Comparison of the dynamics of exoskeletal-assisted and unassisted locomotion in an FDA-approved lower extremity device: Controlled experiments and development of a subject-specific virtual simulator

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 2; p. e0270078
• Main Authors: Chandran, Vishnu D., Nam, Sanghyun, Hexner, David, Bauman, William A., Pal, Saikat
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 10.02.2023; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Biology and Life Sciences; Biomechanical Phenomena; Care and treatment; Coders; Comparative analysis; Computational neuroscience; Datasets; Design optimization; Electromyography; Empirical analysis; Exoskeleton; Exoskeleton Device; Exoskeletons; Experiments; FDA approval; Gait; Health aspects; Human engineering; Humans; Immobilization; Innovations; Kinematics; Knee; Locomotion; Lower Extremity; Maneuvers; Medicine and Health Sciences; Metabolism; Modelling; Motion capture; Nervous system diseases; Neurological diseases; Neurological disorders; Patient outcomes; Prediction models; Rehabilitation; Research and Analysis Methods; Review boards; Robot dynamics; Robotics; Robotics - methods; Robotics industry; Robots; Simulation; Walking; United States
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270078
• ISSN: 1932-6203

Robotic exoskeletons have considerable, but largely untapped, potential to restore mobility in individuals with neurological disorders, and other conditions that result in partial or complete immobilization. The growing demand for these devices necessitates the development of technology to characterize the human-robot system during exoskeletal-assisted locomotion (EAL) and accelerate robot design refinements. The goal of this study was to combine controlled experiments with computational modeling to build a virtual simulator of EAL. The first objective was to acquire a minimum empirical dataset comprising human-robot kinematics, ground reaction forces, and electromyography during exoskeletal-assisted and unassisted locomotion from an able-bodied participant. The second objective was to quantify the dynamics of the human-robot system using a subject-specific virtual simulator reproducing EAL compared to the dynamics of normal gait. We trained an able-bodied participant to ambulate independently in a Food and Drug Administration-approved exoskeleton, the ReWalk P6.0 (ReWalk Robotics, Yoknaem, Israel). We analyzed the motion of the participant during exoskeletal-assisted and unassisted walking, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit maneuvers, with simultaneous measurements of (i) three-dimensional marker trajectories, (ii) ground reaction forces, (iii) electromyography, and (iv) exoskeleton encoder data. We created a virtual simulator in OpenSim, comprising a whole-body musculoskeletal model and a full-scale exoskeleton model, to determine the joint kinematics and moments during exoskeletal-assisted and unassisted maneuvers. Mean peak knee flexion angles of the human subject during exoskeletal-assisted walking were 50.1° ± 0.6° (left) and 52.6° ± 0.7° (right), compared to 68.6° ± 0.3° (left) and 70.7° ± 1.1° (right) during unassisted walking. Mean peak knee extension moments during exoskeletal-assisted walking were 0.10 ± 0.10 Nm/kg (left) and 0.22 ± 0.11 Nm/kg (right), compared to 0.64 ± 0.07 Nm/kg (left) and 0.73 ± 0.10 Nm/kg (right) during unassisted walking. This work provides a foundation for parametric studies to characterize the effects of human and robot design variables, and predictive modeling to optimize human-robot interaction during EAL.