From Darwin to the Census of Marine Life: Marine Biology as Big Science

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 8; no. 1; p. e54284
• Main Author: Vermeulen, Niki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 14.01.2013; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: 21st century; Biological Science Disciplines - methods; Biology; Census; Collaboration; Cooperation; Genomes; Genomics; Historians; Human Genome Project; Life on Earth; Life sciences; Marine biology; Marine Biology - methods; Natural history; Oceanography; Oceans; Review; Science Policy; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Society; Studies
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054284
• ISSN: 1932-6203

With the development of the Human Genome Project, a heated debate emerged on biology becoming 'big science'. However, biology already has a long tradition of collaboration, as natural historians were part of the first collective scientific efforts: exploring the variety of life on earth. Such mappings of life still continue today, and if field biology is gradually becoming an important subject of studies into big science, research into life in the world's oceans is not taken into account yet. This paper therefore explores marine biology as big science, presenting the historical development of marine research towards the international 'Census of Marine Life' (CoML) making an inventory of life in the world's oceans. Discussing various aspects of collaboration--including size, internationalisation, research practice, technological developments, application, and public communication--I will ask if CoML still resembles traditional collaborations to collect life. While showing both continuity and change, I will argue that marine biology is a form of natural history: a specific way of working together in biology that has transformed substantially in interaction with recent developments in the life sciences and society. As a result, the paper does not only give an overview of transformations towards large scale research in marine biology, but also shines a new light on big biology, suggesting new ways to deepen the understanding of collaboration in the life sciences by distinguishing between different 'collective ways of knowing'.