In rice splice variants that restore the reading frame after frameshifting indel introduction are common, often induced by the indels and sometimes lead to organism-level rescue

• Published in: PLoS genetics Vol. 18; no. 2; p. e1010071
• Main Authors: Jia, Yanxiao, Qin, Chao, Traw, Milton Brian, Chen, Xiaonan, He, Ying, Kai, Jing, Yang, Sihai, Wang, Long, Hurst, Laurence D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 18.02.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Alternative splicing; Biology and Life Sciences; CRISPR; Engineering and Technology; Gene loci; Genetic aspects; Genetic research; Genetic variation; Genotype & phenotype; INDEL Mutation - genetics; Isoforms; Mutation; Oryza - genetics; Proteins; Reading; Reading Frames; Research and Analysis Methods; Rice; RNA splicing; China
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010071
• ISSN: 1553-7404; 1553-7390

The introduction of frameshifting non-3n indels enables the identification of gene-trait associations. However, it has been hypothesised that recovery of the original reading frame owing to usage of non-canonical splice forms could cause rescue. To date there is very little evidence for organism-level rescue by such a mechanism and it is unknown how commonly indels induce, or are otherwise associated with, frame-restoring splice forms. We perform CRISPR/Cas9 editing of randomly selected loci in rice to investigate these issues. We find that the majority of loci have a frame-restoring isoform. Importantly, three quarters of these isoforms are not seen in the absence of the indels, consistent with indels commonly inducing novel isoforms. This is supported by analysis in the context of NMD knockdowns. We consider in detail the two top rescue candidates, in wax deficient anther 1 (wda1) and brittle culm (bc10), finding that organismal-level rescue in both cases is strong but owing to different splice modification routes. More generally, however, as frame-restoring isoforms are low abundance and possibly too disruptive, such rescue we suggest to be the rare exception, not the rule. Nonetheless, assuming that indels commonly induce frame-restoring isoforms, these results emphasize the need to examine RNA level effects of non-3n indels and suggest that multiple non-3n indels in any given gene are advisable to probe a gene's trait associations.