How much should you worry about contaminant neutrons in spatially fractionated grid radiation therapy?

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 1; p. e0280433
• Main Authors: Mahmoudi, Farshid, Mohammadi, Najmeh, Haghighi, Meysam, Alirezaei, Zahra, Jabbari, Iraj, Chegeni, Nahid, Elmtalab, Soheil, Vega-Carrillo, Hector Rene, Kazemian, Ali, Geraily, Ghazale, Karimi, Amir Hossein
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 13.01.2023; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Apoptosis; Auroral kilometric radiation; Cancer therapies; Complications and side effects; Compression; Contaminants; Contamination; Delay time; Dosimetry; Energy; Engineering and Technology; Fluence; Geometry; Health aspects; Humans; Libraries; Linear accelerators; Medicine and Health Sciences; Monte Carlo Method; Monte Carlo simulation; Neutron radiation; Neutrons; Particle Accelerators; Patients; Photons; Physical Sciences; Radiation; Radiation Dosage; Radiation Protection; Radiation therapy; Radiotherapy; Research and analysis methods; Sensors; Tumors; Iran
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280433

Neutron contamination in radiation therapy is of concern in treatment with high-energy photons (> 10 MV). With the development of new radiotherapy modalities such as spatially fractionated grid radiation therapy (SFGRT) or briefly grid radiotherapy, more studies are required to evaluate the risks associated with neutron contamination. In 15 MV SFGRT, high-Z materials such as lead and cerrobend are used as the block on the tray of linear accelerator (linac) which can probably increase the photoneutron production. On the other hand, the high-dose fractions (10-20 Gy) used in SFGRT can induce high neutron contamination. The current study was devoted to addressing these concerns via compression of neutron fluence (Φn) and ambient dose equivalent ([Formula: see text]) at the patient table and inside the maze between SFGRT and conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT). The main components of the 15 MV Siemens Primus equipped with different grids and located inside a typical radiotherapy bunker were simulated by the MCNPX® Monte Carlo code. Evidence showed that the material used for grid construction does not significantly increase neutron contamination inside the maze. However, at the end of the maze, neutron contamination in SFGRT is significantly higher than in CFRT. In this regard, a delay time of 15 minutes after SFGRT is recommended for all radiotherapy staff before entering the maze. It can be also concluded that [Formula: see text] at the patient table is at least 10 times more pronounced than inside the maze. Therefore, the patient is more at risk of neutrons compared to the staff. The [Formula: see text] at the isocenter in SFGRT with grids made of lead and cerrobend was nearly equal to CFRT. Nevertheless, it was dramatically lower than in CFRT by 30% if the brass grid is used. Accordingly, SFGRT with the brass grid is recommended, from radiation protection aspects.