Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Technology: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course a...
Saved in:
Published in | JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION Vol. 10; p. e50297 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Publication |
Language | English |
Published |
Canada
JMIR Publications
01.01.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.
This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.
Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.
In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ
=-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ
=0.265; ρ
=0.190; ρ
=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ
=0.360; ρ
=0.341; ρ
=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ
=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ
=-0.196; ρ
=-0.262; ρ
=-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ
=-0.209; ρ
=-0.347; ρ
=-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ
=-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively).
This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.
RR2-10.2196/14643. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background:The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.Objective:This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.Methods:Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.Results:In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively).Conclusions:This study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID):RR2-10.2196/14643 Background:The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. Objective:This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Methods:Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. Results:In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). Conclusions:This study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.BACKGROUNDThe growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.OBJECTIVEThis study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.METHODSNursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=-0.196; ρSwedish=-0.262; ρPolish=-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=-0.209; ρSwedish=-0.347; ρPolish=-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively).RESULTSIn total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=-0.196; ρSwedish=-0.262; ρPolish=-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=-0.209; ρSwedish=-0.347; ρPolish=-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively).This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.CONCLUSIONSThis study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.RR2-10.2196/14643.INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)RR2-10.2196/14643. Background: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. Objective: This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Methods: Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann -Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. Results: In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample ( P <.001; rho (Swedish) =- 0 . 201 ) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score ( P <.001; rho (all) =0.265; rho (Swedish) = 0 . 190 ; rho (Polish) = 0 . 352 ) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices ( P <.001; rho (all) =0.360; rho (Swedish) = 0 . 341 ; rho (Polish) =0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample ( P <.001; rho (Swedish) =0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score ( P <.001; rho (all) =-0.196; rho (Swedish) =- 0 . 262 ; rho (Polish) =- 0 . 133 ) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices ( P <.001; rho (all) =-0.209; rho (Swedish )=- 0 . 347 ; rho (Polish) =- 0 . 134 ) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample ( P <.001; rho (Swedish) =-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). Conclusions: This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. Background: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. Objective: This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Methods: Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. Results: In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). Conclusions: This study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. Background: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. Objective: This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Methods: Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. Results: In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). Conclusions: This study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. ©Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. BackgroundThe growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. MethodsNursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. ResultsIn total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). ConclusionsThis study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.2196/14643 BACKGROUND: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. METHODS: Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. RESULTS: In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample ( P <.001; ρ Swedish =−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score ( P <.001; ρ all =0.265; ρ Swedish =0.190; ρ Polish =0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices ( P <.001; ρ all =0.360; ρ Swedish =0.341; ρ Polish =0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample ( P <.001; ρ Swedish =0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score ( P <.001; ρ all =−0.196; ρ Swedish =−0.262; ρ Polish =−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices ( P <.001; ρ all =−0.209; ρ Swedish =−0.347; ρ Polish =−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample ( P <.001; ρ Swedish =−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/14643. The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ =-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ =0.265; ρ =0.190; ρ =0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ =0.360; ρ =0.341; ρ =0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ =0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ =-0.196; ρ =-0.262; ρ =-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ =-0.209; ρ =-0.347; ρ =-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ =-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. RR2-10.2196/14643. |
Author | Dallora, Ana Luiza Björling, Gunilla Anderberg, Peter Bohman, Doris Andersson, Ewa Kazimiera Marcinowicz, Ludmiła Gregory Palm, Bruna Stjernberg, Louise |
AuthorAffiliation | 7 Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden 4 Optentia Research Unit North West University Vanderbijlpark South Africa 6 Faculty of Nursing Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Moshi United Republic of Tanzania 1 Department of Health Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona Sweden 11 School of Health Sciences University of Skövde Skövde Sweden 5 School of Health and Wellfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden 8 Faculty of Health Sciences Medical University of Bialystok Białystok Poland 3 Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona Sweden 9 Department of Care Science Malmö University Malmö Sweden 10 Swedish Red Cross University Huddinge Sweden 2 Department of Health and Caring Sciences Linnaeus University Växjö Sweden |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 10 Swedish Red Cross University Huddinge Sweden – name: 4 Optentia Research Unit North West University Vanderbijlpark South Africa – name: 9 Department of Care Science Malmö University Malmö Sweden – name: 11 School of Health Sciences University of Skövde Skövde Sweden – name: 3 Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona Sweden – name: 2 Department of Health and Caring Sciences Linnaeus University Växjö Sweden – name: 5 School of Health and Wellfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden – name: 1 Department of Health Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona Sweden – name: 8 Faculty of Health Sciences Medical University of Bialystok Białystok Poland – name: 6 Faculty of Nursing Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Moshi United Republic of Tanzania – name: 7 Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ana Luiza orcidid: 0000-0002-6752-017X surname: Dallora fullname: Dallora, Ana Luiza – sequence: 2 givenname: Ewa Kazimiera orcidid: 0000-0002-4282-8901 surname: Andersson fullname: Andersson, Ewa Kazimiera – sequence: 3 givenname: Bruna orcidid: 0000-0003-0423-9927 surname: Gregory Palm fullname: Gregory Palm, Bruna – sequence: 4 givenname: Doris orcidid: 0000-0002-5687-7894 surname: Bohman fullname: Bohman, Doris – sequence: 5 givenname: Gunilla orcidid: 0000-0003-1445-900X surname: Björling fullname: Björling, Gunilla – sequence: 6 givenname: Ludmiła orcidid: 0000-0003-0614-1093 surname: Marcinowicz fullname: Marcinowicz, Ludmiła – sequence: 7 givenname: Louise orcidid: 0000-0002-8673-5109 surname: Stjernberg fullname: Stjernberg, Louise – sequence: 8 givenname: Peter orcidid: 0000-0001-9870-8477 surname: Anderberg fullname: Anderberg, Peter |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38683660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-26341$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-23889$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-64282$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-129166$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-67348$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:rkh:diva-4931$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
BookMark | eNqNk91u0zAUxy00xEbpK6BICAkJCraP49i7QVX5mjRAYoVby3GcJl0aDzth2h2vwevxJDhtqVYkoDf-_Pl__rbPuY-OWtdahMYEP6dE8hcppjK7g04ocDmBjNOjW-NjNA5hiTEmGaM4lffQMQgugHN8gj596H2o20Vy0fWFbbvw8_uPZNp19TANydxda18kc2uq1jVucXOavO-brjYRtT6ZeRfC5MKarnatbtYiNw_Q3VI3wY63_Qh9fvN6Pns3Of_49mw2PZ-YjMgutjwzpYC0LAFyYzHmHKwFYRnWFrRJM8JonhVEUwnAMp0yk4mcF7jMocAwQmcb3cLppbry9Ur7G-V0rdYLzi-U9tFqY5WwhTS6EDEIYWUuZYnzEpcxXEo4xixqTTZa4dpe9fme2nbpMo6iUprK-HYj9PSv_Kv6y3Qd3V9WikkgkX72f3qle8UzYOKfZnZ40_aKUEniox1kploqzqigh5mp6qAoCCEPw_OuUpQDG676coNHdmWLIU-8bvZO7e-0daUW7psiBEsi1l_xZKvg3dfehk6t6mBs0-jWuj4owEzE1BF88PboD3Tpeh8TcaBSkCIVZLjww9uWdl5-F0EEHm8AM6Szt-UOIVgN9aXW9QW_AOOHGSk |
Cites_doi | 10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740104 10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00027-2 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.01.008 10.2196/13951 10.1109/iemc.2004.1407500 10.1007/s10654-014-9984-2 10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236408 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006 10.1186/1472-6963-5-59 10.1111/wvn.12569 10.1111/jocn.15321 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137 10.1016/s0020-7373(08)80006-5 10.1177/2158244014556633 10.3928/01484834-20171120-03 10.1111/bjet.12051 10.2196/14643 10.1186/s41239-020-00184-4 10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w 10.1177/08919887221149139 10.1080/09537287.2019.1702226 10.1177/1460458211435425 10.1111/nuf.12337 10.2196/15630 10.1001/jama.2017.15927 10.2196/30644 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.022 10.1089/tmj.2017.0056 10.2196/35380 10.1108/NLW-07-2014-0085 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000380 10.1108/ijhg-02-2019-0012 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001199 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104382 10.1111/hir.12204 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.013 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.12.010 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000615 10.1080/0144929x.2016.1221462 10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3.735 10.3390/app112210537 |
ContentType | Journal Article Publication |
Copyright | Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024. 2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024. 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024. – notice: 2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024. 2024 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM ADTPV AOWAS D8T DF3 ZZAVC ABSHZ DF6 AABRY D8X AGRUY D92 BZJLE STUKM DOA |
DOI | 10.2196/50297 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Freely available online SWEPUB Blekinge Tekniska Högskola SwePub Articles full text SWEPUB Högskolan i Skövde full text SWEPUB Högskolan i Skövde SWEPUB Högskolan i Jönköping full text SWEPUB Högskolan i Jönköping SWEPUB Linnéuniversitetet full text SWEPUB Linnéuniversitetet SwePub Other SwePub Other full text DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals [open access] url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Nursing |
EISSN | 2369-3762 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_8ed9cad8e0014fb99f0bf0f3ee516004 oai_swepub_ki_se_855968 oai_DiVA_org_rkh_4931 oai_DiVA_org_mau_67348 oai_DiVA_org_lnu_129166 oai_DiVA_org_hj_64282 oai_DiVA_org_his_23889 oai_DiVA_org_bth_26341 PMC11091804 38683660 10_2196_50297 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Poland Sweden |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Poland – name: Sweden |
GroupedDBID | 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAHSB AAYXX ABUWG ADBBV AFKRA AFPKN ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV BENPR CCPQU CITATION FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE KQ8 M48 M~E OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY RPM UKHRP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC COVID DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM ADRAZ ADTPV AOWAS D8T DF3 ZZAVC ABSHZ DF6 AABRY D8X AGRUY D92 BZJLE PUEGO STUKM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-c767cf835ff33bce00663ee38e40ae3ac57142b7d1a293347a54c78b6d0fb3d03 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2369-3762 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:25:39 EDT 2025 Mon Sep 01 03:23:19 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 06:57:08 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 07:03:56 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 06:29:22 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 03 05:33:55 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 06:51:37 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 06:17:51 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:35:43 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 16:22:08 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 12:26:57 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:57:43 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:28:26 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | technophilia technology enthusiasm technology anxiety nursing education mobile phone eHealth |
Language | English |
License | Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c719t-c767cf835ff33bce00663ee38e40ae3ac57142b7d1a293347a54c78b6d0fb3d03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-4282-8901 0000-0003-0423-9927 0000-0003-1445-900X 0000-0002-8673-5109 0000-0001-9870-8477 0000-0002-6752-017X 0000-0003-0614-1093 0000-0002-5687-7894 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.2196/50297 |
PMID | 38683660 |
PQID | 3053985812 |
PQPubID | 4997112 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8ed9cad8e0014fb99f0bf0f3ee516004 swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_855968 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_rkh_4931 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_mau_67348 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_lnu_129166 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_hj_64282 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_his_23889 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_bth_26341 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11091804 proquest_miscellaneous_3048767869 proquest_journals_3053985812 pubmed_primary_38683660 crossref_primary_10_2196_50297 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2024 text: 2024-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Canada |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Canada – name: Toronto – name: Toronto, Canada |
PublicationTitle | JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION |
PublicationTitleAlternate | JMIR Med Educ |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | JMIR Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: JMIR Publications |
References | ref13 ref12 ref53 ref52 ref11 ref55 ref10 ref54 ref17 ref16 ref19 He, J (ref50) 2010; 21 ref18 ref51 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 Charles-Ogan, G (ref32) 2015; 3 ref3 ref6 Day-Black, C (ref39) 2015; 26 ref5 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref2 ref1 ref38 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 Miller, LA (ref15) 2014; 18 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 Elder, BL (ref14) 2009; 30 |
References_xml | – ident: ref1 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740104 – ident: ref27 – volume: 3 start-page: 71 issue: 6 year: 2015 ident: ref32 publication-title: Br J Educ – ident: ref55 doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00027-2 – volume: 26 start-page: 78 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: ref39 publication-title: ABNF J – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.01.008 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.2196/13951 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1109/iemc.2004.1407500 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9984-2 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236408 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-59 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1111/wvn.12569 – volume: 21 start-page: 203 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: ref50 publication-title: J Inf Syst Educ – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1111/jocn.15321 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.1016/s0020-7373(08)80006-5 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.1177/2158244014556633 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.3928/01484834-20171120-03 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1111/bjet.12051 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.2196/14643 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00184-4 – ident: ref33 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1177/08919887221149139 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1702226 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.1177/1460458211435425 – ident: ref7 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1111/nuf.12337 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.2196/15630 – ident: ref22 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.15927 – volume: 18 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: ref15 publication-title: Online J Nurs Inform – ident: ref25 doi: 10.2196/30644 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.022 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0056 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.2196/35380 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1108/NLW-07-2014-0085 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000380 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1108/ijhg-02-2019-0012 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001199 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104382 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1111/hir.12204 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.013 – ident: ref28 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.12.010 – ident: ref21 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000615 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1080/0144929x.2016.1221462 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3.735 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.3390/app112210537 – volume: 30 start-page: 148 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: ref14 publication-title: Nurs Educ Perspect – ident: ref31 |
SSID | ssj0001742059 |
Score | 2.2639894 |
Snippet | The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has... Background:The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This... Background: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This... BACKGROUND: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This... BackgroundThe growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This... |
SourceID | doaj swepub pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | e50297 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Anxiety Attitude of Health Personnel Attitude to Computers Attitudes Clinical medicine Colleges & universities Cross-Sectional Studies Curricula Data collection Digital technology eHealth Familjecentrerad hälsa (FamCeH) Family-Centred Health Female Health care industry Humans Literacy Male mobile phone Nursing Nursing education Omvårdnad Original Paper Poland Portable computers Questionnaires Self report Skills Sociodemographics Students Students, Nursing - psychology Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data Surveys and Questionnaires Sweden technology anxiety technology enthusiasm technophilia Telemedicine Young Adult |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQDwgJISr-Am0VpMItahL_httSqCokONAW9WbZyVi7LaRoN3vgxmvwen2Szjjp0oiqe-ESRbETT2bszDf25DNju85ppepaZMIphQcc6UYZyILTDoOxSueeVnQ_f1GHJ-LTqTy9sdUX5YT19MC94vYMNFXtGgME5oOvqpD7kAcOIAs1MIGiz7sRTMXZFYz4EDjcZw8p1xl72Z6kXZpGzidy9N8GLP_NjxyxiEbPc_CYPRogYzrpRd1k96B9wr4OYX561JNTLi5__0knHS38N7BIj2M2bPp34vxdGn-1pbZgnu6TeNlRTMOiZ9NDfj1lJwcfj_cPs2F_hKzWRdXhUek6IIQKgXNfQ4QPANyAyB1wV0tdiNLrpnDo1LnQTopaG6-aPHje5PwZ22gvWnjBUg9BQoPRRWmC4CV3OarcyYJ7x3mQIWE714qzP3saDIvhA2nWRs0m7D2pc1VIrNXxAtrSDra062yZsK1rY9hhKC0sfpB4ZSQCkYS9XhXjIKCVDdfCxZLqYNyFbldVCXve224lCce-x5XKE2ZGVh2JOi5pZ9NItE1srIUhud70HWB0z4fZt0l8Pd9NbakQDqypN50tLCIkg0Lu3lnvzFJUiO_79q5q31viAUd4r9a0-8MtKX1PmDXtzs-nVlS8uL3d4dI5nqElsaso8_J_GP0Ve1AiUOyntbbYRjdfwjYCvc7vxDF9BWP2WzA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1fb9MwELdgSAhpQiD-BcYUpMFbtCT-G15QGUwTEjywDfXNshN7LYN0a9IH3vgafD0-CXdO2ipial-iKnbti-8u97vz5UzIgTFSiLJkCTNCwAU0XQnlEm-kAWeskKnFHd3PX8TJOfs05uM-4Nb0aZXLd2J4UVezEmPkhyCXtFAc7NG7q-sET43C3dX-CI3b5A6WLsOULjmW6xgL-H0AH-6SXcx4Blk75HhW08AEhUr9N8HL_7MkB7VEg_05fkDu98AxHnWcfkhuufoR-do7-_FpV6Ky-fv7Tzxqcfu_ck18FnJi43X4_G0cPrjFudw8PkLyktOQjIVj4yC_HpPz449nRydJf0pCUsqsaOEqZOkBSHlPqS1dABHOUeVYahw1JZcZy62sMgOmnTJpOCulsqJKvaVVSp-QnXpWu2ckts5zV4GPkSvPaE5NaipleEatodRzH5H95cLpq64YhgYnAldWh5WNyHtczlUj1q4ON2bzC92rglauKkoY2KF75m1R-NT61APNPAP4xSKyt2SG7hWq0Wv2R-TVqhlUAfc3TO1mC-wD3hcYX1FE5GnHuxUlFCSQCpFGRA24OiB12FJPJ6HcNtZkzRTS9boTgMF_Pky_jcLj2XaicwGgYEu_ybTRgJMUEHmwsd93jb4hPO-bTd1-1FgNHEC-2DLvT7PAJD6mtsw7v5xoVtDs5nn7W5fwCzgJoiLU8838ekHu5QAEu7DVHtlp5wv3EoBca_eDtv4DT2hR5Q priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Technology: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38683660 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3053985812 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3048767869 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11091804 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-26341 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-23889 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-64282 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-129166 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-67348 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:rkh:diva-4931 http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id https://doaj.org/article/8ed9cad8e0014fb99f0bf0f3ee516004 |
Volume | 10 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwED-xTUIgHkB8ZYwoSAOeAkns2A4SQtvYNCFtmtiK9mbZiU3LthTSVmL_PWcnLYuoVl6iKr7Elztf73eXyxlgWynOWFnSmCrG8ICWLpgwsVVcYTBW8ES7N7pHx-xwQL-c5zeqCTsBTpaGdm4_qUFz-e73r-tPaPAfXRkzLqD3uduAaQ020BlxZ5tHHcL3aRYM_RK_ZVpGWOHMKbsLD3pX9jySb9y_DG3-WzTZay3q3dHBQ7h_I9v2CO6Y-jGcdHF_dNp2q5y8jXamrg6gMpPozBfHRn_z6B8i_-Wtm8U00Z5jLD71VVkoF3-L6ycwONg_2zuMu-0S4pKnxRSPjJcWEZW1hOjSeDRhDBGGJsoQVeY8pZnmVarQxxPKVU5LLjSrEqtJlZCnsF6Pa_McIm1sbioMNjJhKcmISlQlVJ4SrQixuQ0gnItM_my7YkiMJpxMpZdpALtOkItB18Tanxg332VnE1KYqijxxsbFaVYXhU20TSzynKeIw2gAW3M1yPnCkPj_RAqRIy4J4NViGG3CvehQtRnPHA2GYeiFWRHAs1ZrC04ILkXCWBKA6Omzx2p_pB4Nfd9t15w1FY6v163qe9d8Hn3b8Y-np0OZMUQHK-iGo4lEwCSQye1b6X5IFyTi8765jeyydm3BEe2zFfNeqZmr5qNixbzNxVDSgqTL5-1OXeAv1CQuFSY2_5fwBdzLEBu2mawtWJ82M_MSsd1Uh7DGz3kIG7v7xydfQ58hCb1F_wE6vVlf |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1db9Mw0BqdBEgIgfgKjBGkjbdoSew4DhJC3Zc6tlVo69DejJPYtAzS0aZCe-Nv8Cf4UfwS7py0VcTUPu0limLHvtydfR--3BGyoVTMeZYxjynO4QIrXXChPaNiBcZYEvspnuged3nnjH04j85XyJ_pvzAYVjndE-1GnQ8z9JFvAV_SREQgj95f_vCwahSerk5LaFRscaivfoLJNn53sAv03QzD_b3eTserqwp4WRwkJVx5nBlQPIyhNM20FbpaU6GZrzRVWRQHLEzjPFAgCimLVcSyWKQ8901Kc5_CuLfIKqNgyrTI6vZe9-PJ3KsDliYoLLfJPYyxBu7eirA6VEPo2doA1ym0_8dlNrKXWom3_4Dcr1VVt13x1kOyootH5KR2L7inVVLM8d9fv912iQEHuR67PRuF684d9m9d-4svzqVH7g6C553a8C8cGwe5ekzObgSDT0irGBb6GXFTbSKdg1UTCsNoSJWvcqGigKaKUhMZh6xPEScvq_QbEswWxKy0mHXINqJz1ojZsu2D4eiLrBefFDpPMhhYo0Fo0iQxfmp8AzBHASh8zCFrU2LIegmP5ZzhHPJ61gyLD09UVKGHE-wD9h6Ie5445GlFuxkkFHiecu47RDSo2gC12VIM-jbBN2aBDQTCtVkxQOOd3cGntv28tOzLkIMasqRffzCWoJkJAHJjYb-vEq1R-N43i7p9KzD_OJgVfMm839UEwwaZWDLv6KIvWUKD6-etH13AHVASWIWL54vp9Yrc6fSOj-TRQffwBbkbghpaOc3WSKscTfRLUCPLdL1euy75fNPbxT8775BA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3bbtMw1BpDmpAQAnHLGCNIG29Rk9ixHSSEykq1MZgQ21DfjJPYtBukoxehvfEb_Aqfw5dwjpO2ipjap71EUezYJ-fic_HJMSE7WgvO85wFTHMOF5B0yaUJrBYanLFUhBnu6H444vun7F0v6a2RP7N_YTCtcrYmuoW6GOYYI28BX9JUJqCPWrZOi_jY6b6--BHgCVK40zo7TqNikUNz-RPct_Grgw7QejeOu29P9vaD-oSBIBdROoErF7kFI8RaSrPcOAVsDJWGhdpQnSciYnEmikiDWqRM6ITlQma8CG1Gi5DCuDfITUGTCGVM9MQivgM-J5guG-Q2ZlsDn7cSPCeqof7cKQFXmbb_Z2g26pg63de9S-7URqvfrrjsHlkz5X3yqQ40-MdVeczx31-__fYEUw8KM_ZPXD6uvwjdv_Tdz744lxn5ewhecOwSwXBsHOTyATm9Fvw9JOvlsDSPiZ8Zm5gC_JtYWkZjqkNdSA14zTSlNrEe2Z4hTl1UhTgUODCIWeUw65E3iM55I9bNdg-Go6-qFkMlTZHmMLBB19BmaWrDzIYWYE4iMP2YR7ZmxFC1MI_VgvU88nzeDGKIeyu6NMMp9gHPDxQ_Tz3yqKLdHBIK3E85Dz0iG1RtgNpsKQd9V-ob68FGEuHarRig8U5n8LntPi-b9FXMwSBZ0a8_GCuw0SQAubO035lCvxS-98Wybt9KrEQODgZfMe93PcUEQiZXzDs67yuW0ujqeetH53AHlARW4XJzOb2ekQ1YJNT7g6PDJ-RWDPZoFT3bIuuT0dQ8BXtykm07wfXJl-teKf4ByrSTEA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nursing+Students%E2%80%99+Attitudes+Toward+Technology&rft.jtitle=JMIR+medical+education&rft.au=Dallora%2C+Ana+Luiza&rft.au=Andersson%2C+Ewa+Kazimiera&rft.au=Palm%2C+Bruna+Gregory&rft.au=Bohman%2C+Doris&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.issn=2369-3762&rft.eissn=2369-3762&rft.volume=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2F50297&rft.externalDocID=oai_DiVA_org_his_23889 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2369-3762&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2369-3762&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2369-3762&client=summon |