Methodological Reporting of Randomized Trials in Five Leading Chinese Nursing Journals
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of methodological reporting complying with CONSORT and explore associated trial level variables in the Chinese nursing care field....
Saved in:
| Published in | PloS one Vol. 9; no. 11; p. e113002 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
21.11.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0113002 |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of methodological reporting complying with CONSORT and explore associated trial level variables in the Chinese nursing care field.
In June 2012, we identified RCTs published in five leading Chinese nursing journals and included trials with details of randomized methods. The quality of methodological reporting was measured through the methods section of the CONSORT checklist and the overall CONSORT methodological items score was calculated and expressed as a percentage. Meanwhile, we hypothesized that some general and methodological characteristics were associated with reporting quality and conducted a regression with these data to explore the correlation. The descriptive and regression statistics were calculated via SPSS 13.0.
In total, 680 RCTs were included. The overall CONSORT methodological items score was 6.34 ± 0.97 (Mean ± SD). No RCT reported descriptions and changes in "trial design," changes in "outcomes" and "implementation," or descriptions of the similarity of interventions for "blinding." Poor reporting was found in detailing the "settings of participants" (13.1%), "type of randomization sequence generation" (1.8%), calculation methods of "sample size" (0.4%), explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines for "sample size" (0.3%), "allocation concealment mechanism" (0.3%), additional analyses in "statistical methods" (2.1%), and targeted subjects and methods of "blinding" (5.9%). More than 50% of trials described randomization sequence generation, the eligibility criteria of "participants," "interventions," and definitions of the "outcomes" and "statistical methods." The regression analysis found that publication year and ITT analysis were weakly associated with CONSORT score.
The completeness of methodological reporting of RCTs in the Chinese nursing care field is poor, especially with regard to the reporting of trial design, changes in outcomes, sample size calculation, allocation concealment, blinding, and statistical methods. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of methodological reporting complying with CONSORT and explore associated trial level variables in the Chinese nursing care field. In June 2012, we identified RCTs published in five leading Chinese nursing journals and included trials with details of randomized methods. The quality of methodological reporting was measured through the methods section of the CONSORT checklist and the overall CONSORT methodological items score was calculated and expressed as a percentage. Meanwhile, we hypothesized that some general and methodological characteristics were associated with reporting quality and conducted a regression with these data to explore the correlation. The descriptive and regression statistics were calculated via SPSS 13.0. In total, 680 RCTs were included. The overall CONSORT methodological items score was 6.34±0.97 (Mean ± SD). No RCT reported descriptions and changes in "trial design," changes in "outcomes" and "implementation," or descriptions of the similarity of interventions for "blinding." Poor reporting was found in detailing the "settings of participants" (13.1%), "type of randomization sequence generation" (1.8%), calculation methods of "sample size" (0.4%), explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines for "sample size" (0.3%), "allocation concealment mechanism" (0.3%), additional analyses in "statistical methods" (2.1%), and targeted subjects and methods of "blinding" (5.9%). More than 50% of trials described randomization sequence generation, the eligibility criteria of "participants," "interventions," and definitions of the "outcomes" and "statistical methods." The regression analysis found that publication year and ITT analysis were weakly associated with CONSORT score. The completeness of methodological reporting of RCTs in the Chinese nursing care field is poor, especially with regard to the reporting of trial design, changes in outcomes, sample size calculation, allocation concealment, blinding, and statistical methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of methodological reporting complying with CONSORT and explore associated trial level variables in the Chinese nursing care field. In June 2012, we identified RCTs published in five leading Chinese nursing journals and included trials with details of randomized methods. The quality of methodological reporting was measured through the methods section of the CONSORT checklist and the overall CONSORT methodological items score was calculated and expressed as a percentage. Meanwhile, we hypothesized that some general and methodological characteristics were associated with reporting quality and conducted a regression with these data to explore the correlation. The descriptive and regression statistics were calculated via SPSS 13.0. In total, 680 RCTs were included. The overall CONSORT methodological items score was 6.34 ± 0.97 (Mean ± SD). No RCT reported descriptions and changes in "trial design," changes in "outcomes" and "implementation," or descriptions of the similarity of interventions for "blinding." Poor reporting was found in detailing the "settings of participants" (13.1%), "type of randomization sequence generation" (1.8%), calculation methods of "sample size" (0.4%), explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines for "sample size" (0.3%), "allocation concealment mechanism" (0.3%), additional analyses in "statistical methods" (2.1%), and targeted subjects and methods of "blinding" (5.9%). More than 50% of trials described randomization sequence generation, the eligibility criteria of "participants," "interventions," and definitions of the "outcomes" and "statistical methods." The regression analysis found that publication year and ITT analysis were weakly associated with CONSORT score. The completeness of methodological reporting of RCTs in the Chinese nursing care field is poor, especially with regard to the reporting of trial design, changes in outcomes, sample size calculation, allocation concealment, blinding, and statistical methods. Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of methodological reporting complying with CONSORT and explore associated trial level variables in the Chinese nursing care field. Methods In June 2012, we identified RCTs published in five leading Chinese nursing journals and included trials with details of randomized methods. The quality of methodological reporting was measured through the methods section of the CONSORT checklist and the overall CONSORT methodological items score was calculated and expressed as a percentage. Meanwhile, we hypothesized that some general and methodological characteristics were associated with reporting quality and conducted a regression with these data to explore the correlation. The descriptive and regression statistics were calculated via SPSS 13.0. Results In total, 680 RCTs were included. The overall CONSORT methodological items score was 6.34±0.97 (Mean ± SD). No RCT reported descriptions and changes in “trial design,” changes in “outcomes” and “implementation,” or descriptions of the similarity of interventions for “blinding.” Poor reporting was found in detailing the “settings of participants” (13.1%), “type of randomization sequence generation” (1.8%), calculation methods of “sample size” (0.4%), explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines for “sample size” (0.3%), “allocation concealment mechanism” (0.3%), additional analyses in “statistical methods” (2.1%), and targeted subjects and methods of “blinding” (5.9%). More than 50% of trials described randomization sequence generation, the eligibility criteria of “participants,” “interventions,” and definitions of the “outcomes” and “statistical methods.” The regression analysis found that publication year and ITT analysis were weakly associated with CONSORT score. Conclusions The completeness of methodological reporting of RCTs in the Chinese nursing care field is poor, especially with regard to the reporting of trial design, changes in outcomes, sample size calculation, allocation concealment, blinding, and statistical methods. BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of methodological reporting complying with CONSORT and explore associated trial level variables in the Chinese nursing care field. METHODS: In June 2012, we identified RCTs published in five leading Chinese nursing journals and included trials with details of randomized methods. The quality of methodological reporting was measured through the methods section of the CONSORT checklist and the overall CONSORT methodological items score was calculated and expressed as a percentage. Meanwhile, we hypothesized that some general and methodological characteristics were associated with reporting quality and conducted a regression with these data to explore the correlation. The descriptive and regression statistics were calculated via SPSS 13.0. RESULTS: In total, 680 RCTs were included. The overall CONSORT methodological items score was 6.34 ± 0.97 (Mean ± SD). No RCT reported descriptions and changes in "trial design," changes in "outcomes" and "implementation," or descriptions of the similarity of interventions for "blinding." Poor reporting was found in detailing the "settings of participants" (13.1%), "type of randomization sequence generation" (1.8%), calculation methods of "sample size" (0.4%), explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines for "sample size" (0.3%), "allocation concealment mechanism" (0.3%), additional analyses in "statistical methods" (2.1%), and targeted subjects and methods of "blinding" (5.9%). More than 50% of trials described randomization sequence generation, the eligibility criteria of "participants," "interventions," and definitions of the "outcomes" and "statistical methods." The regression analysis found that publication year and ITT analysis were weakly associated with CONSORT score. CONCLUSIONS: The completeness of methodological reporting of RCTs in the Chinese nursing care field is poor, especially with regard to the reporting of trial design, changes in outcomes, sample size calculation, allocation concealment, blinding, and statistical methods. Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of methodological reporting complying with CONSORT and explore associated trial level variables in the Chinese nursing care field. Methods In June 2012, we identified RCTs published in five leading Chinese nursing journals and included trials with details of randomized methods. The quality of methodological reporting was measured through the methods section of the CONSORT checklist and the overall CONSORT methodological items score was calculated and expressed as a percentage. Meanwhile, we hypothesized that some general and methodological characteristics were associated with reporting quality and conducted a regression with these data to explore the correlation. The descriptive and regression statistics were calculated via SPSS 13.0. Results In total, 680 RCTs were included. The overall CONSORT methodological items score was 6.34±0.97 (Mean ± SD). No RCT reported descriptions and changes in “trial design,” changes in “outcomes” and “implementation,” or descriptions of the similarity of interventions for “blinding.” Poor reporting was found in detailing the “settings of participants” (13.1%), “type of randomization sequence generation” (1.8%), calculation methods of “sample size” (0.4%), explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines for “sample size” (0.3%), “allocation concealment mechanism” (0.3%), additional analyses in “statistical methods” (2.1%), and targeted subjects and methods of “blinding” (5.9%). More than 50% of trials described randomization sequence generation, the eligibility criteria of “participants,” “interventions,” and definitions of the “outcomes” and “statistical methods.” The regression analysis found that publication year and ITT analysis were weakly associated with CONSORT score. Conclusions The completeness of methodological reporting of RCTs in the Chinese nursing care field is poor, especially with regard to the reporting of trial design, changes in outcomes, sample size calculation, allocation concealment, blinding, and statistical methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of methodological reporting complying with CONSORT and explore associated trial level variables in the Chinese nursing care field.BACKGROUNDRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the adherence of methodological reporting complying with CONSORT and explore associated trial level variables in the Chinese nursing care field.In June 2012, we identified RCTs published in five leading Chinese nursing journals and included trials with details of randomized methods. The quality of methodological reporting was measured through the methods section of the CONSORT checklist and the overall CONSORT methodological items score was calculated and expressed as a percentage. Meanwhile, we hypothesized that some general and methodological characteristics were associated with reporting quality and conducted a regression with these data to explore the correlation. The descriptive and regression statistics were calculated via SPSS 13.0.METHODSIn June 2012, we identified RCTs published in five leading Chinese nursing journals and included trials with details of randomized methods. The quality of methodological reporting was measured through the methods section of the CONSORT checklist and the overall CONSORT methodological items score was calculated and expressed as a percentage. Meanwhile, we hypothesized that some general and methodological characteristics were associated with reporting quality and conducted a regression with these data to explore the correlation. The descriptive and regression statistics were calculated via SPSS 13.0.In total, 680 RCTs were included. The overall CONSORT methodological items score was 6.34 ± 0.97 (Mean ± SD). No RCT reported descriptions and changes in "trial design," changes in "outcomes" and "implementation," or descriptions of the similarity of interventions for "blinding." Poor reporting was found in detailing the "settings of participants" (13.1%), "type of randomization sequence generation" (1.8%), calculation methods of "sample size" (0.4%), explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines for "sample size" (0.3%), "allocation concealment mechanism" (0.3%), additional analyses in "statistical methods" (2.1%), and targeted subjects and methods of "blinding" (5.9%). More than 50% of trials described randomization sequence generation, the eligibility criteria of "participants," "interventions," and definitions of the "outcomes" and "statistical methods." The regression analysis found that publication year and ITT analysis were weakly associated with CONSORT score.RESULTSIn total, 680 RCTs were included. The overall CONSORT methodological items score was 6.34 ± 0.97 (Mean ± SD). No RCT reported descriptions and changes in "trial design," changes in "outcomes" and "implementation," or descriptions of the similarity of interventions for "blinding." Poor reporting was found in detailing the "settings of participants" (13.1%), "type of randomization sequence generation" (1.8%), calculation methods of "sample size" (0.4%), explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines for "sample size" (0.3%), "allocation concealment mechanism" (0.3%), additional analyses in "statistical methods" (2.1%), and targeted subjects and methods of "blinding" (5.9%). More than 50% of trials described randomization sequence generation, the eligibility criteria of "participants," "interventions," and definitions of the "outcomes" and "statistical methods." The regression analysis found that publication year and ITT analysis were weakly associated with CONSORT score.The completeness of methodological reporting of RCTs in the Chinese nursing care field is poor, especially with regard to the reporting of trial design, changes in outcomes, sample size calculation, allocation concealment, blinding, and statistical methods.CONCLUSIONSThe completeness of methodological reporting of RCTs in the Chinese nursing care field is poor, especially with regard to the reporting of trial design, changes in outcomes, sample size calculation, allocation concealment, blinding, and statistical methods. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Tian, Jinhui Ren, Dan Wei, Hongli Zhang, Lihuan Yang, Kehu Wang, Quan Shi, Chunhu |
| AuthorAffiliation | 2 Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China 4 The First Clinical Medicine School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China Cardiff University, United Kingdom 5 The Second Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China 1 Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China 3 School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 4 The First Clinical Medicine School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China – name: 1 Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China – name: 2 Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China – name: 3 School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China – name: 5 The Second Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China – name: Cardiff University, United Kingdom |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Chunhu surname: Shi fullname: Shi, Chunhu – sequence: 2 givenname: Jinhui surname: Tian fullname: Tian, Jinhui – sequence: 3 givenname: Dan surname: Ren fullname: Ren, Dan – sequence: 4 givenname: Hongli surname: Wei fullname: Wei, Hongli – sequence: 5 givenname: Lihuan surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Lihuan – sequence: 6 givenname: Quan surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Quan – sequence: 7 givenname: Kehu surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Kehu |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25415382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNk11v0zAUhiM0xD7gHyCIhITgosVfcZNdIE0Vg6LCpDJ2a7n2SerJtUucTMCvx2lT1EwTQolk5-R5X59z5HOaHDnvIEmeYzTGdILf3fq2dtKONzE8RhhThMij5AQXlIw4QfToYH-cnIZwi1BGc86fJMckYzjuyUly8wWaldfe-sooadMFbHzdGFelvkwX0mm_Nr9Bp9e1kTakxqWX5g7SOUjdQdOVcRAg_drWofv-vEsqPE0el3GBZ_16lny__HA9_TSaX32cTS_mI8UL0owyUk44lJIxTRXLFSuXqsASCOeEZpxOUJ5PsEaMYK04FAhyqQhjmWbLXC9Lepa83PlurA-ib0kQmBOeE5JjFInZjtBe3opNbday_iW8NGIb8HUlZCxYWRCllDTTktBCU0Y0WaqMQiFpfEvNiyx6ve9Pa5dr0ApcU0s7MB3-cWYlKn8nGGEoyzqDN71B7X-0EBqxNkGBtdKBb7d5T4qc4m3er-6hD1fXU5WMBRhX-niu6kzFBcM5pgVCeaTGD1Dx0bA2Kt6f0sT4QPB2IIhMAz-bSrYhiNm3xf-zVzdD9vUBuwJpm1Xwtm2Md2EIvjjs9N8W7y9uBM53gKp9CDWUQplGdj6xNGMFRqKbkn3TRDclop-SKGb3xHv_f8r-AEjGFSI |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2019_103450 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina55070372 crossref_primary_10_2174_0122103155308948240528050738 crossref_primary_10_1089_acm_2017_0065 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v9_i1_102 crossref_primary_10_4103_picr_PICR_169_19 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000001083 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_070639 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181ff7309 10.1136/ebn.1.2.38 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.003 10.1136/ebn.3.4.100 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829664b9 10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008-w1 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.002 10.1136/bmj.316.7131.611 10.1001/jama.287.21.2801 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.08.003 10.1136/bmj.f4796 10.1002/sim.5402 10.7326/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00013 10.1186/1745-6215-10-46 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.06.016 10.1136/bmj.a2390 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.123745 10.1001/jama.290.8.1062 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science 2014 Shi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2014 Shi et al 2014 Shi et al |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science – notice: 2014 Shi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2014 Shi et al 2014 Shi et al |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISR 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7RV 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7X2 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU D1I DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB. KB0 KL. L6V LK8 M0K M0S M1P M7N M7P M7S NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY RC3 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0113002 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Opposing Viewpoints Gale In Context Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Immunology Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Local Electronic Collection Information Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Materials Science Database (ProQuest) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest Engineering Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection Agriculture Science Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database (ProQuest) Engineering Database (ProQuest) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (ProQuest) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database (ProQuest) Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Nucleic Acids Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Engineering Database Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database Ecology Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection Entomology Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Materials Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts ProQuest Engineering Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Materials Science Database ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Agricultural Science Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Sciences (General) Nursing Medicine Statistics |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Methodological Reporting of Nursing RCTs in China |
| EISSN | 1932-6203 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 1626822810 oai_doaj_org_article_faa35da239d342d2bc53e9a39a3fd695 PMC4240555 3503716111 A418139008 25415382 10_1371_journal_pone_0113002 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | China |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
| GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 8AO 8C1 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHMBA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS APEBS ARAPS ATCPS BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1I D1J D1K DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IGS IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISE ISR ITC K6- KB. KQ8 L6V LK5 LK8 M0K M1P M48 M7P M7R M7S M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PYCSY RNS RPM SV3 TR2 UKHRP WOQ WOW ~02 ~KM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IPNFZ NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PV9 RIG RZL BBORY PMFND 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. KL. M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS RC3 7X8 5PM PUEGO - 02 AAPBV ABPTK ADACO BBAFP KM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-52f76efa44d3c48c4fbc91ae26623563708871d0421dc6e90e8ac2445d4b8dbf3 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1932-6203 |
| IngestDate | Fri Nov 26 17:14:33 EST 2021 Wed Aug 27 01:19:43 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:32:41 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 17:19:53 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:08:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:04:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:23:42 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:41:52 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 03:58:44 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:22:49 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:53:18 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:54:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:02 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 11 |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c692t-52f76efa44d3c48c4fbc91ae26623563708871d0421dc6e90e8ac2445d4b8dbf3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Conceived and designed the experiments: CS JT LZ. Performed the experiments: CS JT LZ HW DR QW KY. Analyzed the data: CS LZ KY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KY HW. Wrote the paper: CS DR QW KY. Addressed disagreements: KY. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0113002 |
| PMID | 25415382 |
| PQID | 1626822810 |
| PQPubID | 1436336 |
| ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_1626822810 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_faa35da239d342d2bc53e9a39a3fd695 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4240555 proquest_miscellaneous_1627983110 proquest_journals_1626822810 gale_infotracmisc_A418139008 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A418139008 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A418139008 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A418139008 gale_healthsolutions_A418139008 pubmed_primary_25415382 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0113002 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0113002 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2014-11-21 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-11-21 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2014 text: 2014-11-21 day: 21 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, USA |
| PublicationTitle | PloS one |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS One |
| PublicationYear | 2014 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| References | L Turner (ref7) 2012; 11 R Möhler (ref26) 2012; 49 D Zhu (ref15) 2003; 19 S Adie (ref19) 2013; 258 DG Altman (ref30) 2013; 347 K Huwiler-Müntener (ref4) 2002; 287 ref17 A DiCenso (ref1) 1998; 1 DF Polit (ref16) 2011; 60 ref18 Z Samaan (ref5) 2013; 6 I Boutron (ref28) 2008; 2008 N Cullum (ref2) 2000; 3 XL Li (ref12) 2002; 17 E Mayo-Wilson (ref25) 2013; 203 L Xu (ref22) 2008; 29 DG Altman (ref9) 2012; 31 M Zwarenstein (ref29) 2008; 337 JJ Gagnier (ref27) 2006; 144 N Parent (ref13) 2009; 19 ref21 LJ Mei (ref10) 2012; 12 G Borglin (ref3) 2010; 47 XX Zhang (ref11) 2009; 25 KF Schulz (ref6) 2010; 152 ref8 T Wu (ref24) 2009; 10 I Boutron (ref20) 2003; 290 J Stephenson (ref23) 1998; 316 BA Smith (ref14) 2008; 56 |
| References_xml | – volume: 60 start-page: 9 year: 2011 ident: ref16 article-title: Deliberate ignorance: a systematic review of blinding in nursing clinical trials publication-title: Nurs Res doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181ff7309 – volume: 1 start-page: 38 year: 1998 ident: ref1 article-title: Implementing evidence-based nursing: some misconceptions publication-title: Evidence-Based Nursing doi: 10.1136/ebn.1.2.38 – volume: 25 start-page: 72 year: 2009 ident: ref11 article-title: Reporting quality assessment on randomized controlled trials of cancer nursing care: based on CONSORT statement publication-title: Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing – volume: 29 start-page: 727 year: 2008 ident: ref22 article-title: Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals publication-title: Contemp Clin Trials doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.003 – volume: 17 start-page: 16 year: 2002 ident: ref12 article-title: Evaluation on the randomized controlled trials papers published in Journal of Nurses Training publication-title: Journal of Nurses Training – volume: 3 start-page: 100 year: 2000 ident: ref2 article-title: Evaluation of studies of treatment or prevention interventions publication-title: Evidence Based Nursing doi: 10.1136/ebn.3.4.100 – volume: 258 start-page: 872 year: 2013 ident: ref19 article-title: CONSORT compliance in surgical randomized trials: are we there yet? A systematic review publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829664b9 – volume: 11 start-page: MR000030 year: 2012 ident: ref7 article-title: Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 2008 start-page: W60 year: 2008 ident: ref28 article-title: Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008-w1 – volume: 152 start-page: 726 year: 2010 ident: ref6 article-title: CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232 – ident: ref17 – volume: 56 start-page: 31 year: 2008 ident: ref14 article-title: Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) publication-title: Nurs Outlook doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.002 – volume: 316 start-page: 611 year: 1998 ident: ref23 article-title: Why do we need randomised controlled trials to assess behavioural interventions? publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7131.611 – volume: 287 start-page: 2801 year: 2002 ident: ref4 article-title: Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2801 – volume: 12 start-page: 735 year: 2012 ident: ref10 article-title: Methodological Evaluation on Domestic Clinical Trials on Traditional Chinese Medicine Nursing from 2006 to 2011 publication-title: Chin J Evid-based Med – volume: 49 start-page: 40 year: 2012 ident: ref26 article-title: Proposed criteria for reporting the development and evaluation of complex interventions in healthcare (CReDECI): guideline development publication-title: Int J Nurs Stud doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.08.003 – volume: 347 start-page: f4796 year: 2013 ident: ref30 article-title: Declaration of transparency for each research article publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4796 – volume: 6 start-page: 169 year: 2013 ident: ref5 article-title: A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature publication-title: J Multidiscip Healthc – volume: 19 start-page: 60 year: 2003 ident: ref15 article-title: Investigation on randomized controlled trials of nursing care field in China publication-title: Journal of Practical Nursing – volume: 31 start-page: 2985 year: 2012 ident: ref9 article-title: Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.5402 – volume: 144 start-page: 364 year: 2006 ident: ref27 article-title: Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00013 – volume: 10 start-page: 46 year: 2009 ident: ref24 article-title: Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? publication-title: Trials doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-46 – ident: ref21 – volume: 47 start-page: 123 year: 2010 ident: ref3 article-title: Bias in experimental nursing research: Strategies to improve the quality and explanatory power of nursing science publication-title: Int J Nurs Stud doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.06.016 – ident: ref8 – ident: ref18 – volume: 337 start-page: a2390 year: 2008 ident: ref29 article-title: Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2390 – volume: 203 start-page: 250 year: 2013 ident: ref25 article-title: Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials publication-title: Br J Psychiatry doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.123745 – volume: 19 start-page: 25 year: 2009 ident: ref13 article-title: Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals publication-title: Can J Cardiovasc Nurs – volume: 290 start-page: 1062 year: 2003 ident: ref20 article-title: Methodological differences in clinical trials evaluating nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments of hip and knee osteoarthritis publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.290.8.1062 |
| SSID | ssj0053866 |
| Score | 2.1739533 |
| Snippet | Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to investigate the... Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to... BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to... Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always well reported, especially in terms of their methodological descriptions. This study aimed to... |
| SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e113002 |
| SubjectTerms | Analysis Clinical medicine Clinical trials Descriptions Design Evidence-based nursing Guideline Adherence - standards Guidelines as Topic - standards Handbooks Humans Identification methods Intervention Laboratories Mathematical analysis Measurement methods Medical journals Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Nurses Nursing Nursing care Periodicals as Topic - standards Quality control Randomization Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Regression analysis Report writing Reporting Reproducibility Research Design - standards Research Report - standards Statistical analysis Statistical methods Statistics Studies Systematic review |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF6hnLggyquBFhaEBBzcxt6X91gQVUEqSECr3qx9lkjBjurkwq9n9mGrRpXKASmn7OfInsfOTDz7DUKvGTfMSy0Krhe2oFWpweesK6hmMsQL5iNJ0ukXfnJGP1-wi2ujvkJPWKIHToI79EoRZlVFpCW0spU2jDipCHy85TKyl0LMG4qptAeDF3OeD8oRUR5mvRysu9YdgEWT4W-UIRBFvv5xV56tV11_U8r5d-fktVB0fB_dyzkkPkr3voPuuPYB2sle2uO3mUr63UN0fhoHRA8bHE5vCCBa4c5jiFK2-7X87SyOszt6vGyxh90Pr1JnPQ7DtV3vcO4PwPkB-0fo7Pjjjw8nRZ6kUBguqw1Um15w5xWllhhaG-q1kaVyEJ0rwjgRYa8pLThwaQ13cuFqZSDwM0t1bbUnj9GsBdntImz5wlMNIK4rKpjVNJCuCaWh7nFclHNEBrE2JtOMh2kXqya-OxNQbqR7bYIymqyMOSrGq9aJZuMW_PugsREbSLLjF2A6TTad5jbTmaMXQd9NOnE6unpzRCHtIRKyozl6FRGBKKMNnTiXatv3zaev5_8A-v5tAnqTQb4DcRiVTz_AMwUCrglyb4IEdzeT5d1gnYNU-qaEkhSyvLpcwJWDxd68_HJcDj8auuta120jRsialAHzJBn4KNmK0RAUQeJiYvoT0U9X2uXPyFNOIVtkjD39H7p6hu5CqkrDKdCq3EOzzdXW7UM6uNHPo-f_Ae0BXsk priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELegCLQXxApshQEGIQEP2Zr4K3lCA1ENREEa29S3KP7IqDSSsrQv_PXcOU4gaAKkPtWX1jn77n62z78j5LmQRpSZVpHUUxvxJNZgc9ZFXIsM44UoPUnS_JM8OuUfFmIRNtyakFbZ-UTvqG1tcI_8IAbkDcEsjaevV98jrBqFp6uhhMZ1cgOpyzClSy36BRfYspThuhxT8UEYnf1VXbl9mNes20zpwpFn7e9982h1UTdXAc8_8yd_C0izO-R2QJL0sB36bXLNVWNyax7OysfkZtgIGJPtYMANfRlYpl-NyRbCzJal-S45m_tC0p0jpC0sh4dpXdLjorL1t-UPZ-mJn650WdEZeEn6sc3Ap1iE2zWOhn-koW_NPXI6e3fy9igKFRciI7NkDavSUklXFpxbZnhqeKlNFhcOonjChGQKfVJswdBja6TLpi4tDAAEYblOrS7ZfTKqQLu7hFo5LbkGIakTroTVHMnZVKFhfeSkiieEdYrPTaAjx6oYF7k_Y1OwLGn7muNw5WG4JiTqn1q1dBz_kH-DY9rLIpm2_6K-PM-DbeZlUTBhi4RllvHEJtpAF7OCwae0MhMT8gRnRN7eTO1dQn7IAR6xDFDUhDzzEkioUWHGznmxaZr8_eez_xD6cjwQehGEyhrUYYpwSwLeCYm6BpJ7A0lwC2bQvIvzt9NKk_8yIHiym9NXNz_tm_FHMQuvcvXGy6gsZTHK7LQm0Gs2ERyDJ2hcDYxjoPphS7X86vnMOaBKIcSDv3frIdkCsMrxHmgS75HR-nLjHgEgXOvH3up_AgBfXw0 priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Methodological Reporting of Randomized Trials in Five Leading Chinese Nursing Journals |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25415382 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1626822810 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1627983110 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4240555 https://doaj.org/article/faa35da239d342d2bc53e9a39a3fd695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113002 |
| Volume | 9 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1bb9MwFLZGJ9BeECuwFUYxCAl4SNXEt-QBoW1aGYgOVNapb1EcO6NSSUrTSsCv59hxIoI6gVTlof7cuCfn5tj-DkIvGE9ZFknhcTlUHg18CTantEcli0y8YJklSRpf8PMp_TBjsx1U12x1Aiy3Tu1MPanpajH48f3nWzD4N7Zqg_DrToNlkesB6Cux7JK7EJuEMdUxbdYVwLo5dwfoburZClCWx7_x1p3loii3paJ_76j8I0SN7qG7LrfEx5Uy7KMdnXfRnbFbPe-i2-7VQBftO5Mu8SvHO_26i_ZM4lnxNt9HV2NbWrp2jbhK1KEzLjI8SXJVfJv_0gpfWgXG8xyPwG_ij9WefGzKcutSY3dH7MZWPkDT0dnl6bnnajB4KY-CNcxTM8F1llCqSErDlGYyjfxEQ1wPCONEGC_lKzB9X6VcR0MdJimkDExRGSqZkYeok4N0DxFWfJhRCSAuAyqYktTQtYlEwoxJc-H3EKkFH6eOoNzUyVjEdtVNwESlGmtsHlfsHlcPeU2vZUXQ8Q_8iXmmDdbQa9svitV17Kw1zpKEMJUEJFKEBiqQKQwxSgh8MsUj1kNPjUbE1VnVxknExxQSJhJBXtVDzy3CUGzkZg_PdbIpy_j9p6v_AH2ZtEAvHSgrQBxp4s5NwH8y1F0t5FELCY4ibTUfGv2tpVLGPkxmIT8M_SH0rHV6e_Ozptn8qNmXl-tiYzEiColvMAeVCTSSDRg14RQkLlrG0RJ9uyWff7UM5xTyTMbYo5tH_BjtQepKzanQwD9CnfVqo59AeriWfXRLzARcw1PfXEfv-mj35Ozi86RvX7j0rUf4DTU4aDE |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Jb9NAFB6VIKAXRMPSQKEDAgEHt7FncXxAqCxVQ5MilbTKzXgWl0jFDnUiBD-K38h79thgVAGXSj5lvrEnb946y3uEPBZSizRSoSdV33g88BXInLEeVyJCeyHSMknS-EDuHfF3UzFdIT_quzB4rLLWiaWiNrnGNfJtHzxvMGYDv_9y_sXDqlG4u1qX0KjYYt9--wohW_Fi-Abm90kQ7L6dvN7zXFUBT8soWEDklYbSpgnnhmk-0DxVOvITC5YqYEKyEOXON8DMvtHSRn07SDQYQWG4GhiVMnjvJXIZDG8fJSqcNgEe6A4p3fU8Fvrbjhu25nlmt0COWL14U5u_skpAYws689O8OM_R_fO85m8GcPcGue48V7pTsdoaWbFZl1wdu735LrniFh66ZM0pjII-c1mtn3fJKrq1VVbom-R4XBaurhUvrcIA6EzzlB4mmck_z75bQyeleNBZRndBK9NRdeKfYtFvW1jqvkjd2Ipb5OhC5uI26WRA3XVCjeynXAFIqoCHwiiOyeDCREE8ZmXo9wirCR9rl_4cq3CcxuWeXghhUDXWGKcrdtPVI17Ta16l__gH_hXOaYPF5N3lD_nZSex0QZwmCRMmCVhkGA9MoDQMMUoYPKmRkeiRTeSIuLoJ26igeIeDO8Yi8Np65FGJwAQeGZ4QOkmWRREP3x__B-jDYQv01IHSHMihE3crA_4TJgZrITdaSFBDutW8jvxbU6WIfwks9Kx5-vzmh00zvhRP_WU2X5aYMBowHzF3KhFoKBsIjsYaKB62hKNF-nZLNvtU5k_n4MUKIe7-fVib5NreZDyKR8OD_XtkFRxljndQA3-DdBZnS3sfnNGFelBqAEo-XrTK-QlHWpvA |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF6VIKpeEA2PBgpdEAg4uIm9r_iAUKFELW0KKm2Vm_G-SqRihzoRgp_Gr2PWXhuMKuBSyafsrL2ZnflmZh8zCD1mXDEbSxFwOdABjUIJOqdNQCWLnb1gtkySND7gO8f07YRNltCP-i6MO1ZZY2IJ1DpXbo28H4LnDcZsGA761h-LeL89ejn7ErgKUm6ntS6nUYnInvn2FcK34sXuNsz1kygavTl6vRP4CgOB4nE0hyjMCm5sSqkmig4VtVLFYWrAakWEcSKcDoYaBDvUipt4YIapAoPINJVDLS2B915BVwVhodMxMWmCPcARzv1VPSLCvpeMzVmemU3QKVIv5NSmsKwY0NiFzuwsLy5yev88u_mbMRzdQNe9F4u3KrFbRUsm66Llsd-n76JrfhGii1Y9eBT4mc9w_byLVpyLW2WIvolOxmUR6xqEcRUSQGecW3yYZjr_PP1uND4qVQVPMzwChMb71el_7AqAm8Jg_0Xsx1bcQseXMhe3UScD7q4hrPnAUglEXEZUMC2pSwwnUgmxmeEi7CFSMz5RPhW6q8hxlpT7ewJComqsiZuuxE9XDwVNr1mVCuQf9K_cnDa0LpF3-UN-fpp4XEhsmhKm04jEmtBIR1LBEOOUwGM1j1kPbTiJSKpbsQ0cJVsUXDMSgwfXQ49KCpfMI3NqcZouiiLZfXfyH0QfDltETz2RzYEdKvU3NOA_uSRhLcr1FiVAkmo1rzn5rblSJL-UF3rWMn1x88Om2b3UnQDMTL4oaUQ8JKGjuVOpQMPZiFFnuIHjoqUcLda3W7LppzKXOgWPljF29-_D2kDLADbJ_u7B3j20Aj4zdddRo3AddebnC3Mf_NK5fFACAEYfLxtxfgKsuJ_2 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodological+Reporting+of+Randomized+Trials+in+Five+Leading+Chinese+Nursing+Journals&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Shi%2C+Chunhu&rft.au=Tian%2C+Jinhui&rft.au=Ren%2C+Dan&rft.au=Wei%2C+Hongli&rft.date=2014-11-21&rft.pub=Public+Library+of+Science&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0113002&rft.externalDocID=1626822810 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |