Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Radiographic Assessment of Osteoplastic Hemilaminectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Foraminal Nerve Root Compression
Introduction: Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the p...
Saved in:
Published in | Spine Surgery and Related Research Vol. 5; no. 6; pp. 352 - 358 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
27.11.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2432-261X 2432-261X |
DOI | 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0203 |
Cover
Abstract | Introduction: Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months.Results: The preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery.Conclusions: The current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Introduction: Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months. Results: The preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery. Conclusions: The current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions. Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression.INTRODUCTIONOsteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression.We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months.The preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery.RESULTSThe preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery.The current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions.CONCLUSIONSThe current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions. Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression. We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months. The preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery. The current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions. |
ArticleNumber | 2020-0203 |
Author | Kanayama, Masahiro Hashimoto, Tomoyuki Shimamura, Yukitoshi Hara, Hiroyuki Nojiri, Hidetoshi Oha, Fumihiro Hasegawa, Yuichi Tsujimoto, Takeru Tanaka, Masaru Endo, Tsutomu Ishijima, Muneaki |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Nojiri, Hidetoshi organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University – sequence: 1 fullname: Oha, Fumihiro organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Hasegawa, Yuichi organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Hashimoto, Tomoyuki organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Ishijima, Muneaki organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University – sequence: 1 fullname: Tanaka, Masaru organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University – sequence: 1 fullname: Hara, Hiroyuki organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Shimamura, Yukitoshi organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Kanayama, Masahiro organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Endo, Tsutomu organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital – sequence: 1 fullname: Tsujimoto, Takeru organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kl9r2zAUxc3oWLuuz3sbetxLWv2xZPtl0IV1LYRljA72Jq7l60TBtjxJKfST7OtOTprQDvYgbHzP-R3ke95mJ4MbMMveM3rJuaLiKgTvLznldJaOeJWd8VzwGVfs18mz99PsIoQNpZRVQlIq3mSnIq-UKhU9y_7MOztYAx1ZbqNxPQYCQ0O-uxDdiB6ifUDyAxrrVh7GtTXkOgQMocchEteSZYjoxg5CTKNb7G0HvR3QRNc_EjuQuEZy7xHiwbDY9jV4cuP8JEy539BPEc5FMnf96BPcuuFd9rqFLuDF0_M8-3nz5X5-O1ssv97NrxczU9AizgwqJVlDjYGyBJBcIgqKlQKUtC0rWXOFRkBVlQU1LGd5LYFXrGipzHNQ4jy723MbBxs9etuDf9QOrN59cH6lwae7dagbmgIYlwCqzkWT4G2pqrrNmWkYgzaxPu1Z47busTHpxh66F9CXk8Gu9co96DItg9MiAT4-Abz7vcUQdW-Dwa6DAd026LRNmReFFDxJPzzPOoYcNpsEci8w3qWeYKuNjWmdboq2nWZU70qkpxLpqUR6KlHyXf3jO6D_7_i8d2xChBUe9Yf_tpNLrdI5mo5DswavcRB_AVV25lc |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10143_023_02109_x |
Cites_doi | 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0076 10.3171/jns.1994.80.3.0415 10.1007/s00264-019-04312-2 10.1007/BF00178765 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00015 10.1097/01.brs.0000252093.31632.54 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828cff6e 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000361 10.1055/s-0031-1279716 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00019 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022 10.1097/00000658-190503000-00003 10.1007/s00776-003-0721-z 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182206dd3 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011 10.2106/00004623-197961040-00001 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00018 10.3171/jns.1987.67.1.0049 10.3928/0147-7447-20000501-12 10.1097/00007632-199111000-00012 10.1007/s007010170066 10.1097/00007632-198207000-00008 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.258 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. – notice: Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. – notice: Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0203 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 2432-261X |
EndPage | 358 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af PMC8668207 34966860 10_22603_ssrr_2020_0203 article_ssrr_5_6_5_2020_0203_article_char_en |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 7.U ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV GROUPED_DOAJ HYE JSF JSH M~E OK1 RJT RPM RZJ W2D AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c707t-ce6651d0cca88aa525ee30e96ae50f895b26ec3a99870c1414b5a2917f0544a63 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2432-261X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:59 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:45:20 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 12:25:15 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:54:11 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:29:10 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:14 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 06:31:06 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | osteoplastic hemilaminectomy lumbar segmental instability lumbar foraminal nerve root compression |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c707t-ce6651d0cca88aa525ee30e96ae50f895b26ec3a99870c1414b5a2917f0544a63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Corresponding author: Masaru Tanaka, mastanak@juntendo.ac.jp |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af |
PMID | 34966860 |
PQID | 2615477532 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8668207 proquest_miscellaneous_2615477532 pubmed_primary_34966860 crossref_citationtrail_10_22603_ssrr_2020_0203 crossref_primary_10_22603_ssrr_2020_0203 jstage_primary_article_ssrr_5_6_5_2020_0203_article_char_en |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021/11/27 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-11-27 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2021 text: 2021/11/27 day: 27 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Japan |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Japan |
PublicationTitle | Spine Surgery and Related Research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Spine Surg Relat Res |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
References | 14. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26 (6):652-7. 4. Kunogi J, Hasue M. Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16 (11):1312-20. 18. Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32 (2):E93-9. 24. Yoshimoto M, Iesato N, Terashima Y, et al. Mid-term clinical results of microendoscopic decompression for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;3 (3):229-35. 19. Shawky Abdelgawaad A, Babic D, Siam AE, et al. Extraforaminal microscopic assisted percutaneous nucleotomy for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. Spine J. 2018;18 (4):620-5. 20. Yamada H, Yoshida M, Hashizume H, et al. Efficacy of novel minimally invasive surgery using spinal microendoscope for treating extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25 (5):268-76. 8. Posner I, White AA, 3rd, Edwards WT, et al. A biomechanical analysis of the clinical stability of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7 (4):374-89. 17. Lewis PJ, Weir BK, Broad RW, et al. Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg. 1987;67 (1):49-53. 11. Bickham WS. III. Technique of exposure of the spinal cord and canal; osteoplastic resection and laminectomy. Ann Surg. 1905;41 (3):372-98. 16. Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg. 1994;80 (3):415-21. 21. Yoshimoto M, Takebayashi T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Minimally invasive technique for decompression of lumbar foraminal stenosis using a spinal microendoscope: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54 (3):142-6. 9. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, et al. Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61 (4):479-95. 10. Herkowitz HN. Spine update. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20 (9):1084-90. 26. Akagi S, Saito T, Kato I, et al. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of lumbar disk herniation in the elderly. Orthopedics. 2000;23 (5):445-8. 2. Mori M, Ogawa R. Osteoplastic partial laminectomy for removing the lumbar disc herniation. Nihon Geka Hokan. 1966;35 (5):873-8. 7. Inoue S, Kataoka O, Tajima T, et al. Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1986;60 (3):391-4. Japanese. 5. Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25 (3):389-94. 12. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Shinya Y, et al. Recapping T-saw laminoplasty for spinal cord tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24 (13):1363-70. 6. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26 (17):1873-8. 1. Kondo E, Ando K. A new laminectomy procedure for lumbar disc herniation. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1952;26 (3):200-1. Japanese. 3. Tsuji H, Itoh T, Sekido H, et al. Expansive laminoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis. Int Orthop. 1990;14 (3):309-14. 23. Enyo Y, Yamada H, Kim JH, et al. Microendoscopic lateral decompression for lumbar foraminal stenosis: a biomechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27 (5):257-62. 13. Li Z, Taguchi T, Gondo T, et al. Experimental study of osteoplastic laminectomy in the lumbar spine of rabbits. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8 (6):858-63. 22. Ahn Y, Oh HK, Kim H, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy: an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2014;75 (2):124-33; discussion 32-3. 15. Vik A, Zwart JA, Hulleberg G, et al. Eight year outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a comparison of reoperated and not reoperated patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143 (6):607-10; discussion 10-1. 25. Benzakour A, Benzakour T. Lumbar disc herniation: long-term outcomes after mini-open discectomy. Int Orthop. 2019;43 (4):869-74. 22 23 24 25 26 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 21 |
References_xml | – reference: 13. Li Z, Taguchi T, Gondo T, et al. Experimental study of osteoplastic laminectomy in the lumbar spine of rabbits. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8 (6):858-63. – reference: 21. Yoshimoto M, Takebayashi T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Minimally invasive technique for decompression of lumbar foraminal stenosis using a spinal microendoscope: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54 (3):142-6. – reference: 2. Mori M, Ogawa R. Osteoplastic partial laminectomy for removing the lumbar disc herniation. Nihon Geka Hokan. 1966;35 (5):873-8. – reference: 15. Vik A, Zwart JA, Hulleberg G, et al. Eight year outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a comparison of reoperated and not reoperated patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143 (6):607-10; discussion 10-1. – reference: 7. Inoue S, Kataoka O, Tajima T, et al. Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1986;60 (3):391-4. Japanese. – reference: 11. Bickham WS. III. Technique of exposure of the spinal cord and canal; osteoplastic resection and laminectomy. Ann Surg. 1905;41 (3):372-98. – reference: 18. Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32 (2):E93-9. – reference: 22. Ahn Y, Oh HK, Kim H, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy: an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2014;75 (2):124-33; discussion 32-3. – reference: 6. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26 (17):1873-8. – reference: 8. Posner I, White AA, 3rd, Edwards WT, et al. A biomechanical analysis of the clinical stability of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7 (4):374-89. – reference: 24. Yoshimoto M, Iesato N, Terashima Y, et al. Mid-term clinical results of microendoscopic decompression for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;3 (3):229-35. – reference: 12. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Shinya Y, et al. Recapping T-saw laminoplasty for spinal cord tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24 (13):1363-70. – reference: 25. Benzakour A, Benzakour T. Lumbar disc herniation: long-term outcomes after mini-open discectomy. Int Orthop. 2019;43 (4):869-74. – reference: 5. Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25 (3):389-94. – reference: 23. Enyo Y, Yamada H, Kim JH, et al. Microendoscopic lateral decompression for lumbar foraminal stenosis: a biomechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27 (5):257-62. – reference: 19. Shawky Abdelgawaad A, Babic D, Siam AE, et al. Extraforaminal microscopic assisted percutaneous nucleotomy for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. Spine J. 2018;18 (4):620-5. – reference: 4. Kunogi J, Hasue M. Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16 (11):1312-20. – reference: 20. Yamada H, Yoshida M, Hashizume H, et al. Efficacy of novel minimally invasive surgery using spinal microendoscope for treating extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25 (5):268-76. – reference: 17. Lewis PJ, Weir BK, Broad RW, et al. Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg. 1987;67 (1):49-53. – reference: 1. Kondo E, Ando K. A new laminectomy procedure for lumbar disc herniation. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1952;26 (3):200-1. Japanese. – reference: 26. Akagi S, Saito T, Kato I, et al. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of lumbar disk herniation in the elderly. Orthopedics. 2000;23 (5):445-8. – reference: 14. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26 (6):652-7. – reference: 10. Herkowitz HN. Spine update. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20 (9):1084-90. – reference: 9. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, et al. Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61 (4):479-95. – reference: 16. Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg. 1994;80 (3):415-21. – reference: 3. Tsuji H, Itoh T, Sekido H, et al. Expansive laminoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis. Int Orthop. 1990;14 (3):309-14. – ident: 2 – ident: 24 doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0076 – ident: 16 doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.3.0415 – ident: 25 doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04312-2 – ident: 3 doi: 10.1007/BF00178765 – ident: 12 doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00015 – ident: 18 doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000252093.31632.54 – ident: 23 doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828cff6e – ident: 22 doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000361 – ident: 21 doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1279716 – ident: 14 doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00019 – ident: 5 doi: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022 – ident: 11 doi: 10.1097/00000658-190503000-00003 – ident: 7 – ident: 13 doi: 10.1007/s00776-003-0721-z – ident: 20 doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182206dd3 – ident: 6 doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011 – ident: 1 – ident: 9 doi: 10.2106/00004623-197961040-00001 – ident: 10 doi: 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00018 – ident: 17 doi: 10.3171/jns.1987.67.1.0049 – ident: 26 doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20000501-12 – ident: 4 doi: 10.1097/00007632-199111000-00012 – ident: 15 doi: 10.1007/s007010170066 – ident: 8 doi: 10.1097/00007632-198207000-00008 – ident: 19 doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.258 |
SSID | ssj0001935003 |
Score | 2.1874452 |
Snippet | Introduction: Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be... Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref jstage |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 352 |
SubjectTerms | lumbar foraminal nerve root compression lumbar segmental instability Original osteoplastic hemilaminectomy |
Title | Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Radiographic Assessment of Osteoplastic Hemilaminectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Foraminal Nerve Root Compression |
URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ssrr/5/6/5_2020-0203/_article/-char/en https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966860 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2615477532 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8668207 https://doaj.org/article/d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af |
Volume | 5 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Spine Surgery and Related Research, 2021/11/27, Vol.5(6), pp.352-358 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07j9QwELbQVTQIxCtwICNR0AT8iJ1EVAditULoTjrdSddZfgWCbpPVbrbgl_B3mYmz0S4C0VCkSew48Xy2v3Em3xDyWkqnG6DBuePC5UipcyeszHWIXFe-9jaO0RbnenldfL5RNwepvjAmLMkDp457F5i1sCgpa7UrZKhq1VS6dk3BfeDcNjj7spodOFPj7kotFeA1afkAw8Dduu0G9T_BW8KPb0fL0KjWD0vQdyBkX-OfuObvIZMHa9DiPrk3kUd6lh76AbkTu4fk5yTteUsvdgPgJ26p7QLFLLz9OiZhb3ppQ5vEqVtPz2Y1Tto39ALs3K-BRMNN6TKuWsAIUE8_9KsftO0oMER6tQ9HxwpfditnN3QB4BkzgtFzjJqkl30_UJxeUmRt94hcLz5dfVzmU7qF3JesHHIftVY8MLBpVUGnCxWjZLHWNirWQMc7oaOXFhy0knle8MIpK8Dda4D2FVbLx-Sk67v4lNDAqxKmkuC4tUUoQ60dC1DKFlGESsqMvN33vvGTFjmmxLg14JOM5jJoLoPmMmiujLyZK6yTDMffi35Ac87FUD97PAGoMhOqzL9QlZH3CQzzbfY1x8aU0XDMTc4X8U85mG4y8mqPIAOjFT_B2C72u60Bf1UVJYwNkZEnCVFzCyjdryvNMlIeYe3oTY6vdO23URG8goqClc_-x6s_J3cFxu1wnovylJwMm118AcRrcC_HMfYLNuEydQ |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+Outcomes+and+Postoperative+Radiographic+Assessment+of+Osteoplastic+Hemilaminectomy+in+the+Treatment+of+Lumbar+Foraminal+Nerve+Root+Compression&rft.jtitle=Spine+surgery+and+related+research&rft.au=Masaru+Tanaka&rft.au=Masahiro+Kanayama&rft.au=Tomoyuki+Hashimoto&rft.au=Fumihiro+Oha&rft.date=2021-11-27&rft.pub=The+Japanese+Society+for+Spine+Surgery+and+Related+Research&rft.eissn=2432-261X&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=358&rft_id=info:doi/10.22603%2Fssrr.2020-0203&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2432-261X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2432-261X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2432-261X&client=summon |