective understanding of the Nutri-Score compared to other label formats, and more particularly among specific at-risk populations.The objective understanding of four FOPLs-namely Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), the simplified nutrition labelling system (SENS), and modified Reference Intakes (mRIs)-was investigated in a sample from the NutriNet-Santé French cohort (n = 3,751). Logistic regression mixed models were computed to assess the association of the four FOPLs, compared to a "no label" situation, on the consumers' ability to rank products according to their overall nutritional quality. Objective understanding was also investigated according to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics.METHODSThe objective understanding of four FOPLs-namely Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), the simplified nutrition labelling system (SENS), and modified Reference Intakes (mRIs)-was investigated in a sample from the NutriNet-Santé French cohort (n = 3,751). Logistic regression mixed models were computed to assess the association of the four FOPLs, compared to a "no label" situation, on the consumers' ability to rank products according to their overall nutritional quality. Objective understanding was also investigated according to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics.Compared to a "no label" situation, all FOPLs were significantly associated to an increase in consumers' ability to classify the products correctly, with wide disparities in results according to formats. The best performance was observed for the Nutri-Score (OR = 20.33(17.68-23.37)), followed by SENS (OR = 9.57(8.50-10.77)), MTL (OR = 3.55(3.20-3.93)) and mRIs (OR = 1.53(1.39-1.69)). This ranking was similar among all sub-populations and the ORs associated to the Nutri-Score were over 10, whichever the sub-group considered. Women, younger people, non-smokers, individuals with higher educational level and those with children had a higher capacity to identify healthier products (all P≤0.05).RESULTSCompared to a "no label" situation, all FOPLs were significantly associated to an increase in consumers' ability to classify the products correctly, with wide disparities in results according to formats. The best performance was observed for the Nutri-Score (OR = 20.33(17.68-23.37)), followed by SENS (OR = 9.57(8.50-10.77)), MTL (OR = 3.55(3.20-3.93)) and mRIs (OR = 1.53(1.39-1.69)). This ranking was similar among all sub-populations and the ORs associated to the Nutri-Score were over 10, whichever the sub-group considered. Women, younger people, non-smokers, individuals with higher educational level and those with children had a higher capacity to identify healthier products (all P≤0.05).Nutri-Score, with a summarized graded and color-coded format, using semantic colours, is associated to a higher objective understanding than monochrome and nutrient-specific labels. Furthermore, though objective understanding may differ according to individual characteristics of subjects, the magnitude of effect of the Nutri-Score largely outweighed this effect, even in the at-risk populations.CONCLUSIONNutri-Score, with a summarized graded and color-coded format, using semantic colours, is associated to a higher objective understanding than monochrome and nutrient-specific labels. Furthermore, though objective understanding may differ according to individual characteristics of subjects, the magnitude of effect of the Nutri-Score largely outweighed this effect, even in the at-risk populations. To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However, to be effective in purchasing situations, the label needs to be well understood, which may be influenced by label format and sociodemographic characteristics. This study aimed at investigating the objective understanding of the Nutri-Score compared to other label formats, and more particularly among specific at-risk populations. The objective understanding of four FOPLs-namely Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), the simplified nutrition labelling system (SENS), and modified Reference Intakes (mRIs)-was investigated in a sample from the NutriNet-Santé French cohort (n = 3,751). Logistic regression mixed models were computed to assess the association of the four FOPLs, compared to a "no label" situation, on the consumers' ability to rank products according to their overall nutritional quality. Objective understanding was also investigated according to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. Compared to a "no label" situation, all FOPLs were significantly associated to an increase in consumers' ability to classify the products correctly, with wide disparities in results according to formats. The best performance was observed for the Nutri-Score (OR = 20.33(17.68-23.37)), followed by SENS (OR = 9.57(8.50-10.77)), MTL (OR = 3.55(3.20-3.93)) and mRIs (OR = 1.53(1.39-1.69)). This ranking was similar among all sub-populations and the ORs associated to the Nutri-Score were over 10, whichever the sub-group considered. Women, younger people, non-smokers, individuals with higher educational level and those with children had a higher capacity to identify healthier products (all P≤0.05). Nutri-Score, with a summarized graded and color-coded format, using semantic colours, is associated to a higher objective understanding than monochrome and nutrient-specific labels. Furthermore, though objective understanding may differ according to individual characteristics of subjects, the magnitude of effect of the Nutri-Score largely outweighed this effect, even in the at-risk populations. BACKGROUND:To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However, to be effective in purchasing situations, the label needs to be well understood, which may be influenced by label format and sociodemographic characteristics. This study aimed at investigating the objective understanding of the Nutri-Score compared to other label formats, and more particularly among specific at-risk populations. METHODS:The objective understanding of four FOPLs-namely Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), the simplified nutrition labelling system (SENS), and modified Reference Intakes (mRIs)-was investigated in a sample from the NutriNet-Santé French cohort (n = 3,751). Logistic regression mixed models were computed to assess the association of the four FOPLs, compared to a "no label" situation, on the consumers' ability to rank products according to their overall nutritional quality. Objective understanding was also investigated according to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. RESULTS:Compared to a "no label" situation, all FOPLs were significantly associated to an increase in consumers' ability to classify the products correctly, with wide disparities in results according to formats. The best performance was observed for the Nutri-Score (OR = 20.33(17.68-23.37)), followed by SENS (OR = 9.57(8.50-10.77)), MTL (OR = 3.55(3.20-3.93)) and mRIs (OR = 1.53(1.39-1.69)). This ranking was similar among all sub-populations and the ORs associated to the Nutri-Score were over 10, whichever the sub-group considered. Women, younger people, non-smokers, individuals with higher educational level and those with children had a higher capacity to identify healthier products (all P≤0.05). CONCLUSION:Nutri-Score, with a summarized graded and color-coded format, using semantic colours, is associated to a higher objective understanding than monochrome and nutrient-specific labels. Furthermore, though objective understanding may differ according to individual characteristics of subjects, the magnitude of effect of the Nutri-Score largely outweighed this effect, even in the at-risk populations. Background To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However, to be effective in purchasing situations, the label needs to be well understood, which may be influenced by label format and sociodemographic characteristics. This study aimed at investigating the objective understanding of the Nutri-Score compared to other label formats, and more particularly among specific at-risk populations. Methods The objective understanding of four FOPLs-namely Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), the simplified nutrition labelling system (SENS), and modified Reference Intakes (mRIs)-was investigated in a sample from the NutriNet-Santé French cohort (n = 3,751). Logistic regression mixed models were computed to assess the association of the four FOPLs, compared to a "no label" situation, on the consumers' ability to rank products according to their overall nutritional quality. Objective understanding was also investigated according to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. Results Compared to a "no label" situation, all FOPLs were significantly associated to an increase in consumers' ability to classify the products correctly, with wide disparities in results according to formats. The best performance was observed for the Nutri-Score (OR = 20.33(17.68-23.37)), followed by SENS (OR = 9.57(8.50-10.77)), MTL (OR = 3.55(3.20-3.93)) and mRIs (OR = 1.53(1.39-1.69)). This ranking was similar among all sub-populations and the ORs associated to the Nutri-Score were over 10, whichever the sub-group considered. Women, younger people, non-smokers, individuals with higher educational level and those with children had a higher capacity to identify healthier products (all P[less than or equal to]0.05). Conclusion Nutri-Score, with a summarized graded and color-coded format, using semantic colours, is associated to a higher objective understanding than monochrome and nutrient-specific labels. Furthermore, though objective understanding may differ according to individual characteristics of subjects, the magnitude of effect of the Nutri-Score largely outweighed this effect, even in the at-risk populations. To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However, to be effective in purchasing situations, the label needs to be well understood, which may be influenced by label format and sociodemographic characteristics. This study aimed at investigating the objective understanding of the Nutri-Score compared to other label formats, and more particularly among specific at-risk populations. The objective understanding of four FOPLs-namely Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), the simplified nutrition labelling system (SENS), and modified Reference Intakes (mRIs)-was investigated in a sample from the NutriNet-Santé French cohort (n = 3,751). Logistic regression mixed models were computed to assess the association of the four FOPLs, compared to a "no label" situation, on the consumers' ability to rank products according to their overall nutritional quality. Objective understanding was also investigated according to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. Compared to a "no label" situation, all FOPLs were significantly associated to an increase in consumers' ability to classify the products correctly, with wide disparities in results according to formats. The best performance was observed for the Nutri-Score (OR = 20.33(17.68-23.37)), followed by SENS (OR = 9.57(8.50-10.77)), MTL (OR = 3.55(3.20-3.93)) and mRIs (OR = 1.53(1.39-1.69)). This ranking was similar among all sub-populations and the ORs associated to the Nutri-Score were over 10, whichever the sub-group considered. Women, younger people, non-smokers, individuals with higher educational level and those with children had a higher capacity to identify healthier products (all P[less than or equal to]0.05). Nutri-Score, with a summarized graded and color-coded format, using semantic colours, is associated to a higher objective understanding than monochrome and nutrient-specific labels. Furthermore, though objective understanding may differ according to individual characteristics of subjects, the magnitude of effect of the Nutri-Score largely outweighed this effect, even in the at-risk populations. Background To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However, to be effective in purchasing situations, the label needs to be well understood, which may be influenced by label format and sociodemographic characteristics. This study aimed at investigating the objective understanding of the Nutri-Score compared to other label formats, and more particularly among specific at-risk populations. Methods The objective understanding of four FOPLs—namely Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), the simplified nutrition labelling system (SENS), and modified Reference Intakes (mRIs)—was investigated in a sample from the NutriNet-Santé French cohort (n = 3,751). Logistic regression mixed models were computed to assess the association of the four FOPLs, compared to a “no label” situation, on the consumers’ ability to rank products according to their overall nutritional quality. Objective understanding was also investigated according to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. Results Compared to a “no label” situation, all FOPLs were significantly associated to an increase in consumers’ ability to classify the products correctly, with wide disparities in results according to formats. The best performance was observed for the Nutri-Score (OR = 20.33(17.68–23.37)), followed by SENS (OR = 9.57(8.50–10.77)), MTL (OR = 3.55(3.20–3.93)) and mRIs (OR = 1.53(1.39–1.69)). This ranking was similar among all sub-populations and the ORs associated to the Nutri-Score were over 10, whichever the sub-group considered. Women, younger people, non-smokers, individuals with higher educational level and those with children had a higher capacity to identify healthier products (all P≤0.05). Conclusion Nutri-Score, with a summarized graded and color-coded format, using semantic colours, is associated to a higher objective understanding than monochrome and nutrient-specific labels. Furthermore, though objective understanding may differ according to individual characteristics of subjects, the magnitude of effect of the Nutri-Score largely outweighed this effect, even in the at-risk populations. Background To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies, including front-of-package nutrition labelling (FOPL). In France, the Nutri-Score has been selected by health authorities in March 2017. However, to be effective in purchasing situations, the label needs to be well understood, which may be influenced by label format and sociodemographic characteristics. This study aimed at investigating the objective understanding of the Nutri-Score compared to other label formats, and more particularly among specific at-risk populations. Methods The objective understanding of four FOPLs-namely Nutri-Score, Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), the simplified nutrition labelling system (SENS), and modified Reference Intakes (mRls)-was investigated in a sample from the NutriNet-Sante French cohort (n = 3,751). Logistic regression mixed models were computed to assess the association of the four FOPLs, compared to a "no label" situation, on the consumers' ability to rank products according to their overall nutritional quality. Objective understanding was also investigated according to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. Results Compared to a "no label" situation, all FOPLs were significantly associated to an increase in consumers' ability to classify the products correctly, with wide disparities in results according to formats. The best performance was observed for the Nutri-Score (OR = 20.33(17.68-23.37)), followed by SENS (OR = 9.57(8.50-10.77)), MTL (OR = 3.55(3.20-3.93)) and mRls (OR = 1.53(1.39-1.69)). This ranking was similar among all sub-populations and the ORs associated to the Nutri-Score were over 10, whichever the sub-group considered. Women, younger people, non-smokers, individuals with higher educational level and those with children had a higher capacity to identify healthier products (all P <= 0.05). Conclusion Nutri-Score, with a summarized graded and color-coded format, using semantic colours, is associated to a higher objective understanding than monochrome and nutrient-specific labels. Furthermore, though objective understanding may differ according to individual characteristics of subjects, the magnitude of effect of the Nutri-Score largely outweighed this effect, even in the at-risk populations. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Allès, Benjamin Touvier, Mathilde Egnell, Manon Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle Ducrot, Pauline Hercberg, Serge Julia, Chantal |
| AuthorAffiliation | 1 Sorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), U1153 Inserm, U1125, Inra, Cnam, Paris 13 University, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Bobigny, France 2 Santé publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France 3 Public health department, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France College of Agricultural Sciences, UNITED STATES |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: College of Agricultural Sciences, UNITED STATES – name: 3 Public health department, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France – name: 1 Sorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), U1153 Inserm, U1125, Inra, Cnam, Paris 13 University, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Bobigny, France – name: 2 Santé publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Manon orcidid: 0000-0002-5012-3573 surname: Egnell fullname: Egnell, Manon – sequence: 2 givenname: Pauline surname: Ducrot fullname: Ducrot, Pauline – sequence: 3 givenname: Mathilde surname: Touvier fullname: Touvier, Mathilde – sequence: 4 givenname: Benjamin surname: Allès fullname: Allès, Benjamin – sequence: 5 givenname: Serge surname: Hercberg fullname: Hercberg, Serge – sequence: 6 givenname: Emmanuelle surname: Kesse-Guyot fullname: Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle – sequence: 7 givenname: Chantal surname: Julia fullname: Julia, Chantal |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30138359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://hal.science/hal-02179446$$DView record in HAL |
| BookMark | eNqNk9tu1DAQhiNURA_wBggiVUL0Iksc57DpBVJVUbpSxSIK3FoTZ7LxkrUX21ngcXhTJntA3apCyBeJZr7_H88kcxwcaKMxCJ6zeMR4wd7MTW81dKMlhUdxQqfMHgVHrORJlCcxP7jzfhgcOzeP44yP8_xJcMhjxsc8K4-C39NqjtKrFYa9rtE6D7pWehaaJvzQe6uiW2kshlfWaB9Nm-gjyG8ww1APSa-MDjuosAtBErdWehMq8lipuoculC1YkB6tcl5JN_i6fl3TnYeXZrEEyhjtwh_Kt6HxLdqwMXYBfmPsngaPG-gcPts-T4IvV-8-X15HN9P3k8uLm0gWSe6jlLGyaRDipEqxKXhSFkUOTcoKoKshspjFRVKUJRGyGWdpSokKICvKAiGv-UnwcuO77IwT2-k6QWNNsnGelQURkw1RG5iLpVULsL-EASXWAWNnAiw12aHIyJDzEhnZp6zCMkuSuqqLquIZNuPB6-22Wl8tsJaovYVuz3Q_o1UrZmYlcmqDpTEZnG0M2nuy64sbMcTihFHtNF8xYl9vi1nzvUfnxUI5iV0HGk2_7pFzNs7TktDTe-jDk9hSM6BmlW4M3VEOpuIiy1iaDm0TNXqAolPjQkn6bRtF8T3B2Z6AGI8__Qx658Tk9tP_s9Ov--yrO2yL0PnWma4ffl-3D764-1X-znW3LwScbwBpjXMWGyGVh8GHWlOdYLEYlnM3NDEsp9guJ4nTe-Kd_z9lfwB6vUAY |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107400 crossref_primary_10_1159_000514336 crossref_primary_10_5057_isase_2023_C000005 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13082783 crossref_primary_10_2196_32487 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17072335 crossref_primary_10_21272_mmi_2021_4_02 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2024_102677 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2025_145020 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_058139 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13030324 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2021_105664 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12051303 crossref_primary_10_34087_cbusbed_773881 crossref_primary_10_1002_mar_21838 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nut_2019_110593 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foohum_2024_100485 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2020_041196 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfoodeng_2023_111625 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2023_106587 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_nutr_011224_030917 crossref_primary_10_1080_09637486_2021_1873918 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods10122958 crossref_primary_10_1108_EJM_10_2021_0764 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14030601 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40519_022_01507_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12082307 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jand_2021_07_008 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000003657 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0277048 crossref_primary_10_1002_fft2_387 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107291 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12966_020_01053_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107691 crossref_primary_10_1080_09637486_2022_2060951 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11244011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soisec_2022_100034 crossref_primary_10_37527_2023_73_2_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2024_105136 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0040_1715576 crossref_primary_10_1039_C9FO02271F crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_nutr_111120_094932 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15132852 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107269 crossref_primary_10_1080_09637486_2021_1980866 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14163423 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0954422422000117 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2020_103948 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2021_103848 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjnph_2022_000599 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40100_024_00337_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13124335 crossref_primary_10_1080_08974438_2023_2267048 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2020_105005 crossref_primary_10_3390_app10165678 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14040771 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12966_019_0817_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_nbu_12539 crossref_primary_10_5057_isase_2021_C000014 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15153367 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2025_105465 crossref_primary_10_1111_nbu_12421 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2022_105971 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_m3173 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12966_021_01207_7 crossref_primary_10_4018_IJABE_311050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_128688 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000002708 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nut_2022_111849 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12966_021_01222_8 crossref_primary_10_20960_nh_03483 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu16060827 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15061337 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu11081817 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0228179 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12092887 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mmm_2022_07_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_phanu_2024_100380 crossref_primary_10_1080_09637486_2020_1796932 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19148751 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tifs_2021_09_003 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.045 10.1186/s12966-016-0416-4 10.1016/j.jand.2015.09.017 10.1017/S0007114510004617 10.1186/1471-2458-10-242 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450C 10.1371/journal.pone.0140898 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.020 10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.027 10.1017/S1368980012000754 10.1016/j.jada.2004.12.006 10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016108 10.1017/S1368980010000637 10.3390/nu7085325 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.11.1457 10.1007/s00038-011-0257-5 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.08.009 10.1093/heapro/17.1.13 10.2196/jmir.2575 10.1136/bmj.b2393 10.1186/1471-2458-9-184 10.1016/j.appet.2007.05.009 10.1016/j.appet.2011.12.023 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8 10.1017/S0007114515000264 10.1007/s10389-007-0101-9 10.4082/kjfm.2014.35.4.190 10.1111/jhn.12039 10.1017/S1368980012003515 10.3917/spub.139.0281 10.1016/j.jada.2009.03.012 10.1186/1479-5868-7-65 10.1093/heapro/dap012 10.1371/journal.pone.0087083 10.1111/nure.12000 10.1111/nyas.12461 10.1017/S1368980010003290 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376 10.1007/s10654-010-9433-9 10.1080/10410236.2012.725270 10.1079/PHN2005666 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science 2018 Egnell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Attribution 2018 Egnell et al 2018 Egnell et al |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 Public Library of Science – notice: 2018 Egnell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Attribution – notice: 2018 Egnell et al 2018 Egnell et al |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM IOV ISR 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7RV 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7X2 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU D1I DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB. KB0 KL. L6V LK8 M0K M0S M1P M7N M7P M7S NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY RC3 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0202095 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Immunology Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Materials Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest Engineering Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection Agricultural Science Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Engineering Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Nucleic Acids Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Engineering Database Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database Ecology Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection Entomology Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Materials Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts ProQuest Engineering Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Materials Science Database ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Agricultural Science Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Sciences (General) Public Health |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | FOP label objective understanding |
| EISSN | 1932-6203 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 2092586597 oai_doaj_org_article_56d3339e157941be9522dbd7bb35ef87 PMC6107140 oai_HAL_hal_02179446v1 A551445794 30138359 10_1371_journal_pone_0202095 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | France United Kingdom--UK |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: France – name: United Kingdom--UK |
| GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 8AO 8C1 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHMBA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS APEBS ARAPS ATCPS BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1I D1J D1K DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IGS IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISE ISR ITC K6- KB. KQ8 L6V LK5 LK8 M0K M1P M48 M7P M7R M7S M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PV9 PYCSY RNS RPM RZL SV3 TR2 UKHRP WOQ WOW ~02 ~KM IPNFZ NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB RIG BBORY PMFND 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. KL. M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS RC3 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM PUEGO AAPBV ABPTK N95 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-4119ffea02b4ef7329776af417aaccee101072799a02cf85447aabaa5797ea6d3 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1932-6203 |
| IngestDate | Sun Jul 02 11:04:13 EDT 2023 Wed Aug 27 01:32:05 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 13:38:44 EDT 2025 Fri May 09 12:26:57 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 09:55:02 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 11:19:23 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:13:56 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:44:01 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:36:32 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 03:43:30 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:19:01 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:39:28 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:38 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:58:17 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 8 |
| Language | English |
| License | Attribution: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c726t-4119ffea02b4ef7329776af417aaccee101072799a02cf85447aabaa5797ea6d3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5012-3573 0000-0002-3168-1350 0000-0002-9715-3534 0000-0002-7970-171X |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/56d3339e157941be9522dbd7bb35ef87 |
| PMID | 30138359 |
| PQID | 2092586597 |
| PQPubID | 1436336 |
| PageCount | e0202095 |
| ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_2092586597 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_56d3339e157941be9522dbd7bb35ef87 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6107140 hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02179446v1 proquest_miscellaneous_2093318649 proquest_journals_2092586597 gale_infotracmisc_A551445794 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A551445794 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A551445794 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A551445794 gale_healthsolutions_A551445794 pubmed_primary_30138359 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0202095 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0202095 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2018-08-23 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-08-23 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2018 text: 2018-08-23 day: 23 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
| PublicationTitle | PloS one |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS One |
| PublicationYear | 2018 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| References | C Lassale (ref41) 2013; 15 A Drichoutis (ref66) 2006 ref53 ref11 KE Assmann (ref49) 2014; 9 ref54 (ref29) 2012 AC Vergnaud (ref38) 2011; 56 P Ducrot (ref20) 2015; 10 (ref2) 2003; 916 I Borgmeier (ref52) 2009; 9 C Julia (ref27) 2016; 13 C Estaquio (ref48) 2009; 109 JP Schuldt (ref57) 2013; 28 ref46 EL Vyth (ref19) 2010; 7 CE Hodgkins (ref15) 2015; 113 P Helfer (ref56) 2014; 1331 P Ducrot (ref26) 2016; 50 P Crosetto (ref25) 2017 D Su (ref65) 2015; 12 G Grunert Klaus (ref9) 2007; 15 WL Watson (ref17) 2014; 72 C Mejean (ref28) 2013; 16 C Mejean (ref55) 2013; 26 ref40 N Le Moullec (ref45) 1996 AE Black (ref47) 2000; 24 M Touvier (ref42) 2010; 25 R Govindasamy (ref68) 1999 ref35 ref34 ref37 SW Hong (ref63) 2014; 29 ref36 JA Satia (ref61) 2005; 105 C Delamaire (ref5) 2009 ref31 ref33 ref32 P Ducrot (ref21) 2015; 7 ref39 GI Feunekes (ref8) 2008; 50 P Crosetto (ref24) 2016 M Touvier (ref44) 2011; 105 V Scott (ref60) 1994 EL Vyth (ref13) 2010; 13 KG Grunert (ref6) 2010; 18 N Lubman (ref62) 2012; 44 (ref3) 2004 S Hercberg (ref30) 2010; 10 S Campos (ref4) 2011; 14 L Young (ref18) 2002; 17 JA Sterne (ref50) 2009; 338 B Kelly (ref16) 2009; 24 C Lassale (ref43) 2016; 116 ref23 G Cowburn (ref7) 2005; 8 ref22 KL Hawley (ref14) 2013; 16 JC Hersey (ref10) 2013; 71 MG Kim (ref64) 2014; 35 LA Sutherland (ref12) 2010; 91 (ref1) 2017; 390 O Genschow (ref58) 2012; 58 KG Grunert (ref51) 2010; 55 C Julia (ref59) 2017; 7 A Drichoutis (ref67) 2005 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref37 – volume: 55 start-page: 177 year: 2010 ident: ref51 article-title: Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK publication-title: Appetite doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.045 – volume: 13 start-page: 101 year: 2016 ident: ref27 article-title: Impact of the front-of-pack 5-colour nutrition label (5-CNL) on the nutritional quality of purchases: an experimental study publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0416-4 – volume: 116 start-page: 427 year: 2016 ident: ref43 article-title: Correlations between Fruit, Vegetables, Fish, Vitamins, and Fatty Acids Estimated by Web-Based Nonconsecutive Dietary Records and Respective Biomarkers of Nutritional Status publication-title: J Acad Nutr Diet doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.09.017 – volume: 105 start-page: 1055 year: 2011 ident: ref44 article-title: Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies publication-title: Br J Nutr doi: 10.1017/S0007114510004617 – volume: 10 start-page: 242 year: 2010 ident: ref30 article-title: The Nutrinet-Sante Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-242 – year: 1994 ident: ref60 article-title: Ticks, claims, tables and food groups: A comparison for nutrition labelling publication-title: Health Promot Int – volume: 91 start-page: 1090S year: 2010 ident: ref12 article-title: Guiding stars: the effect of a nutrition navigation program on consumer purchases at the supermarket publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450C – volume: 10 start-page: e0140898 year: 2015 ident: ref20 article-title: Effectiveness of Front-Of-Pack Nutrition Labels in French Adults: Results from the NutriNet-Sante Cohort Study publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140898 – ident: ref53 – ident: ref11 – volume: 50 start-page: 627 year: 2016 ident: ref26 article-title: Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial publication-title: Am J Prev Med doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.020 – volume: 72 start-page: 90 year: 2014 ident: ref17 article-title: Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers’ responses to seven labelling formats publication-title: Appetite doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.027 – volume: 16 start-page: 430 year: 2013 ident: ref14 article-title: The science on front-of-package food labels publication-title: Public Health Nutr doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000754 – year: 1999 ident: ref68 article-title: The influence of consumer demographic characteristics on nutritional label usage publication-title: Journal of Food Products Marketing – ident: ref36 – volume: 12 start-page: E158 year: 2015 ident: ref65 article-title: A Sex-Specific Analysis of Nutrition Label Use and Health, Douglas County, Nebraska, 2013 publication-title: Prev Chronic Dis – volume: 105 start-page: 392 year: 2005 ident: ref61 article-title: Food nutrition label use is associated with demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial factors and dietary intake among African Americans in North Carolina publication-title: J Am Diet Assoc doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.12.006 – volume: 916 year: 2003 ident: ref2 article-title: WHO Technical Report Series – volume: 18 start-page: 261 year: 2010 ident: ref6 article-title: Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries publication-title: Z Gesundh Wiss doi: 10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0 – ident: ref40 – ident: ref23 – volume: 7 start-page: e016108 year: 2017 ident: ref59 article-title: Perception of different formats of front-of-pack nutrition labels according to sociodemographic, lifestyle and dietary factors in a French population: cross-sectional study among the NutriNet-Sante cohort participants publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016108 – volume: 13 start-page: 1882 year: 2010 ident: ref13 article-title: Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choice publication-title: Public Health Nutr doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000637 – ident: ref54 – volume: 7 start-page: 7106 year: 2015 ident: ref21 article-title: Objective Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels among Nutritionally At-Risk Individuals publication-title: Nutrients doi: 10.3390/nu7085325 – ident: ref33 – volume: 29 start-page: 1457 year: 2014 ident: ref63 article-title: Association between nutrition label use and chronic disease in Korean adults: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2009 publication-title: J Korean Med Sci doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.11.1457 – ident: ref39 – volume: 56 start-page: 407 year: 2011 ident: ref38 article-title: Agreement between web-based and paper versions of a socio-demographic questionnaire in the NutriNet-Sante study publication-title: Int J Public Health doi: 10.1007/s00038-011-0257-5 – year: 2004 ident: ref3 article-title: Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health – volume: 44 start-page: 398 year: 2012 ident: ref62 article-title: Food label use and food label skills among immigrants from the former Soviet Union publication-title: J Nutr Educ Behav doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.08.009 – volume: 17 start-page: 13 year: 2002 ident: ref18 article-title: Impact of the Pick the Tick food information programme on the salt content of food in New Zealand publication-title: Health Promot Int doi: 10.1093/heapro/17.1.13 – year: 2016 ident: ref24 article-title: Réponses des consommateurs à trois systèmes d'étiquetage nutritionnels en face avant publication-title: Cahier de Nutrition et de Diététique – volume: 15 start-page: e152 year: 2013 ident: ref41 article-title: Validity of web-based self-reported weight and height: results of the Nutrinet-Sante study publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/jmir.2575 – volume: 338 start-page: b2393 year: 2009 ident: ref50 article-title: Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393 – ident: ref22 – volume: 9 start-page: 184 year: 2009 ident: ref52 article-title: Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-184 – year: 1996 ident: ref45 article-title: Validation du manuel photo utilisé pour l’enquête alimentaire de l’étude SU.VI.MAX publication-title: Cah Nutr Diet – volume: 50 start-page: 57 year: 2008 ident: ref8 article-title: Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries publication-title: Appetite doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.05.009 – year: 2017 ident: ref25 article-title: Modification des achats alimentaires en réponse à cinq logos nutritionnels publication-title: Modification des achats alimentaires en réponse à cinq logos nutritionnels – ident: ref32 – volume: 58 start-page: 699 year: 2012 ident: ref58 article-title: The color red reduces snack food and soft drink intake publication-title: Appetite doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.12.023 – year: 2005 ident: ref67 article-title: Nutrition knowledge and consumer use of nutritional food labels publication-title: European Review of Agricultural Economics – volume: 390 start-page: 1345 year: 2017 ident: ref1 article-title: Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8 – year: 2009 ident: ref5 article-title: Baromètre Santé Nutrition 2008 Saint Denis – volume: 113 start-page: 1652 year: 2015 ident: ref15 article-title: Guiding healthier food choice: systematic comparison of four front-of-pack labelling systems and their effect on judgements of product healthiness publication-title: Br J Nutr doi: 10.1017/S0007114515000264 – volume: 15 start-page: 385 year: 2007 ident: ref9 article-title: A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels publication-title: Journal of Public Health doi: 10.1007/s10389-007-0101-9 – volume: 35 start-page: 190 year: 2014 ident: ref64 article-title: Association between Nutrition Label Reading and Nutrient Intake in Korean Adults: Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, 2007–2009 (KNHANES IV) publication-title: Korean J Fam Med doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2014.35.4.190 – volume: 26 start-page: 494 year: 2013 ident: ref55 article-title: Consumer acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutrition labels publication-title: J Hum Nutr Diet doi: 10.1111/jhn.12039 – year: 2006 ident: ref66 article-title: Consumer’s use of nutritional labels: a review of research studies and issues publication-title: Acad Mark Sci Rev – volume: 16 start-page: 392 year: 2013 ident: ref28 article-title: Perception of front-of-pack labels according to social characteristics, nutritional knowledge and food purchasing habits publication-title: Public Health Nutr doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003515 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.3917/spub.139.0281 – volume: 109 start-page: 1031 year: 2009 ident: ref48 article-title: Adherence to the French Programme National Nutrition Sante Guideline Score is associated with better nutrient intake and nutritional status publication-title: J Am Diet Assoc doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.03.012 – ident: ref46 – volume: 7 start-page: 65 year: 2010 ident: ref19 article-title: Front-of-pack nutrition label stimulates healthier product development: a quantitative analysis publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-65 – volume: 24 start-page: 120 year: 2009 ident: ref16 article-title: Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market publication-title: Health Promot Int doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap012 – volume: 9 start-page: e87083 year: 2014 ident: ref49 article-title: Dietary quality and 6-year anthropometric changes in a sample of French middle-aged overweight and obese adults publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087083 – volume: 71 start-page: 1 year: 2013 ident: ref10 article-title: Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers publication-title: Nutr Rev doi: 10.1111/nure.12000 – volume: 1331 start-page: 174 year: 2014 ident: ref56 article-title: The effects of nutrition labeling on consumer food choice: a psychological experiment and computational model publication-title: Ann N Y Acad Sci doi: 10.1111/nyas.12461 – volume: 14 start-page: 1496 year: 2011 ident: ref4 article-title: Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review publication-title: Public Health Nutr doi: 10.1017/S1368980010003290 – volume: 24 start-page: 1119 year: 2000 ident: ref47 article-title: Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations publication-title: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376 – volume: 25 start-page: 287 year: 2010 ident: ref42 article-title: Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9433-9 – volume: 28 start-page: 814 year: 2013 ident: ref57 article-title: Does green mean healthy? Nutrition label color affects perceptions of healthfulness publication-title: Health Commun doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.725270 – year: 2012 ident: ref29 article-title: Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Promoting Healthier Choices – ident: ref35 – volume: 8 start-page: 21 year: 2005 ident: ref7 article-title: Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review publication-title: Public Health Nutr doi: 10.1079/PHN2005666 – ident: ref31 |
| SSID | ssj0053866 |
| Score | 2.543872 |
| Snippet | To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple strategies,... Background To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple... BACKGROUND:To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple... Background To improve nutritional status and prevent chronic nutrition-related diseases, international organizations have recommended the use of multiple... |
| SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral hal proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e0202095 |
| SubjectTerms | At risk populations Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Children Chronic diseases Chronic illnesses Consumers Descriptive labeling Diet Epidemiology Exercise Format Health aspects International organizations Labeling Labelling Labels Life Sciences Lifestyles Medicine and Health Sciences Nutrition Nutrition research Nutritional status Nutritive value People and Places Populations Prevention Public health Quality Questionnaires Regression analysis Research and Analysis Methods Santé publique et épidémiologie Smoking Social Sciences Sociodemographics Socioeconomic factors Studies Traffic signals |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Nb9MwFLegJy6I8bXAAIOQgIO3JnacmFuZqAqCFTGGdrNs16GDKqlIw__Df8p7Tho1aNI4cI2f7fh9-b3E72dCnguVJMamBUukzZlw3DAFgTnLcwubbWy8DNcBfTyRszPx_jw937nqC8-EtfDALeOOUrngnCsfp6A5sfUKAoaFXWTW8tQXeagjhz1vm0y1PhisWMquUI5n8VEnl8N1VfpDCJCgRzrYiAJef--Vry_xUORovarqywLPv89P7mxI01vkZhdJ0km7gj1yzZe3yV5nqzV92QFKv7pDfs_t99av0Wa3loVWBT1BNH52imCWdIpgBmxesE_G_QA_Q8stVD8FXfErahzmqthzU9GLvpSLuiHqM45bN2HO-jU97m86rCl-9aWh5ou2wXI7cH2XnE3ffjmese5qBuayRG6YiGNVFN6MEyt8kfEEwkhpChFnBl7FezD0MURGSgGFK_JUCGiwxoAQM29ApPfIqARh7BPqHLfCgsIo4YXMvYKs0PtxZiFTi0H2EeFbOWnX4Zbj9RkrHX7GZZC_tAzXKF3dSTcirO-1bnE7rqB_gyrQ0yLqdngAuqg7XdRX6WJEnqAC6baEtfcdeoJhqcBOEXkWKBB5o8SjPd9MU9f63fzrPxCdfh4QveiIigrY4UxXTgFrQkSvAeXBgBL8hxvOtkRm7Cx8Nvmg8Rnmq0oI-SuOyD5aw5Z1tQaeJWkuIR2F4bcWcnnz074ZZ8YzfaWvmkDDYUeRQkXkfmtQ_Vtw_IHOU2jJBqY2eM1hS3mxDOjokA8gCOWD_yHQh-QGBMgI4c4SfkBGm5-NfwRB6MY-Dv7mDwr_h1w priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1fb9MwELdYeUFCiI0_KwwwCAl48NbEjh3zgspENRCsiDHUt8h2nXVQJWVp-T58U-4SNzRoAl7js2P7fOc72_c7Qp4KHcfGJjmLpU2ZcNwwDYY5S1MLm21kvKzTAX04lken4t0kmYQDtyo8q1zrxFpRT0uHZ-TgpOs4SSXYv68W3xlmjcLb1ZBCY4tcRegyfNKlJq3DBbIsZQiX4yo6CNzZX5SF3wczCZpMOttRjdrf6uatGT6N7C3mZXWZ-fnnK8qNbWl0k9wI9iQdNgtgm1zxxQ653hzG0SbGaIdsBwmu6PMAM_3iFvk5tl8bbUdXmxEutMzpMWL0sxOEuKQjhDhg45x9NO4baB9arAH8KawgP6fGoQeLNZclPW8DvKjrYkFju9Wq_mf1kh62-Q8rimfBtI4Eo40J3TRc3SanozefD49YSNjAnIrlkglgQp57M4it8LniMRiX0uQiUga64j2I_wDsJa2BwuVpIgQUWGMSpZU3csrvkF4BzNkl1DluhYVlpIUXMvUafEXvB8qC_xZNOe8TvuZb5gKaOSbVmGf1FZ0Cr6ZhQIbczgK3-4S1tRYNmsc_6F_jkmhpEYu7_lBenGVBtLMEOs659hEMQ0TWazBpp3aqrOWJz1PVJ49wQWVNYGurUbIhGqsCK_XJk5oC8TgKfPBzZlZVlb0df_kPopNPHaJngSgvYTqcCUEWMCbE-epQ7nUoQau47t9mOBkbAz8avs_wG3qxWgj5I-qTXZSO9dRV2W8hhebXEnN58eO2GP-ML_0KX65qGg77jBS6T-42Atb2guO1Ok-gRHVEr9PNbklxPqsx08FLQGjKe3_v1n1yDQxihGxnMd8jveXFyj8Ao3NpH9aa5Ree0IQU priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Objective understanding of Nutri-Score Front-Of-Package nutrition label according to individual characteristics of subjects: Comparisons with other format labels |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30138359 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2092586597 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2093318649 https://hal.science/hal-02179446 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6107140 https://doaj.org/article/56d3339e157941be9522dbd7bb35ef87 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202095 |
| Volume | 13 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3Nb9MwFLfW7sIFMb6WMYpBSMDBUxM7cYyE0DatDMTaaWOot8hOnXVQJWNpEVz4X_hPec9JowUVsUsO8fNHbL_n34vt3yPkuVBBoE2YsSAyMRMp10wBMGdxbGCx9bWNXDigo2F0eCY-jMPxGlnGbK07sFzp2mE8qbOr2c6Pbz_fgsK_cVEbpL_MtHNZ5HYH4E8AsKFD1mFtkqiqR6LZVwDtdruXiFpYFPR5fZnuX6W0FivH6d9Y7s4UD052L2dFuQqc_n3G8tqiNbhDbtdok-5W02ODrNn8Ltmo9bmkL2vS6Vf3yO-R-VLZPrq4ft-FFhkdImM_O0XCSzpAwgM2ytixTr-CLaL5ks6fwnyyM6pT9Gcx57ygF811L5q2maGx3HLh6ixf0_0mGmJJ8c8wdffCaAWoq4LL--RscPBp_5DV4RtYKoNozoTvqyyzuh8YYTPJA4Cakc5gVDQ0xVowBn1AT0qBRJrFoRCQYLQOpZJWRxP-gHRzGIxNQtOUG2FgUilhRRRbBZ6jtX1pwJvzJ5x7hC_HKUlrbnMMsTFL3IadBB-n6vAERzepR9cjrMl1WXF7_Ed-D6dAI4vM3O5FcXWe1IqehNBwzpX14TOEb6wCgDsxE2kMD20WS488wQmUVNdcG_uS7CJ0FZjJI8-cBLJz5Hj851wvyjJ5P_p8A6HTk5bQi1ooK6A7Ul1fuYBvQtavluR2SxJsTNqubYqdce3DD3c_JvgOfVolRPTd98gmasOy68oE-iwI4whcVih-qSGrk582yVgznvvLbbFwMhxWnUgojzysFKppBcdNdh5CimypWquZ7ZT8YuoY1MFnQKLKrRvU-4jcAoyMLO4s4NukO79a2MeAQ-emRzpyLOEZ7_v4HLzrkfW9g-HxSc_92ek504PPXwd_AO91jxA |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLa28gASQmxcFhjMIBDw4NHEzsVICJVB1bKuQ7ugvgU7ddZBlZSlBfFz-AP8Rs7JjQZNwMte4xPH9jk-F8fnO4Q8EtJxlHZj5ng6YCLiiklwzFkQaDC2tjJeXg5ob-j1jsW7kTtaIT-rXBi8VlnpxFxRj9MIz8ghSJeOG3jg_76afWFYNQr_rlYlNAqx2DXfv0HIlr3svwH-Pnac7tujnR4rqwqwyHe8ORO2LePYqLajhYl97oAH5KlY2L5SEZgMkNE2GHUpgSKKA1cIaNBKub70jfLGHPpdJZfA8LZxR_mjOsAD3eF5ZXoe9-3npTRsz9LEbINbBlNwG-YvrxJQ24LVCV7FbM2maXaeu_vnrc0lM9i9Tq6V_ivtFAK3RlZMsk6uFod_tMhpWidrpcbI6NMS1vrZDfJjX38qtCtdLGfU0DSmQ6wJwA4RUpN2EVKB7cfsvYo-g7ajSVUwgILEmimF9YPlxzfnKT2tE8po1MSexn6zRf7N7AXdqestZhTPnmmeeUYLl73oOLtJji-ElbdIKwHmbBAaRVwLDWIrhRFeYCTEpsa0fQ3xoj3m3CK84lsYlejpWMRjGua_BH2IogoGhMjtsOS2RVj91qxAD_kH_WsUiZoWsb_zB-nZSViqktCFgXMujQ3TELY2ElzosR77WnPXxIFvkS0UqLBIpK01WNhB51jgSxZ5mFMg_keCF4xO1CLLwv7-h_8gOjxoED0pieIUliNSZVIHzAlxxRqUmw1K0GJR82sTXIylifc6gxCfYdQshfC-2hbZwN1RLV0W_lYK0H21Y85vflA345fxZmFi0kVOw8GueUJa5HaxwepRcPyNz11o8RtbrzHMZktyOskx2iEqQSjMO38f1ha53DvaG4SD_nD3LrkCzjjCxTOHb5LW_Gxh7oHDO9f3cy1DyceLVmu_AAkdwW8 |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwELe2ISEkhNj4s8BgBoGAB29N7MQxEkJjo2rZaCfGUN-CnTrrYErK0oL4OHwNPh13-ceCJuBlr_HFsX3n3905vjtCHgnledr4CfMCEzIRc80UGOYsDA0oW1fboCgH9HYQ9A7Fm5E_WiA_61gYvFZZY2IB1OMsxjNycNKV54cB2L-bSXUtYn-n-3L6hWEFKfzTWpfTKEVk137_Bu5b_qK_A7x-7Hnd1--3e6yqMMBi6QUzJlxXJYnVHc8Im0jugTUU6ES4UusY1AfIawcUvFJAESehLwQ0GK19qaTVwZhDv4vkkuS-i3tMjhpnD3AkCKpQPS7dzUoyNqZZajfARIPp-C1VWFQMaPTC4gSvZS5NT7L8PNP3zxucZ1Ri9zq5VtmydKsUvmWyYNMVcrU8CKRlfNMKWa7QI6dPqxTXz26QH0PzqURaOj8bXUOzhA6wPgA7wPSatIvpFdgwYfs6_gzIR9O6eAAF6bUnFNYPlh_fnGX0uAkuo3E7DzX2m8-Lb-bP6XZTezGneA5Niyg0WprvZcf5TXJ4Iay8RZZSYM4qoXHMjTAgwkpYEYRWgZ9qbUca8B3dMecO4TXforjKpI4FPU6i4vegBI-qZECE3I4qbjuENW9Ny0wi_6B_hSLR0GIe8OJBdnoUVbAS-TBwzpV1YRrCNVaBOT02Y2kM920SSoeso0BFZVBtg2bRFhrKAl9yyMOCAnOBpLirjvQ8z6P-8MN_EB28axE9qYiSDJYj1lWAB8wJc4y1KNdalIBocftrE1yMMxPvbe1F-Aw9aCVE8NV1yCrujnrp8ug3QED39Y45v_lB04xfxluGqc3mBQ0HHRcI5ZDb5QZrRsHxlz73oUW2tl5rmO2W9HhS5GsHDwXTYt75-7DWyWUAtGivP9i9S66AXY6Z45nH18jS7HRu74HtOzP3C5Ch5ONFo9ovEK7FpQ |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Objective+understanding+of+Nutri-Score+Front-Of-Package+nutrition+label+according+to+individual+characteristics+of+subjects%3A+Comparisons+with+other+format+labels&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Egnell%2C+Manon&rft.au=Ducrot%2C+Pauline&rft.au=Touvier%2C+Mathilde&rft.au=All%C3%A8s%2C+Benjamin&rft.date=2018-08-23&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0202095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0202095&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |