Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Radiographic Assessment of Osteoplastic Hemilaminectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Foraminal Nerve Root Compression

Introduction: Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSpine Surgery and Related Research Vol. 5; no. 6; pp. 352 - 358
Main Authors Nojiri, Hidetoshi, Oha, Fumihiro, Hasegawa, Yuichi, Hashimoto, Tomoyuki, Ishijima, Muneaki, Tanaka, Masaru, Hara, Hiroyuki, Shimamura, Yukitoshi, Kanayama, Masahiro, Endo, Tsutomu, Tsujimoto, Takeru
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 27.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2432-261X
2432-261X
DOI10.22603/ssrr.2020-0203

Cover

Abstract Introduction: Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months.Results: The preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery.Conclusions: The current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions.
AbstractList Introduction: Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months. Results: The preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery. Conclusions: The current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions.
Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression.INTRODUCTIONOsteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression.We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months.The preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery.RESULTSThe preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery.The current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions.CONCLUSIONSThe current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions.
Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly observed during neuroforaminal decompression without spinal fusion. Moreover, this procedure allows anatomical reconstruction of the posterior elements. However, there might be a potential risk for the progression of lumbar segmental instability after performing this procedure. This study aimed to review the radiographic and clinical outcomes of osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression. We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Lumbar segmental instability was evaluated as a radiographic assessment using functional radiography. The mean follow-up period was 65 months. The preoperative VASs for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were 46±31, 72±26, and 43±34, respectively, which were improved to 24±23, 19±23, and 19±23, respectively. The JOA score was also improved from 14±5 to 22±4. Three patients (5.9%) were reoperated due to recurrent disc herniation within 2 years following surgery. In addition, three patients (5.9%) developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability but did not require additional surgery. The current study revealed that 94.1% of the patients who underwent osteoplastic hemilaminectomy achieved a significant improvement in the clinical outcomes and did not require additional surgery within 2 years following the procedure. Over a 5-year follow-up on average, 5.9% of the subjects developed postoperative lumbar segmental instability; however, they have maintained acceptable clinical conditions.
ArticleNumber 2020-0203
Author Kanayama, Masahiro
Hashimoto, Tomoyuki
Shimamura, Yukitoshi
Hara, Hiroyuki
Nojiri, Hidetoshi
Oha, Fumihiro
Hasegawa, Yuichi
Tsujimoto, Takeru
Tanaka, Masaru
Endo, Tsutomu
Ishijima, Muneaki
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Nojiri, Hidetoshi
  organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Oha, Fumihiro
  organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Hasegawa, Yuichi
  organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Hashimoto, Tomoyuki
  organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Ishijima, Muneaki
  organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Tanaka, Masaru
  organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Hara, Hiroyuki
  organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Shimamura, Yukitoshi
  organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Kanayama, Masahiro
  organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Endo, Tsutomu
  organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Tsujimoto, Takeru
  organization: Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kl9r2zAUxc3oWLuuz3sbetxLWv2xZPtl0IV1LYRljA72Jq7l60TBtjxJKfST7OtOTprQDvYgbHzP-R3ke95mJ4MbMMveM3rJuaLiKgTvLznldJaOeJWd8VzwGVfs18mz99PsIoQNpZRVQlIq3mSnIq-UKhU9y_7MOztYAx1ZbqNxPQYCQ0O-uxDdiB6ifUDyAxrrVh7GtTXkOgQMocchEteSZYjoxg5CTKNb7G0HvR3QRNc_EjuQuEZy7xHiwbDY9jV4cuP8JEy539BPEc5FMnf96BPcuuFd9rqFLuDF0_M8-3nz5X5-O1ssv97NrxczU9AizgwqJVlDjYGyBJBcIgqKlQKUtC0rWXOFRkBVlQU1LGd5LYFXrGipzHNQ4jy723MbBxs9etuDf9QOrN59cH6lwae7dagbmgIYlwCqzkWT4G2pqrrNmWkYgzaxPu1Z47busTHpxh66F9CXk8Gu9co96DItg9MiAT4-Abz7vcUQdW-Dwa6DAd026LRNmReFFDxJPzzPOoYcNpsEci8w3qWeYKuNjWmdboq2nWZU70qkpxLpqUR6KlHyXf3jO6D_7_i8d2xChBUe9Yf_tpNLrdI5mo5DswavcRB_AVV25lc
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10143_023_02109_x
Cites_doi 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0076
10.3171/jns.1994.80.3.0415
10.1007/s00264-019-04312-2
10.1007/BF00178765
10.1097/00007632-199907010-00015
10.1097/01.brs.0000252093.31632.54
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828cff6e
10.1227/NEU.0000000000000361
10.1055/s-0031-1279716
10.1097/00007632-200103150-00019
10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022
10.1097/00000658-190503000-00003
10.1007/s00776-003-0721-z
10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182206dd3
10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011
10.2106/00004623-197961040-00001
10.1097/00007632-199505000-00018
10.3171/jns.1987.67.1.0049
10.3928/0147-7447-20000501-12
10.1097/00007632-199111000-00012
10.1007/s007010170066
10.1097/00007632-198207000-00008
10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.258
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.
Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.
Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.
– notice: Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.
– notice: Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0203
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2432-261X
EndPage 358
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af
PMC8668207
34966860
10_22603_ssrr_2020_0203
article_ssrr_5_6_5_2020_0203_article_char_en
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 7.U
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BCNDV
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
JSF
JSH
M~E
OK1
RJT
RPM
RZJ
W2D
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c707t-ce6651d0cca88aa525ee30e96ae50f895b26ec3a99870c1414b5a2917f0544a63
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2432-261X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:59 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:45:20 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 12:25:15 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:54:11 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:29:10 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:14 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:31:06 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords osteoplastic hemilaminectomy
lumbar segmental instability
lumbar foraminal nerve root compression
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.
Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c707t-ce6651d0cca88aa525ee30e96ae50f895b26ec3a99870c1414b5a2917f0544a63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Corresponding author: Masaru Tanaka, mastanak@juntendo.ac.jp
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af
PMID 34966860
PQID 2615477532
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8668207
proquest_miscellaneous_2615477532
pubmed_primary_34966860
crossref_citationtrail_10_22603_ssrr_2020_0203
crossref_primary_10_22603_ssrr_2020_0203
jstage_primary_article_ssrr_5_6_5_2020_0203_article_char_en
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021/11/27
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-11-27
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2021
  text: 2021/11/27
  day: 27
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
PublicationTitle Spine Surgery and Related Research
PublicationTitleAlternate Spine Surg Relat Res
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
Publisher_xml – name: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
References 14. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26 (6):652-7.
4. Kunogi J, Hasue M. Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16 (11):1312-20.
18. Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32 (2):E93-9.
24. Yoshimoto M, Iesato N, Terashima Y, et al. Mid-term clinical results of microendoscopic decompression for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;3 (3):229-35.
19. Shawky Abdelgawaad A, Babic D, Siam AE, et al. Extraforaminal microscopic assisted percutaneous nucleotomy for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. Spine J. 2018;18 (4):620-5.
20. Yamada H, Yoshida M, Hashizume H, et al. Efficacy of novel minimally invasive surgery using spinal microendoscope for treating extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25 (5):268-76.
8. Posner I, White AA, 3rd, Edwards WT, et al. A biomechanical analysis of the clinical stability of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7 (4):374-89.
17. Lewis PJ, Weir BK, Broad RW, et al. Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg. 1987;67 (1):49-53.
11. Bickham WS. III. Technique of exposure of the spinal cord and canal; osteoplastic resection and laminectomy. Ann Surg. 1905;41 (3):372-98.
16. Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg. 1994;80 (3):415-21.
21. Yoshimoto M, Takebayashi T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Minimally invasive technique for decompression of lumbar foraminal stenosis using a spinal microendoscope: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54 (3):142-6.
9. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, et al. Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61 (4):479-95.
10. Herkowitz HN. Spine update. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20 (9):1084-90.
26. Akagi S, Saito T, Kato I, et al. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of lumbar disk herniation in the elderly. Orthopedics. 2000;23 (5):445-8.
2. Mori M, Ogawa R. Osteoplastic partial laminectomy for removing the lumbar disc herniation. Nihon Geka Hokan. 1966;35 (5):873-8.
7. Inoue S, Kataoka O, Tajima T, et al. Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1986;60 (3):391-4. Japanese.
5. Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25 (3):389-94.
12. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Shinya Y, et al. Recapping T-saw laminoplasty for spinal cord tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24 (13):1363-70.
6. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26 (17):1873-8.
1. Kondo E, Ando K. A new laminectomy procedure for lumbar disc herniation. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1952;26 (3):200-1. Japanese.
3. Tsuji H, Itoh T, Sekido H, et al. Expansive laminoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis. Int Orthop. 1990;14 (3):309-14.
23. Enyo Y, Yamada H, Kim JH, et al. Microendoscopic lateral decompression for lumbar foraminal stenosis: a biomechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27 (5):257-62.
13. Li Z, Taguchi T, Gondo T, et al. Experimental study of osteoplastic laminectomy in the lumbar spine of rabbits. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8 (6):858-63.
22. Ahn Y, Oh HK, Kim H, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy: an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2014;75 (2):124-33; discussion 32-3.
15. Vik A, Zwart JA, Hulleberg G, et al. Eight year outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a comparison of reoperated and not reoperated patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143 (6):607-10; discussion 10-1.
25. Benzakour A, Benzakour T. Lumbar disc herniation: long-term outcomes after mini-open discectomy. Int Orthop. 2019;43 (4):869-74.
22
23
24
25
26
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
21
References_xml – reference: 13. Li Z, Taguchi T, Gondo T, et al. Experimental study of osteoplastic laminectomy in the lumbar spine of rabbits. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8 (6):858-63.
– reference: 21. Yoshimoto M, Takebayashi T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Minimally invasive technique for decompression of lumbar foraminal stenosis using a spinal microendoscope: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54 (3):142-6.
– reference: 2. Mori M, Ogawa R. Osteoplastic partial laminectomy for removing the lumbar disc herniation. Nihon Geka Hokan. 1966;35 (5):873-8.
– reference: 15. Vik A, Zwart JA, Hulleberg G, et al. Eight year outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a comparison of reoperated and not reoperated patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143 (6):607-10; discussion 10-1.
– reference: 7. Inoue S, Kataoka O, Tajima T, et al. Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1986;60 (3):391-4. Japanese.
– reference: 11. Bickham WS. III. Technique of exposure of the spinal cord and canal; osteoplastic resection and laminectomy. Ann Surg. 1905;41 (3):372-98.
– reference: 18. Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32 (2):E93-9.
– reference: 22. Ahn Y, Oh HK, Kim H, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy: an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2014;75 (2):124-33; discussion 32-3.
– reference: 6. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26 (17):1873-8.
– reference: 8. Posner I, White AA, 3rd, Edwards WT, et al. A biomechanical analysis of the clinical stability of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7 (4):374-89.
– reference: 24. Yoshimoto M, Iesato N, Terashima Y, et al. Mid-term clinical results of microendoscopic decompression for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;3 (3):229-35.
– reference: 12. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Shinya Y, et al. Recapping T-saw laminoplasty for spinal cord tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24 (13):1363-70.
– reference: 25. Benzakour A, Benzakour T. Lumbar disc herniation: long-term outcomes after mini-open discectomy. Int Orthop. 2019;43 (4):869-74.
– reference: 5. Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25 (3):389-94.
– reference: 23. Enyo Y, Yamada H, Kim JH, et al. Microendoscopic lateral decompression for lumbar foraminal stenosis: a biomechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27 (5):257-62.
– reference: 19. Shawky Abdelgawaad A, Babic D, Siam AE, et al. Extraforaminal microscopic assisted percutaneous nucleotomy for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. Spine J. 2018;18 (4):620-5.
– reference: 4. Kunogi J, Hasue M. Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16 (11):1312-20.
– reference: 20. Yamada H, Yoshida M, Hashizume H, et al. Efficacy of novel minimally invasive surgery using spinal microendoscope for treating extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25 (5):268-76.
– reference: 17. Lewis PJ, Weir BK, Broad RW, et al. Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg. 1987;67 (1):49-53.
– reference: 1. Kondo E, Ando K. A new laminectomy procedure for lumbar disc herniation. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1952;26 (3):200-1. Japanese.
– reference: 26. Akagi S, Saito T, Kato I, et al. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of lumbar disk herniation in the elderly. Orthopedics. 2000;23 (5):445-8.
– reference: 14. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26 (6):652-7.
– reference: 10. Herkowitz HN. Spine update. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20 (9):1084-90.
– reference: 9. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, et al. Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61 (4):479-95.
– reference: 16. Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg. 1994;80 (3):415-21.
– reference: 3. Tsuji H, Itoh T, Sekido H, et al. Expansive laminoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis. Int Orthop. 1990;14 (3):309-14.
– ident: 2
– ident: 24
  doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0076
– ident: 16
  doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.3.0415
– ident: 25
  doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04312-2
– ident: 3
  doi: 10.1007/BF00178765
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00015
– ident: 18
  doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000252093.31632.54
– ident: 23
  doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828cff6e
– ident: 22
  doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000361
– ident: 21
  doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1279716
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00019
– ident: 5
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022
– ident: 11
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-190503000-00003
– ident: 7
– ident: 13
  doi: 10.1007/s00776-003-0721-z
– ident: 20
  doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182206dd3
– ident: 6
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011
– ident: 1
– ident: 9
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-197961040-00001
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00018
– ident: 17
  doi: 10.3171/jns.1987.67.1.0049
– ident: 26
  doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20000501-12
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199111000-00012
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.1007/s007010170066
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-198207000-00008
– ident: 19
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.258
SSID ssj0001935003
Score 2.1874452
Snippet Introduction: Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be...
Osteoplastic hemilaminectomy for the treatment of lumbar foraminal nerve root compression is a safe technique as the exiting nerve root can be directly...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
jstage
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 352
SubjectTerms lumbar foraminal nerve root compression
lumbar segmental instability
Original
osteoplastic hemilaminectomy
Title Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Radiographic Assessment of Osteoplastic Hemilaminectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Foraminal Nerve Root Compression
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ssrr/5/6/5_2020-0203/_article/-char/en
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966860
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2615477532
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8668207
https://doaj.org/article/d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af
Volume 5
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Spine Surgery and Related Research, 2021/11/27, Vol.5(6), pp.352-358
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07j9QwELbQVTQIxCtwICNR0AT8iJ1EVAditULoTjrdSddZfgWCbpPVbrbgl_B3mYmz0S4C0VCkSew48Xy2v3Em3xDyWkqnG6DBuePC5UipcyeszHWIXFe-9jaO0RbnenldfL5RNwepvjAmLMkDp457F5i1sCgpa7UrZKhq1VS6dk3BfeDcNjj7spodOFPj7kotFeA1afkAw8Dduu0G9T_BW8KPb0fL0KjWD0vQdyBkX-OfuObvIZMHa9DiPrk3kUd6lh76AbkTu4fk5yTteUsvdgPgJ26p7QLFLLz9OiZhb3ppQ5vEqVtPz2Y1Tto39ALs3K-BRMNN6TKuWsAIUE8_9KsftO0oMER6tQ9HxwpfditnN3QB4BkzgtFzjJqkl30_UJxeUmRt94hcLz5dfVzmU7qF3JesHHIftVY8MLBpVUGnCxWjZLHWNirWQMc7oaOXFhy0knle8MIpK8Dda4D2FVbLx-Sk67v4lNDAqxKmkuC4tUUoQ60dC1DKFlGESsqMvN33vvGTFjmmxLg14JOM5jJoLoPmMmiujLyZK6yTDMffi35Ac87FUD97PAGoMhOqzL9QlZH3CQzzbfY1x8aU0XDMTc4X8U85mG4y8mqPIAOjFT_B2C72u60Bf1UVJYwNkZEnCVFzCyjdryvNMlIeYe3oTY6vdO23URG8goqClc_-x6s_J3cFxu1wnovylJwMm118AcRrcC_HMfYLNuEydQ
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+Outcomes+and+Postoperative+Radiographic+Assessment+of+Osteoplastic+Hemilaminectomy+in+the+Treatment+of+Lumbar+Foraminal+Nerve+Root+Compression&rft.jtitle=Spine+surgery+and+related+research&rft.au=Masaru+Tanaka&rft.au=Masahiro+Kanayama&rft.au=Tomoyuki+Hashimoto&rft.au=Fumihiro+Oha&rft.date=2021-11-27&rft.pub=The+Japanese+Society+for+Spine+Surgery+and+Related+Research&rft.eissn=2432-261X&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=358&rft_id=info:doi/10.22603%2Fssrr.2020-0203&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_d0aa5125aa6b43d895f869bf41cd11af
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2432-261X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2432-261X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2432-261X&client=summon