Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Technology: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION Vol. 10; p. e50297
Main Authors Dallora, Ana Luiza, Andersson, Ewa Kazimiera, Gregory Palm, Bruna, Bohman, Doris, Björling, Gunilla, Marcinowicz, Ludmiła, Stjernberg, Louise, Anderberg, Peter
Format Journal Article Publication
LanguageEnglish
Published Canada JMIR Publications 01.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ =-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ =0.265; ρ =0.190; ρ =0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ =0.360; ρ =0.341; ρ =0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ =0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ =-0.196; ρ =-0.262; ρ =-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ =-0.209; ρ =-0.347; ρ =-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ =-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. RR2-10.2196/14643.
AbstractList Background:The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.Objective:This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.Methods:Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.Results:In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively).Conclusions:This study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID):RR2-10.2196/14643
Background:The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. Objective:This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Methods:Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. Results:In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P&lt;.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P&lt;.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P&lt;.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P&lt;.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P&lt;.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P&lt;.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P&lt;.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). Conclusions:This study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.
The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.BACKGROUNDThe growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.OBJECTIVEThis study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.METHODSNursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=-0.196; ρSwedish=-0.262; ρPolish=-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=-0.209; ρSwedish=-0.347; ρPolish=-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively).RESULTSIn total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=-0.196; ρSwedish=-0.262; ρPolish=-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=-0.209; ρSwedish=-0.347; ρPolish=-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively).This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.CONCLUSIONSThis study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.RR2-10.2196/14643.INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)RR2-10.2196/14643.
Background: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. Objective: This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Methods: Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann -Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. Results: In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample ( P &lt;.001; rho (Swedish) =- 0 . 201 ) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score ( P &lt;.001; rho (all) =0.265; rho (Swedish) = 0 . 190 ; rho (Polish) = 0 . 352 ) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices ( P &lt;.001; rho (all) =0.360; rho (Swedish) = 0 . 341 ; rho (Polish) =0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample ( P &lt;.001; rho (Swedish) =0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score ( P &lt;.001; rho (all) =-0.196; rho (Swedish) =- 0 . 262 ; rho (Polish) =- 0 . 133 ) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices ( P &lt;.001; rho (all) =-0.209; rho (Swedish )=- 0 . 347 ; rho (Polish) =- 0 . 134 ) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample ( P &lt;.001; rho (Swedish) =-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). Conclusions: This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.
Background: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. Objective: This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Methods: Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. Results: In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P&lt;.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P&lt;.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P&lt;.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P&lt;.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P&lt;.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P&lt;.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P&lt;.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). Conclusions: This study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. 
Background: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. Objective: This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Methods: Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. Results: In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P&lt;.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P&lt;.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P&lt;.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P&lt;.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P&lt;.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P&lt;.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P&lt;.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). Conclusions: This study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. ©Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg.
BackgroundThe growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students’ attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. MethodsNursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. ResultsIn total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=−0.196; ρSwedish=−0.262; ρPolish=−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=−0.209; ρSwedish=−0.347; ρPolish=−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). ConclusionsThis study highlights nursing students’ techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care’s increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology–related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.2196/14643
BACKGROUND: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. METHODS: Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. RESULTS: In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire—342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students’ technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample ( P &lt;.001; ρ Swedish =−0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score ( P &lt;.001; ρ all =0.265; ρ Swedish =0.190; ρ Polish =0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices ( P &lt;.001; ρ all =0.360; ρ Swedish =0.341; ρ Polish =0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample ( P &lt;.001; ρ Swedish =0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score ( P &lt;.001; ρ all =−0.196; ρ Swedish =−0.262; ρ Polish =−0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices ( P &lt;.001; ρ all =−0.209; ρ Swedish =−0.347; ρ Polish =−0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample ( P &lt;.001; ρ Swedish =−0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/14643.
The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency. This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes. Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences. In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ =-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ =0.265; ρ =0.190; ρ =0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ =0.360; ρ =0.341; ρ =0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ =0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ =-0.196; ρ =-0.262; ρ =-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ =-0.209; ρ =-0.347; ρ =-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ =-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively). This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively. RR2-10.2196/14643.
Author Dallora, Ana Luiza
Björling, Gunilla
Anderberg, Peter
Bohman, Doris
Andersson, Ewa Kazimiera
Marcinowicz, Ludmiła
Gregory Palm, Bruna
Stjernberg, Louise
AuthorAffiliation 7 Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
4 Optentia Research Unit North West University Vanderbijlpark South Africa
6 Faculty of Nursing Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Moshi United Republic of Tanzania
1 Department of Health Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona Sweden
11 School of Health Sciences University of Skövde Skövde Sweden
5 School of Health and Wellfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden
8 Faculty of Health Sciences Medical University of Bialystok Białystok Poland
3 Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona Sweden
9 Department of Care Science Malmö University Malmö Sweden
10 Swedish Red Cross University Huddinge Sweden
2 Department of Health and Caring Sciences Linnaeus University Växjö Sweden
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 10 Swedish Red Cross University Huddinge Sweden
– name: 4 Optentia Research Unit North West University Vanderbijlpark South Africa
– name: 9 Department of Care Science Malmö University Malmö Sweden
– name: 11 School of Health Sciences University of Skövde Skövde Sweden
– name: 3 Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona Sweden
– name: 2 Department of Health and Caring Sciences Linnaeus University Växjö Sweden
– name: 5 School of Health and Wellfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden
– name: 1 Department of Health Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona Sweden
– name: 8 Faculty of Health Sciences Medical University of Bialystok Białystok Poland
– name: 6 Faculty of Nursing Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Moshi United Republic of Tanzania
– name: 7 Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ana Luiza
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6752-017X
  surname: Dallora
  fullname: Dallora, Ana Luiza
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ewa Kazimiera
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4282-8901
  surname: Andersson
  fullname: Andersson, Ewa Kazimiera
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Bruna
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0423-9927
  surname: Gregory Palm
  fullname: Gregory Palm, Bruna
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Doris
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5687-7894
  surname: Bohman
  fullname: Bohman, Doris
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Gunilla
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1445-900X
  surname: Björling
  fullname: Björling, Gunilla
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Ludmiła
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0614-1093
  surname: Marcinowicz
  fullname: Marcinowicz, Ludmiła
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Louise
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8673-5109
  surname: Stjernberg
  fullname: Stjernberg, Louise
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Peter
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9870-8477
  surname: Anderberg
  fullname: Anderberg, Peter
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38683660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-26341$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-23889$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-64282$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-129166$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-67348$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:rkh:diva-4931$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNqNk91u0zAUxy00xEbpK6BICAkJCraP49i7QVX5mjRAYoVby3GcJl0aDzth2h2vwevxJDhtqVYkoDf-_Pl__rbPuY-OWtdahMYEP6dE8hcppjK7g04ocDmBjNOjW-NjNA5hiTEmGaM4lffQMQgugHN8gj596H2o20Vy0fWFbbvw8_uPZNp19TANydxda18kc2uq1jVucXOavO-brjYRtT6ZeRfC5MKarnatbtYiNw_Q3VI3wY63_Qh9fvN6Pns3Of_49mw2PZ-YjMgutjwzpYC0LAFyYzHmHKwFYRnWFrRJM8JonhVEUwnAMp0yk4mcF7jMocAwQmcb3cLppbry9Ur7G-V0rdYLzi-U9tFqY5WwhTS6EDEIYWUuZYnzEpcxXEo4xixqTTZa4dpe9fme2nbpMo6iUprK-HYj9PSv_Kv6y3Qd3V9WikkgkX72f3qle8UzYOKfZnZ40_aKUEniox1kploqzqigh5mp6qAoCCEPw_OuUpQDG676coNHdmWLIU-8bvZO7e-0daUW7psiBEsi1l_xZKvg3dfehk6t6mBs0-jWuj4owEzE1BF88PboD3Tpeh8TcaBSkCIVZLjww9uWdl5-F0EEHm8AM6Szt-UOIVgN9aXW9QW_AOOHGSk
Cites_doi 10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740104
10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00027-2
10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.01.008
10.2196/13951
10.1109/iemc.2004.1407500
10.1007/s10654-014-9984-2
10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236408
10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006
10.1186/1472-6963-5-59
10.1111/wvn.12569
10.1111/jocn.15321
10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
10.1016/s0020-7373(08)80006-5
10.1177/2158244014556633
10.3928/01484834-20171120-03
10.1111/bjet.12051
10.2196/14643
10.1186/s41239-020-00184-4
10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w
10.1177/08919887221149139
10.1080/09537287.2019.1702226
10.1177/1460458211435425
10.1111/nuf.12337
10.2196/15630
10.1001/jama.2017.15927
10.2196/30644
10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.022
10.1089/tmj.2017.0056
10.2196/35380
10.1108/NLW-07-2014-0085
10.1097/CIN.0000000000000380
10.1108/ijhg-02-2019-0012
10.1097/NNE.0000000000001199
10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104382
10.1111/hir.12204
10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.013
10.1016/j.nedt.2018.12.010
10.1097/CIN.0000000000000615
10.1080/0144929x.2016.1221462
10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0
10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3.735
10.3390/app112210537
ContentType Journal Article
Publication
Copyright Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024.
2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024. 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024.
– notice: 2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024. 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ADTPV
AOWAS
D8T
DF3
ZZAVC
ABSHZ
DF6
AABRY
D8X
AGRUY
D92
BZJLE
STUKM
DOA
DOI 10.2196/50297
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
SwePub
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Freely available online
SWEPUB Blekinge Tekniska Högskola
SwePub Articles full text
SWEPUB Högskolan i Skövde full text
SWEPUB Högskolan i Skövde
SWEPUB Högskolan i Jönköping full text
SWEPUB Högskolan i Jönköping
SWEPUB Linnéuniversitetet full text
SWEPUB Linnéuniversitetet
SwePub Other
SwePub Other full text
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database

MEDLINE - Academic






MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals [open access]
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Nursing
EISSN 2369-3762
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_8ed9cad8e0014fb99f0bf0f3ee516004
oai_swepub_ki_se_855968
oai_DiVA_org_rkh_4931
oai_DiVA_org_mau_67348
oai_DiVA_org_lnu_129166
oai_DiVA_org_hj_64282
oai_DiVA_org_his_23889
oai_DiVA_org_bth_26341
PMC11091804
38683660
10_2196_50297
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Poland
Sweden
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Poland
– name: Sweden
GroupedDBID 7X7
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAHSB
AAYXX
ABUWG
ADBBV
AFKRA
AFPKN
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BCNDV
BENPR
CCPQU
CITATION
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HMCUK
HYE
KQ8
M48
M~E
OK1
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
RPM
UKHRP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
COVID
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ADRAZ
ADTPV
AOWAS
D8T
DF3
ZZAVC
ABSHZ
DF6
AABRY
D8X
AGRUY
D92
BZJLE
PUEGO
STUKM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c719t-c767cf835ff33bce00663ee38e40ae3ac57142b7d1a293347a54c78b6d0fb3d03
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2369-3762
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:25:39 EDT 2025
Mon Sep 01 03:23:19 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 06:57:08 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 07:03:56 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 06:29:22 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 03 05:33:55 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 06:51:37 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 06:17:51 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:35:43 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 16:22:08 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 12:26:57 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:57:43 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:28:26 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords technophilia
technology enthusiasm
technology anxiety
nursing education
mobile phone
eHealth
Language English
License Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 29.04.2024.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c719t-c767cf835ff33bce00663ee38e40ae3ac57142b7d1a293347a54c78b6d0fb3d03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-4282-8901
0000-0003-0423-9927
0000-0003-1445-900X
0000-0002-8673-5109
0000-0001-9870-8477
0000-0002-6752-017X
0000-0003-0614-1093
0000-0002-5687-7894
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.2196/50297
PMID 38683660
PQID 3053985812
PQPubID 4997112
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8ed9cad8e0014fb99f0bf0f3ee516004
swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_855968
swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_rkh_4931
swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_mau_67348
swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_lnu_129166
swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_hj_64282
swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_his_23889
swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_bth_26341
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11091804
proquest_miscellaneous_3048767869
proquest_journals_3053985812
pubmed_primary_38683660
crossref_primary_10_2196_50297
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Canada
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Canada
– name: Toronto
– name: Toronto, Canada
PublicationTitle JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION
PublicationTitleAlternate JMIR Med Educ
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher JMIR Publications
Publisher_xml – name: JMIR Publications
References ref13
ref12
ref53
ref52
ref11
ref55
ref10
ref54
ref17
ref16
ref19
He, J (ref50) 2010; 21
ref18
ref51
ref46
ref45
ref48
ref47
ref42
ref41
ref44
ref43
ref49
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
Charles-Ogan, G (ref32) 2015; 3
ref3
ref6
Day-Black, C (ref39) 2015; 26
ref5
ref40
ref35
ref34
ref37
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref33
ref2
ref1
ref38
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
Miller, LA (ref15) 2014; 18
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
Elder, BL (ref14) 2009; 30
References_xml – ident: ref1
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740104
– ident: ref27
– volume: 3
  start-page: 71
  issue: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: ref32
  publication-title: Br J Educ
– ident: ref55
  doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00027-2
– volume: 26
  start-page: 78
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: ref39
  publication-title: ABNF J
– ident: ref45
  doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.01.008
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.2196/13951
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1109/iemc.2004.1407500
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9984-2
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236408
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-59
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1111/wvn.12569
– volume: 21
  start-page: 203
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: ref50
  publication-title: J Inf Syst Educ
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1111/jocn.15321
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
– ident: ref49
  doi: 10.1016/s0020-7373(08)80006-5
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.1177/2158244014556633
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.3928/01484834-20171120-03
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1111/bjet.12051
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.2196/14643
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00184-4
– ident: ref33
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1177/08919887221149139
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1702226
– ident: ref51
  doi: 10.1177/1460458211435425
– ident: ref7
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1111/nuf.12337
– ident: ref53
  doi: 10.2196/15630
– ident: ref22
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.15927
– volume: 18
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: ref15
  publication-title: Online J Nurs Inform
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.2196/30644
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.022
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0056
– ident: ref54
  doi: 10.2196/35380
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1108/NLW-07-2014-0085
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000380
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1108/ijhg-02-2019-0012
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001199
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104382
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.1111/hir.12204
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.013
– ident: ref28
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.12.010
– ident: ref21
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000615
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.1080/0144929x.2016.1221462
– ident: ref47
  doi: 10.1016/0747-5632(87)90010-0
– ident: ref48
  doi: 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3.735
– ident: ref52
  doi: 10.3390/app112210537
– volume: 30
  start-page: 148
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: ref14
  publication-title: Nurs Educ Perspect
– ident: ref31
SSID ssj0001742059
Score 2.2639894
Snippet The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has...
Background:The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This...
Background: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This...
BACKGROUND: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This...
BackgroundThe growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This...
SourceID doaj
swepub
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage e50297
SubjectTerms Adult
Anxiety
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitude to Computers
Attitudes
Clinical medicine
Colleges & universities
Cross-Sectional Studies
Curricula
Data collection
Digital technology
eHealth
Familjecentrerad hälsa (FamCeH)
Family-Centred Health
Female
Health care industry
Humans
Literacy
Male
mobile phone
Nursing
Nursing education
Omvårdnad
Original Paper
Poland
Portable computers
Questionnaires
Self report
Skills
Sociodemographics
Students
Students, Nursing - psychology
Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sweden
technology anxiety
technology enthusiasm
technophilia
Telemedicine
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQDwgJISr-Am0VpMItahL_httSqCokONAW9WbZyVi7LaRoN3vgxmvwen2Szjjp0oiqe-ESRbETT2bszDf25DNju85ppepaZMIphQcc6UYZyILTDoOxSueeVnQ_f1GHJ-LTqTy9sdUX5YT19MC94vYMNFXtGgME5oOvqpD7kAcOIAs1MIGiz7sRTMXZFYz4EDjcZw8p1xl72Z6kXZpGzidy9N8GLP_NjxyxiEbPc_CYPRogYzrpRd1k96B9wr4OYX561JNTLi5__0knHS38N7BIj2M2bPp34vxdGn-1pbZgnu6TeNlRTMOiZ9NDfj1lJwcfj_cPs2F_hKzWRdXhUek6IIQKgXNfQ4QPANyAyB1wV0tdiNLrpnDo1LnQTopaG6-aPHje5PwZ22gvWnjBUg9BQoPRRWmC4CV3OarcyYJ7x3mQIWE714qzP3saDIvhA2nWRs0m7D2pc1VIrNXxAtrSDra062yZsK1rY9hhKC0sfpB4ZSQCkYS9XhXjIKCVDdfCxZLqYNyFbldVCXve224lCce-x5XKE2ZGVh2JOi5pZ9NItE1srIUhud70HWB0z4fZt0l8Pd9NbakQDqypN50tLCIkg0Lu3lnvzFJUiO_79q5q31viAUd4r9a0-8MtKX1PmDXtzs-nVlS8uL3d4dI5nqElsaso8_J_GP0Ve1AiUOyntbbYRjdfwjYCvc7vxDF9BWP2WzA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1fb9MwELdgSAhpQiD-BcYUpMFbtCT-G15QGUwTEjywDfXNshN7LYN0a9IH3vgafD0-CXdO2ipial-iKnbti-8u97vz5UzIgTFSiLJkCTNCwAU0XQnlEm-kAWeskKnFHd3PX8TJOfs05uM-4Nb0aZXLd2J4UVezEmPkhyCXtFAc7NG7q-sET43C3dX-CI3b5A6WLsOULjmW6xgL-H0AH-6SXcx4Blk75HhW08AEhUr9N8HL_7MkB7VEg_05fkDu98AxHnWcfkhuufoR-do7-_FpV6Ky-fv7Tzxqcfu_ck18FnJi43X4_G0cPrjFudw8PkLyktOQjIVj4yC_HpPz449nRydJf0pCUsqsaOEqZOkBSHlPqS1dABHOUeVYahw1JZcZy62sMgOmnTJpOCulsqJKvaVVSp-QnXpWu2ckts5zV4GPkSvPaE5NaipleEatodRzH5H95cLpq64YhgYnAldWh5WNyHtczlUj1q4ON2bzC92rglauKkoY2KF75m1R-NT61APNPAP4xSKyt2SG7hWq0Wv2R-TVqhlUAfc3TO1mC-wD3hcYX1FE5GnHuxUlFCSQCpFGRA24OiB12FJPJ6HcNtZkzRTS9boTgMF_Pky_jcLj2XaicwGgYEu_ybTRgJMUEHmwsd93jb4hPO-bTd1-1FgNHEC-2DLvT7PAJD6mtsw7v5xoVtDs5nn7W5fwCzgJoiLU8838ekHu5QAEu7DVHtlp5wv3EoBca_eDtv4DT2hR5Q
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Technology: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38683660
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3053985812
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3048767869
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11091804
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-26341
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-23889
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-64282
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-129166
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-67348
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:rkh:diva-4931
http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id
https://doaj.org/article/8ed9cad8e0014fb99f0bf0f3ee516004
Volume 10
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwED-xTUIgHkB8ZYwoSAOeAkns2A4SQtvYNCFtmtiK9mbZiU3LthTSVmL_PWcnLYuoVl6iKr7Elztf73eXyxlgWynOWFnSmCrG8ICWLpgwsVVcYTBW8ES7N7pHx-xwQL-c5zeqCTsBTpaGdm4_qUFz-e73r-tPaPAfXRkzLqD3uduAaQ020BlxZ5tHHcL3aRYM_RK_ZVpGWOHMKbsLD3pX9jySb9y_DG3-WzTZay3q3dHBQ7h_I9v2CO6Y-jGcdHF_dNp2q5y8jXamrg6gMpPozBfHRn_z6B8i_-Wtm8U00Z5jLD71VVkoF3-L6ycwONg_2zuMu-0S4pKnxRSPjJcWEZW1hOjSeDRhDBGGJsoQVeY8pZnmVarQxxPKVU5LLjSrEqtJlZCnsF6Pa_McIm1sbioMNjJhKcmISlQlVJ4SrQixuQ0gnItM_my7YkiMJpxMpZdpALtOkItB18Tanxg332VnE1KYqijxxsbFaVYXhU20TSzynKeIw2gAW3M1yPnCkPj_RAqRIy4J4NViGG3CvehQtRnPHA2GYeiFWRHAs1ZrC04ILkXCWBKA6Omzx2p_pB4Nfd9t15w1FY6v163qe9d8Hn3b8Y-np0OZMUQHK-iGo4lEwCSQye1b6X5IFyTi8765jeyydm3BEe2zFfNeqZmr5qNixbzNxVDSgqTL5-1OXeAv1CQuFSY2_5fwBdzLEBu2mawtWJ82M_MSsd1Uh7DGz3kIG7v7xydfQ58hCb1F_wE6vVlf
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR1db9Mw0BqdBEgIgfgKjBGkjbdoSew4DhJC3Zc6tlVo69DejJPYtAzS0aZCe-Nv8Cf4UfwS7py0VcTUPu0limLHvtydfR--3BGyoVTMeZYxjynO4QIrXXChPaNiBcZYEvspnuged3nnjH04j85XyJ_pvzAYVjndE-1GnQ8z9JFvAV_SREQgj95f_vCwahSerk5LaFRscaivfoLJNn53sAv03QzD_b3eTserqwp4WRwkJVx5nBlQPIyhNM20FbpaU6GZrzRVWRQHLEzjPFAgCimLVcSyWKQ8901Kc5_CuLfIKqNgyrTI6vZe9-PJ3KsDliYoLLfJPYyxBu7eirA6VEPo2doA1ym0_8dlNrKXWom3_4Dcr1VVt13x1kOyootH5KR2L7inVVLM8d9fv912iQEHuR67PRuF684d9m9d-4svzqVH7g6C553a8C8cGwe5ekzObgSDT0irGBb6GXFTbSKdg1UTCsNoSJWvcqGigKaKUhMZh6xPEScvq_QbEswWxKy0mHXINqJz1ojZsu2D4eiLrBefFDpPMhhYo0Fo0iQxfmp8AzBHASh8zCFrU2LIegmP5ZzhHPJ61gyLD09UVKGHE-wD9h6Ie5445GlFuxkkFHiecu47RDSo2gC12VIM-jbBN2aBDQTCtVkxQOOd3cGntv28tOzLkIMasqRffzCWoJkJAHJjYb-vEq1R-N43i7p9KzD_OJgVfMm839UEwwaZWDLv6KIvWUKD6-etH13AHVASWIWL54vp9Yrc6fSOj-TRQffwBbkbghpaOc3WSKscTfRLUCPLdL1euy75fNPbxT8775BA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3bbtMw1BpDmpAQAnHLGCNIG29Rk9ixHSSEykq1MZgQ21DfjJPYtBukoxehvfEb_Aqfw5dwjpO2ipjap71EUezYJ-fic_HJMSE7WgvO85wFTHMOF5B0yaUJrBYanLFUhBnu6H444vun7F0v6a2RP7N_YTCtcrYmuoW6GOYYI28BX9JUJqCPWrZOi_jY6b6--BHgCVK40zo7TqNikUNz-RPct_Grgw7QejeOu29P9vaD-oSBIBdROoErF7kFI8RaSrPcOAVsDJWGhdpQnSciYnEmikiDWqRM6ITlQma8CG1Gi5DCuDfITUGTCGVM9MQivgM-J5guG-Q2ZlsDn7cSPCeqof7cKQFXmbb_Z2g26pg63de9S-7URqvfrrjsHlkz5X3yqQ40-MdVeczx31-__fYEUw8KM_ZPXD6uvwjdv_Tdz744lxn5ewhecOwSwXBsHOTyATm9Fvw9JOvlsDSPiZ8Zm5gC_JtYWkZjqkNdSA14zTSlNrEe2Z4hTl1UhTgUODCIWeUw65E3iM55I9bNdg-Go6-qFkMlTZHmMLBB19BmaWrDzIYWYE4iMP2YR7ZmxFC1MI_VgvU88nzeDGKIeyu6NMMp9gHPDxQ_Tz3yqKLdHBIK3E85Dz0iG1RtgNpsKQd9V-ob68FGEuHarRig8U5n8LntPi-b9FXMwSBZ0a8_GCuw0SQAubO035lCvxS-98Wybt9KrEQODgZfMe93PcUEQiZXzDs67yuW0ujqeetH53AHlARW4XJzOb2ekQ1YJNT7g6PDJ-RWDPZoFT3bIuuT0dQ8BXtykm07wfXJl-teKf4ByrSTEA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nursing+Students%E2%80%99+Attitudes+Toward+Technology&rft.jtitle=JMIR+medical+education&rft.au=Dallora%2C+Ana+Luiza&rft.au=Andersson%2C+Ewa+Kazimiera&rft.au=Palm%2C+Bruna+Gregory&rft.au=Bohman%2C+Doris&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.issn=2369-3762&rft.eissn=2369-3762&rft.volume=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2F50297&rft.externalDocID=oai_DiVA_org_his_23889
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2369-3762&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2369-3762&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2369-3762&client=summon