Impact of distance education on academic performance in a pharmaceutical care course

The objective of this study was to compare the performance of pharmacy students from a Pharmaceutical Care course, taught in both distance education (DE) and campus-based formats using active methodologies. For two semesters, students (n = 82) taking the course studied half the subject in the distan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 12; no. 4; p. e0175117
Main Authors Gossenheimer, Agnes Nogueira, Bem, Tamires, Carneiro, Mára Lucia Fernandes, de Castro, Mauro Silveira
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 06.04.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The objective of this study was to compare the performance of pharmacy students from a Pharmaceutical Care course, taught in both distance education (DE) and campus-based formats using active methodologies. For two semesters, students (n = 82) taking the course studied half the subject in the distance education format and half in person. Questionnaires were applied at the beginning of the semester aimed to outline the demographic profile of the students. Their grade in the course was evaluated to determine their performance. The Module 1 (Information on Medication) average on the campus-based was 7.1225 and on DE was 7.5519, (p = 0.117). The Module 2 (Pharmaceutical Services) average on the campus-based was 7.1595 and on distance education was 7.7025, (p = 0.027*). There was a difference in learning outcomes in the Pharmaceutical Care Course between face-to-face and distant education. Therefore, the student performance was better in the distance education module, indicating distance education can be satisfactorily used in Pharmacy Programs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Conceptualization: ANG MSC MLFC.Formal analysis: ANG.Funding acquisition: MSC.Investigation: ANG MSC TB.Methodology: ANG MSC MLFC.Project administration: ANG.Supervision: MSC.Visualization: ANG.Writing – original draft: ANG.Writing – review & editing: ANG MSC MLFC.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0175117